Comments on: Honda Civic Type-R Confirmed for Australia

By: Andie

Andie — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:30:18 +0000

Sorry, I amnot your car user, but happend to find my 10-year-lost-contact friend who post his message in this website. His name is Bill Streat. I remember every word he shared with me, about his car, his GTRs, like a monster,etc.

Could you please forward my email address(andie.meng@cn.fortis.com) to him and ask him to contact me?

Thanks from China,

Andie

By: Bill Streat

Bill Streat — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:29:43 +0000

I have read all the literature on the Civic Type-R and, compared to most reviews of other cars,the responses to this car are almost unanimously positive. Rarely does this happen. The most severe critique came from a reviewer who got into a lather because the Type-R could not match the torque curve of the turbo-assisted opposition. As has been said, if you want that sort of power you have those other options. Previously, as the owner of two Nissan R32 GTRs, I have had a good sense of the thrill of turbo power but, traditionally, motoring afficiandos have rejoiced in the inspired engineering and subtelty of naturally aspirated sports cars (eg, the first MR2). In this sense the Type-R fits the bill coupled with its modern safety features. Anyway, who could/should be thrashing a car around public streets. I am buying the Type-R.

By: Mark Chapman Smith

Mark Chapman Smith — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:15:08 +0000

Would be my weapon of choice at the upcoming 12 hour Production Car Race in early 2008.
Would hammer the mountain all day and probably do real well on fuel burn and probably go all the way on it’s brakes.
Now if Honda will hand out one to find out, imagine the positve sales results the day after, just like the good old days of Bathurst.
But then again, this is a modern Corporate entity probably chocked full of accountants and trend setter caffine sippers who don’t know anything, especially Australian Motor Sport tradition.
Prospective sponsors can call 0410687600, probably have to buy one.
Mark Chapman Smith

By: Ape

Ape — Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:25:13 +0000

I wasn’t sure from the photos, but I’ve just seen a black one “in the flesh”. Absolutely stunning! I’m seriously thinking of buying one now.

By: Psymon

Psymon — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:06:10 +0000

Best looking car I have ever seen, all the people who hate it are afraid of change!

By: Honda

Honda — Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:29:30 +0000

common guys, they made an effort to design something unique that none other car has, yes the back is too F***big but hey u cant blame them, read the specifications, read what they put in the rear, they dont have independent rear suspention, they have a torsion bar, therfore they need extra space,

second they design the car to be also aero dynamic, its not all about the looks. When you sit in a car its all about the drive, stability, confort, handling, and also revving power. None other car can have all these, and honda did do an exectional good job.

I bet you 1million dollers you cant even design a small model car. So why are you people saying it is shit, while honda and the design team spent how many donkey years to design this car.

If Honda did make a turbo car, it would be like every other freaking turbo car!!!!, so what would be a difference anymore?

Honda wants to be unique, honda engine last longer than any other engine, part wise body wise, and everything else, u pay ur buck and that is what u get.

High reving power meaning u can hear ur car scream and everyone else around u.

You want turbo get one but u cant rev that to its tits because the head gasket will blow, piston would be flying and hell you would need to recon ur engine..now ask urself would u want that or not..and be happy to rev honda’s new type r’s tits off…

By: b.slade

b.slade — Sat, 16 Jun 2007 20:33:13 +0000

ugly car with uglyy asss i agree with u mr harry….

By: b.slade

b.slade — Sat, 16 Jun 2007 20:30:35 +0000

likeee a yello shit with worms in it…….

By: ed

ed — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:54:50 +0000

Dw no one really likes the rear. But the optional rear skirt does seem to make it more bearable. Some parts of the rear i do like, but other parts just seem like too much of a gamble. But like people say, dont be too sure until you see it in the flesh. This car has already changed the opinion of a lot people who dislike.

Also, it’d be nice if people would stop comparing the CTR to cars which have more cylinders under the bonnet or forced-induction. Honda IS claiming that its fast, but theyre not saying its the fastest or anything. The main reason why they want you to buy one is because they say its a really good drive. Thats it. Wanna go faster? get another car. Honda isnt trying to trick anyone into believing its faster than the other hot hatches with over 200bhp. At the end of the day, going fast isnt everything. If it is to you, then just accept that people drive cars for different reasons.

For some people, revving the guts out of a car is fun. Which other car lets you do that? I say, good on Honda for being different and giving people something new. Turbo-chargers and bigger engines are great, but so many hot hatches have them now. Whats the point in another?

Thats why im so sure on this car that ive already bought one. Even though i dont know the exact price.

By: Paul

Paul — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 23:23:15 +0000

Ive seen shots of the interior and it is very niiiice… certainly looks good for a Civic. And Im not disputing its credentials, if Integras are anything to go off it will be a agile little car. But for me and Im sure some others the looks aernt my thing, mainly the rear. In the cars defence, Im not really a hatchback fan.