Expand Ad
  • Spacious cabin; economical diesel with good pulling power; class-leading turning circle
  • Choppy ride; diesel engine not as refined as as the newer models in the segment; no rear camera option; six airbags not standard across the dual cab range; styling needs refreshing

OUR RATING
6 / 10



Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review

When the current-generation Mitsubishi Triton launched in Australia back in 2006, it was a veritable game-changer in its class. The Triton was refreshingly stylish – replacing some of the typical blocky (and blokey) lines associated with ute designs with curves, and brought new levels of passenger comfort not previously seen in the segment.

Apart from its standout looks, the Mitsubishi Triton is also credited with moving the segment forward by transforming the dual-cab ute from building site workhorse to something that doubled as a family/lifestyle vehicle.

For 2012, the pick-up and cab chassis market represents one of the most hotly contested segments in Australia – with no less than 13 manufacturers offering buyers a staggering 147 different choices if you count each individual variant on offer in both 4×2 and 4×4 guise.

For the six-year-old Mitsubishi Triton (a major refresh occurred in 2009), grabbing market prominence is now a tough fight against several new-generation vehicles including the Volkswagen Amarok, Ford Ranger, Mazda BT-50, with an all-new Holden Colorado to come.

Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review

These new players have pushed the game further still, with higher levels of comfort, technology and more car-like drivability on offer.

Despite the increased competition, Triton continues to hold its own, with February 2012 sales showing Mitsubishi in third place in both two-wheel-drive and four-wheel-drive segments. That’s ahead of Mazda’s BT-50 and Holden’s Colorado.

It’s a strong result considering the quality offerings from Ford, Mazda, Nissan and Toyota, and testament to the loyal following the Triton nameplate has fostered in Australia over the years.

It’s also a reflection of Mitsubishi’s generous factory backing, with a five- to 10-year new vehicle warranty, five-year roadside assist and capped price servicing.

Despite the growth in the segment, the overwhelming majority of sales are for the more expensive four-wheel-drive variants, due to a whole range of factors including off-road capability and towing capacity.

But for those individuals and families with little or no need to tow more than 2.5 tonnes, and even less requirement to venture off the beaten track, the Mitsubishi Triton two-wheel-drive option will save you around $9000 against the 4×4 variant with the same GL-R specification and double-cab body.

A new-generation Mitsubishi Triton will appear sometime within the next two years, but in the meantime there are plenty of reasons besides offering Australia’s best new car warranty to put the Mitsubishi Triton on your shopping list.

Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review

The first of which is the sheer space and legroom it offers rear seat passengers. It’s a voluminous cabin that’s able to accommodate five large adults.

The fabric seats are comfortable enough, but given The GL-R is second only to the top spec GLX-R, perhaps some partial leather trim on the seats might be in keeping with its position in the Triton hierarchy, even if it is only two-wheel drive.

More side bolstering would be helpful, too, particularly in the front pews, given the vehicle’s intended dual-purpose use and likely weekend recreational duties.

There is, however, a stitched, leather sports steering wheel of reasonable thickness and a leather-wrapped shifter signifying the GL-R’s elevated status in the model line-up.

There are no soft trims to add a sense of luxury to the interior, but the plastics employed are at least an interesting mix of patterns and shades. Instead, the Triton goes for a tough modern detailing, with plenty of metal-look accents employed across the dash, instrument dials and door trims.

Creature comforts include the usual inventory of power windows and mirrors, a four-speaker sound system, which belts out notes with better-than-expected clarity, air-conditioning, cruise control with steering wheel mounted controls and Bluetooth phone connectivity.

The extra space that Mitsubishi Triton offers means there’s also an endless array of storage spaces conveniently located throughout the vehicle.

Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review

Triton’s passive safety kit includes driver and front passenger airbags only (side and curtain airbags are an option on the GL-R), while active safety features include anti-lock brakes with brake-force distribution and electronic stability and traction control.

With newer models such as the Amarok and Ranger carrying a 5-star ANCAP rating on their dual cab utes and six airbags as standard, Triton is showing its age with a maximum rating of four stars.

Mitsubishi only offers a petrol engine on one Triton variant; the rest of the range in both two- and four-wheel drive are all powered by diesels.

Under the bonnet of the Mitsubishi Triton GL-R is a 2.5-litre four-cylinder intercooled turbo-diesel engine, and in this instance it’s mated to an optional automatic transmission that shows its age with just four gears.
(The VW Amarok auto, when it arrives later this year, will have eight ratios, though expect at least a six-speed auto in the all-new Triton.)

Generating 100kW of power and 314Nm of torque, the Mitsubishi Triton is by no means the most powerful thing in its class and the outputs are lower than those produced by the 3.2-litre four-cylinder diesel (118kW/343Nm) it replaced in the 2009 update.

However, there’s more power and torque on offer with Triton by moving up a spec to the GLX-R double cab, which gets a more powerful tune of the same 2.5-litre diesel engine, but putting out a more robust 131kW and 350Nm.

That’s not to say that the less powerful engine is lacking in any major way, because it’s certainly not. It’s ability to pull this large ute with a fair amount of urgency from as little as 2000rpm is unquestioned. There’s some turbo lag if you drop the throttle too quickly, but most diesels in this segment suffer from the same setback.

Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review

From second gear through to fourth, the gearing is relatively tall but, again, there’s enough torque to pull the Triton effectively in all forward ratios, even when driving the car gently around suburbia.

It’s a smooth-shifting transmission, too – and while there’s the usual diesel clatter at idle, that unwelcome mechanical racket does smooth out at speed without endangering the refinement of some of the excellent diesels found in the passenger car and SUV segments.

The VW Amarok, Ford Ranger and Mazda BT-50 have all proved dual-cab utes can have decent road manners, as well as more car-like steering, despite their basic, load-carrying-biased suspension set-ups. The Triton has been left trailing in these respects, with incredibly slow steering that requires tiresome amounts of arm-twirling and a ride that is choppy.

The brakes – with ventilated discs up front and drum brakes on the rear wheels, as is common practice in this class – are sure-footed, though, and there’s a natural feel to the brake pedal travel.

The lazy steering doesn’t help with parking, and no parking sensors or reverse-view camara are available, even as an option.

At least the Mitsubishi Triton offers a class-leading 11.8-metre turning circle for manoeuvring in tight spaces.

Naturally, the cargo bed is significantly reduced with the double cab body – (around 720mm shorter than the single cab), but a trip to the tip with a tray full of broken gear from the garage proved that you can still get a decent size load into the back without necessarily having to cover the tray – (depending on the composition of the load) due to the vehicle’s 460mm tray height.

Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review
Mitsubishi Triton Review

There are further benefits to a smaller-displacement diesel engine, and reduced fuel consumption is another area where the Mitsubishi Triton shines. Armed with a 75-litre fuel tank, we were able to achieve an average fuel consumption of 8.2L/100km over the week-long test. That’s 0.4 less than the ADR81/82 figure for the automatic Triton, or the same as what is published for the manual and achieved without the benefit of highway kilometres.

The Mitsubishi Triton still retains some good virtues, though after not so long ago being the pick of the dual-cab crop it now finds itself short in some key areas – notably safety and driving manners – compared to newer competition.


  Submit an Owner Car Review

MITSUBISHI TRITON BREAKDOWN

Mitsubishi Triton Review
  • 6
  • 6
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  Submit an Owner Car Review


  • Noddy

    Where would a reversing camera go on a car like this? It has a folding tray lid and then a large plastic tray. This is still first and foremost a commercial vehicle. 

    • Douglas9305

      It is mounted just above the license plate

  • MisterZed

    The Triton is a good looking vehicle when it’s clean (like the one in the photos), but I’ve never seen one on the road maintained in that kind of condition.

  • Bryan

    I know it was done for practical reasons but I think the new longer tray has ruined the proportions of the Triton.  It is a shame that Mitsubishi don’t still offer the shorter tray as an option for those who want one of these as a life style vehicle instead of just catering to the tradies who actually need to carry Chep pallets in the back.  Otherwise, they are still one of the better looking dual cabs on the market.

    • Kampfer

      I find the Triton’s look starting to show its age and the design will aged very quickly. I think the new Ranger look much better than this.

      Looking at the future models from Mitsubishi (new Colt and Outlander) I don’t hold much hope on the next Triton, look wise…

  • jekyl & hyde

    better than mahindra and great wall…and not much else.worst cabin plastics i’ve seen in a long time….

  • Jerrycan

    I think that is the first time CarAdvice has bettered the claimed fuel economy of any vehicle!
    And probably due to no highway mileage in this case.
    Commercial utes have few aerodynamic considerations as standard but a good tonneau cover on the tray does make a big difference at speed.

  • Amlohac

    I think the only reason its ahead of the Bt50 and the holden is because of supply issues out of thailand for those two vehicles? I know thats the case for Bt50 anyway.

    Kind of hard to sell what you cant get.

  • MisterZed

    Anyone know when the 3.5L V6 is due to replaced?  They discontinued it a few years ago, I thought it would have been replaced by now with the 3.8L MIVEC (from Pajero?).

    • Birty

      I don’t think they’re going to replace it. Hilux is pretty much the only Ute you can still get with a V6 and they’ve gone all Diesel in Pajero to except the Exceed. 

  • NO EGO

    Coming from a SR5 Hilux to a Triton. The Triton is a more comfy ride.. More economical and without the factory recalls. Value for money and plenty of torque. And its not trying to be a big american rig.
    like most!

  • Shamess

    No EGO I put money on it that you are either an employee of Mitsubishi or paid to say this. How dare do you compare a Mitsubish…..t with the Might of TOYOTA

    • Gtk6969

      I have a fleet of 4×4 with my business ,and would not get another Toyota hilux to many breakdowns and repairs I have tritons and dmax

      • JP

        Sorry to say, but Mitsubishi not that bad “Shamess”. Triton pull a caravan with no problem…. We have both Triton and Toyota and we use Triton to pull our exclusive caravan. It is a lot faster, more economical, more comfy ride. It is also the only “bakkie” with a rear electric window. What do you need more?

Mitsubishi Triton Specs

GL-R : 2.5L DIESEL TURBO F/INJ - 4 SP AUTOMATIC - DOUBLE CAB UTILITY
Car Details
Make
MITSUBISHI
Model
TRITON
Variant
GL-R
Series
MN MY12
Year
2012
Body Type
DOUBLE CAB UTILITY
Seats
5
Engine Specifications
Engine Type
DIESEL TURBO F/INJ
Engine Size
2.5L
Cylinders
DIESEL TURBO 4
Max. Torque
314Nm @  2000rpm
Max. Power
100kW @  4000rpm
Pwr:Wgt Ratio
59.1W/kg
Bore & Stroke
91.1x95mm
Compression Ratio
17
Valve Gear
DUAL OVERHEAD CAM
Drivetrain Specifications
Transmission
4 SP AUTOMATIC
Drive Type
4x2
Final Drive Ratio
3.917
Fuel Specifications
Fuel Type
DIESEL
Fuel Tank Capacity
75
Fuel Consumption (Combined)
9.1L / 100km
Weight & Measurement
Kerb Weight
1691
Gross Vehicle Weight
5175Kg
Height
1775mm
Length
5030mm
Width
1750mm
Ground Clearance
200mm
Towing Capacity
Brake:2500  Unbrake:750
Steering & Suspension
Steering Type
RACK & PINION - POWER ASSISTED
Turning Circle
11.8
Front Rim Size
6x16
Rear Rim Size
6x16
Front Tyres
205/80 R16
Rear Tyres
205/80 R16
Wheel Base
3000
Front Track
1505
Rear Track
1500
Front Brakes
DISC - VENTILATED
Rear Brakes
DRUM
Standard Features
Comfort
Air Conditioning
Control & Handling
16 Inch Alloy Wheels, Electronic Brake Force Distribution, Traction Control System, Vehicle Stability Control
Driver
Cruise Control, Power Steering
Engine & Transmission
Limited Slip Differential
Entertainment
Radio CD with 2 Speakers
Exterior
Power Mirrors, Side Steps
Interior
Power Windows
Safety
Dual Airbag Package, Anti-lock Braking, Seatbelts - Pre-tensioners Front Seats
Security
Central Locking Remote Control, Engine Immobiliser
Optional Features
Exterior
Metallic Paint
Safety
Side & Head Airbags
Other
Service Interval
12 months /  15,000 kms
Warranty
60 months /  130,000 kms
VIN Plate Location
12-C-2
Country of Origin
THAILAND