BMW 318d Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

BMW 318d Review

BMW 3

Pros: 

Cons: 

By Alborz Fallah
FIND DEALS

Price: $46,750 to $54,340

The BMW 318d has arrived, and it’s timing couldn’t be more crucial for the Bavarian car maker. The BMW 3 Series is being throttled by its arch-rival, the Mercedes-Benz C-Class, in Australian luxury car sales, despite the launch of an all-new Three earlier this year.

BMW’s signature model has been missing its crucial volume models, having launched only the BMW 320d, BMW 328i and BMW 335i variants. So now for the crunch.

With a starting price of $56,400, the new BMW 318d becomes the new entry model in the all-new BMW 3 Series range. It replaces the BMW 320i as the most affordable 3 Series, though that model also returns (click to read separate review).

The BMW 318d is priced a good $4000 cheaper than the entry C-Class diesel, the C200 CDI, and brings with it the latest in diesel engine technology, an eight-speed automatic gearbox and fuel consumption that’s superior by nearly a full litre (4.5L/100km v 5.4L/100km).

Although the 318d uses essentially the same engine as the 320d, the difference in tune (and a few components) results in 105kW of power (compared with 135kW) and 320Nm of torque (compared with 380Nm). On city roads the difference is hard to notice but when it comes to merging on the highway or performing an overtaking manoeuvre, it’s easy to feel the difference. Put the two side by side and the 318d will take an additional 1.7 seconds to go from 0-100km/h (9.3 seconds).

Behind the wheel the 318d embodies the essence of what the new BMW 3 Series range offers: a dynamic and sporty drive. Coupled to an eight-speed automatic (standard), the 2.0-litre diesel works coherently in delivering all its torque and power and hardly feels over-laboured in the task. There’s that feel that more torque would be welcomed (which is where the 320d comes in), but overall it’s more than capable of performing everyday tasks.

With the option of three driving modes (Eco pro, Comfort, Sport), the 318d can change its characteristics with a press of a button. For example, select Sport mode and instantly you’ll be rewarded with a more responsive engine, sharper steering and accelerator pedal response and a change in gearbox shift dynamics. None of this is new to BMW, but to have it as standard kit on the base model 3-Series isn’t something that should necessarily be taken for granted. Ultimately it doesn’t make the 318d any faster, but once you’re out of suburban traffic and keen on a spirited drive, it makes for a more enjoyable experience.

This is where BMW has had the edge over its German and Japanese rivals for some time. Even its entry model cars tend to steer and corner better than their rivals. There’s something intrinsically more enjoyable about being in control of a BMW 3-Series if you appreciate the act of driving as more than just getting from A to B. Those who are overly obsessed with style may be polarised by the Three’s front-end design but it certainly has road presence.

In the past we’ve criticised BMW for delivering uninspiring and somewhat Spartan interiors. Generally overdosed on black colours and oozing little character. This is still the case when it comes to the current 1 Series Coupe/Convertible but for the new 3 Series, it has all changed. A soft-touch interior is something we’ve come to expect but there’s now the option of much lighter interior colours (even for the steering wheel) and the inside is a generally more inviting and a nicer placer to be. It’s quiet, too; despite the diesel-powered heart, the clatter is hardly noticeable on the road.

A new 6.5-inch colour screen is standard (although adding sat-nav is still a $1538 option for the 318d) and makes using iDrive a better experience. Air-conditioning controls (dual-zone) and overall quality of switchgear is top-notch. The Sensatec man-made leather interior upholstery is by no means a comparison for the real stuff found in the 328i and 335i but still does a great job of portraying a luxury interior. Compared with the previous-generation BMW 3 Series, the 318d offers 15mm more knee room and 8mm more headroom for the rear passengers. Size-wise, it’s equivalent to the 5 Series of the early 2000s, which means it will easily accommodate four large adults for long-distance drives with the option for a fifth when required.

BMW’s strategy with the 318d is to attract potentially new buyers into dealerships primarily on price. Given the cost difference between a 318d and 320d is a mere $4000 and you gain a noticeable amount of equipment upgrades on top of the power and torque increase, it’s a very logical upgrade.

On the equipment side, the entry model 318d gets 16-inch alloy wheels, an automatic opening boot lid, keyless push button start, rear parking assistance (front optional) and a 6.5-inch colour screen iDrive infotainment system that is hooked up to six speakers (4x25W). Bluetooth telephone connectivity is standard but Bluetooth audio streaming is an option, which is rather disappointing given cars far cheaper offer the system as part of the standard Bluetooth kit.

Safety features include driver and front passenger airbags, head airbags in the front and rear, side airbags for driver and front passenger as well as dynamic stability control and the guarantee of BMW’s excellent build quality in the event of an accident.

The BMW 318d is a very capable and efficiency package for buyers in the market for one of the most affordable compact executive sedans.

But it’s worth spending your bonus on the BMW 320d that costs a few thousand dollars more but brings more power and torque, extra driving modes (Sport Plus), bigger wheels, gearshift paddles, better interior lighting, rear parking sensors, and powered front seats.

The BMW 318d is available in four grades: Standard, Modern Line ($3900), Sport ($4900) and Luxury ($4900).

Owner reviews of the BMW 3 Add a New Review

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=687966531 Steven Hambleton

    0-100 means bugger all to me. I’d rather know what 50-70 or 50-90 times are. They are more real world figures for me. As for the 320 being a better buy, I’d only option rear parking sensors out of that lot so it’s a waste of money.

    I’d spend the extra on sports leather seats!

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      I havnen’t got exact figures for you on those times, but given the 320d is 7.6 sec to 100 instead of 9.3 – and that times isn’t a factor of take off speed (since both are exactly the same in their weight distribution and driveline setup) – the in gear acceleration of the 320d is noticeably better. 

    • F1MotoGP

      I agree with you 0-100 is not real life driving. I could not find for current BMW but on one website they compared this two cars. Not much different when you look at from 80 to 120!

      Ferrari F430: 0-100 km/h: 3,8s; 80-120 km/h: 3,1s

      330d: 0-100 km/h: 6,1s; 80-120 km/h: 4,8s

      • Icon

        Perhaps, but the whole point of performance sedan is for SPEED

  • Dru_555

    The LHS of the interior looks disfigured

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Karl-Sass/100000921334936 Karl Sass

      It’s a bit different, but I don’t mind it.

  • Laurie

    BMW should have dropped this model and make the 320d the entry model people who are buying these cars a few thousand is neither here or there for them! jmho

    • Daniel

      I wouldn’t be so sure actually. Just considering how many used 318i/320i’s with no options, standard wheels and flat paint there are around I think a lot of people can only just afford a BMW. That few thousand can be crucial. 

  • gt86.com.au

    And still no LCD screen in the Dash.. is this car from the 2000s. Not good enough BMW!
    You may have better driving dynamics than audi and merc, but they beat you on tech and style time and time again!

    • Phil

      I quote from the article:

      “A new 6.5-inch colour screen is standard”

      The article also includes photos of the dashboard which clearly has a LCD screen in it.

      • Drac

         He did say in the dash though, in the BMW it is kindve ON the dash :P

  • MisterZed

    That beige interior looks like it’s designed for senior citizens.

    • F1MotoGP

       You can have Black or Veneto Beige.
      Source BMW Australia

  • John

    Why is it that motoring reviewers universally can’t use the word vinyl when writing about euro cars but must use phrases like man made leather. Would they use the same terms in writing a review on a car sourced from Korea, china, Japan etc. I think not. It really detracts from the quality of the review and reveals the intrinsic bias of the reviewer. don’t be a spokesperson for the euro car companies, be a reviewer with some credibility.

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      John, my understanding of Sensatec man-made leather is that it’s of a higher quality to that found in many mainstream Japanese/Korean cars. It certainly feels much softer than the ‘vinyl’ upholstery that you’re describing. 

      • John

        Well a higher quality of vinyl is still vinyl, a poorer quality leather is still leather. When you buy apple cider, you don’t expect to get pear juice. It seems like we need correct labeling laws for cars now as well as food. Again I ask the question if there was high quality vinyl in a Chinese car etc, would you report it as vinyl or man made leather? Journalists have a duty to report things accurately, otherwise be a propagandist.

        • Captain Nemo

          Well said John couldn’t agree more.
          In my opinion if its not made in a paddock by a bull its not leather.
          The word leather should not be used. 

        • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

          John, if the chinese company said it was ‘man-made’ leather, it’s likely I’d use the correct terminology and point out that it’s no where near as good as the real stuff, which, if you read this article, I do the same. 

      • Bank

        Funny, because Japanese luxury cars such as Lexus use leather that is of very high quality

        And why you comparing BMW with ‘main stream’ cars??

        Why not conduct a review that compared BMW, Mercedes, Audi & Lexus and do a thorough review of the real world performance, paint quality, interior quality and leather quality ? etc

        • Phil

          Leather of the absolute finest quality will still not last the last the life of a typical car. No matter what, it will crack/wrinkle/shrink/rip in time, often after just a few years (Ford Falcon leather!).

          No such problems with the ‘man made’ leathers. Have a look inside old Mercs from the 60s/70/s80s with the “MB-Tex’ upholstery – it’ll still be in excellent condition.

          • Whinestone

            Yes, both have their advantages and disadvantages and I guess car makers make a decision in terms of what to use according to their needs and goals.

          • Phil

            Or they can give us a choice like BMW have done here.

            I find it remarkable that Mercedes has pretty much dropped their mb-tex trim (though they call it something else now). When it was standard and customers had the choice of optional leather, basically everyone kept the mb-tex.

          • Finn

            I wonder why the real deal is standard on the higher up models, but they don’t offer the choice of the synthetic alternative.

  • Stack

    Why should they call it vinyl when it’s not….that’s misleading.
    I had vinyl in my commodore 25 yrs ago.
    The world’s moved on mate.

    • Igomi Watabi

      yeah, spot-on Stack. I’m not going to outright say it’s not vinyl, but does anyone know the actual composition of this stuff, because vinyl does refer specifically to organic compounds that contain an ethene-derived vinyl compund (yeah, yeah, I Wikipedia’d it). Does this stuff. not all polymers are vinyls.

  • Dominique Vøn Hütch

    mmmm Artico.

  • LOL

    This $56,400 BMW is made in Africa. I would wait for the new 2013 MIJ $49,999  Lexus IS due any minute now.

    • Greg

      Way overpriced downunder! Buyers are ripped off. The cherokee diesel is about 6 grands cheaper, 3 liter and not 2, produces way more torque and horsepower than this overpriced, badge snobbed bimmer fans and it offers 4WD with low range where you can take it to places BMW can’t even dream of going to. 

      For my money go for the jeep.

      • Johnson

        How in the name of tits do you come to the conclusion that a BMW 320 buyer would have a Jeep on the shopping list also?

        I want what you are smoking.

        • Greg

          abso – god damn – lutely johnson. Use your logic! first of all 3 l should be more expensive than 2 l as they both employ the same diesel technology state of the art. Secondly 6 cylinders vs 4, more cylinders, longer block, more valves etc. In fact the cherokee has higher specific torque and output than the bimmer. Finally it is 4WD which means it costs a lot more to manufacture. 

          How the hell the bimmer charges more than the jeep is because of pure greed!!! Get it!!

          • Igomi Watabi

            I still don’t get it, Greg. Johnson is right. No-one looking at a 3-Series would ever, ever have the Grand Cherokee on the same shopping list. If you’re going to go down the interminably dull route of “wah, cars are too expensive”, then compare like against like.

            And while I’m at it, besides the completely different raisons d’etre of the two cars, a BMW driver (or driver of most other marques) wouldn’t go near the dreadful ergonomics and approximate build quality of a Jeep.

          • James Cortez

            What do yo mean dreadful?? Look at how popular it is in the states

    • Phil

      How could the 2013 Lexus IS be due “any minute”?

      We’re not even halfway through 2012 yet!

      • source: wikipedia

        Model year and the actual year of production do not always coincide.  For example, a 2009 model year automobile is available during most of the 2009 calendar year, but is usually also available from the third quarter of 2008 because production of the 2009 model began in July and August 2008.

        • Phil

          If a “2009 model” was avaliable during 2008 especially as early as July 2008, its a 2008 year AND model car.

          • clavicle

            Logically that should be the case, but the actual methodology used by manufacturers is different. Don’t ask me why, but it just happens to be the way they do it.

  • Phil

    A negative point is that “320d is logical upgrade for most”……..how is the avaliability of a upgraded model a bad point for the base model? Makes no sense at all particularly since one of the good points is supposed to be the starting price of this 318d.

    The only other negative point is bluetooth streaming is optional, well I wouldn’t want it but anyway, with that huge list of positives – drive, price, economy, style, interior and high level of equipment…..why only 3.5 stars?
    Does having bluetooth streaming as a option cost it 1.5 stars or are there other negatives CA has forgotten to mention?

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

      It makes little sense to go for the 318d when the 320d exists, Phil. That was my point. The 320i and 320d are four star cars and the 328i is a 4.5 star car as you can see in our other reviews. 

      • Phil

        Yet in the 320i review, you didn’t list as many positives and of course, it doesn’t have the “low starting price” that you praised the 318d for.

        Your review/scoring system is what makes little sense here. You rain it with praise including its low starting price, now your saying this particular model makes “little sense” and you should pay more for the 320d (thus abolishing this “low starting price” thing).
        Plus you marked the 320i down for not having standard audio streaming too - so both these cars have the same positives and same negatives (except the 318d gets a extra tick for the “low starting price”), yet different rating….

        • http://www.caradvice.com.au/ Alborz Fallah

          No on all accounts. I’ll make it clear:

          320i – much better acceleration and driving feel with moderate fuel consumption rise over 318d – only about $1000 more, so if diesel is no issue, you’d be mad not to go for the 320i. It also gets 17″ wheels, electric seats and a better interior lighting system. Not bad for the money.320d – is the best of the lot if you can afford it, it gets all the same stuff as the 320i but with better fuel economy and much more torque (same 0-100km/h time though)

          For me its a choice between 320d and 320i, the 318d is only if you simply CANNOT afford the other two – hence why the low starting price is a plus. 

          • Phil

            So to sum up then, the 318d is a fantastic car by your defintion, but it’s actually only a average car by your star rating system because there is a more expensive version that is a little better.
            So what would the rating be if it were a single model range? Still a average 3.5 stars for a car that according to your has basically everything going for it?

            Plus a “moderate fuel consumption rise” between 318D and 320i……ummm it’s a %35 difference! You must surely know the fuel consumption as you wrote it the economy figure in your article(and I’m assuming you write your own reviews).

            You probably haven’t noticed, but basically every single one of CA’s reviews have a 3 or 4 star rating. If you look at what you’ve put in the list of positives for this car, I find it bizarre that again, this car has the same average overall rating you give to basically all other cars.
            So what can we expect a 5 star rating for the “best of the lot” 320D?

  • JamesB

    C’mon, price is never a positive for any BMW sold in Australia. At 56K, it’s still much higher than an American 328i, which starts at around 43K. It’s also no faster than a Corolla. I wouldn’t force myself into a slow, overpriced and underequipped car just to brag about the propeller badge. The brilliant chassis also cannot be exploited much without the right engine.

    • Greg

      Yes, waaaay overpriced. I guess most BM buyers are still badge snobbed.

    • UFO

      Corolla would win the race, no doubt there..

      Corolla is lighter, fwd so it will have advantage off the line

      • Phil

        Shorter ratios from a 8 speed box plus peak power and twice as much torque 2500rpm lower in the rev range should give the BMW a far better advantage off the line.

        Plus FWD is not a advantage off the line. Weight shifts off the front and moves to the back when you start moving – particulary if you do a hard launch.
        FWD will get the best traction when your reversing….

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chaitanya-Kumar-Samardhi/820693647 Chaitanya Kumar Samardhi

    HI Albortz,
    I have been to the BMW showrooms and I was actually in a fix trying to decide between the 328i and the 320 (both with the sport line), the reason being that both were evenly priced. Let me explain, The 328i on the sport spec was just $2000 more expensive than the 320d but what it gets more is the Business Satellite navigation approx $2.4k, electric lumbar seat adjust, Premium (9 speaker audio) $.9k and the 18 inch wheels $1.2k. So add this to the 320d then the price exceeds the 328i by quite a bit. So I see the 328i more valuable and the 320d more expensive. Can you now please help me choose between these 2. Please do not compare the 320d with the 318d and the 320i. It can only be compared with the 328i as the price is the same. 
    What fuel efficiency can I expect from the 320d and the 328i in the city.
    Thanks

    • Kris

      Mate I was in the same dilemma, and I think the 328i is better value for money and the engine is a cracker. Just bought my 328i from Sylvania BMW yesterday – one of the first few that came into Aus that was built in Germany :) – amazing car, cant wait to pick it up next week!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chaitanya-Kumar-Samardhi/820693647 Chaitanya Kumar Samardhi

    Hi Kris, Thanks for that mate. Can you please tell me of you drove the 320d as well before you made the choice. With the rising prices of petrol I am giving the 328i a serious thought. The thing is that the diesel’s efficiency would be closed to the claimed but the petrol’s wouldn’t. 
    I would just like to know of the petrol feels much faster even though the diesel has more torque.

  • John

    if you are going to drop 70k on a bmw any bmw dealer worth their salt will let you test drive each car. why don’t you ask and then choose?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chaitanya-Kumar-Samardhi/820693647 Chaitanya Kumar Samardhi

      I would always like to consider more than one view and would like to know if there are any issues with these cars from an owner. I am pretty sure almost all cars are available for test drives, frankly any good car would excite a person but the facts and reality comes after the purchase. If all can be known by just a dive then what invites you to CA???