2009 Aston Martin V8 Vantage Coupe Review
October 3, 2008 by Anthony Crawford
Anyone who’s had a peep inside the DBS will immediately recognise the centre console in the new Vantage, which includes the controversial Emotional Control Unit or key replacement that I happen to like.
On the way back to Sydney with the car to myself, I hooked up my Nano to the integrated iPod connection that sits inside the centre console box, a welcome new addition (believe it or not), which runs through the optional Alpine 700W unit, wow!
Before I tell you how good this thing sounds, I have never met anyone from Alpine or exchanged brown paper bags or bank accounts.
The sheer power and clarity of this unit is mesmerising times ten. From Newton Falkner to Nelly and everything in between, this system is faultless at any volume.
I’m told the standard 160W unit does the job but please, ignore that advice and get the dealer to remove and replace it with extreme prejudice.
As with all Astons, the Vantage is essentially hand made using bespoke craftsmanship and materials. It shows, in the volume of hand-stitched leather throughout the cabin.
I had forgotten just how much luggage space there was in the Vantage.
While I can quote the specs at 300 litres boot capacity, practically, there was space for four soft bags, camera equipment and a small Esky, and that’s without utilizing the considerable shelf space behind the driver and passenger seats.
The factory specs quote a combined fuel consumption of 13.9-litres/100kms – that may be right but I don’t care, neither will anyone else putting down $258,737 (RRP).
“More power, more torque, this is the Vantage that will convert you”
CarAdvice Overall Rating: 
How does it Drive:
How does it Look:
How does it Go:
• Engine: front-mid 4.7-litre, alloy V8, quad camshaft, 32-valve with dry sump lubrication
• Power: 313kW @ 7000 rpm
• Torque: 470Nm @ 5750 rpm
• Transmission: Six-speed manual
• Brakes: Four-pot ventilated grooved rotors with ABS, EBD & EBA
• Driven Wheels: Rear
• Weight: 1630kg
• 0-100km/h: 4.8 seconds (claimed)
• Top Speed: 290km/h
• Fuel Type: 98RON petrol
• Fuel Tank: 80-litres
• Fuel Consumption: 13.9-litres/100kms (Combined)
• Safety: DSC, TC, Dual stage driver and passenger airbags, side airbags, Tyre pressure monitoring
• Turning Circle: 11.1m
• CO2 Emissions: 328g/km
• Wheels/tyres: Front: 19-inch, 235/40ZR19
Rear: 19-inch, 275/35ZR19
wonderful review guys
sounds delicious, consider me jealous, now back to my 4pot civic :(
Awesome stuff! Well written review on a brilliant, unpretentious and supremely capable car. Now if only I could win lotto.
Frankly, being very pretty and having a shiny badge doesn’t really do it for me. Give me a R35 Skyline and I still have $100 000 left for another set of wheels.
But thats me :D
I suppose at least,it’s a worthy alternative to the Porsche 911.
As for Tim’s R35 remark-I have a feeling that will be said quite a lot when reviewing high performance cars. ;)
Are you really comparing a Nissan to an Aston Martin
Really?
As a pleb with no money, I’d pick the Nissan and save myself a tonne of interest. It is all about the go.
But if I seriously had $150,000 to blow on a GT-R I’d probably be looking at the Aston.
The beauty of the thing, plus the horny sound track, has surely got to be worth the extra coin if you’ve got that much to spend on a car in the first place.
Despite the fact that the R35 GT-R is undoubtedly an awesome technologically advanced piece of automotive engineeering… there isn’t a 4-5 year waiting list for the Nissan which gives you an idea which one is more popular.
Yeah, I’m a massive fan of the GTR, but there is no way I’d choose it over the Vantage.
Insanely beautiful car, makes Ferraris and Lambo look bulky and ugly.
would put my order in now if I could, but that ain’t happening unless I win lotto, then this would be parked right next to a Gallardo.
We sell them , i love them, it’s my dream car mine would be yellow … oh well, of to the newsagent to buy another ticket.
Can someone pass the tissues :-)
Always been one of (if not) the nicest cars in the world.
And humbly might I suggest that if you were to honestly choose the Nissan over the Aston, then you honestly don’t understand the Aston. They are not a race car tuned for the road they are the “Creme de la Creme” of road cars.
OMG, if Angelina Jolie had wheels, she would look like that
vantage is pure class
I have wood, just looking at the pics. ASTON MARTIN, I just want one.
love this car! and give me the proper 6sp manual box please.. Im sick of you guys going on about clutchless manuals!! NO THANKS give me the proper manual anydAY, THE auto versions are for lazy fat cats who buy these cars for looks not for driving…
I have to say the R35 GTR is an amazing car enspecialy for that price. But come on for a car that looks that good, sounds that breath taking and goes fast enough. And with a badge like Aston Martin, my heart tells me to spend to spend an extra $100,000 which is slower. Though common sense doesn’t.
The problem with the GTR is that they come from the same company that makes bluebirds. And its not that good looking either. Its been designed with the wind tunnel in mind where as the Aston is designed by the heart and James Bond drives an Aston. You choose boys
The Vantage and GTR are in different leagues. The GTR may be fantastic to drive but dont forget this – GTRs will be EVERYWHERE! Theyre not expensive. Youll still only see a few vantages around. Id buy the AM and seriously may even try to.
Absolutely gorgeous. A second or so slower to 100kph wont worry you in one of these – you’ve got nothing to prove so you’re not going to hit the track or race from lights. I’d take the XKR over it, being a family man and all – similar shape (front not as nice), but the rear seat would get it past the missus. Inferior car, maybe, but at least no-ones going to think you are a James Bond wannabee. I’ll have to leave the Aston to you single guys (sob!).
Wow Vfacts says 82 of these were sold so far this year compared to 312 Porsche 911’s.
Some people must be really brave and think with their heart instead of their head. Well done i respect that.
Stupid, but i respect it…
Well done Aston for burning all those people who paid for the 4.3 and lost a huge amount with the 4.7 brought out.
Those that dont upgrade, wont be back..
“Well done Aston for burning all those people who paid for the 4.3 and lost a huge amount with the 4.7 brought out.
Those that dont upgrade, wont be back..”
So DanMan, car manufacturers shouldn’t upgrade and improve their car because people already bought it? It’s like buying any other car. It will eventually be upgraded or replaced with a better one…
sigh.
Not when you only change the engine no. Not after only three years no.not when a car is 240k on the road, no.
Not after the confusion after the ford sale, no.
Millionaires dont like to be stuffed around IMO.
Beautiful car. It’s an automotive sculpture. This beast isn’t about performance numbers, it’s about HOW it produces them. It’s class, pure masculinity and attitude on wheels.
Putting Nissan in the same sentence is sacrilege! :)
Precisely Gift-Ed.
Why are these nobs comparing a nissan with this. Fools.
Buy this for street cred and absolute pleaseure of owning one of the most credible makes of car available, buy the Datsun if you want to go fast round a track.
I hope you blew a set of tyres in that thing
Shaken not stirred or what, just look at the lines. Let me say even better looking in real. As for the Nissan, called Godzilla becacause it looks like Godzilla.
Nothing compares to this, this is the epitome of what a car should be. This car makes me cry that i don’t have a bigger pay packet.
R35, good car, but, different league. You’ll be able to pick one up in 10 years for 30k. Not so the Aston.
When is the full video test being posted?
Does look the business does/nt it?
It’s only 911 money, don’t be a sheep and buy this instead!
Cheers,
F-0