Car Advice

2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Aspire

By David Twomey |

Mitsubishi has given Australian drivers moving out of petrol-hungry ‘big-six’ sedans something to aspire to, a more powerful, more luxurious version of its big-selling Lancer called, the Aspire.

lancer-front-2.jpg

-David Twomey

Announcing the new model today, Mitsubishi said the new Lancer Aspire was designed to widen the appeal of the Lancer range, which includes three well-equipped sedans and the giant-killing Lancer Evolution performance sedan, and bring a fresh level of prestige and performance to the small-car segment.
Mitsubishi isn’t just targeting the Large Car segment buyers who are moving into something more compact, they are also pitching the Lancer Aspire at the medium segment, pointing out that on performance and size, the Lancer is close to a lot of medium size cars, such as the Mazda6, Honda Accord Euro and Ford Mondeo.

lancer-side.jpg

Mitsubishi’s passenger vehicle product planning manager, Chris Maxted, said a new 2.4-litre engine, generating 125kW of power at 6000 rpm and 226Nm of torque at 4100 rpm, meant the Lancer Aspire provided the perfect solution to drivers downsizing from larger, less fuel efficient vehicles – especially those who wanted to maintain high levels of spirited driving performance without breaking the bank when refuelling.

Mr Maxted, said the Lancer Aspire 2.4-litre sedan represented a real opportunity for the company in the still-increasing small-car segment.

lancer-engine.jpg

“We have found that up to 32 per cent of our new Lancer customers are coming to us from both mid- and large-sized passenger vehicles,” Mr Maxted said.

“While they don’t wish to give up the luxuries of a richly appointed cabin or an energetic engine response, they do recognise the need to conserve their resources – and that’s where the Lancer Aspire 2.4-litre sedan is a perfect match.”

The new 2.4-litre engine also powers the Outlander and comes from the same ’4B’ family as the 2.0-litre engine in the existing Lancer range.

Mr Maxted told CarAdvice this meant it was not difficult to gain approval from Mitsubishi in Japan for the Australia-only Aspire, and he added that the Aspire name was chosen at Mitsubishi Motors Australia Limited’s headquarters in Adelaide, but had some Mitsubishi history to it.

lancer-front.jpg

To develop the new Aspire MMAL has taken to 2009 Lancer VRX, removed the rear spoiler and alloy pedals, added unique chrome highlights to the grille surround, beltline and bootlid, blacked-out tail light bezels and HID headlights with adaptive cornering facility.

On the inside, the Aspire is fitted with woodgrain and leather trim, lidded bins for the centre console and a Rockford Fosgate six-disc CD audio system with a 10-inch subwoofer in the boot.

For a limited time, Mitsubishi is offering the new car with its new, Mitsubishi Multi Communication System (MMCS) information/entertainment system free of charge, normally a $2400 option – or a $4000 packaged with a sunroof.

MMCS provides satellite navigation, mobile phone control, iPod integration and audio system control through a large touch screen in the centre fascia.

lancer-interior.jpg

The Lancer Aspire’s standard specifications include a host of safety and comfort features such as Automatic Traction & Stability Control, ABS brakes with EBD, seven SRS airbags, rain sensing wipers and dusk sensing headlamps, “Smart” key entry, climate controlled air-conditioning, electric windows, Bluetooth connectivity and steering wheel mounted paddle-shifters for the standard Continuously Variable Transmission.

Mr Maxted said Mitsubishi had introduced the Lancer Aspire to conquest buyers currently fleeing the Large Car segment, many of whom were private customers, although he indicated that increasingly the company expected to see company and lease buyers also joining these ranks.

He told CarAdvice that many of these buyers wanted a level of luxury and equipment that they were used to in a large car, plus good performance, while seeking reduced fuel consumption. Mitsubishi quotes the car as having an official ADR Combined Cycle fuel consumption of 8.5-litres/100km.

He said Lancer Aspire was aimed at meeting these requirements and added that as a bonus the Lancer Aspire had a better power-to-weight ratio than the major Medium Car contenders, Ford Mondeo Zetec, Honda Accord Euro, Mazda6 and Toyota Camry.
Priced at $33,990, the Lancer Aspire compares favourably with similarly priced variants of those cars in every way, except physical size.

However, according to Mitsubishi, the Lancer currently approaches the dimensions of the first generation Mitsubishi Magna.

Mitsubishi was careful to describe the Lancer Aspire as a ‘premium’ model not a luxury model as it rides on the 18-inch alloy wheels and suspension from the more sporting VRX and as such the company does not consider it will provide a driving experience to warrant a “luxury” tag.

lancer-boot.jpg

The Aspire will also only be available as a sedan, as Mitsubishi believes the buyers will be more conservative and therefore different from those who will be attracted to the Lancer Sportback which is due to be released in the next two months.

The Lancer Aspire will be available in a number of colours from the Lancer line-up palette, including Cool Silver, Effect Grey, Red Metallic, White Solid, Black Mica and Champagne and comes with Mitsubishi’s five year/130,000 whole vehicle warranty, backed up by its 10 year/160,000 km powertrain warranty and a five year/unlimited km roadside assistance package.

The Mitsubishi Lancer Aspire will be available in showrooms from September 22 and CarAdvice will bring you driving impressions of the car just as soon as we can road test one.


 
  • Baji

    Well at least to woodgrain looks okay. Everything else just screams out “CHEAP!” Its a pity cos the lancer is actually a nice car.

  • http://AustralianCarAdvice The Salesman

    Walk into a Hyundai or Kia showroom and drive out in a 2.4litre 5 speed automatic with all the same gear minus the leather and wood grain with five year warranty for less than $25,000.00 DRIVE AWAY and it is basically Honda Accord. $33,990.00 I don’t think so.

  • greenroom

    The finish looks improved, better than the current car, but the still too plain.

    I dislike the name intensely. I wouldn’t own it, I don’t ‘aspire’ to owning a lancer. I wouldn’t advertise ‘aspire’ I’d feel like a wanker with sign on a car.

    I do aspire to owning a 911, but not a lancer. If the 911 was called / badged aspire, I’d dump that aspiration too.

    Ah well, another one not for me…. as if they care.

  • JEYKL AND HYDE

    whats the saying about silk purse?at $34k it’s going to get rolled by everybody.best stick to the 20k segment….

  • Jimbo

    A great idea but I’m not sure about the name either or the price. Oh well when they don’t sell and Mitsubishi are having run out sales for $27990 drive away (i.e. magna/380) then they will be worth a look.

  • http://faster DanMan

    Do the Automotive Marketing depts in this country have a total disconnect with the general public. Tinsel by name Tinsel by nature. The lancer brand cannot support this pricepoint. Unless it has EVO in it’s name.
    90 day stockers here we come.
    Sometimes I really feel for Mitsu dealers. Head office telling them to push this crap.
    I mean its an ok Car at 29990 D/Away but not at this price…
    My 2 cents..

  • http://faster DanMan

    Mr Maxted said Mitsubishi had introduced the Lancer Aspire to conquest buyers currently fleeing the Large Car segment, many of whom were private customers, although he indicated that increasingly the company expected to see company and lease buyers also joining these ranks.

    Read into that.. coming to an airport hire car rank near you.. then auctioned to mitsu dealers.. then on the yard as ‘approved used cars’..
    The downward spiral…

  • Tony M

    Do they think we are stupid. When you get max torque of 260Nm at 4100rpm’s I bet the fuel figures are not going to be great. Just because a car is smaller doesn’t mean it uses less petrol. We who chase economical cars look at high torque figures at low revs.

  • oh

    34000? more expensive than 380? They are dreaming….Ha Ha Ha

  • Edd

    Nice Car….But the price Tag $34k ??? LOL

    Friend of mine bought New Accord with 5 speed Auto for $28grand D/away.

    Again and again stupid move from Mitsubishi Australia…..

  • Richo

    I like the rear tail lights, if they don’t cost too much i’ll probably buy them to put on my VRX.

    Otherwise, other then the larger engine, i don’t see the value in this over a normal VRX. MMAL would have been better off just putting the 2.4ltr into the VRX and the car would have been even more popular.

    For those wondering, the new lancer is a very nice car and i’m very happy with it. Comfortable, economy is good, handling is good, its well equiped and its basically just a very good car for its price. Only real complaint is that NVH levels aren’t at a “premium” level which i think is going to hurt this aspire model if it wants to sell at that price.

  • Reckless1

    Haha, they are fooling themselves calling this a small car.

    It’s not a small car, it’s not a large car, and it’s not worth $15,000 more than the entry version of the same car.

    $34,000 puts it into territory where it can’t compete – the last time a manufacturer tried this was when Proton (was it the Waja?) tried to sell a 1600cc car for $28,000…..

  • Realcars

    NVH levels aren’t even at ordinary levels unfortunately.

    I HATE NOISY SMALL CARS.Road noise is terrible in these.

    33k they must be joking.LOL.

  • del

    Richo I believe they are dropping the 2.4L engine into the VR-X for 2009.

  • Richo

    Realcars – i’d be interested to know how you heard that road noise was bad? I find road noise is not too bad at all, similar level to what my old ’04 magna had, possibly even a bit quieter.

    The only NVH issues is that the engine is a bit noisier then say a subaru liberty, but in saying that the noise it makes isn’t too bad for a 4 banger.

    Its a very good car for its price i think, much better then the likes of the corolla, elantra, and most other small cars. The mazda 3 is possibily a bit better car, but its not as well equiped.

  • Richo

    also its a 5 star safety car which puts it at an advantage against its direct price competitors

  • Golfschwein

    They should have called it the Lancer Vanden Plas.

  • dazza76

    For $34k id rather wait a few months and spend the extra $6k on the incoming Ralliart Lancer.!

  • WTFF

    33990?? are they nuts?

    Base model Mazda 6 is $27990, Accord euro is $32900 who’s going to pick the lancer over those 2 cars?

  • fasthonda

    The AutoCar Mag. did a test on a pre-production version of the Ralliart Lancer.
    The impression I got from the write up was that they were quite disappointed with the car.

  • http://faster DanMan

    Golfschwein Says:
    September 17th, 2008 at 4:16 pm
    They should have called it the Lancer Vanden Plas.

    OMG i just spit coffee everywhere.
    ++1,
    Thats gold right there!

  • http://www.ihatemycar.com.au ihatemycardotcomdotau

    33990$ plus all other costs will be close to 36K ….what are they thinking that money grows on trees or something )-:

  • Steven A

    Whats wrong with people here today?.

    Its great to have an opnion but Gaz & Tony M simply dont know what their talking about and also quoting incorrect figures.
    This article is very informative but you need to consider the FACTS here.

    Lancer has an enviable heritage and referring to this EXCELLENT small to medium car as rubbish is clearly an ignorant comment.

    And being a slightly smaller and lighter vehicle does mean it usually uses more petrol.

    Lancer is built in Japan and not in cheper locations such as Korea & Thailand like the Honda & others referred to.

    The Lancer has the highest possible safety rating of “5 STARS”.

    Its crammed full of high tech features not found in cars in its class plus the other larger cars referred too.
    Carefully read the specs on Lancer and you’ll find it has more to offer that most others.

    Lancer Ralliart and Lancer Evo’s are related to the Lancer Aspire and thats a bloody good thing to know.

    No I dont own one but like it or not watch this sell up a storm!.

  • Fenno

    Mitsubishi has looked in one direction for ‘aspiration’ (pardon the relative pun), Fairy-Land.
    If we make-believe the Lancer is a medium-sized car by plonking in a larger donk, slapping in some cow and plastic tree, then we dont have to think about being totally smashed every month by Corolla, 3, Focus and Civic.

    Remembering, if you call a spade-a-spade MMAL you should have called this car the Mitsubishi Lancer Avoid.

  • http://www.ihatemycar.com.au ihatemycardotcomdotau

    Lancer is a EXCELLENT car with not so Excellent resale value…many smaller cheaper cars have 5 star rating now …which is standard now…this car goes pretty much head to head with Corolla which I bet would resale better/higher from any Mitshu…this car will be worth in a year time 25K or something.

  • Bollinger

    Shame they didn’t do a Carla Zampatti edition…bit of velour and some nice cream alloys wouldve brought back memories…

  • http://Antilag.com Joe

    Great idea and at 25k drive away they’d sell thousands of them.

    33k plus on-roads? No thanks…

    A shame really, because it would make a very nice competitor in the 20-30k medium sized car bracket.

  • Chucky

    Has anyone complaining about the price even bothered looking at what you get for that price? Leather seats and HID lights with cornering ability for $1,700 more than the VRX version is a bargain.

    Oh and btw I see plenty of Lancer VRXs running around these days, and the Lancer overall is having excellent sales. Only the Corolla and Mazda 3 have had better sales this year in the small car segment.

  • Chucky

    Fenno Says:
    September 17th, 2008 at 5:45 pm
    Mitsubishi has looked in one direction for ‘aspiration’ (pardon the relative pun), Fairy-Land.
    If we make-believe the Lancer is a medium-sized car by plonking in a larger donk, slapping in some cow and plastic tree, then we dont have to think about being totally smashed every month by Corolla, 3, Focus and Civic.

    ———————————————————————————————————————-

    How can the Focus and Civic be smashing the Lancer every month if they are selling less? Looks like you flunked maths big time.

  • WTFF

    Mazda 6, Accoed Euro both made in Japan and much better value than this lancer

  • Barneyridge

    Has anyone consider that this Lancer version would be competing with the Mazda 3 SP with Luxury pack…List price for SP23 auto with luxury pack is $33,860. Very similar to the Lancer I would say.

  • milobob

    There are better cars out there for this money, I agree.

    However, you pay essentially $6k more compared to the VRX for HIDs, Leather, MMCS and AUTO… which itself is worth that much or more. So it is actually quite good value considering the kit, HOWEVER, the plastic interior does let it down (makes it feel cheap, so doesn’t feel like a premium model).

    If Mitsubishi steps up its interior plastics, they could possibly have a very good car. Lancer sells very well, roughly 1400 sales a month. Which I believe is 3rd overall in the small car segment.

    As for NVH, I can safely say the SP23 is still worse than the new VRXs (with added insulation). But both are tolerable in my opinion.

  • technofreak

    hhehehehe….HAHAHAHAHA….oh you crack me up mitsubishi…BWAHAHAHAHA!!!…oh…pleeze stop it!!….hehehehe….ROFLMAO…oh I think i did a pee…

  • Peter

    You all bitch and moan. The fact is, a fair number of the Mazda SP23′s sold had the luxury pack installed, bringing its cost to around the same as this Lancer. I see this model as an equivalent to the SP23 with ‘luxury’ pack.

    You guys should note that they released this model as a limited edition run earlier this year as the ‘Olympic’ edition with only the 2L engine and they all sold out. They obviously would not proceed with this model if they knew that they weren’t going to sell any cars.

  • Barneyridge

    Agree with you Peter…..the price difference between the 2 (Mazda and Mitsubishi) is only $130.

    I think they will sell fast.

    Seems a lot of people just like bashing Mitsubishi

  • Realcars

    Richo didn’t mean to offend. The Lancer is a schmick looking car no doubt and possibly the best in class in most respects.

    My idea of a reliable Alfa 156.LOL.

    Most desirable car in class in my humble opinion as well.

    Road noise was a bit intrusive when I rode in a VRX a couple of months ago. But then again most imported Jap cars have this issue to varying extent especially on coarse surface.

    Might have been to do with the low profile tyres on this variant more than anything else.

    These Lancers really do look a million dollars but not 33k unfortunately if u get my drift.

  • Falcodore

    Would take the mazda SP23 over this, better looking (IMO) great drive, better resale and probably more reliable if past experiences are anything to go by.

  • Pablo

    My folks have asked me to help them buy a new car. This thing was worth looking at until I saw the price tag.
    Looks like a Accord Euro or an 08 BFII XR6 with 6 speed auto might be the go.
    A friend recently bought an SP23 auto with extras for $31K driveaway.

  • Richo

    Fair enough realcars, i take your point.

    Falcodore, don’t know what your talking about mate, lancers have a very good reliability record, as do mazda’s, and really pretty much all japanese cars. So don’t really know where your getting your info from

  • Joober

    Looks like a supped up version of the Olympic edition lancer selling atm, identical interior with Computer HU, Although hard plasticy, I agree there is lots of gizmos especially able to control some of the car bits from the HU itself.
    But the price tag is is a bit high, similarly goes with the Olympic edition.

    Lancers have always been reliable (A few friends had theirs in the past even some boosting it and still goes after a long time…), likewise with my sisters mirage, goes like a rock.

  • SamR

    Personally I would rather have a cheaper version of a better car then a a cheap car loaded to the gills with as much fruit as it can hold … and at a higher price.

    Honda Accord or Mazda 6 are far better cars with better resale as well.

  • Mitsu

    The Aspire is a joke. In the U.S they get the 2.4L with the GTS (their VRX) for 2009 models with no extra cost. Mitsu Australia are creating a whole new model (if I understand this article correctly…no 2.4L for VRX?) which will be $35k drive away. No thanks.

  • Robj

    Subaru Liberty (even Imprezza) is a better choice than this, no thanks Mitsubishi.

  • Tom

    I stock looking lancer with a 4 cylinder engine does not make a large car competitor.

    Especially for the money, absurd

    How can it cost more money to build the 2.4? Just because its bigger doesn’t mean its necessarily more expensive.

    And that money is getting very close to what the Ralliart should cost.

    Not to mention mitsubishi is making out as if this is some sort of new model, when no one in the public is going to notice the difference.

  • Martin

    I’m sorry, I am reading this correctly, they are saying idiots would actually consider buying this ugly, boxy, cheap, trash over a Mazda6, Honda Accord Euro and even the Ford Mondeo?

    HA you have to be kidding me.

  • oh

    Both Aspire and SP23 are overpriced…

  • http://faster DanMan

    Wow, what a well thought through argument there OH. The jury rests before such an amazing display of logic.
    Some many points brought up to hammer home your thesis..LOL

  • Mitsu

    They should have just put this engine in the VRX like they did in the U.S….add SatNav as an option like they did in U.S… add Xenons as an option….at $33k driveaway without options…. now that is competitive. Instead they force feed the public with the Aspire with its ugly silver trimmed grill, ugly fake wood grain and no rear spoiler.

  • ZANDIT

    Must agree with Richo, Those rear taillights would look great on the VRX my wife drives, those standard ones look like they have been in the sun too long like on old cars. But for approx $700-$800 for the lamps alone(checked with my local dealer), I’ll wait until some aftermarket crowd do them for half-price!!
    Also agree with the comments on the road noise, but its only on really coarse roads, and anyway, you only have to turn up the Rockford-Fosgate stereo more!!!

  • Jonathan

    AWESOME! I’ve been waiting for the new 2009 Lancer for 5 months already ever since i saw that the US versions (VRX equivalent) had the 2.4 L.

    This has to be one of the quickest P plate legal cars at the moment. Plus it looks mad :)

    125kW and 226nM…25 kW and 51 nM more than the Corolla Conquest with only a 150 more curb weight….this car is made for p platers who want decent power.

  • Stormie

    Tom Says:
    September 18th, 2008 at 9:38 am
    I stock looking lancer with a 4 cylinder engine does not make a large car competitor.

    Especially for the money, absurd

    How can it cost more money to build the 2.4? Just because its bigger doesn’t mean its necessarily more expensive.

    And that money is getting very close to what the Ralliart should cost.

    Not to mention mitsubishi is making out as if this is some sort of new model, when no one in the public is going to notice the difference.

    Tom, what do you think the mitsubishi magna was (first and second generations(86-95)… a 4 banger the size (almost of the 6s of the time. also in that article its mentioned that the latest lancer is almost the size of those early magnas (which btw sold fairly well). You must have noticed this gradual size increase in the lancer range- i know i have. It seems like every yera the lancer gets slightly bigger. And honestly my mother just bought a car- tested honda accord, mazda 3 and 6, and the liberty(unsure on which year for the liberty was second hand) and ended up choosing the vrx lancer as she though it looked the nicest.

  • BernieCinders

    I’M THERE.

    I’LL HAVE 1. Get rid of this Ford RUBBISH i currently own.

    Standard equipment far out weighs its competors.

    HID headlight with adaptive corning.
    Effiecent 2.4l
    CVT 6speed.
    Rockford Stero with 10″ sub in boot
    MMCS
    SUNROOF
    Reversing camera
    Leather
    Parking sensors

    Drive away $35000. after heavy pushing the dealer.

    THANKS

  • BernieCinders

    oh and i forgot

    7 airbags
    5 star NCAP rating
    5yr / 130000km warranty
    5yr ROADSIDE ASSIST
    10yr powertrain

    Beats others BASIC 3yr warranty.

  • on-the-verge

    wrote off the es 2006 lancer last week,it had, mitsa body kit, lowered, 17inch wheels, 2.4, we loved that car, using the gears manually is pure fun. probably give the aspire a miss, but seriously considering the 2.4 vrx.

    i’ve driven heaps of small hire cars and nothing has come near the mitsa, i hope this 2.4 is ok

  • Lancer lover

    Just bought one. A good step down from my SV6 and I might add – better equipped. Yep a bit noisy at low speed but heaps of kit and for those quoting cheaper/better other japanese cars. the new accord is underpowered and doesn’t sit on 18″ alloys, The mondeo handles like a wet sponge. The lancer goes where it is pointed and looks great not a clone japanese design.

  • joey

    I bourght a Lancer Olympic in July and im very happy with it It has all the option and i got a spoiler with it. I purchased it for 33k inc on road cost and $1000 free fuel. Mazda, honda, did not have these features at that price. when you use paddle shift the car is very responsive which would leave some six cyl cars for dead but fuel goes down. i made from melb to adelaide on one tank (approx 52 lt). alittle bumpy ride due to 18inch wheels but handle road excellent.

  • TK

    I picked up a secondhand Lancer Olympic a month ago. I’m super happy. The car is great, especially the sat nav/ audio system. Love the leather seats as well!! I agree with you Joey on value. Friends purchased a new mazda 3 maxx, paid the same as I did (about $28) I must admit that I picked up the bargain of the century considering my car set the first owner back $32,990 + on roads (ouch) That said, their car has no stability control standard, no climate control, no leather sports seats, 16″ wheels (18s on mine), 4 speed auto v 6speed CVT on mine, basic 4 speaker audio, 9 speaker $650w Rockford in mine, oh and did I mention the satnav which incorporates an excellent blue tooth system. Keyless entry etc etc. I’m not Mazda bashing here, the 3 is an excellent car. My point is that the I got a LOT more car for the money, It also looks much better.

  • Mitsulover

    I dont know why people give bad comments on the lancer aspire when you dont drive one. I own one and i tell you it is a bloody good car. It handles corner pretty well, the CVT is so responsive, the extra features are the best. i absolutely have no problem with the price. $34500 driveaway plus mats, tinted front windows, how about that? It is just the matter of negociate with your local dealer. Definately, the best value compare to maz6 and accord.

  • javier

    i think is a nice looking car with lots of features ! i actually own one in black i think that if you are thinking on buying one black is the color to have. When it comes to price i think is not so bad, keep in mind that it has a 10 year warranty and 5 year road side assistance lets not forget that…..there is only a couple of problems with this car..it does not come with xtra lights for when opening back doors and the second problem is that it does not have a lock switch to look all the doors on the drivers door while sitting in the car..but i still think is a nice car for the money!!!

  • M Taylor

    I just boght the aspire drive away at 32K and I test drove everything and it was simply the best ….yes was with sat nav and I test drove the mazda sp25 it was slightly better but u cant get that for less than 36K so will kepp the 4K in my poket

  • Phil

    I own a VR Lancer and could not be happier. It’s actually quite comparable to the Camry Sportivo that my father owned, and no one had a problem paying $30k-plus for those. And honestly it’s a better car for less money with more kit.

    IMO the new Lancer range is better than it’s competitors at every price point. ES is better than Mazda3 Neo, VRX is better than SP25, Ralliart is better than WRX and EVO is better than STi.

    The Aspire model is a more difficult proposition, mainly because ‘cheap luxury’ is not something I think makes sense, but the Aspire is still much better than a leather-clad Sonata or Nissan Maxima. I don’t think you can really compare the Aspire to a base model Mazda6, but I also don’t know what you would gain by choosing the base 6 anyway.

    Anyone who has actually driven the CJ Lancer will tell you that it is a very good car. The Mitsu bashers here probably don’t have licences I reckon.

  • Ravith

    I am going to buy base model Lancer (ES) with side/curtain air bag and then it wil be 5 start safety car. Go to the http://www.ancap.com.au and compare the car safety. Lancer will leave Honda and Mazda much behind in safety scores. There is not a car in this segment stronger than Lancer. Check yourself.

  • Andrew M

    Ravith,
    The subaru Impreza is safer than the Lancer

    Also the Fiesta and Mazda2 are safer.
    The focus lags by .1 out of 37.

    Also, I dont believe they have tested the new Mazda3

  • sanil

    Am a proud owner of ASPIRE.I brought it for 31500 driveaway. no one can beat it with its features vs price. 18′ alloy, leather trim, sat nav,rockford premium audio,HID headlamps, rain sensors,corner lighting,sports seats,paddle shifters,bluetooth with CID ,Multi information display, 5 year road side assist,10 year power train warranty.

  • Bronwen

    My husband and I bought the Lancer Aspire in January this year and we’ve never looked back. We bought it in red and have received so many positive comments…not only about the colour but also what it came with. It was so amazing and truly great to drive.

    My only whinge is the steering is so light that if there are any imperfections in the road, you can really feel it in the steering. But I wouldn’t trade it for anything else. We said if we could afford another one in black, we would have the ‘his’ and ‘hers’!

    We were disappointed that with this 2009 model as we were given an outdated GPS database cd. How can you sell a new model with an old version and we waited to see when and if we were going to get a current copy only to be told we would have to pay for it. That put a damper on it.

    I would recommend this beaut car to anyone who really wants value for money!

    • Deco

      I own a 2008 Lancer VR and find the road noise terrible. How is it for you?

      • Lancerlover

        I drive 2008 lancer ES, i find the road noise terrible as well however when the windows are all closed its not bad.

        A friend who is a mechanic working at NRMA said that my car dealer ended up giving me cheap tyres when I upgraded to 17inches, otherthan a bit of noise i dont have any issues with the car, i only did 18k in 18 months and i am planning to change my tyres once i hit 25k.

        Its a great car and what makes it even better car is the warranty and price tag, no comparison with Mazda 3 and Honda civic, and no offense to them but they are behind with three points – warranty, price and features.

        Definitely recommended.

    • Linc

      The steering is supposedly very tight, but personally, I was driving a Camry hybrid the other day, and was reallydisappointed that it didn’t have the immediacy of response that our ’07 civic has. I’m going to test this on the weekend, and the reports of the current owners are positive.

  • TK

    Have a 08 Lancer Olympic and it’s a great car!!! I do agree with Deco’s comments, Lancers (esp. any model with 18s) are a bit noisy and I don’t like the tram-lining I feel through the wheel. That said, there isn’t much about that can match our car for value, warranty and kit. They also look geat (not the hatch though, that dosen’t grab me at all!)

  • http://www.bigoh.com.au Kin

    Just Bought Lancer Aspire Black MY 10 for $34K (heavy bargain) driveaway from ACT. The car includes the following as extra in addition to the standard features:

    -tinted window
    -mats
    -3 year car wash

    I think the car does not sell that well in ACT, as the dealer is geting it from Brisbane. But I am very excited about it, for me, it is the best value for money I could get in the market I guess :)

  • Damlite

    Couple months ago (march-2010) I bought a black one for 34k with a few extras (after market alloys and privacy glass/tinted windows) and I haven’t looked back since.

    If you can get past the fact that its a lancer and a mitsubishi (which mind you has come a long way), you won’t find any other deal like this in the current market. All the mid-size premium/luxury cars we looked at for every manufacturer we could think of was either higher priced, didn’t have as many features or both. Even the new Kizashi and i45 that suzuki and hyundai released does not come close to the amount of standard features stuffed into this car (love the MMCS), and even if it does the price tag increases. IMO best value for money, period.