Hyundai Santa Fe Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Hyundai Santa Fe Review

HYUNDAI SANTA FE

Pros: Looks, four-cylinder turbo engine, interior quality, build quality, expected levels of standard kit, seven seat availability

Cons: Niggling issues with gearbox hesitation

By Alborz Fallah
FIND DEALS

Our Rating:  

The all-new Hyundai Santa Fe is set to go on sale in Australia towards the end of 2012 amid huge demand from the North American and Korean markets.

The third-generation Santa Fe continues Hyundai’s presence in the mid-sized SUV segment with an entirely new look that brings the model in line with the company’s current fluidic sculpture design philosophy.

From the outside the new Hyundai Santa Fe shares little in its looks with the outgoing model. In fact, if it wasn’t for the badge you’d find it hard to pick it as a new SUV.

The bold front grille, sharp lines and overall edgy design portray a very contemporary look – something we’ve come to expect from the Koreans.

Given North America is the Santa Fe’s main market, the design work was carried out by the company’s US design centre in collaboration with head office in Seoul. The interior has also seen vast improvements with soft-touch plastics around the dashboard and doors as well as coherent multi-tone textures that uplift the overall cabin ambience. Attention to detail is evident throughout the cabin with simple things such as hexagonal air-conditioning vents and power-window switches that emphasise the overall design theme.

Korean-built Santa Fe models destined for the Australian market will be available with seven seats on the standard wheelbase. The North American market gets a long-wheelbase seven-seat variant built in the company’s Alabama plant, although this model will not come to Australia as it is available in left-hand-drive only.

CarAdvice attended an early drive program of a pre-production Santa Fe at Hyundai’s research and development centre in Namyang, South Korea. The single pre-production vehicle made use of a 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbocharged engine coupled to a six-speed automatic transmission.

Built on an entirely new platform, the new Hyundai Santa Fe is produced globally with a range of one diesel and three petrol engines. It’s still unclear whether Australia will get access to all powertrains but it seems likely that the 2.4-litre naturally aspirated petrol and 2.2-litre turbodiesel will be available at launch. The 2.0-litre turbo may also be available for our market (particularly since we were given a chance to drive it), although it is likely to face similar engineering challenges as those that have kept the i45 turbo (which uses the same engine) out of Australia and in left-hand-drive markets only. Hyundai Australia declined to shed any light on the 2.0-litre turbo’s prospects for the Australian market.

Our turbo test car produced 197kW of power and 365Nm of torque, which resulted in a respectable 0-100km/h time of 8.2 seconds. Floor the accelerator pedal and the Santa Fe moves with ease. There’s no noticeable turbo lag as you go through the rev range but we did feel the gearbox hesitating at times and also noticed that it would override the gear selector if left in manual mode. These may be quirks of the pre-production mode, but either way it’s refined, quite inside and smooth in its acceleration.

Although the pre-production model had none of the local tuning we expect for the SUV when it hits Australia dealerships, it’s fair to say the steering feel is more dynamic than the model it replaces. There’s a feeling of over assistance and lightness, but that seems to be a desired feature for vehicles in this segment, as it makes parking and maneuvering an easier task. In some markets the Santa Fe will be available with a flex-steer system that allows the driver to change between three different driving modes which also alter steering feel. It’s currently unclear if Australia will get this feature, but we suspect that it will.

Our test car was equipped with satellite navigation, digital radio and a panoramic glass sunroof. Australian models are more than likely to gain standard satellite navigation on the mid- and high-spec variants and we suspect Hyundai will add a reversing camera as standard equipment across the range (given it’s available in the significantly cheaper Veloster).

On the interior side of things, the new Santa Fe can handle five adults without too much hassle. There’s plenty of leg room and headroom in the first two rows while the third row will be best suited to children or infants.

As for safety, the new Santa Fe is equipped with seven airbags and all the usual active safety features such as electric stability control (ESC). No official safety ratings have been released yet but given the company’s safety track record, we suspect it is very likely to achieve a five-star rating.

Official timing, pricing and specifications for the new Hyundai Santa Fe are still unconfirmed but Hyundai Australia is committed to bringing the vehicle to market before the year’s end.


 

Owner reviews of the HYUNDAI SANTA FE

Write a review for the HYUNDAI SANTA FE

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.
Add a New Review

  • Damian

    I hope Hyundai price this right (below $50k for the flagship turbo-diesel).  They’ll sell like hot cakes!

    • Sumpguard

      I’d expect it to be closer to mid $50′s for the top spec version. Otherwise it will compete with the ix35 highlander diesel.

       

  • Shak

    IMO a much better looking car than the ix35 and also the old Santa Fe.

  • Just

    The interior looks so much better with the darker tones.

  • massi

    It looks a bit Kia

    • Stevesss

       agree

  • Hans

    Looks just like a Q7!

  • Weatherbey

    I like it. Looks like my Q5. At least on the outside, particularly the back.

    • D987

       I was thinking the same thing, those taillights are very Audi like.

  • Hyun

    Looks like a Hyundai

    • Sumpguard

         Agreed ands that’s a good thing. 

      • Don Quay

        Not necessarily, some current models are pretty crook to look at.

        • Sumpguard

          …and some aren’t.  The Oz version of this is well styled, Elantra and i40 a very well done so is the next gen i30.

              Most brands have their duds. Mazda’s CX5 is ordinary at best. Very disappointing!!  The smiley face on some of their other cars is garb too to my eyes and the mazda 2 sedan simply woeful at the rear. I do still like the mazda 6 though.

              Meanwhile over at subaru they sent their stylist to the funny farm!

              Ford’s focus is poorly done all round.

              Thankfully this household’s chosen brand is doing very well on the style front of late! Bring on the Santa Fe !!

          • Richard Allen

            Hyundai in the garage, tiger print doona on the bed and dogs playing snooker on the wall?  Have you got an LG surround sound system too?

          • Stevo

            I think that Hyundai just suffers a lack of driveway credibility, due to their humble origins and deribative styling, particularly in the leafy eastern suburbs.  However, I would rather be seen driving a Hyundai than to have to listen to a crappy LG surround sound system each night.  Presumably Sumpguard tells anyone who will listen about the sheer beauty of his silver plastic and alumium bodied speakers.

          • Kia Fan

            Best thing about Hyundai styling is that it enables KIa to take a butt ugly car and then make it look good!

          • Don Quay

            See my post below regarding the good and the bad looking Hyundais, though I think the i40 looks too much like the i45 to be attractive. Never seen a new Elantra on the road, is anyone buying them? I think the ad for them is very strange, it seems to say the car is big on the outside and small on the inside, sort of like a reverse Tardis.

            I never mentioned any other brands, but since you’ve asked. I really can’t agree with you on the Mazdas. I think the 2 serves its demographic very well, they seem to love them and the looks. The rear looks like a cat’s face you know, which must be some Japanese – Hello Kitty thing I guess. From personal experience, I can assure you they are a great drive, better than any Hyundai, Kia or Toyota and are absolutely bullet proof for reliability. The CX5 is perhaps a little heavy with the grille, but i could live with it. The interior is excellent, very roomy for 4 adults. I actually took one for a test drive last weekend as I am due to get a new car later in the year and it drives very well, steering, ride, features and comfort are first class and the petrol engine is more than adequate, better than I expected from the impression you’d get from the reviews.

            I don’t mind the Focus at all, not my favourite, but it is quite OK and they are apparently sensational to drive, the benchmark for the class.

            Subaru? Well I guess you can say they are better looking than SSSSangYYYongs, but they’re not as good value anymore and the quality of the interiors has certainly gone down.

  • Crx

    An ex-owner of the Sonata 2.0t. It is a nice car, but the car was hyped up, sales of the 2.0t are have been less than expected..

    But the main problem with that car was that it was way too hard on the gas, poor mpg and the it was too harsh and noisy

    From what I have heard with the local dealership is that Hyundai will be dropping the 2.0t and will be adopting the 3.3L V6 GDI for next sonata

  • MisterZed

    Too much ugly grey plastic cladding around the wheel arches, bottom of rear bumper, bottom of doors etc.  If it were fully body colour coded it would look 100% better.

    • Labrys

      I kind of have to agree with you there.

      I think it would work better with a full body colour.
      Having said that it is useful have that cladding when you are taking on some less then great roads.

  • Aap

    Driven both V6 & diesel Santa FE..

    I’d choose the V6..

    But the the Kluger V6 is better..

    • Johnson

      Shame the Kluger was designed by a blind bonobo

      • Martin

        Well put :o )

  • Ectomorphian

     ”The 2.0-litre turbo may also be available for our market… …although it is likely to face similar engineering challenges as those that have kept the i45 turbo (which uses the same engine) out of Australia and in left-hand-drive markets only.”
    Bull crap. I don’t know the ins and outs of this issue, but using the excuse “engineering challenges”? After developing your own transmissions in-house, direct-injection tech, and claiming to be tougher on yourselves than no one else, that’s the sole, singular reason you can’t get that motor down here? Stop making excuses and JUST BRING IT HERE. You’re better than that Hyundai.

    /end rant.

  • save it for the track

    Not everyone wants or needs seven seats in a medium/large SUV/4wd. All SUV/4wd manufaturers who are now only providing seven seats should offer a model with only five. With the under floor space that then provides to be used for wet storage or other storage. Other than that, shape wise, it looks lika an evolution of the current Santa Fe, even the a/c vents are simarlily positioned (in the front anyway), with a slightly different shape. Are the second row a/c vents on the B-pillars(like the current model), and does the third row have a/c. Also is the a/c dual zone or tri-zone (if 3rd row has vents)? If it has side curtain airbags do they extend to the third row?

  • Don Quay

    For a test drive it is very curious that there is not a single mention about the ride, steering, handling, braking or any other aspect of the driving experience. Did you just stand around and look at it and read the press kit they gave you? I think this was the same trip that other journos have written about where the test drive was as a passenger along a 2km straight without any hills, bends or dips. I’m not sure what this says about Hyundai’s confidence in the car’s performance, but I am sure the trip didn’t have much purpose as a test drive.

    Mind you, except for the grill, it is much better looking the usual horrors Hyundai have released in the past, particularly when compared to the i45, i20 and the iX35.

    • Theta

      Usual CarAdvice review about Hyundai/Kia. A subtle form of advertising rather than an inquisitive review. Check John Cadogan’s association with Hyundai and you’ll understand why these articles about Hyundai are so similar.

      At least other sites make an effort. Like Don says, this is just regurgitated press release.

  • jordan

    anyone else see ford ecosport in that front??????? though i think hyundai have done a better job

  • Sydlocal

    Whilst not trying to make excuses for them it could be due to things like engine/transmission placement and pipe/exhaust plumbing etc. There may not be enough clearance/room for things like the steering rack and brake master cyl to be moved to the right hand side of the firewall for RHD applications. Exhaust routing/turbo positioning (likely in this case) etc may also do the same. This has been an issue for quite a few LHD only cars when RHD markets request them.

  • neutralman

    Summing from other forums … Design and the look is there, so are safety features, but the niggling issues with build quality and frequent equipment failures seem to bug Hyundai/Kia SUVs. 55K for Hyundai SUV (however much they have improved) – sees them in Pajero Prado territory.

  • Bryan

    I wonder why more manufacturers don’t offer their compact four wheel drives with a low range transmission?  At the moment Suzuki seems to have that corner of the market all to themselves.  Some of these vehicles are surprisingly capable off road already but a good set of reduction gears would improve them beyond what an electromagnetic center diff and traction control can do.

    And not to buy into the above argument but I quite like the look of this one.

  • Coldcarib8

    Ravi

    Please let the dealership in Trindad and Tobago West Indies keep the price affordable I am currently the owner of a 2007 Tucson good performance want to upgrade to the New Santa Fe the current model in disel cost about $52,000.00 USD