Audi Q3 Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Audi Q3 Review

AUDI Q3

Pros: Top-notch diesel; comfortable ride; premium interior despite its base model position; quality list of standard features; excellent fuel economy

Cons: Unadventurous styling; no rear seat armrest; rear seats dont fold completely flat: lots of expensive options;

By Anthony Crawford |
FIND DEALS

Price: $44,800 to $56,000

Our Rating:  

As Audi’s most recent addition to its extensive, 24-model line-up, the Audi Q3 is also its smallest and least expensive SUV to date.

The Q3 is angled to take substantial market share from its main competitor, the BMW X1 – although it must also compete with the hugely popular Range Rover Evoque.

And in typical Audi style, there’s a lot to choose from in the Q3 model range, with a total of eight variants on offer with a mix of both two-wheel and four-wheel-drive versions, petrol and diesel engines, and automatic and manual transmissions.

As if that wasn’t enough, every Audi Q3 (whether diesel or petrol) is powered by a 2.0-litre engine employing turbocharging and direct injection technology that allow for a range of power tunes from 103kW up to 155kW for the flagship 2.0-litre TSFI petrol version.

CarAdvice already covered most of these engine variants in our March review of the Audi Q3, but for this review we focus solely on the entry-level model – the 2.0-litre TDI.

At $44,800 plus on-road costs, it’s something of prestige bargain undercutting the least expensive diesel-powered Range Rover Evoque eD4 Pure edition by almost $7000 and the BMW X1 2.0 20d by $5100.

However, the Audi Q3 is based on the Volkswagen Tiguan and you have an all-wheel-drive 2.0-litre 103TDI for $35,990 – considerably less that the Q3 equivalent.

However, one possible drawback of being the base model in the Audi Q3 range is that the only transmission available is a six-speed manual unit, with no automatic option available.

But make no mistake – from the moment you climb into the cockpit of this junior Audi SUV, you’ll be getting a 100 per cent premium experience.

Leather, and beautifully supple it is too, is standard fit across the entire Q3 model range, as is the pop-up screen, high-end audio system, dual-zone climate control air-conditioning, Bluetooth phone and audio, and an electrically operated handbrake.

It’s all very driver-centric inside, with lots of proper metal accents spread among a well laid out centre stack, instrument cluster and door trim – and typical Audi attention to detail.

The steering wheel is thick-rimmed with especially tactile leather binding, providing good feel and grip. It also has the usual remote audio controls, but all the screen functions are managed from the centre stack.

Even the stubby sports car-style shifter feels like a premium bit of kit.


Despite its billing as the smallest SUV Audi has to offer, there’s loads of space inside the Q3 – that’s five adults and a good bit of luggage. Fold the rear seats (they don’t fold flat) and the cargo space expands from 460 litres to 1365 litres.

Rear legroom isn’t bad, either, but the tapered roofline means that those passengers over 190cm tall with find rear headroom less than desirable.

The overall driving position in the Audi Q3 is superb. The driver sits well into the vehicle and the seats, which don’t at first appear to have enough bolstering, provide excellent support even when conditions allow for a more spirited driving style.

Styling-wise, no-one will have any trouble in recognising your latest purchase as an Audi. Like all models in the Audi range, the large vertical grille on the Q3 dominates the front end and the slim-look rear light assembly is similar to that on the larger Q5.

Audi engineers have done well to muffle the usually intrusive diesel clatter from the 2.0-litre engine and there’s even a bit of a growl during in-gear acceleration in third and fourth gear ratios.

It might be the least powerful engine tune on offer in the Q3 model range, but 103kW and 330Nm mated to a light-shifting six-speed manual means this Audi Q3 is anything but dull.

Throttle response is more eager than expected and the engine feels more refined than other 2.0-litre diesels we’ve driven, though the engine prefers to operate above 1500rpm.

On paper, the Q3’s 9.9-second sprint time from 0-100km/h isn’t all that inspiring, but using all the advantages of a light-shifting manual box and a respectable torque curve and the entry-level Audi Q3 makes some decent pace.

As a front-wheel-drive SUV, we might have expected a degree of torque steer, but even under heavy load there’s nothing to speak of. It’s all very well behaved in that department.

The electro-mechanical steering is relatively light at low speeds (not uncomfortably so) for what is essentially an urban-bound SUV, but weighs up nicely at freeway speeds. And while there isn’t a lot of communication transmitted through the steering wheel, the Audi Q3 goes precisely where you point it.

Audi has worked hard to minimise the weight of the Q3 to just 1445kg by employing a host of lightweight solutions including an aluminium bonnet and tailgate that collectively weigh in at an astonishingly light 19.6 kilograms.

The Q3 is well balanced. Pushing the vehicle through a series of tight S-bends produced minimal body roll and no discernible weight shift. It’s not as sharp as the Range Rover Evoque through corners, but the Q3’s chassis feels more settled and there’s plenty of grip to inspire driver confidence and make the Q3 often feel more like a big hatch than an SUV.

It’s the same story with ride quality. It simply doesn’t matter how bad the road surface is, the suspension simply absorbs everything in its path for what is a superior ride comfort to anything in its class.

If driven with a gentle right foot, the base model Audi Q3 will return less than 5.0 litres per 100km. Jump on the throttle and you will still average less than 7.0L/100km of diesel.

Apart from a few minor annoyances such as the lack of a rear seat centre arm rest and no standard satellite navigation on the pop-up screen, the entry-level Audi Q3 2.0-litre TDI is still a highly appealing prestige offering.


 

Owner reviews of the AUDI Q3

Write a review for the AUDI Q3

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.
Add a New Review

  • nugsdad

    $44k + sat nav, decent headlights, elec tailgate,metallic paint, floor mats, and auto = well over $60k.  Another German bargain ………………not.

    • Phil

      Why you need all that crap? Why would you look at the bottom of the range model anyway if you want your car loaded with useless gizmos? “elec tailgate” – what you don’t have arms?
      Plus it doesn’t come in auto at all  – which is good, might make you appareciate actually driving a car rather than operating it’s on board gizmos.

    • SKODABRO

      Um… You are very wrong indeed! 44K is a very good base price compared to the competitors. Sat-Nav is cheap because it is able to be retro-fitted to any Q3′s. The standard headlights are fantastic, there is not need for xenon’s  You can no get the electric tailgate in the Q3 and it is not needed in any car. Metallic paint can get thrown in if you haggle enough. Floor Mats are standard and you can not get it in Auto and the only reason you would get it in auto would be because you cant drive a manual. 

      I am trading a A3 in for a Q3 very soon as second car. They are a AMAZING car! It has changed my mind about SUV’s completely! I am looking at getting either a demo 2.0TDI 130kw (S-Tronic) or a 2.0 TFSI 125kw. I am considering both options but are leaning towards the petrol for the price. 

      I highly encourage anyone to take a look at the Q3, you will LOVE it!

      • SKODABRO

        I origionally also thought the Q3 was over-priced and expensive but then compare it to the Evoque etc and it isnt. I can see the value in it after having one for 3 days and loving it!

  • Noddy

    Looks good, perhaps buying one would improve my image amongst my business colleagues?

    • Smart US

       not

    • Smart US

       not

      • Noddy

        Not what hot shot?

        • Dominique Vøn Hütch

          Que Borat – “I am NOT gay”.

          • Noddy

            Borat isn’t, but I have my doubts about you.

          • Dominique Vøn Hütch

            Good to know.

  • Altezza

    I’d go for Evoque.

  • Altezza

    I’d go for Evoque.

    • FanBoi

      …and be on the waiting list for 3 years? 
      NO THANKS!
      //

      • Altezza

        No problem, I can wait. Patience is virtue.

  • Guest

    yaawwwnn…..can they come up with something more interesting, please??

  • Mad Max

    In my opinion these Q3´s are just too expensive. I looked at one while my VW was in for a service and I can´t see why you would buy one. If you go for an auto diesel with a sun roof and one or two extra´s it can quickly jump past $70´000 on the road. The Tiguan (which its based on) with the same specifications is $48´000 drive away. I´m sorry but I can´t see where the extra $22´000 is.
    The other thing that I can´t quite get to grips with is why the base car is manual only. I´m not having a dig at Audi drivers but I doubt many of your average Australian Audi owners tick the manual option box. I might be wrong but I doubt Audi sells many manuals in Australia.

    • Amlohac

      You can not compare a VW to an Audi in terms of quality and finish.

      A lot of people cant see the extra $$$. But if you took both cars and drove them back to back you would certainly see. Audi’s gear is much MUCH more refined.

      I have a Golf R, the thing is amazing. But having had the chance to drive an S3 i can certainly see the big difference in fit and finish, overal handling etc. Its just, more complete i guess.

  • Splatcat03

    This is only slightly slower than a toyota 86 and much more more practical. It also seems as though it handles really well, so maybe it should be recategorised as a sports car.

    • Phil

      I’m pretty sure the Toyota 86 does 100kmh in less than 9.9 secs.

    • F1

      Yeah only 3.5+ seconds slower.. Sigh

  • Smart US

    WTF no auto… is this a joke???

    • Phil

      I think it’s more of a joke that supposed car enthusiasts who spend time trawling through the web looking at motoring news, want to spend $000s extra on a car with a auto so they don’t have to change gears.

      • Dominique Vøn Hütch

        Very true – Its just that my girlfriend can’t drive a manual.

        • Noddy

          Go home and be a family man.

    • Phil

      I think it’s more of a joke that supposed car enthusiasts who spend time trawling through the web looking at motoring news, want to spend $000s extra on a car with a auto so they don’t have to change gears.

  • Smart US

    WTF no auto… is this a joke???

  • Bill P.

    I have ordered one of these Q3s – the petrol version – and am looking forward to getting it in July. I test drove the Tiguan, which is really nice, practical and cost effective. But it doesn’t give you anywhere near the same feel good factor that the Q3 does – neither did the Land Rover Evoque, which I also tested. I just love the understated classic style of the Audi. Plus I am a big fan of their quattro drive. Yes, it is too expensive and I know I am paying a premium for a badge. But it is a damn good badge.

  • Norm

    I think it goes beyond badge engineering. Weight reduction takes some serious engineering & design. Down to 1445kg when the donour Tiguan and cousin Yeti are around 1640kg. That’s a good thing and it’s reflected in the economy figures.

    No auto is just plain odd on a prestige car. But don’t get me started – stopped – started – about DSG transmissions….:) 

    The styling might be unadventurous but I can’t say I’ve warmed to the overstated Evoque in the flesh either. Looks like it’s been saved from the squasher at the wreckers.

    • Bill P.

      Norm, I agree with your comment about the Evoque styling. I can’t understand why so many people think it looks good. To me it looks like a giant has sat on it and squashed down the back. I believe the Evoque will look terribly dated in few years time – like those ‘Hot Wheels’ cars from the seventies. It also looks rather garish and flashy. I much prefer the understated Teutonic style of the Q3.

      The VW Tiguan looks OK – but it is rather boxy and bland. And as you say, it weighs 200kg more than the Q3.