blog counter

2009 Nissan GT-R review

October 16, 2008 by Karl Peskett  

2009 Nissan GT-R review & road test

gtrheadershot.jpg

 Model Tested:

  • 2009 Nissan R35 GT-R – Black Edition from $152,990

Options:

  • None fitted

plus.jpg Everything. Power, Braking, Handling, Quality, Comfort, the lot

minus.jpg Rear seats a bit cramped

CarAdvice Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif

- Review by Karl Peskett - Photography by Tom Jakovljevic

It’s 5:30pm on a Friday afternoon and I get a call on my mobile.

“Hey Karl, what are you up to?”

“Oh, anything and everything,” was my reply.

“It’s Friday afternoon, mate, you can’t pull that one on me.” Steve Jones is a perceptive young man.

“I was just talking about life in general mate. It’s been pretty busy, lately”, I said. Little did I know, it was about to get even busier.

“Aren’t we all”, said Jones. Continuing with barely a pause for thought, he lets go of the big one. “So, I hear you’d like to drive a GT-R.”

All of a sudden, in the time it took for my synapses to register that statement, my plans for that week changed. I had a clean slate. “When did you want to get together for it?” Jones asked.

gtrgtrbadge.jpg

No one would give up a chance to go along with Steve Jones, who, along with his navigator, Ruari Sauter-Dawson, recently won the 2008 Quit TargaWest tarmac rally in Perth. Working for Fabcar, a dealership in Perth that imports GT-Rs for private buyers, Jones is possibly the best qualified person in Australia to run us through the capabilities of a GT-R.

With that, we booked ourselves a time and a place.

gtrdriveridstickers.jpg

Jones suggested that the best place to test Nissan’s latest and greatest car, was the very spot that its mettle was tested. A TargaWest stage? There couldn’t be a better location. As they say on Millionare, “Lock it in, Eddie.”

There was a problem looming though. The period we had set for the drive coincided with a gloomy weather forecast. The prediction was showers, with an afternoon thunderstorm risk. Perfect, if you’re wanting to test out grip levels in the wet.

gtrdatsunracing.jpg

However, on a road where rocks, trees and branches are being cleared by only centimetres, and in a car that costs more than $180,000, and goes from 0-100km/h in just 3.5 seconds, sitting on what can only be described as loose bitumen – well, let’s say we weren’t too keen to add water to the equation.

Next page…

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Tags:
Related Articles:
  • 2011 Nissan Micra revealed – Geneva 2010- As we previously mentioned Nissan’s all-new B-segment mini...
  • Nissan to release electric SUV next month – report- According to a report published in Japan's Best...
  • 2009 Nissan Pathfinder facelift spied- The next Nissan Pathfinder has been spied out...
  • 2010 Nissan Dualis spy photos- Joining our spy photos gallery this morning comes...
  • Nissan GT-R coming to Australia?- It was only 2 days ago I was...
  • Comments

    43 Responses to “2009 Nissan GT-R review”
    1. +2 Vote -1 Vote +1BOSSCR
      says:

      *** Primo ***

      I JUST WANT ONE!

      Or would I get a W427….? It’s a tough one!

    2. My word is Datsun .. love it.

      Just like the car. Its an absolute pleasure to be ever so slightly involved in bringing this extraoridnary car to the public.

      TJ.

    3. Vote -1 Vote +1Jared J
      says:

      Why no pics of the standard car? I know we’ve seen them all before, but it just looks like all you drove was a caged-up racer with bucket seats – not really something most of us are likely to ever get our butts into.

    4. Vote -1 Vote +1Sam
      says:

      Can we please stop calling it R-35. Its a Nissan GT-R. No Skyline, no R-35. Thanks. Oh, and I also would do anything to own one. Sorry kids, no Christmas presents this year,or next year, daddy is buying us all a new car. I’ll have to borrow my mates M3 so I can drive it do the dealership and pose as a buyer looking for a test drive. hehe.

    5. Vote -1 Vote +1Tom
      says:

      Sam, Nissan themselves call this the R35

      And you are making your judgment from a modified race version?

    6. Vote -1 Vote +1pious
      says:

      “rear seats a bit cramped” is the understatement of the century. I checked one out in Kyoto in March, and there was barely a handwidth between front and back. Crueled it for me, unfortunately.

    7. Vote -1 Vote +1Gavin
      says:

      CarAdvice, possibly the best story I have read on your site… I’ve read just about every article for the last 2 years and this would top the lot!

      Journalism, and writing to challenge any Wheels article. Tops job!

      “…keyless start fob is straight from the Maxima.” Bahaha!

    8. Vote -1 Vote +1Sam
      says:

      Acutally Tom, if you go the Nissan website there is no mention of R-35. Its just GT-R.

    9. Vote -1 Vote +1Sam
      says:

      Actually, oops

    10. Jared, the ownwer of the standard one is nice enough to allow us to sample their GTR which they have spent considerable money on getting into the country.

      His wishes were that no pictures were taken of the car, so they must be respected.

    11. Vote -1 Vote +1Tom
      says:

      Sam, the chassis code is CBA-R35. She is definitely a r35.

    12. Vote -1 Vote +1Tom
      says:

      I don’t think its fair to give it 4 and a half stars on looks either.

    13. Vote -1 Vote +1Tony
      says:

      Awesome work guys

    14. Vote -1 Vote +1Mitch
      says:

      rear seats a bit cramped, i dont think you buy it for the rear seat room

    15. Vote -1 Vote +1Wispy
      says:

      i gota family and 8 kids so the rere seat importnt to me so instead i bought kia carnval after much thout

    16. Vote -1 Vote +1Sam
      says:

      Chassis code? OK I stand corrected, but still, its name just GT-R right? Have Nissan dropped the skyline name plate all together? Perhaps they offer a different sports car offering to revive the name?

    17. Vote -1 Vote +1zahmad
      says:

      Damn!….Sam, the skyline coupe and sedan still exists in Japan+, its known as the infiniti g37/g35….

    18. Vote -1 Vote +1Sam
      says:

      Zahmad, thanks for confusing me further.
      What about in Australia where it matters….

    19. +1 Vote -1 Vote +1Tom Jakovljevic
      says:

      Zahmad – sorry to correct you.

      In Japan, the Skyline is now in the V35/V36/V37 coding’s – but still called a Nissan Skyline.

      In america they are known as G35 G36 etc and go by the Infiniti branding.

      Same car though.

      The Nissan R35 GTR has no mention of the word Skyline – it is not related by chasis, driveline or engine in any sort of way. The GTR is a unique car to Nissan.

    20. Vote -1 Vote +1acfsambo
      says:

      Sam, the last Skyline GT-R was called the R34, the one before it the R33. This one has just dropped the skyline name but is still the R35.

    21. Previously the GTR and Skyline GTST or GTT etc were build off the same platform.

      Chassis was a bad choice of word, my bad.

      Its hard to pretend to work and browse the internet mate!

    22. Vote -1 Vote +1jon
      says:

      If only the japs had a sense of style, this thing is ugly

    23. Vote -1 Vote +1Sam
      says:

      Thanks for the help Tom. I was aware of the r43 33 etc but was unsure given the lengthy delay between the R34 and the new R35 and the deletion of the Skyline name plate. Cheers.

    24. Vote -1 Vote +1Sam
      says:

      Thanks Acfsambo.

    25. Vote -1 Vote +1Fenno
      says:

      Get over it guys, “the chassis code is this, blah blah blah!”
      It’s Godzilla and nothing less!

    26. Vote -1 Vote +1O
      says:

      i love how the sides just finish and dont merge into the rear that sharp crease is so hot

    27. Vote -1 Vote +1SamR
      says:

      Great car but the price is not what you quote at $152,990.

      A friend wants to buy one and rang a couple of dealers and got quotes of “Delivery” fees up to $20,000 on top of the car price plus more for Govt charges etc.

    28. Vote -1 Vote +1technofreak
      says:

      Nissan…the most confusing manufacturer! to make so many completely crap ugly cars and then keep punching out beautiful beasts like the GTR…

      Love the Datsun stickers….if only I had one of my old 1600s still in the garage i would have to get me one ;)

    29. Vote -1 Vote +1jon
      says:

      Nissan…the most confusing manufacturer! to make so many completely crap ugly cars and then keep punching out beautiful beasts like the GTR

      take the beer glasses off technofreak its still ugly

    30. Vote -1 Vote +1Joober
      says:

      “This one has just dropped the skyline name but is still the R35.” – and the kept the traditional circular tailights :)

      Well all I can say recent emission laws (Kyoto??) in japan killed off the inline RB engines and hence such a delay in any next sports car otherwise they could have just tweaked it with technology as they come…, I think this goes with the 200sx sr20 as well.

      Great review, and an owesome car, can wait for tuner editions as well as the upper spec variants yet to come!. its gonna be great seeing Japanese Manufacturers release their supercars in near future!

    31. Vote -1 Vote +1Cupid Stunt aka No Name
      says:

      The one to have I guess, but not really suitable for the road in reality, not if you want to keep your licence anyway. I would imagine most will end up being raced.

    32. Vote -1 Vote +1Brian
      says:

      You know, my pedestrian Honda CBF1000 does 0-100kph in 3.5 secs. It only cost me $13,500 brand new in September this year. No car made is as agile. That’s where I get my wheeled thrills. I have a WM Caprice V8 for carting the family around and for my transport when it rains. Come to think of it a CBR1000RR is even quicker than my bike (3 secs or less) for only a grand or two extra. What’s all this fuss about being priviliged enough to afford $152K. Rocks in your head if you ask me!!! Where’s the accomplishment in that? Cheers, bikers!

    33. Vote -1 Vote +1Grant
      says:

      Oh boy, what a pathetic load of crap over the name….. ffs, its Godzilla, its awesome & shits over everything else around at the moment. Sure, it may not be the best looking car, but who cares….. function over form any day, and beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Japanese styled cars never look as good as the Euros, thats pretty much a given. You shouldnt be buying this thing to look good in anyway, you are buying it cos it is THE business. And to the bikers, yeah, rocks in your head when you crash as you got nothing between you and the road :)

    34. Vote -1 Vote +1Mt Evo
      says:

      That livery is disgusting, red,green etc…what were they thinking?? How to make a car look even uglier

    35. Vote -1 Vote +1Christopher
      says:

      I have yet to see one of these out on track or in competition use, this is a HUGE car by the way, yet reviewers and blogs such as yours keep talking about it like it’s a lotus elise!

      by the sounds of it, and everything I’ve read thus far, it sounds like an engineering marvel, ranking with the Bugatti Veyron perhaps in that respect?

      I haven’t heard it either yet, but in my opinion the RB series of engines that has been in this bloodline are some of the best sounding engines to of graced this planet, I’d say the RB20DET was the best. You can’t beat that straight six sound!

    36. Vote -1 Vote +1Hayzel
      says:

      You know, my pedestrian Honda CBF1000 does 0-100kph in 3.5 secs. It only cost me $13,500 brand new in September this year. No car made is as agile. That’s where I get my wheeled thrills. I have a WM Caprice V8 for carting the family around and for my transport when it rains. Come to think of it a CBR1000RR is even quicker than my bike (3 secs or less) for only a grand or two extra. What’s all this fuss about being priviliged enough to afford $152K. Rocks in your head if you ask me!!! Where’s the accomplishment in that? Cheers, bikers!

      ———————————————————–
      Just wait until you get hit by a car or have a crash (one hit kill no compromise)…maybe u’ll open ur eyes then……

    37. Vote -1 Vote +1Hayzel
      says:

      Oh btw I was quoting what brian wrote about bikes in earlier post..

    38. Vote -1 Vote +1Matrix
      says:

      “You know, my pedestrian Honda CBF1000 does 0-100kph in 3.5 secs. It only cost me $13,500 brand new in September this year. No car made is as agile. That’s where I get my wheeled thrills. I have a WM Caprice V8 for carting the family around and for my transport when it rains. Come to think of it a CBR1000RR is even quicker than my bike (3 secs or less) for only a grand or two extra. What’s all this fuss about being priviliged enough to afford $152K. Rocks in your head if you ask me!!! Where’s the accomplishment in that? Cheers, bikers!”

      You sound like an idiot!

    39. Vote -1 Vote +1pammie
      says:

      will get one soon

    40. Vote -1 Vote +1Nismo
      says:

      simply amazing car

    41. Vote -1 Vote +1Andy
      says:

      If you but this its not for the looks. Its cause the car is a monster, its for that moment when some arrogant european car driver pulls up next to you and wont give u a run cause you will leave them for dead even though thye might of spent 2 or 3 times more on the car. As for the bike post. Car drivers wont understand until they have been on a bike. No extra crap like brake assist or traction control. Just you, a motor and the road

    42. Vote -1 Vote +1Bobby Wilson
      says:

      Nice car,
      Well done Nissan……Far too exspensive for what it is!
      if Nissan sold it at 80K-100K they would have sold more and maybe even bring the badge “GTR” to the level where people can justify and see it as value for money and not just performance.

      The reality is still a Japanese car…..!

    Speak Your Mind

    Tell us what you're thinking...
    and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

    *
    To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
    Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word