<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ford FG Falcon specification &amp; pricing update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/</link>
	<description>Australian Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:46:50 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oz.</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-93626</link>
		<dc:creator>Oz.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-93626</guid>
		<description>I agree Andrew. McDonald&#039;s must sell very healthy Big Macs because of their popularity and that means the Holden Commodore is better than the newly released Falcon because they still out-sell it. The reason Falcon doesn&#039;t suddenly out sell Holden&#039;s Commie is because Ford didn&#039;t properly market the new Falcon at all, only some finger walking with a brain-dead voice-over saying at the end: &quot;The new Ford G Series, see the possibilities - The new Falcon XR range, see the possibilities&quot;. Also another advantage Holden has over Ford is as someone on this site described awhile ago, Holden is Australia&#039;s default vehicle.   

Although, Ford have recently released an ad stating that it&#039;s the first Australian-built sedan to receive 5 stars and the Ute ad is very good too, they never seem to air their ads much. At the moment, the only Ford ads you see are &quot;the big spring clean&quot; clearance and no Falcon ads. 

Andrew M - ok then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Andrew. McDonald&#8217;s must sell very healthy Big Macs because of their popularity and that means the Holden Commodore is better than the newly released Falcon because they still out-sell it. The reason Falcon doesn&#8217;t suddenly out sell Holden&#8217;s Commie is because Ford didn&#8217;t properly market the new Falcon at all, only some finger walking with a brain-dead voice-over saying at the end: &#8220;The new Ford G Series, see the possibilities &#8211; The new Falcon XR range, see the possibilities&#8221;. Also another advantage Holden has over Ford is as someone on this site described awhile ago, Holden is Australia&#8217;s default vehicle.   </p>
<p>Although, Ford have recently released an ad stating that it&#8217;s the first Australian-built sedan to receive 5 stars and the Ute ad is very good too, they never seem to air their ads much. At the moment, the only Ford ads you see are &#8220;the big spring clean&#8221; clearance and no Falcon ads. </p>
<p>Andrew M &#8211; ok then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-93623</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-93623</guid>
		<description>OZ,
Not telling anyone!!......especially you. ha ha ha ha ha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OZ,<br />
Not telling anyone!!&#8230;&#8230;especially you. ha ha ha ha ha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-93230</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-93230</guid>
		<description>It comes down to the old saying &quot;McDonalds is the most popular restaurant, so therefore it must be the best food in the world huh?&quot;
And in this case McDonalds is a Commodore...

Ford needs to learn how to market, and Holden needs to learn how to design their own bodies and engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It comes down to the old saying &#8220;McDonalds is the most popular restaurant, so therefore it must be the best food in the world huh?&#8221;<br />
And in this case McDonalds is a Commodore&#8230;</p>
<p>Ford needs to learn how to market, and Holden needs to learn how to design their own bodies and engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92585</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92585</guid>
		<description>Reckless,
please show me the link to where it says that the biggest seller means the best vehicle for i am surely not smart enough to find it.

who ever claimed there was a &quot;link&quot;
all i know is that i was quoted 6-8 weeks for my FG.
either way, i couldnt care less if they had truck loads of them sitting to go.
what does that prove??...... SFA.

all i care is that i have ended up with the better vehicle, and it will be something that i will enjoy to drive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reckless,<br />
please show me the link to where it says that the biggest seller means the best vehicle for i am surely not smart enough to find it.</p>
<p>who ever claimed there was a &#8220;link&#8221;<br />
all i know is that i was quoted 6-8 weeks for my FG.<br />
either way, i couldnt care less if they had truck loads of them sitting to go.<br />
what does that prove??&#8230;&#8230; SFA.</p>
<p>all i care is that i have ended up with the better vehicle, and it will be something that i will enjoy to drive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reckless1</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92417</link>
		<dc:creator>Reckless1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 08:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92417</guid>
		<description>&quot;Limited Slip Says: 
September 8th, 2008 at 5:51 pm 
Reckless1……are you stupid? you said” still using the same failed basic shape” as the AU !!! are you blind?? their is nothing the same or even similar to the FG …..it is totally new !! TOTALLY NEW !! The new shape and design is fantastic It looks nothing like the AU or BA……IT MAKES THEM LOOK OLD AND SLABBY. have you even seen an FG ?? VE is way off getting 5 stars because the body is too weak and the forward vision problems due to the A pillars is a bad problem. The reason they wont pole test the VE and the Camry\Aurion (same car different name) is that their bodies are way too weak. 
&quot;

Oh, sorry - silly me. I must have missed the bit where Ford can&#039;t keep up with demand for the Falcon - can you show me the link, bro - for I am surely not smart enough to find it.  Must be the appeal of that &quot;TOTALLY NEW&quot; design, I guess. 

Then again, perhaps you&#039;re shrieking hysterically because you don&#039;t want to face up to reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Limited Slip Says:<br />
September 8th, 2008 at 5:51 pm<br />
Reckless1……are you stupid? you said” still using the same failed basic shape” as the AU !!! are you blind?? their is nothing the same or even similar to the FG …..it is totally new !! TOTALLY NEW !! The new shape and design is fantastic It looks nothing like the AU or BA……IT MAKES THEM LOOK OLD AND SLABBY. have you even seen an FG ?? VE is way off getting 5 stars because the body is too weak and the forward vision problems due to the A pillars is a bad problem. The reason they wont pole test the VE and the Camry\Aurion (same car different name) is that their bodies are way too weak.<br />
&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, sorry &#8211; silly me. I must have missed the bit where Ford can&#8217;t keep up with demand for the Falcon &#8211; can you show me the link, bro &#8211; for I am surely not smart enough to find it.  Must be the appeal of that &#8220;TOTALLY NEW&#8221; design, I guess. </p>
<p>Then again, perhaps you&#8217;re shrieking hysterically because you don&#8217;t want to face up to reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Salesman</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92386</link>
		<dc:creator>The Salesman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 05:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92386</guid>
		<description>Bret,
Struck a raw nerve there. I wont argue that Holden and Ford are just as profitable as Toyota. That was not my point. I have spent a considerable amount of time with a Toyota dealer and through dealer conferences I can tell you that Toyota are not concerned with Holden or Ford. In fact they have enough revenue to buy them both out. They wont because they want them there in the market as they are. Toyota are watching the business model of Hyundai - Kia very closely as the Koreans pose the biggest threat over the long term scale. India and China is the next big thing. Just because they are not in the Australian market yet does not mean they present no threat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bret,<br />
Struck a raw nerve there. I wont argue that Holden and Ford are just as profitable as Toyota. That was not my point. I have spent a considerable amount of time with a Toyota dealer and through dealer conferences I can tell you that Toyota are not concerned with Holden or Ford. In fact they have enough revenue to buy them both out. They wont because they want them there in the market as they are. Toyota are watching the business model of Hyundai &#8211; Kia very closely as the Koreans pose the biggest threat over the long term scale. India and China is the next big thing. Just because they are not in the Australian market yet does not mean they present no threat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92368</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92368</guid>
		<description>The Salesperson,
Empty retohric. Ford and Holden are just as profitable as Toyota (manufacturing), and with ongoing cost savongs with globalisation of model platforms will continue to be strong.
Both Holden and Ford sell double the number of Australian built cars in Australia that Toyota.
&quot;India and China&quot; still only rate in the &quot;Other&quot; category of country of origin, ie. they DON&#039;T rate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Salesperson,<br />
Empty retohric. Ford and Holden are just as profitable as Toyota (manufacturing), and with ongoing cost savongs with globalisation of model platforms will continue to be strong.<br />
Both Holden and Ford sell double the number of Australian built cars in Australia that Toyota.<br />
&#8220;India and China&#8221; still only rate in the &#8220;Other&#8221; category of country of origin, ie. they DON&#8217;T rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92366</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92366</guid>
		<description>Of course this will be the last &quot;Aussie only&quot; Falcon. The next one will be built of off a global platform, wherever that may be developed.
And if you look at the numbers, it is only the massive development costs of designing a car for a single market that affects Ford Aus. bottom line.

Holden haven&#039;t had a uniquely 100% Australian product since the Kingswood was canned in the late 70&#039;s. Even the VE is a global platform, developed here, but driven by GM&#039;s global requirements.

Ammortising the development costs over a much larger sales volume (of a global platform) will ensure that Ford will be manufacturing cars in Australia for as long as the rest stay here - cause it&#039;s now all in or nothing, if 1 goes the rest won&#039;t survive.

Richo/Andrew, the profits on building the Focus here will be quite high, considering that there are no or very little, local development overhead costs to be factored in. eg. Every VE sold (here and OS) must have x% of $1Bill added to cover costs before any profits are made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course this will be the last &#8220;Aussie only&#8221; Falcon. The next one will be built of off a global platform, wherever that may be developed.<br />
And if you look at the numbers, it is only the massive development costs of designing a car for a single market that affects Ford Aus. bottom line.</p>
<p>Holden haven&#8217;t had a uniquely 100% Australian product since the Kingswood was canned in the late 70&#8217;s. Even the VE is a global platform, developed here, but driven by GM&#8217;s global requirements.</p>
<p>Ammortising the development costs over a much larger sales volume (of a global platform) will ensure that Ford will be manufacturing cars in Australia for as long as the rest stay here &#8211; cause it&#8217;s now all in or nothing, if 1 goes the rest won&#8217;t survive.</p>
<p>Richo/Andrew, the profits on building the Focus here will be quite high, considering that there are no or very little, local development overhead costs to be factored in. eg. Every VE sold (here and OS) must have x% of $1Bill added to cover costs before any profits are made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Salesman</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92364</link>
		<dc:creator>The Salesman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 03:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92364</guid>
		<description>Face it guys and girls. Ford and Holden are dying a slow and horrible death. There is next to no breath left in them. Most of the sales rely on fleet deals. The top of the shopping list now is space, economy and price, enter Japan and Korea with India and China hot on the heals of an ever changing market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Face it guys and girls. Ford and Holden are dying a slow and horrible death. There is next to no breath left in them. Most of the sales rely on fleet deals. The top of the shopping list now is space, economy and price, enter Japan and Korea with India and China hot on the heals of an ever changing market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOVE GTR</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92292</link>
		<dc:creator>LOVE GTR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92292</guid>
		<description>I reckon this will be the last Aust Falcon. With these volumes, I can&#039;t see Ford putting in the money to produce another local large car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reckon this will be the last Aust Falcon. With these volumes, I can&#8217;t see Ford putting in the money to produce another local large car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PoisonEagle</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92289</link>
		<dc:creator>PoisonEagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 14:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92289</guid>
		<description>Personally, if the Falcon doesn&#039;t stay profitable, I think manufacturing should be contracted to China or Thailand (with ALL the R&amp;D done here). it&#039;s not like we are sending profits overseas ( except for the fact its a US company). Seems like the only chance we have. Besides the Focus (and it&#039;s flexible platform) will probably keep Ford Oz afloat anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, if the Falcon doesn&#8217;t stay profitable, I think manufacturing should be contracted to China or Thailand (with ALL the R&amp;D done here). it&#8217;s not like we are sending profits overseas ( except for the fact its a US company). Seems like the only chance we have. Besides the Focus (and it&#8217;s flexible platform) will probably keep Ford Oz afloat anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92236</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 09:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92236</guid>
		<description>Richo,
from what i understand the FG was engineered to be LHD, RHD compatible.
the export program was canned after the engineering base for the FG had already been done.

also,
contrary to what yourself and others may think, an export program WONT secure the falcons future.
even the current Holden export program doesnt cement the commodores future.
the first of the aussie made sedans will only be secured once they start making them in another country on top of still here in OZ.

what im getting at is how much holden is, or should is say isnt making on the exports.
sure your thoughts on smaller cars yeild smaller margins may be correct (ill take your wor on that),
but you forget that an exported vehicle also yeilds a smaller margin.
so in a nut shell,
the combined margin of fords falcons and focus&#039;s would equal the total of holdens home and away sold commodores</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richo,<br />
from what i understand the FG was engineered to be LHD, RHD compatible.<br />
the export program was canned after the engineering base for the FG had already been done.</p>
<p>also,<br />
contrary to what yourself and others may think, an export program WONT secure the falcons future.<br />
even the current Holden export program doesnt cement the commodores future.<br />
the first of the aussie made sedans will only be secured once they start making them in another country on top of still here in OZ.</p>
<p>what im getting at is how much holden is, or should is say isnt making on the exports.<br />
sure your thoughts on smaller cars yeild smaller margins may be correct (ill take your wor on that),<br />
but you forget that an exported vehicle also yeilds a smaller margin.<br />
so in a nut shell,<br />
the combined margin of fords falcons and focus&#8217;s would equal the total of holdens home and away sold commodores</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oz.</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92219</link>
		<dc:creator>Oz.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92219</guid>
		<description>Those alloy wheels are ugly, I wouldn&#039;t care if I had an XT with alloy wheels or if it had hubcaps.

Oh and Andrew M, Ford was also the first to have disk brakes as standard... 
And what XR Ute did you get, Is it an XR6, XR6T or XR8?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those alloy wheels are ugly, I wouldn&#8217;t care if I had an XT with alloy wheels or if it had hubcaps.</p>
<p>Oh and Andrew M, Ford was also the first to have disk brakes as standard&#8230;<br />
And what XR Ute did you get, Is it an XR6, XR6T or XR8?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92211</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92211</guid>
		<description>oh and on the subject of the article,

i bought my new XR UTE on the 30th of august.
i paid the pre september price, but will get a september spec build.
i didnt realise that until i had already bargained a price, and neither did the dealer

seems like i got a better deal for not holding off another day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh and on the subject of the article,</p>
<p>i bought my new XR UTE on the 30th of august.<br />
i paid the pre september price, but will get a september spec build.<br />
i didnt realise that until i had already bargained a price, and neither did the dealer</p>
<p>seems like i got a better deal for not holding off another day</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92210</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92210</guid>
		<description>Frosty,
get your hand off it.
ford was the first to introduce......... 
drivers airbags as standard,
duel airbags as standard,
ABS as standard,
5 star safety rating as standard,
central locking as standard,
lap sash seat belt as standard,
remote boot release as standard,

ford has always had a better safety rating to the equivalent commodore.
i came across a chart a while ago on used cars that will prove exactlly what i just said.

and back on to the 5 star rating,
the commodore in its current form cannot achieve 5 stars.
it scored too far off the mark in the frontal crashes to a point that even if it achieved top marks possible for the side impacts, it still wouldnt rack enough points to jump into the 5 star club.

the only reason you think holden is superior and more innovative is because you only know the Holden tune.

holden build cars for fans, and thats it.
thats why they sell more, because they develop a fan base and do a mighty fine job at keeping it or growing it.
and i dont mean a fan base as in a loyal customer fanbase,
but rather the racing &quot;hoonised&quot; image sort of a fan base</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frosty,<br />
get your hand off it.<br />
ford was the first to introduce&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
drivers airbags as standard,<br />
duel airbags as standard,<br />
ABS as standard,<br />
5 star safety rating as standard,<br />
central locking as standard,<br />
lap sash seat belt as standard,<br />
remote boot release as standard,</p>
<p>ford has always had a better safety rating to the equivalent commodore.<br />
i came across a chart a while ago on used cars that will prove exactlly what i just said.</p>
<p>and back on to the 5 star rating,<br />
the commodore in its current form cannot achieve 5 stars.<br />
it scored too far off the mark in the frontal crashes to a point that even if it achieved top marks possible for the side impacts, it still wouldnt rack enough points to jump into the 5 star club.</p>
<p>the only reason you think holden is superior and more innovative is because you only know the Holden tune.</p>
<p>holden build cars for fans, and thats it.<br />
thats why they sell more, because they develop a fan base and do a mighty fine job at keeping it or growing it.<br />
and i dont mean a fan base as in a loyal customer fanbase,<br />
but rather the racing &#8220;hoonised&#8221; image sort of a fan base</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Limited Slip</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92209</link>
		<dc:creator>Limited Slip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 07:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92209</guid>
		<description>Reckless1......are you stupid? you said&quot; still using the same failed basic shape&quot; as the AU !!!  are you blind?? their is nothing the same or even similar to the FG .....it is totally new !! TOTALLY NEW !!  The new shape and design is fantastic    It looks nothing like the AU or BA......IT MAKES THEM LOOK OLD AND SLABBY. have you even seen an FG ??  VE is way off getting 5 stars because the body is too weak and the forward vision problems due to the A pillars is a bad problem. The reason they wont pole test the VE and the Camry\Aurion (same car different name) is that their bodies are way too weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reckless1&#8230;&#8230;are you stupid? you said&#8221; still using the same failed basic shape&#8221; as the AU !!!  are you blind?? their is nothing the same or even similar to the FG &#8230;..it is totally new !! TOTALLY NEW !!  The new shape and design is fantastic    It looks nothing like the AU or BA&#8230;&#8230;IT MAKES THEM LOOK OLD AND SLABBY. have you even seen an FG ??  VE is way off getting 5 stars because the body is too weak and the forward vision problems due to the A pillars is a bad problem. The reason they wont pole test the VE and the Camry\Aurion (same car different name) is that their bodies are way too weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reckless1</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92184</link>
		<dc:creator>Reckless1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92184</guid>
		<description>Holden is more &quot;working class&quot; than falcon?????  Holden buyers are more &quot;thick skinned&quot; than the Falcon buyers?????

Man, you should take up comedy.

People do not base their buying decisions on what is the best car.  They buy what they perceive they need to solve their transport problem.

For some it&#039;s a Prius, others get a Navara, others get a Captiva.

Problem for Ford is, no-one&#039;s getting a Falcon, or a Focus, or a Mondeo, or a Fiesta  because for some reason, those cars aren&#039;t perceived as meeting the customers&#039; needs.

Ford&#039;s marketing is completely to blame for this.  But when you have chosen the god-awful style of the AU and are still using the same failed basic shape, you see part of the reason, maybe a large part of the reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holden is more &#8220;working class&#8221; than falcon?????  Holden buyers are more &#8220;thick skinned&#8221; than the Falcon buyers?????</p>
<p>Man, you should take up comedy.</p>
<p>People do not base their buying decisions on what is the best car.  They buy what they perceive they need to solve their transport problem.</p>
<p>For some it&#8217;s a Prius, others get a Navara, others get a Captiva.</p>
<p>Problem for Ford is, no-one&#8217;s getting a Falcon, or a Focus, or a Mondeo, or a Fiesta  because for some reason, those cars aren&#8217;t perceived as meeting the customers&#8217; needs.</p>
<p>Ford&#8217;s marketing is completely to blame for this.  But when you have chosen the god-awful style of the AU and are still using the same failed basic shape, you see part of the reason, maybe a large part of the reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phillip</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92183</link>
		<dc:creator>phillip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92183</guid>
		<description>I have often knocked Ford in the past, but geez, it&#039;s really hard to believe that the Falcon is selling less than the Commodore, considering just how much better the Falcon obviously is. 

I guess that because the Holden badge is, how can I say, a touch more working-class than Ford, their follows are thick-skinned loyalists who would never consider buying anything else (Barina sales prove this too), whereas a traditional Falcon buyer has possibly moved up to a Honda or something European by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have often knocked Ford in the past, but geez, it&#8217;s really hard to believe that the Falcon is selling less than the Commodore, considering just how much better the Falcon obviously is. </p>
<p>I guess that because the Holden badge is, how can I say, a touch more working-class than Ford, their follows are thick-skinned loyalists who would never consider buying anything else (Barina sales prove this too), whereas a traditional Falcon buyer has possibly moved up to a Honda or something European by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92180</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92180</guid>
		<description>Joober – they aren’t even looking at exports for the falcon in 2010, they are concentrating on local production of the focus instead. Which all sounds very well and good, except the fact that small cars have inherently smaller profit margins then large cars (for example it actually costs slightly more for Toyota to build a corolla then it does a camry, believe it or not). So what that means is they have to sell nearly 2 focus’s to make the same amount of money as 1 XR6… as I said, all sounds very well and good saying we are going to produce smaller cars for a more fuel conscious market, but in reality both holden and Toyota know that in a “niche” manufacturing market like Australia you need to concentrate on large cars where you have greater profit margins, which means offcourse you need exports to get the necessary sales volume. Ford selling 60,000 focus’s and 40,000 falcons in Australia won’t yield anywhere near as much money as Holden selling 100,000 commodores and statesmans around the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joober – they aren’t even looking at exports for the falcon in 2010, they are concentrating on local production of the focus instead. Which all sounds very well and good, except the fact that small cars have inherently smaller profit margins then large cars (for example it actually costs slightly more for Toyota to build a corolla then it does a camry, believe it or not). So what that means is they have to sell nearly 2 focus’s to make the same amount of money as 1 XR6… as I said, all sounds very well and good saying we are going to produce smaller cars for a more fuel conscious market, but in reality both holden and Toyota know that in a “niche” manufacturing market like Australia you need to concentrate on large cars where you have greater profit margins, which means offcourse you need exports to get the necessary sales volume. Ford selling 60,000 focus’s and 40,000 falcons in Australia won’t yield anywhere near as much money as Holden selling 100,000 commodores and statesmans around the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joober</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/comment-page-1/#comment-92174</link>
		<dc:creator>Joober</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16294/ford-fg-falcon-specification-pricing-update/#comment-92174</guid>
		<description>Glenn, I would think its more they don&#039;t have a export program for the Falcon, unlike Holden or Toyota, That saying if they can hold out till 2010 or so when the new model goes out, perhaps with a LHD compatibility perhaps it may save their ar se somehow...

But then again 2010 who knows whats economic climate is like then...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, I would think its more they don&#8217;t have a export program for the Falcon, unlike Holden or Toyota, That saying if they can hold out till 2010 or so when the new model goes out, perhaps with a LHD compatibility perhaps it may save their ar se somehow&#8230;</p>
<p>But then again 2010 who knows whats economic climate is like then&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
