Skoda Yeti 112TSI: Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Skoda Yeti 112TSI: Review

SKODA YETI

Pros: Fun to drive on- and off-road, great engine and transmissions, excellent handling and good ride over the rough stuff, space and cargo options, the pick of the Yeti family

Cons: Fidgety ride on some surfaces, engine lacks low-down torque, no standard sat-nav or parking sensors

By Anthony Crawford |
FIND DEALS

Price: $32,990 to $35,290

Our Rating:  

The launch of the Skoda Yeti 112TSI is an important event for the fledgling Skoda brand in Australia. Not only is it the third member of the Yeti model range, but it also fills what has been an undesirable price gap between the $26,290 Yeti 77TSI and the $35,690 Yeti 103TDI.

Skoda is on a roll in Australia and is fast outgrowing its niche status as more and more customers buy into the brand’s offering of ‘Euro allure at a value-for-money price’.

Skoda Australia found homes for 3501 new cars in 2011 – an increase of 112 per cent over the previous year. Sales for 2012 are already on track for similar growth with further sales expected with the launch of several new variants of the Skoda Fabia including a dual-clutch DSG, sporty RS and practical wagon, later this year.

The addition of the Skoda Yeti 112TSI makes a lot of sense given the highest volumes in the small SUV segment are 4×4 petrol models, although diesel take-up is growing steadily.

With the 112TSI joining the Yeti family, Skoda has effectively covered all bases with a model that includes 2WD and 4WD, manual and DSG and petrol and diesel variants.

As its 112TSI nameplate suggests, under the bonnet of the newest Yeti is a 1.8-litre four-cylinder direct-injection turbocharged petrol engine developing 112kW and 250Nm of torque. But, that’s only with the optional DSG transmission, and here’s where it gets a tad confusing.

Choose the standard six-speed manual transmission and the power output increases to 118kW. (Volkswagen says the power differential is a result of unique engine tunes for the different transmissions.)

They’re hardly scintillating numbers especially for an SUV weighing close to 1600kg, but the Yeti’s on-road performance will surprise you.

The 1.8-litre engine revs keenly and is happy to wind out to 5000rpm where maximum power is achieved, at least with the manual. The DSG version needs 6000rpm and makes slightly less power. It’s not something that’s really noticeable though, as both versions get going with a fair amount of gusto.

Initial acceleration in the lower gear ratios isn’t particularly urgent, so you’ll need to keep your right foot planted for quicker getaways. The power delivery is linear, however, and the engine itself feels exceptionally refined, even under load.

We also reacquainted ourselves with a back-to-back drive in the Yeti 103TDI, which develops a healthy 320Nm between 1750-2500rpm. In DSG form, the diesel feels less nimble than the 112TSI due to the additional weight (15kg) over the front end. It’s also not as eager to get moving, despite the substantial torque advantage it has over its petrol sibling.

The Yeti 112TSI isn’t as fuel efficient as its petrol and diesel siblings, with fuel consumption rated at 8.4 litres per 100km for the six-speed manual and 8.2L/100km for the DSG version.

Clearly, the Yeti’s engineers have worked hard on reducing engine noise inside the cabin, as even when you’re cruising at the maximum legal speed there’s very little engine noise to be heard. It’s surprisingly good for a relatively small-displacement powertrain.

The Yeti 112TSI manual shifts with consummate ease and is clearly more fun to drive than the DSG version, which, although is equipped with a ‘Sport’ mode, misses out on Volkswagen’s steering wheel-mounted paddle shifters, so it’s less engaging than the manual.

The Yeti’s handling and grip are especially adept. It doesn’t seem to matter how hard you push the vehicle, there’s always maximum grip at both ends. That’s also aided by the Dunlop Sport Maxx tyres that the Skoda Yeti 112TSI is shod with, as well as the vehicle’s proven 4×4 system.

The launch program also included several sections of gravel roads on which the Yeti felt almost as stable as it did on the tarmac. That’s also very reassuring for families and individuals wishing to exploit the Yeti’s off-road capabilities during weekend or holiday getaways.

With the exception of the two-wheel drive 77TSI, all other Yetis are equipped with the fourth-generation Haldex clutch system as used by several other manufacturers including Volvo. On dry roads, the Skoda Yeti operates in what is essentially front-wheel drive, but the instant its army of sensors detects slippage or a different speed between the front and rear axles, the Haldex clutch is able to divert up to 90 per cent of torque to the rear axle.

Despite its SUV standing, the Skoda Yeti 112TSI handles more like a nimble hatch, with flat cornering through the bends and little or no body roll on turn in.

The variable-assist electro-mechanical power steering provides a decent level of weight through the steering wheel for highway cruising and lightens up, as it should, during low speed parking manoeuvres around town. There’s also a good level of communication through the steering wheel, which inspires driver confidence on twistier roads.

Overall, ride quality on board the Skoda Yeti 112TSI is pretty good, although somewhat of a mixed bag. On reasonably well maintained roads with the usual pock-marked blemishes the ride can be a little fidgety, but hit some decent potholes or speed bumps and the Yeti irons them out with no discomfort whatsoever inside the cabin.

It’s a similar scenario on dirt roads and gravel tracks, too, with even the largest potholes being effectively cushioned for those inside the cabin for excellent passenger comfort.

Inside the Skoda Yeti 112TSI is identical to the similarly priced Yeti 103TDI. There’s a nice thick-rimmed sports leather steering wheel that feels especially good, and the seats are both supportive and comfortable, even after hours behind the wheel.

Centre-billing goes to the 6.5-inch touchscreen display, but if you want Satellite Navigation, you’ll need to tick the option box for the $2890 ‘Columbus’ system, which also includes a 30GB hard drive, voice control and eight speakers.

There are no standard front or rear-parking sensors either (they’re an option) with the latest Yeti, and being an SUV, you might have thought rear sensors at least would have been included as a standard item.

Safety kit is well covered on board the Yeti 112TSI, with seven airbags (dual front, front side, curtain and driver’s knee) and a full suite of active and passive safety systems.

From a driver’s perspective, the Skoda Yeti 112TSI, in either manual or automatic guise, is clearly the pick of the Yeti family, combining sporty characteristics with all the important cargo space and 4×4 attributes a small SUV.

Owner reviews of the SKODA YETI Add a New Review

WE RECOMMEND YOU ALSO CONSIDER...

  • Jerrycan

    I know that they have been thrashed off-road in other tests but if I were the owner of one I would prefer a bit more ground clearance or undr body protection or both

    • Thomas

      These come standard with underbody protection. Currently the Yeti is the most capable softroad when it comes to offroading. Will put some proper offroaders to shame.

    • FanBoi

      A face only a mother would love…

  • O123

    isn’t skoda supposed to offer better value? Chuck in sat nav for free and that would help

  • Kejovi

    why would you need rear sensors with a rear like that with good visibility as well? As for sat nav, read a map that’d probably be more accurate

  • save it for the track

    It makes torque from lower down (1500rpm vs 1750) and across a broader powerband than a diesel (up to 4200 or 4500 depending on source), yet the summary under the picture says ‘lacks low down torque’. Doesn’t make sense.

    • Thomas

      Agreed.

    • Anthony

       112TSI max torque of 250Nm from 1500-4500rpm (for the 6sp manual) & from 1200-4200rpm (for the DSG) That said, the urgency doesn’t seem to kick in until until you wind it up, despite the torque curve.

      • save it for the track

        Thanks Anthony. Would it be more a factor of the weight of the vehicle? Does a similar engined Octavia for example feel lacking in low down torque as well?

        • Anthony

            For sure the extra weight of the diesel is felt at the front end and no doubt during acceleration, but as you mentioned the petrol turbo has a very good spread of torque and 1580kg is not overly heavy, it’s just that you need to punch it when accelerating off the mark for that hot hatch-like feeling, and then it sings better than almost any other SUV in the class. 

  • Douglas9305

    Still can’t work out why Skoda in Australia are not the budget offering they are in other countries….

    …oh, hold on – of course if customers are willing to pay more, charge them more!

    • Pmmcarblogs

      I have often wondered the same. In the UK, the Yeti is priced as much as 25% below comparable models of its cousin the VW Tiguan. So Skoda is seen as a cheap way intoVW engineering. Here, prices of the Tiguan and Yeti are at about parity, so there is no identity for Skoda. Imagine: if this model was on the market for say $28k for the automatic, it would sell the house down, as it has in the UK. But not here, at $35k, up against great models from Kia, Hyundai, Subaru, Nissan, and now Mazda.

      • ??????????

        So, are Australians being duped, or is it the Europeans that are paying 25% more for similar engineered cars?????

    • Tomas79

      Comes down to supply and demand…
      Since Skoda Australia can sell the limited stock that is allocated to them at the given price point, why wouldn’t they?

      • Steve

        Low stock allocation is a myth. When Golf GTi exploded globally, VW went to 12 month waiting lists, got huge customer backlash and supply was ramped up drastically. Yeti won’t have the same problem but if they did it wouldn’t take long for them to get it sorted if the demand was there.

        Given the stock I have seen lying around at Richmond (ho,ding yard full of them next to masarati) and Brighton, supply shouldn’t be a concern, possibly the exact opposite really.

    • 3D4

      I agree with Tomas on this.. It can also be the fact, that VW is making sure there is no canibalism between Yeti and Tiguan as it is happening throughout the whole EU market.. Same for SuperB and Passat, Golf and Octavia, Polo and Fabia..

    • exPentaxian

      Sorry replying to old post but for others,,

      It isn’t that, in the UK pricing is set by Skoda UK and VW UK independently in Australia VW Australia runs both brands and don’t want Skoda taking sales from VW, so they screw Skoda’s chances to ‘explode’ and at the same time take too many sales from VW Australia..

  • Maple Leaf

    Skodas are good cars especially the diesel versions with lots of torque. They need to price them around a RAV4.

  • Jerrycan

    I bought my Octavia wagon a few years back when there was not an equivalent Golf version.
    I did not want to buy a Golf because they were made in South Africa and reliability was suspect.
    For some reason Skoda had (when I was looking, and may still be the case) a far higher reliability rating than VW in most countries, including Germany. At least mine has been reliable so far.

    I’m not sure where most VAG cars sold in Australia originate from but I can understand that a Czech Skoda would be 25% cheaper than a German VW in the UK. But maybe not so much difference here against an Sth African version?
    Having said all that the fact is that we are ripped off by overseas manufacturers pricing. I know that is contested by many but the differentials are just too great to be explained by transport costs, market size and taxation alone.

    It reminds me of the UK many years back when British Leyland was government owned and incredibly inefficient. They set the market price for cars and just broke even but Ford who could build cars far more cheaply  (and in the UK) made a fortune, which was just as well as Ford Europe and Ford USA were haemorraging badly and Ford UK kept them all going.
    You could go to France/ Belgium and buy a right hand drive car, bring it back on the ferry and pay the British taxes and save thousands of pounds on UK prices, and many did until the British car manufactureres wised up to it and tried to stop the practice.
    I suspect similar is occuring here with the market price led by our manufacturers and the importers making hay while the sun shines.

    I would not like to see Car Manufacturing removed from Australia, because the mining boom will inevitably end and the Aussie dollar will sink, and then we will be thankful that some manufacturing capability survived here.

  • Up1u

    Can I just ask one question about Volkswagen Golf TSI, Hyundai Sonata, Commodore 3.0 SIDI & Skoda..

    All those cars above have Direct Injection.. I wanted to ask why is it when you give them sudden jolt they don’t seem to have smooth combustion and seems as if they’re chocking or something.. The fuel doesn’t seem to burn smoothly and it cause all sorts of noises, vibration etc.. This is at low rpm when you some times give thm a quick jolt..

    I compared an Toyota Aurion and that car had a very smooth motor, just cannot explain.. The engine was velvety smooth, quiet & unruffled..

    I’m not comparing brands or anything, just asking what the reason for that is?..

  • Jimmy

    Fuel consumption is a bit disappointing. I realise it’s the extra weight that does it as opposed to the same engine in the golf or octavia, but anything above 8L/100km is pretty poor these days. 

    • R1eal

      Well in reality, over 80% of cars on he road consume more then 8/100

    • Phil

      Doesn’t really matter anyway, only people who are happy to waste money are going to buy this anyway. You’d be paying $5000 more than a Octavia or Golf wagon – both of which have far bigger boots and better economy.

  • Slimt

    I would pay 30k for one not 35k

  • Serenity Now

    I would love to buy a Yeti – but the DSG transmission is a deal breaker. 

    Sell this car with a decent fully automatic transmission and I’ll buy it.I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. The 6 speed DSG is a dog. In another review of the model this week – “The DSG can be caught napping”. Napping? NAPPING? It’s a common refrain from many motoring journos when reviewing cars using the VW group DSG transmissions….yet they still seem think it’s acceptable?I worked with someone this week who owns an Octavia wagon…and I quote “great car…transmission takes alot of getting used to though” His colleague was less polite.Why should you have to “get used to” a transmission in a $30k plus car in 2012?!?

  • perthj

    I thought the 112tsi represents 1.2L engine and 77kw?