Mahindra XUV500 Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Mahindra XUV500 Review

MAHINDRA XUV500

Pros: refined diesel engine; long list of standard features; top-quality leather upholstery; fuel-efficient; seven-seats

Cons: suspension tuning needs work for Australian roads; some quality issues regarding fit; no automatic transmission option; six-speed manual rubbery with long throw

By Anthony Crawford |
FIND DEALS

Price: $29,000 to $32,900

Our Rating:  

If you have reservations about the sort of quality and luxury on offer from Indian-built vehicles, then be prepared to change your opinion once you get a look at the Mahindra XUV500.

CarAdvice recently travelled to Mumbai to test-drive the feature-packed SUV and found the seven-seater XUV500 was a surprise gem that exceeded our expectations in most areas.

Mahindra has been in the automotive business since 1947, when it started out assembling Willy’s jeeps under licence.

Today, the company builds a range of vehicles that includes motorbikes, three-wheelers, tractors and an extensive line-up of rugged commercial vehicles and SUVs – based on a rigid ladder frame chassis.

Mahindra already sells tractors and a ute called the Mahindra Pik Up in Australia, but the XUV500 is the first vehicle it’s pitching at customers who aren’t farmers or tradies.

The Mahindra XUV500 is the first monocoque vehicle from the Indian manufacturer and has been designed to meet the requirements of a global market, including the United States.

And from all appearances, they’re up to the challenge. Mahindra build the XUV500 in a world-class manufacturing facility at Chakan, just outside of Mumbai – a complex that spreads over 283 hectares. It’s an impressive site, with more than 700 staff and 25 robots ensuring that a Mahindra XUV500 rolls off the assembly line every four minutes.

Mahindra will launch the XUV500 in Australia later this month – when we will update this review with local driving impressions – with the W8-spec model in both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive. W8 signifies it as the luxury version with features such as leather trim, satellite navigation, automatic headlights and wipers, air-conditioned cool-box and LED parking lamps.

However, the only transmission currently available for the XUV500 is a six-speed manual, which will dampen sales, with an automatic version anywhere from eight months to two years away.

Inside, the Mahindra XUV500 is an awkward blend of premium leather and not-so-premium plastics, although these are mostly of the soft-touch variety.

There’s a decent thick-rimmed leather steering wheel, but the faux wood-enhanced centre-stack lets down what is otherwise an attractive and well-designed fascia.

There are no such issues with the sporty twin-pod instrument cluster, which combines analogue dials with digital read outs for excellent clarity.

Standout features include the plush leather seats that provide good support (despite the elevated driving position) and the high-resolution LCD touchscreen with satellite navigation.

Cruise control, climate control air-conditioning (with vents in all three seat rows) and reverse parking sensors are also standard.

There’s no reverse-view camera, however, despite a connection existing for one, though Mahindra says a camera could be offered as a dealer-fit option in Australia.

The Mahindra XUV500 gets a full suite of safety gear including six airbags, electronic stability control and rollover mitigation, and has received a creditable 4-star safety rating from the ANCAP crash test results. Mahindra’s Australian manager, Mahesh Kaskar told CarAdvice, that they will not rest until the Mahindra XUV500 achieves a 5-star safety rating.

There’s no shortage of space on board the Mahindra XUV500, with a stack of rear leg and headroom along with plenty of elevation for second-row passengers. Meanwhile, third row passengers also gain a relatively deep foot-well.

During our test drive we also found there’s plenty of rear cargo space, with the load area swallowing several large suitcases and our accompanying hand luggage without issue.

Both rear seat rows fold almost completely flat, further expanding the XUV500’s carrying capacity.

Mahindra will launch the XUV500 with its own 2.2-litre four-cylinder diesel engine, which they can be justifiably proud of. It uses direct fuel injection and 5th generation variable geometry turbocharging and generates 103kW of power and 330Nm of torque.

Although our test drive was confined mostly to India’s National Highway out of Mumbai (a drive that requires an inordinate amount of skill to avoid multiple collisions), the engine offers serious pulling power as well as being noticeably quiet and refined throughout the entire rev range.

The same cannot be said of the six-speed manual, which suffers from being too rubbery and suffers from a shifter that’s too long on the throw.

There isn’t a lot of feel to the steering, either – and a short run on Mahindra’s proving ground exposed some mild vibration in the steering wheel on the bumpier banked sections. Despite this, the steering was nicely weighted from the straight-ahead position.

Ride comfort on the highway is on par with some Japanese and Korean models, but it’s a relatively soft suspension set-up that meant we experienced some body roll through corners.

However, driving the Mahindra XUV500 on Australian roads exposed several problem areas with the vehicle, including under-sprung suspension, a rattly interior and variations in engine performance between the different test vehicles.

While we rated the 2.2-litre turbo-diesel engine quite highly for its general refinement and wide torque band during our drive in India, the vehicle we drove in Australia felt sluggish and lacked the torquey characteristic that we enjoyed with the vehicle in Mumbai.

Much of that unwillingness to pull in any gear ratio might well be down to the fact that our test car in Australia had clocked up just 36 kilometres, far less than is usually the standard on press fleet vehicles we normally test drive.

Another colleague reported a noisy engine, which wasn’t the case with the XUV500 he drove India, where all three test vehicles were rated as quiet and refined for a small displacement diesel, even under heavy loads.

Suspension tuning was another area of concern on the Australian XUV500 test vehicles.

Over mildly blemished roads the ride was harsh and unsettled and translated through the cabin, while the smoother undulating sections produced a wallowy ride.

Again, the suspension set-up on the vehicles in India was quite different, producing a more pliant ride along with significantly more composure.

This reviewer would suggest that our Mahindra XUV500 test vehicle was under-sprung and overdamped for Australian road conditions.

There were a few fit and finish issues with our XUV500 test car, too. A constant rattle from the storage box on the top of the fascia proved incessant and annoying, possibly due to the poor fit of the lid, which didn’t close flush as it should. Other colleagues driving the other test vehicles reported precisely the same issue that didn’t affect any of the XUV500s in India.

Clearly there were a number of issues affecting several of the Mahindra XUV500 test vehicles here in Australia. However, we would expect these to be sorted before vehicles are delivered to dealers in Australia.

Fuel economy is another plus of the Mahindra XUV500, with the gauge indicating and average of 6.7L/100km after our 300km round-trip journey. City driving should get a boost, too, with the aid of stop-start technology that switches off the engine when the vehicle comes to a standstill.

Mahindra executives made it clear it will not compete with Chinese brands to be the cheapest SUV on the market.

With a drive-away price starting at $29,900 for the 2WD version and $32,900 for the AWD version the Mahindra XUV500 is priced aggressively to help find favour among car buyers in Australia, though even if the styling won’t be for everyone the XUV500 is a surprise package that shows India is ahead of China in the car-building stakes.

Owner reviews of the MAHINDRA XUV500

Write a review for the MAHINDRA XUV500

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.
Add a New Review

WE RECOMMEND YOU ALSO CONSIDER...

  • Saltypigeon

    It’s uglier than any Chinese car I have seen, if that’s possible

    • Daniel

      I’m not sure what I think of the design, but at least they haven’t shamelessly copied someone else like most Chinese cars do.

      • Robin_Graves

        Agree, at least its original at being ugly.  Some more ‘real’ photos of the interior would have been nice.

        • Henry Toussaint

           I wonder if they will have the purple and black leather or just black or something…I don’t mind and its styling is a bit strange, esspecially above the number plate holder,but it but it is only 26k so it’s all good…

          • Subhash V

            the interior loooks pretty good to me, looking at the car directly from the front make its look like the sexiest in the worl, but when i look at it from the side, its looks very awkward and the back looks too plain…like a tarago.

    • coolbeans

      At least it’s not as ugly as a Ssangyong Stavic…not much of an achievement I know!

      • Hyuntoyata Fan

        Mahindra bought 70% of Ssangyong in 2010.

        • Don Quay

          Yes, you can see that Ssssanyyyong have influenced the styling. I mean in the way that this thing is seriously ugly. Really, what were they thinking with that grille and the hip line above the rear wheel?

    • Smart US

       w rising population in certain demographic this car will have its success unless the demographic does not want to part their way from white and green Camry ’00s…

      • figo87

        very subtle….

    • UGLY_CHAN

      Chinky chnise calling indian ugly you nose less face??  get yur facts correct

  • Oneneutral

    Wow, it is a great looking powerful SUV, if you cast aside the indian snub syndrome. Better than subaru’s Forester, diesel at cheap price. Hope they achieve ANCAP rating at least 4 and this will be for all middle class people’s eye opener against the so called high end brands.

    • Bo

      I am sorry, but “Better than subaru’s Forester”, in what way? If you are talking about appearance, then it still fails. Then there is no need to argue about the rest, isn’t there?

      • FanBoi

        Are you high on weed??

        //

    • Shb_jcb

      Now you’ve hit the nail,on the head mate!! That’s the truth,people want better at lower and whoever offers the best will be lapped up. Rest is all hogwash.

  • Shb_jcb

    Ha ,looks are pretty relative and yes mahindra hasn’t copied like the Chinese car makers. Anyway if people think this is ugly then it will blend in pretty easy in ozzy roads! Yes, the lack of auto will be a damp squib!! Anyway,all talks of be ozzy buy ozzy seems to be dying as people are buying great wall products and other products will also pick up. Way back in the 70s,Toyota and other jap players were In a similar position to these new players today. It’s the way of the world,old has to make way for the new. Good luck Mahindra and to the car advice team that came back in one piece. If you think mumbai highway needed skills,try highways in north India. You will need a lot more of luck and prayers to survive that!! Lol

  • nugsdad

    Well 10 years ago we rubbished the Koreans

  • Icing

    Who supplies them the fuel injectors? Are they Indian OEM? Don’t think so..

    • Richo

       Yes its done by M&M inhouse

  • D987

    The interior looks quite good except for the ugly reddish coloured bits on the dash and seats. It would look better all black with chrome and piano black highlights.

  • Mbox

    If this has serious pulling power then what do you call the Kluger with 204kW & 345Nm ?

    • Fanuc

      Any car with that Toyota V6 is a beast

      I’ve driven rav4 V6 and that thing is a hot-rod!! Seriously wheel-spin at 100 km/h when floored. Very nice engine

      • Phil

        Must be a hopeless 4WD system in the Rav4 V6 if you get seriously wheel spin at 100kmh.
        I’d hate to think what the axle tramp and torque steer would be like in a FWD version….oh wait, I’ve experienced that in the Ewwrion *Shudders*.

    • Anthony

      It’s a 2.2-litre diesel, so the numbers for the XUV500 are very good, especially when you factor in the fuel-efficiency of this engine.

      We have also heard that Mahindra may be developing a twin-turbo version for the XUV500  that will generate 124kW and 400Nm.

      • Devil’s Advocate

        Anthony, 103Kw and 330Nm is not that good for a “supposedly current generation” 2.2L diesel. 2L diesels have been putting out better power and torque than that for years now.

        No argument about the fuel economy though.

        • Phil

          Toyota’s 2.2 Diesel isn’t much better [Plus you can't buy it here anyway]. 110KW and 340NM is only a fraction better and the torque peaks from 2000-2800rpm which is a smaller spread than the Mahindras bigger 1600-2800rpm. Economy is EU6.1L100km in the smaller and lighter Rav4 – in a XUV500 sized car it would be similar or worse than the XUV’s 6.7L100km.
          Toyota does offer a 130KW version but economy shoots up to 7.5L100km and again that economy figure is from the smaller and lighter Rav4.

          • Devil’s Advocate

            Yep. Toyota have been dragging the chain for a while now with their diesels. 

          • Ysys

            But Toyota’s diesel is better.. 130kW is significantly better then 103kW

          • Richo

             what you pay is what you get

  • Ravi

    Ahh Mahindra, Mahindra..
    …verry verry good Indian.Curry in a Hurry.

  • Shak

    Aside from the take it or leave it looks, the car seems to have the right stuff for our market. Especially considering the reviewer said the diesel was ‘excellent’ and the fact that this is Mahindra’s first crack at a serious passenger car, i think what they have done has to be commended. Now all they need to do is price it right, and maybe even throw in a 5 year warranty to really snap up buyers. I think from every objective measure so far its better than the GWM SUV. 

  • iheartnj

    XUV500? Can’t Chinese and Indian manufacturers think of better names for their cars? 

    • iheartnj sr.

       How does iheartnj sound??

      • Susan

         very ugly

      • Susan

         very ugly

  • Josh Rogan

    Styling won’t be for everyone?
    That should read ‘Styling won’t be for ANYONE’.

    • Martin

      Is it ok if someone read your name as Josh Ar Rogant? 

  • Eric Knutsen

    Your last comment is interesting “that shows India is ahead of China in the car-building stakes.”

  • Ray Barker

    XUV = Xtremely Ugly Vehicle.
                                                                                                                                            There may be  one place in the world where the design of might not be ridiculed.:Outside the Exotic Marigold Hotel.

    • Atul

      hahahahahahahahaha you should be in r&d at mahindra

    • Eric Knutsen

       dude the design is inspired from the running cheetah, understand the design language first.You people call a awesome design for a copycat chinese junk. Rofl

    • Eric Knutsen

       dude the design is inspired from the running cheetah, understand the design language first.You people call a awesome design for a copycat chinese junk. Rofl

    • Eric Knutsen

       dude the design is inspired from the running cheetah, understand the design language first.You people call a awesome design for a copycat chinese junk. Rofl

    • Eric Knutsen

       dude the design is inspired from the running cheetah, understand the design language first.You people call a awesome design for a copycat chinese junk. Rofl

    • Richo

       Its Xtreme Utility Vehicle

  • Daniel

    I actually quite like it, I think. I wasn’t sure when the pictures first surfaced, a less-is-more design approach may have suited it better, but I actually think it looks pretty tough now. I really like the huge window protruding rear wheel arches and the front is kind of tough. The rear tailgate is a bit of a mess, but at least it’s also quite plain. Other than that I’d say the door handles are too small and flimsy looking, but then I even think that about Ferrari door handles so they aren’t the only ones. I think as lots of little bits from different angles it’s messy, but actually, as a whole, it comes together quite well. I like it more than any SsangYong or Great Wall car. In a way, I think it even looks better than the Prado (though that’s not saying much…).

    • Dan

      I took a quick glance at one today and the interior including the roof lining makes both my caddillac allante and seville STS boring. Mostly Daniel I think you are dead right.

  • Phil

    No gas struts on the bonnet? Wow, I can just imagine the chatter at the dealerships; “Oh I can’t possibly buy this car – it’s got no gas struts on the bonnet!”.
    CA really grasping for straws on that one.

    What’s with the purple all throughout the interior?

  • Aussiecustoms

    This is just another cheap Asian import but I think this will be a much better seller than Great Wall and Cherry as they are very cheaply made but this car doesn’t give you a headache when you drive it like the others as this is better made.

  • Nitesheffect

    Yupp, when this monster was launched in india in sept 2011
    Everybody shared th same thought just like you people.
    This vehicle is ugly, mahindra designers should hang themselves, no one will buy this vehicle blah blah blah….!!!
    But when mahindra brought XUV5OO in showrooms & people saw the exact model in flesh then they started booking this vehicle & because of high response from consumers mahindra stopped taking bookings for XUV5OO just after the launch-within 6days.
    It just that people need some time to get used to such designes.
    As some of people commented at least mahindra is not coping any designes like chinese suv makers
    NM

  • NM9488

    Yupp, when this monster was launched in india in sept 2011
    Everybody shared th same thought just like you people.
    This vehicle is ugly, mahindra designers should hang themselves, no one will buy this vehicle blah blah blah….!!!
    But when mahindra brought XUV5OO in showrooms & people saw the exact model in flesh then they started booking this vehicle & because of high response from consumers mahindra stopped taking bookings for XUV5OO just after the launch-within 6days.
    It just that people need some time to get used to such designes.
    As some of people commented at least mahindra is not coping any designes like chinese suv makers
    NM

  • Max

    Hi Nitesheffect and NM9488 ,

    You are copying each other !!!

  • Stiffla

    Not bad price wise. At least the Indians can export an SUV.

  • Maurya

    I have seen an XUV500 in flesh in Chennai 5 months ago. I was really impressed by the look of it. I personally think it looks better than Prado or Pajero. And Mahindra in India has an image of rough, tough beast (literally ) , and almost all of them has this ‘Mahindra Grill’, that probably explains why they did not try to ‘funk’ up the vehicle like Kia sportage. My friend wanted to buy this vehicle but his ‘application’ was ‘rejected’ due to the overwhelming response !!!(Mahindra had to resort to  lucky lottos to choose the first batch of customers due to massive response from customers). If they get their pricing right I think  it will be a good bargain.

    • F1

      Why don’t they sell these things in USA? That’s right because in Australia they can pretty much reach the 30k mark..

      Sell this thing in USA as the same price they charge in Aus and watch the lolz

  • Fuga

    That’s the ugliest engine bay I’ve seen in years.

    • Subhash V

      India is a dusty place mate…(im an India so im not bsing) but it’s good to know that the car will be able to handle dirst and stuff in its interiors, a good new to those who don’t clean their car

  • Johaan

    good and bad comments all over! just think this is their first car. Think what we discussed when kia and hundai launched their cars in australia 10years before?? see their improved quality and kia voted car of the year! wait and see, let them get a chance too!!!

    • Jacob

      It is not their first car, they have been making cars for 60 years. 

      • Jack

        It’s there first car on a monocoque body, every other car they make are on ladder frame chassis.

    • Johaan

      I am sorry guys! test drove this car!! agree!  it has got evrything, but poor ride, cheap feeling, over priced, noisy cabin, long gear throw, small speedo, ugly jumping!!! tight squeezy 3rd raw! no auto, and much more!!!! rubbish!

  • Sydfella

    For Guys who are saying this looks ugly – they need to get their eyes and heads checked. I think its a fantastic looking vehicle . Regarding quality – Like china loads of the brands we drive are made in India which no one even knows…I think its the prejudice as opposed to logic that i can sence in peoples comments here…Well done Mahindra … i am definitely booking in a test drive 

  • Kristyrose

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Some  Personally I love the unique look. Great style. Drove one…drives beautiful. Compared to Great Wall x200, it beats it drivewise hands down. Cant wait to get one. Just wondering why we dont have the option for the green colour?? Well done Mahindra. Go the cougar look lol