Porsche Cayman Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Porsche Cayman Review

PORSCHE CAYMAN

Pros: Evocative induction and exhaust notes; sublime handling; satisfyingly quick; tactile controls

Cons: Not blisteringly quick; costs more than its Boxster convertible twin; polarising styling

By Jez Spinks |
FIND DEALS

Price: $98,560 to $113,300

Our Rating:  

If the Porsche Boxster was about saving the company when it launched in 1996, its belated twin, the Porsche Cayman, which arrived in 2005 was about further model expansion.

It was also about reiterating the German brand’s sporting intent after the controversial release of the Porsche Cayenne 4WD just a couple of years earlier.

And if Porsche were to appear on Masterchef, the Cayman certainly sounds like the perfect recipe for a sports car – taking the mid-engined balance of the Porsche Boxster and mixing it with the body rigidity of the brand’s true coupe icon, the Porsche 911.

The latest-generation of the Porsche Boxster lands on our shores in June, but we’ve reacquainted ourselves with the Cayman before itself gets the ‘all-new’ treatment at the start of 2013.

We’re in the ‘base’ model that costs $115,100 before on-road charges are added and is powered by a 2.9-litre six-cylinder that was upgraded from a 2.7-litre as part of a comprehensive model update – at least under the skin – in 2009.

The price tag means the Cayman continues to confound automotive logic by being a coupe that costs more than its convertible relative, which typically cost more to engineer.

Putting that fair debate to one side for now, you can step up to more powerful (3.4-litre) versions of the Cayman, but only if you have $147,5000 for the 235kW Porsche Cayman S or $165,000 for the 243kW Porsche Cayman R.

The Cayman gets incrementally more powerful and better as you climb through the range if you can afford the sizeable financial gaps, but you won’t feel too shortchanged in the regular Cayman.

The slight negatives first are that the 195kW 2.9-litre six sounds quite docile at low speeds, while it doesn’t have an abundance of torque down low.

Some proof of that is an 80-120km/h rolling response that takes 7.6 seconds in fifth gear. The rival, $103,300 Audi TT S and $99,900 BMW 1-Series M Coupe would both beat it for mid-range response.

But start to stretch the Cayman from the lower gears and the sensory experience Porsches are renowned for begins.

As revs climb progressively, occupants are treated to a scintillating blend of induction and exhaust noise before the sound morphs into a higher-pitched yowl at the business end of the tachometer. It doesn’t hurt that the engine sits right behind the driver’s seat.

The six-speed manual version of the Porsche Cayman, as we tested, reaches 0-100km/h in 5.8 seconds according to Porsche, which traditionally underplays the performance of its cars. That can be reduced to 5.7sec by opting for the $5300 PDK dual-clutch auto, or to 5.5sec by paying extra again for Porsche’s Sports Chrono package.

Many drivers will find the Cayman plenty quick enough. It’s certainly satisfyingly fast.

Precision is a word a Porsche continually reminds you of.

The throttle pedal gives you exactly the amount of acceleration you request, and it’s there in the steering as it responds to the most delicate of driver inputs and provides reams of data back to them from the road surface (some of which has been lost with Porsche’s move to an electric steering rack for the latest models).

The steering wheel is also perfectly weighted, just like the accelerator, brake and clutch pedals, and the six-speed manual.

Hurtle into a series of bends on a bumpy stretch of bitumen and the Cayman demonstrates both its supreme handling balance and otherworldly body control.

The suspension is completely dismissive of major surface irregularities, keeping the Cayman composed into corners, and helping to deliver spellbinding traction out of them when some sports cars would be struggling to get their power to the ground.

On coarser roads, though, expect tyre roar to be competing with the engine and exhaust at filling the cabin with noise.

The dynamic excellence of the Porsche Cayman is complete with a ride that is easier to live with than you might imagine.

Despite the extremely stiff chassis, and large 19-inch alloy wheels, there’s only some mild thump over lateral joins but otherwise the Cayman’s suspension is never harsh and has a surprising degree of suppleness (like the old Boxster).

As Porsches inevitably join the vehicle trend for increasing usage of electronics, the Cayman is almost sports retro with its manual parking brake (the new 911 and Boxster have switched to electronic versions) and button-less steering wheel. (Purists rejoice!)

The cabin is certainly focused on functionality. Nothing is overly complicated.

There’s a centre stack for the excellent touchscreen multimedia system and heating/ventilation, and there are just three dials in the instrument cluster ahead of the driver – with the central tacho flanked by the speedo on the left and fuel/oil gauges on the right.

Even taller folks should find adequate headroom in the Cayman as they nestle into the sportily low driving seat, though the cabin is a noticeably more cocooning experience than the 911. Vision out rear certainly isn’t great.

Storage is also limited inside, with no convenient place for a mobile phone. There are no door pockets, so smaller items will find homes only in the glovebox or tiny console bin tray. Two cupholders, in Porsche tradition, do push out from the passenger side of the dash.

Bigger items are a different matter, with the Porsche Cayman presenting as a relatively practical car as far as sports cars and compact coupes go.

Thanks to the placement of the engine, there’s some cargo space in the rear that’s accessed by raising the Cayman’s hatch (above, middle). And like the 911, the ‘bonnet’ lifts up to reveal a deeper compartment (above, bottom) that will hold a couple of holdalls or so.

You could even call the specification of our Porsche Cayman the Purists’ Edition as the only option fitted was an exterior design pack that we rather liked and costs an additional $8690.

Perfectly offsetting the white paintwork were black alloy wheels from the Porsche Boxster Spyder, black side mirrors, black exhaust pipes, black air intakes and outlets, and black ‘Porsche Cayman S’ badging on the rear lid.

The only thing that isn’t black and white is the answer to the question of whether the Porsche Cayman is a handsome coupe. The quirky integration of the fixed roof on a body clearly related to the old Boxster certainly means it’s not as natural looking a coupe like its bigger brother, the 911.

But, regardless, the Porsche Cayman is surely destined to be a modern classic.

 


 

Owner reviews of the PORSCHE CAYMAN

Write a review for the PORSCHE CAYMAN

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.
Add a New Review

  • Jazrod

    Polarizing styling?! This thing looks the goods IMO! 

    • Henry Toussaint

       I love this, Especially the Cayman R!

  • poindexter

    this is the biz for sure

  • rfs1970

    The pictures are stunning!

    First class review…

  • Henry

    Yeah, looks great.

  • Phil

    I’ve always wondered if Porsche just make up those 0-100 times for the “chrono” package just to get people to hand over more money.

    The manual and PDK have basically the same ratios and the manual is 30kgs lighter. If you get a perfect launch in the manual and there’s only one gearchange to reach 100kmh how can the manual be 0.3 secs slower? One manual gearshift at full tilt does not take 0.3 secs.

  • F1

    5.8 sec?? Well in reality that’s fast, but I would expect better from porsche

    • Henry

      It’s a sports car not a super car. The highlight being the balance/handling rather than outright grunt.

  • Daniel

    What’s wrong with 5.8 seconds? For a start, if you want a faster one, you can get the S. And secondly, if you want to go faster again, you can save even more and get a 911. This is a base Porsche, it’s not slow for what it is and it’s what you get for $100,000 as opposed to $250,000 and it’s still most of the $250,000 car in a much cheaper package anyway. It’s an excellent car and the only criticisms I see here (other than styling) are basically that it’s not the 911, which I think is unfair. I’m not even a Porsche fanboy, I’ve never owned one and would probably buy something else if I had the money, but I wish reviewers and the public would stop negatively rating the Cayman essentially for not being a 911. If the Cayman were a person it would have daunting amounts of psychological baggage by now…

    • Kev

      So your logic would mean a Toyota 86 would be a sports car, which does 0-100km is approx. 6.9 seconds (probably close to 5.8 seconds with some performance tweaks).
       
      But why is everyone complaining about Toyota 86 not worth the “sports car” title because it is underpowered?

      The 86 is developed with a handful of other “sports cars” (including the Cayman) as a benchmark, and it certainly does live to the hype based on paper performance and specs (or even some launch reviews).

      Clearly it is another act of the brand snobs trying to put down a genuine sports car competitor before it is even on the public road.

      • Daniel

        Well, even though I’m not a big fan of Toyota (nothing to do with brand snobbery, just think they always seem a little cheap in their styling), I would call the 86 a sports car so you’re preaching to the converted :)

        I think the problem is that so many people expect sports cars to have super car performance these days and that doesn’t seem fair to me. 5.8 or 6.9 seconds is still perfectly fast enough to be designated a sports car, I think it’s more important they handle and drive well. Any car can go fast, that doesn’t make them sporty though. And any car that can get to 100 in ten seconds let alone 6.9, in my book, probably isn’t underpowered. It may not be what someone would call fast, but it probably isn’t underpowered. 

  • Des KSA

    Love those Porsche prices. Base model Cayman in the US, $52000. In the UK, £39000 (A$62000). Oz price, $115000. Stop taking the pi$$ Porsche.

    • Daniel

      US: 300 million people. UK: 80 million people. Australia: 21 million people (and really far away from Germany). Do the math$, Des.

      • Des KSA

        Sorry but bull$hit to that Daniel. My daughter and hubby are looking at a Range Rover Evoque in Canada. Base model in Canada $47000, base model in US, $44000, base model in Oz $50000. The specs may not be exactly the same but the Evoque is not more than TWICE the price here is it? Unlike the Porsche. Even with LCT Porsche are still taking the pi$$ and they should be taken to task about it. Caradvice might like to ask them about the price discrepancy but of course they won’t. By the way, the UK is farther away than Germany.

        • F1MotoGP

           As the words “rip off” resonate in our ears, we applied the same
          comparison to Mercedes-Benz and still we’re looking at paying three
          times the price for luxury cars.

          Mercedes-Benz Australia spokesman David McCarthy says there are crucial
          differences between the two markets and that flows onto the retail
          prices.

          “Basically, we pay more tax,” he says. “There is GST, luxury-car tax and import tax on each car.

          “That’s the starting point. Australia is a tiny market – we have a
          one-million a year vehicle market, the US is about 13 million. You get a
          discount for buying in volume.

          “Australia is a small market but it is geographically huge and needs
          similar levels of personnel and nationwide support and service as the
          US.

          “Then we have specific emission and design regulations which
          Mercedes-Benz at the factory has to engineer and comply. We,
          Mercedes-Benz Australia, pays for that – not Mercedes in Germany. So
          that gets passed on to the customer.

          “Our geographical isolation means we carry cars on shipping routes that
          aren’t well travelled, so that costs extra.  “The other important
          factor is model range. We sell everything from a Smart Fortwo to a
          140-tonne truck and everything – cars, vans, trucks – in between.

          “The US has a much smaller model range. For example, they have no
          four-cylinder engine versions available in the C-Class and E-Class and
          have no A-Class or B-Class models.”

          Porsche Australia spokesman Paul Ellis mirrors what McCarthy outlines.
          He says there’s “about $100,000″ in taxes in the Carrera S.

          “The luxury-car tax is a high-end tax that’s only applied to cars,” he
          says. “It’s not on yachts, jewellery or electronics – just cars – and I
          think that’s because the government sees the car industry as a soft
          touch.

          “The Australian Government imposes more taxes on luxury cars than any
          other economically established and mature market in the world.”

          Ellis says that’s not all. He says that what we get in Australia is a
          far, far better product than the Americans. “In the US you basically get
          a cardboard box and steering wheel for your $88,800,” he says. “Our
          cars have a much, much higher level of standard equipment.”

          McCarthy agrees saying the S-Class, for example, for Australia is the best-specced model in the world.

          Ellis adds that buying power is a big contributor to the cheap US
          prices. “The US sells 30 times the number of Porsches we do,” he says.

          “So it can ask – and get – a better buying price from the factory.
          “Then there’s market positioning. The 911 rivals are relatively more
          affordable in the US. You have to price your car in and around your
          competitors or you don’t get on buyers’ shopping lists.”

          The price differences also comes down to what people can afford. We did
          a check of average wages in Australia and compared them to the US.

          Surprisingly, relative to the US wages, we are paid more. The
          average yearly earnings in Australia for 2010 was $56,950. In the US, it
          was $46,326.

          • Oliver Cromwell

            man i am going to copy and paste that EVERYTIME i hear somebody moan about the differences in car price, which as most of us know, is everytime a new article/review is posted.

            One thing should also be mentioned, imported cars are so expensive here because our government employs a protectionist regime over our inefficient car manufacturing industry. They do it to protect jobs in these areas because if we could buy imported cars cheaper (which we could if they removed the taxes/tariffs) then nobody would buy the crap we build here.

          • Smart US

             are you taking pi$$ on us mate??? “Evoque in Canada base model $47000, base model in US, $44000, base model in Oz $50000″ where does your math comes from – dodgy swindlers school or rip your mate off and he gladly buys you a beer??? shame on your standards mate

        • Daniel

          I just had a look and the Evoque you get in the US for $44,000 has the turbo charged petrol engine that I have seen here for no less than $75,000 before on roads. That’s not twice the price, but it’s still a lot more. And Porsche don’t sell many Caymans, Land Rover sell a huge amount of Evoques. I don’t know official figures, but I would guess Porsche Australia are selling somewhere between 50-100 a year, maybe less maybe more, but even if they were selling 500 it would still be costing them a reasonable amount to keep it here and that has to be offset somehow. If you think Porsche should be taken to task about it, you should probably go and do some proper research and compile a list of companies that should be taken to you task for your reasoning, because I guarantee it will be longer than just Porsche. 

          • F1MotoGP

             Porsche sold in March 88 in Australia. USA monthly figures I do not have but 1Q for 2012 is 7159 that is average 2386  months which is 2712% more.

          • Quasimofo

            How many more cars do you think would seel in Australia if we paid the same price as they do in the US though?

            Let’s compare per capita

            US = 300 million people
            Aus = 30

            Month to Quarter
            88 * 3 = 264

            Population to Population
            264 * 10 = 2640

            Now price is a little more difficult, but let’s just say for the sake of argument that if we paid what they do in the US, double the cars would seel in Australia (my instinct is it would be more than that), but we’ll stick with half.

            2640 * 2 = 5280

            So 5280 Porsches sold in like terms.

            (7159/5280) – 1 = 35% more cars sold in the US when comparing like to like. This isn’t even considering that there is a much larger market for $60k cars than $130k.

            Don’t really have a point, just saying when making comparisons, make them on like terms or it’s pointless.

            Cheers

        • Tomasz

          You’re such a loser Des.
          This argument comes up whenever a German car is reviewed…even though most manufacturers are doing it….& Apple too, among many.
          It’s been explained many many times but you just have to keep whining about it. That’s a loser in anyones language.
          Btw, did you make the same comments for the Jag that costs 200k?
          Thought not. Maybe you’re a racist loser.

          • Des KSA

            Fcuk off Tomasz. What have I done to you? Do you work for Porsche or Merc. Crawl back in your hole. 

      • Jerome S

        Population has nothing to do with it anymore, all the cars are built in the same factories and shipped out to each country. It doesnt matter where the ships go in the world the cost is basically the same to deliver. 

        • Tomasz

          That’s just plain ignorant Jerome.
          Have you heard of Sales Volume ?
          Spreading various costs over 10,000 cars will mean much less per car than if the spread is 100 vehicles.
          Also, get some perspective. The cheapest entry into the Ferrari “Club” is about half a million, & Porsche is about 100 grand….& the losers are still complaining.

    • Henry

      Can say that about any brand..no?

  • JJ

    A business will sell a product for as much as it can get away with. Businesses do not exist to make customers happy, despite what they tell you. They exist to make money. All prestige brands in this country have no problem selling cars at hugely inflated prices, so why should they stop? To make less profit? Out of some altruistic motivation to satisfy people who in reality couldn’t afford these cars even if they were half their current price?

    The only way prices will come down is if the entire market for these cars collectively revolts and just says ‘nope, we’re never buying again at these prices’. That would force prices down.

    Will that ever happen?  

    No.

    The only realistic way to achieve a marginal price reduction is to force the government’s hand through voter pressure and lobbying to remove the LCT and reduce other taxes on cars.

    In these green obsessed times, will that happen?

    No.

    Conclusion – Cars will always be a rip off in this country. Deal with it or move somewhere else.

    It’s harsh, but its reality.

    • bd

      About a year or so ago, BMW and the other German makes cut their prices (still pretty huge margins) for the Korean market and sales increased.

      All the arguments about higher prices in Australia also applies to Korea, but make no mistake about it, a big, big reason for such a huge price differential is the huge profit margins.

      With the FTA, imported European luxury goods should be cheaper in Korea, but instead of passing on the savings to consumers, the luxury brands just raised their prices.

      Why?   B/c they know they could get away with it b/c people would still buy their (overpriced) wares.

    • John

      jj, recently the bmw 5gt dropped siginifcantly in price (>40k), no doubt due to a lack of sales. in addition bmw revised down the price of the new 3 series and merc lowered the entry of the e-class. therefore buyer resistance to purchasing does have an effect, esp when competitors deliver a good product at a lower price point ie IS350. Having said that the porsches options for $8690 is ridiculous. Thats almost the cost of a new car ie proton s16. At the end of the day businesses will charge what the consumer will bear. only competition and buyer resistance will result in lower prices, so keep on resisting.

    • Legnab

      Absolutely correct JJ , old marketing saying , SELL AT THE PRICE THE MARKET WILL BEAR ” ,and that applies to hamburgers , toothpaste and cars .

      Travel to eastern europe and then you realise we are slaughted on groceries just like cars , we are a high earning economy , so we pay through taxes etc etc .

      If you dont like the price of a porsche , go buy a kia rio , oh no their cheaper in the US , well buy a crummerdore .

  • Igomi Watabi

    I have to say, the one thing for which the Cayman cops most criticism is what I like most about it – the styling. I love the Cayman and woiuld have one in a flash if I could afford it.

    In unrelated comment, when are we going to stop getting whingers banging on in EVERY blog about imported cars, about the cost of cars in Australia. We all know they’re more expensive here, we’ve all heard the reasons why. Just. Please. Stop.

  • Roadtard

    Too right, IW.  On both counts.

  • Acfsambo

    This would be a great ‘weekend car’. Don’t think I could have such a small car for everyday use (need more seats a lot of the time).

    And on price, they only charge the prices we will pay.

    To clear things up, ‘European’ cars are more expensive for a few reasons (not just we pay more).
    First, different regulations they have to meet compared to EU and USA, therefore a slightly higher cost for development to be shared with a lot less cars that the EU or USA ones. Secondly, Merc and BMW and that need full service and support across Aus, which is a lot of manpower. Also should only have a small increase in price. 

    In saying all of that, both sides of the argument are valid but not complete. We should pay more but not as much as we are paying. The sad thing is people will pay it.

  • Tony

    why now review this when we are 3 minutes away from the all new model???

    As for pricing, if people stopped buying it in Australia due to the relative rip off, the prices would have to come down… power is in our hands.

  • john

    The only thing I don’t like about the cayman is that porsche (IMO) deliberately hold back the cayman to give the base model 911 breathing space. The cayman has perfect balance. A german tuner did a twin turbo 911 engine conversion in a cayman which was reviewed in EVO mag around 3 years ago and the only negative was that porsche would not build this car, because this is what the cayman should have been all along. The 911 has a physics problem that porsche has managed through their brilliance to almost overcome completely. The cayman suffers no such problem and can be alot better if porsche would allow it!

  • Guest

    i got a 370z… yay.

  • Dominique Vøn Hütch

    F1MotoGP has copy and pasted it a few times already on this site whenever the debate sparks up – or at least other ppl have.  It is a pretty good general yet specific assessment of the two markets.