<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Mazda MX-5 first official image</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/</link>
	<description>Australian Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:22:17 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: carlo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-120523</link>
		<dc:creator>carlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 08:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-120523</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had my MX5 for a year now, and I wished I knew this facelift was coming out so I could have waited.

It&#039;s been a fun year though.

For those who need more grunt, get an RX8. Power is not what the MX5 is about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had my MX5 for a year now, and I wished I knew this facelift was coming out so I could have waited.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a fun year though.</p>
<p>For those who need more grunt, get an RX8. Power is not what the MX5 is about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wheelnut</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-92070</link>
		<dc:creator>Wheelnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-92070</guid>
		<description>Just like the previous MX-5s this one does absolutely nothing for me.. infact it looks like a Honda S2000 wannabe - which IMO is a much better car particularly at full noise</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like the previous MX-5s this one does absolutely nothing for me.. infact it looks like a Honda S2000 wannabe &#8211; which IMO is a much better car particularly at full noise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozmazdaclub ZB</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-91854</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozmazdaclub ZB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-91854</guid>
		<description>Another outstanding car from Mazda....but lets see whats under the bonnet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another outstanding car from Mazda&#8230;.but lets see whats under the bonnet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eureka</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-91839</link>
		<dc:creator>Eureka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-91839</guid>
		<description>Looks good.  As others have already commented...now all they need is to slot the 2.3 turbo motor in.  Then I&#039;d get one.

One other thing...the photo shows a much smaller gap between the top of the tyres and the wheelarch than the current model.  Let&#039;s hope this is a true reflection of the new model and not a photoshop.  This gap on the current MX-5 is so large it makes the car look like a 4WD...or perhaps this is Mazda&#039;s version of the Porsche Cayenne?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good.  As others have already commented&#8230;now all they need is to slot the 2.3 turbo motor in.  Then I&#8217;d get one.</p>
<p>One other thing&#8230;the photo shows a much smaller gap between the top of the tyres and the wheelarch than the current model.  Let&#8217;s hope this is a true reflection of the new model and not a photoshop.  This gap on the current MX-5 is so large it makes the car look like a 4WD&#8230;or perhaps this is Mazda&#8217;s version of the Porsche Cayenne?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fenno</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-91804</link>
		<dc:creator>Fenno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 03:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-91804</guid>
		<description>Anti spam word MPS3

Right on the money Kev20! Agree totally with your observations

Richo, Would be a hoot wouldnt it?! Even the Renesis 13b would allow one to explore the chassis further.

I hope they have tied the rear end down a bit better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anti spam word MPS3</p>
<p>Right on the money Kev20! Agree totally with your observations</p>
<p>Richo, Would be a hoot wouldnt it?! Even the Renesis 13b would allow one to explore the chassis further.</p>
<p>I hope they have tied the rear end down a bit better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-91803</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 02:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-91803</guid>
		<description>a nice improvement on an already good looking car. I really like the MX5, its such a great little car and so pure. But i do wish it had some more grunt. Imagine this thing with the direct injected turbo 2.3ltr 4 out of the 3 and 6 MPS in it! PHWAAAA that&#039;d be awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a nice improvement on an already good looking car. I really like the MX5, its such a great little car and so pure. But i do wish it had some more grunt. Imagine this thing with the direct injected turbo 2.3ltr 4 out of the 3 and 6 MPS in it! PHWAAAA that&#8217;d be awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-91780</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-91780</guid>
		<description>the pre-facelift looked good too....but this looks better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the pre-facelift looked good too&#8230;.but this looks better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: falcodore</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-91735</link>
		<dc:creator>falcodore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-91735</guid>
		<description>Yes, mazda have the best looking cars on the road today IMO that are also well built and very reliable. An MPS version of this would be sweet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, mazda have the best looking cars on the road today IMO that are also well built and very reliable. An MPS version of this would be sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kev20</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-91703</link>
		<dc:creator>Kev20</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-91703</guid>
		<description>It looks good, it has hints of the BMW roadster and the Honda S2000, if you actually look at the detail of it all.
Goes to show that Mazda likes to keep looking cars on the road and have definately hit a purple patch with the releases of the Mazda 6 and 2 (updated versions) and the 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks good, it has hints of the BMW roadster and the Honda S2000, if you actually look at the detail of it all.<br />
Goes to show that Mazda likes to keep looking cars on the road and have definately hit a purple patch with the releases of the Mazda 6 and 2 (updated versions) and the 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autogyro</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-91701</link>
		<dc:creator>Autogyro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 11:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-91701</guid>
		<description>I like it, actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it, actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GTRmon</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-91693</link>
		<dc:creator>GTRmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-91693</guid>
		<description>I think it looks good. Offer it with a turbo 13B and I&#039;d be sold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it looks good. Offer it with a turbo 13B and I&#8217;d be sold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-91687</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-91687</guid>
		<description>What was wrong with the current one? I like to think of the MX-5 as the odd one out in the Mazda family. The one that doesnt need to conform to styling trends. The current one and the previous one and even the original will go down as classics but this just makes it a bit too cheap looking for me. Also, the grill doesnt match the headlights well enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was wrong with the current one? I like to think of the MX-5 as the odd one out in the Mazda family. The one that doesnt need to conform to styling trends. The current one and the previous one and even the original will go down as classics but this just makes it a bit too cheap looking for me. Also, the grill doesnt match the headlights well enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-91686</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-91686</guid>
		<description>Needs a turbo mazda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Needs a turbo mazda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/comment-page-1/#comment-91684</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/16207/2009-mazda-mx-5-facelift-leaked-online/#comment-91684</guid>
		<description>I like the old one better I think. By that I mean, the old NC model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the old one better I think. By that I mean, the old NC model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
