Audi Q3 Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Audi Q3 Review

AUDI Q3

Pros: Great engines offer mix of performance and economy; comfortable ride; good handling; impeccable interior and build quality; will fit four adults comfortably; decent boot space

Cons: No auto for base model; larger families will want something bigger; predictable styling no match for eye-catching Range Rover Evoque; no shortage of options

By Jez Spinks |
FIND DEALS

Price: $44,800 to $56,000

Our Rating:  

Luxury brands continue to shrink their vehicles, and the Audi Q3 is the latest to join an emerging boom in compact premium SUVs.

The Audi Q3 arrives to provide direct competition to the BMW X1 and Range Rover Evoque, though the manufacturer from Ingolstadt, Germany, believes its latest product will follow other SUVs by luring buyers from passenger car segments.

Audi took its time to produce its first SUV – the Audi Q7 in 2006 – but hasn’t wasted any time since, expanding its luxury soft-roader line-up to three within five years (Q3 was released last year in Europe).

An even smaller SUV based on the Audi A1 is expected – and, sorry, no prizes for guessing the model name – but that’s another review for another day.

Here, the Q3 is a relative of the Volkswagen Tiguan, with a slightly wider footprint but sharing an almost identical wheelbase, though from nose to tail it wipes off a noticeable 244mm from the length of Audi’s mid-sized SUV, the Audi Q5.

There are no surprises with the styling, which is either a positive or negative depending on your viewpoint. The Q3 is clearly recognisable as an Audi for its classy but conservative design, with the smallest Q model following the Q5 in looking more like a hatchback on steroids than the more SUV-like (but still ungainly-looking) Q7.

Audi’s Auto Union heritage continues in the large, ‘single frame’ grille that again dominates the front end, and the Q3 features another Q design trait at the rear with the wide tail-gate that incorporates the entire tail-light housings.

The rear of the Q3, though, drops far more sharply than even the Q5’s roof, to give the baby Q a sportier presence.

Structurally, the Audi Q3 is assembled with a higher proportion of stronger, lighter and more expensive steel than the Tiguan, though the luxury compact SUV of the VW Group does share some technology such as driver assist features and engines with the Tiguan that starts much lower, from below $30,000.

Lighter kerb weights, though, ensure any directly comparable Q3 is both faster and more efficient than its VW twin.

The Audi Q3 range also starts with the first front-wheel-drive variant in the copmany’s Q-badged series – a 103kW 2.0 TDI costing from $44,990.

Click here to read more details on the full Audi Q3 range.

We tested the three other models in the line-up, which include a $47,000 125kW TFSI, $54,500 130kW 2.0 TDI and range-topping $56,000 155kW 2.0 TFSI.

All engines offer excellent refinement and levels of performance that at worst is decent and at best excellent, so the choice comes down to your individual preferences and priorities.

If low fuel bills are top of the list, then the base diesel consumes just 5.2 litres per 100km. You’ll just have to trade off quick acceleration, with this model taking nearly 10 seconds to reach 100km/h on the speedo from standstill.

Looking for the sportiest option? Well, that’s easily the 155kW 2.0 TFSI flagship.

The 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo, perhaps most famous for being found in the VW Golf GTI hot-hatch, revs smoothly with zeal and offers a sweet note as the tachometer swings eagerly towards the engine’s redline.

Despite the Q3 2.0 TFSI weighing 185kg more than the GTI, it matches it for performance, with a 0-100km/h time of 6.9 seconds.

In-gear performance, more importantly for most drivers, is equally rapid, with the standard seven-speed dual-clutch auto shifting through the gears with almost imperceptible changes but notable swiftness.

We averaged 8.7L/100km for fuel use against the official 7.7L/100km, a result that was actually better than the less powerful 125kW 2.0 TFSI we also tried.

The lower-power petrol is nowhere near as quick or responsive as the 155kW Q3, though it’s still a worthy engine that’s delightfully smooth and capable of providing decent acceleration – as well as saving buyers up to $9000 over the flagship Q3.

If you want to combine strong performance and reduced consumption, it’s difficult not to be persuaded by the 130kW 2.0 TDI, however.

It provides almost effortless pace while, during our long stint, using an average of 7.5L/100km despite less time spent on fuel-saving freeway sections compared to the others.

Regardless of engine, the Audi Q3 proves to be a baby SUV that is more than capable of delivering relaxing progress for long journeys away from the city.

The VW Golf origins of its underpinnings also shine through, with the Q3 providing the best ride yet of Audi’s expanding range of SUVs despite feeling firmer than you might expect for a luxury model.

While the Q5 is fidgety and the Q7 lumpy, the Q3’s suspension deals expertly with surface irregularities, ensuring no nasty potholes, for example, intrude on cabin comfort.

(Though with the launch held mostly in rural Queensland, we’ll still reserve final judgment on ride until we test the Q3 in the city.)

The Q3 is also fun to drive if you encounter a series of bends, with a well balanced nature that makes it enjoyably chuckable. And there’s no shortage of grip from the tyres, though we were on optional 18-inch rubber rather than the standard 17s.

The Haldex all-wheel-drive system (also shared with Tiguan) is again effective in the Q3, allowing it comfortably tackle off-road excursions as long as they’re limited to dirt or gravel roads, or hilly fields that don’t offer too many tricky obstacles for what is still a relatively low ride height despite the advantage of the small Audi’s short overhangs.

The steering could better connect the driver to the road, and there’s noticeable kickback over mid-corner bumps, but otherwise most buyers will appreciate its smoothness, lightness and accuracy.

And although the Audi Q3 sits lower to the ground than either of its siblings, there’s still a seat high that’s more elevated than your typical hatch, and the good all-round vision that typically accompanies that, to please SUV hunters.

Those searching for a luxury vehicle on a lower budget won’t be disappointed by the Q3’s interior, either.

The Q3 shows how BMW didn’t quite get quality right with the X1, with the Audi presenting yet another interior masterclass in how to blend great design, gorgeous materials and simple ergonomics.

Bigger families would no doubt need to use the standard roof rack to accommodate all their luggage, but for other buyers among Audi’s target market – young singles, young couples or empty-nesters – the Q3 is surprisingly practical.

We found that a 5ft 11in adult can sit behind their own driving position and still have decent room for head and knees (the latter helped by scalloped front seatbacks).

The wide tail-gate opens to reveal commensurately wide access to the well-sized 460-litre boot, which expands to 1365 litres if you fold the 60/40 rear seats flat.

There are also useful metal tie-down points and a temporary steel spare wheel, though it would be preferable if the cargo cover shelf lifted up with the tail-gate rather than stayed in position (it can be removed).

The Audi Q3, then, offers a wealth of positives, not least its terrific blend of performance, refinement and comfort.

And our first encounter strongly suggests this is Audi’s most convincing SUV yet.


 

Owner reviews of the AUDI Q3

Write a review for the AUDI Q3

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.
Add a New Review

  • Bruzzer

    this will be a hit, great engines and package overall.
    compared to the BMW X1, i’ll take this.

  • Gav

    I have to say these look A LOT better in the flesh. I’m waiting for an Evoque to be ready, the Q3 was my second choice before it was even released. I’m still happy with my decision but it’s certainly not a bad car, it is considerably cheaper than the evoque when you compare apples for apples

  • ACD

    After the A6 (makes Q7) and the A4 (makes Q5) 
    have gone on stilts, it’s now the A1′s turn (makes Q3).

    • Oliver Cromwell

      actually its more of a raised A3, the A1 variant will be the …. Q1

  • YOUR MAJESTY

    SO MUCH BETTER LOOKING THAN THE SHIT-LIKE BMW X1!

    • Flash32

      You seem to have a lot of hatred towards BMW. And Is it really necessary to shout? do you shout at your friends and family like that?

      • JiM.

        why can’t he shout? get over it. he’s right too, i actually cannot beleive that bmw has sold a single X1, the most hideous bmw in history. obviously they are a fantastic car brand with so many beautiful cars and then they release that?! if they had made it look like a mini x5 it would be a runaway success!!!!

        • Wesa182

           Jim you sumed it up pretty good there!!!

        • Sumpguard

          The X6 is their ugliest car. The bangled 7 series a close second but yep the X1 is up there too!

    • Ima_Hogg

      I think you need to get your keyboard looked at. It seems to have sticky keys on. 

  • Runnaln

    UK price is $37 for base,  So only ripping Australians off wn extra $8K (20%) pretty good by Audi Standards.

    Can’t see it selling many Evoque (if you can get one), Mazda, I35, sportage, ASX all make more sense

  • Douglas9305

    I reckon the Japanese versions are much better value……

    • Imo

      Which japanese mini suv with comparable performance, style, etc, is better value ?

      • Maximark2601

        Forester Special Edition

        • Gus

          Can’t wait till they release a better auto transmission for the XT model…

        • Rockit

          The interior feel, ambience and quality alone between forester and Audi are worlds apart. If you can comfortably afford the Audi, you wouldnt want the jap brand.

          • Bg

            Is interior quality, performance, refinement etc etc better then Lexus RX350?

      • Smart Us

         any – you badge snobber – shove that badge up your nose

  • http://twitter.com/klowik klowik

    The most practical of all SUVs at 45-60k is the Toyota Kluger.  Q3 is likely for a small family of 4 or young couples or retired seniors.

    • Sydlocal

      Not everyone needs/wants an SUV as physically big as a Kluger. Plus they also may want something that doesn’t suck so much fuel! 

      • Seutx

        But the 3.5L V6 in the Kluger packs some serious punch.. 0-100 in 8 seconds.. Not bad for a two tonne jumbo ayy

        No wonder lotus choose the same engine in the Kluger, V6 Rav4 & Aurion for their Evora.. Because they know its a very good engine and power is underrated by Toyota.. It’s more then what they claim

    • Homer

      Rented a Kluger recently. Dozed off a couple of times and wasn’t even tired. My pet snail has more character.

    • Charles

      I agree regarding the Kluger: my wife has one and it’s great.  I have a Q3 on order as a second car.  It doesn’t need to perform family holiday duties, but does need to have enough room to transport kids and their friends around town.  I can’t wait to get the Q3.

  • JamesB

    It’s hard to justify it over the fashionable Evoque or sporty X1.

  • Fx

    Smooth Power is how I would describe the 2GR-FE

  • Michael

    The author is mistaken regarding the disadvantages – the only one which is correct is the Evoque does look better – but the Q3 still looks pretty good. The Evoque is in a class of its own even outside the compact/4wd segment.

    How can you say “larger families will want something bigger”? Isn’t the entire point of the Q3 is that it is smaller? Larger families will opt for the Q5 or Q7! Lazy journalism.