2012 Subaru Impreza Review | Car Advice

Car Advice

2012 Subaru Impreza Review

SUBARU IMPREZA

Pros: Interior quality; all-wheel drive assurity; visibility; safety

Cons: CVT noise; can feel a little gutless at times; expensive option for sat-nav

By Alborz Fallah |
Add to shortlist

Price: $23,990 to $31,490

Our Rating:  

The fourth-generation Subaru Impreza is perhaps the most civilised model in the Japanese company’s history. Featuring the latest in fuel saving technology, safety and modern styling inside and out, the latest Impreza is sure to be a top contender in the small car category.

Powered by a new-generation 2.0-litre four-cylinder boxer engine, the Subaru Impreza sedan and hatch range is good for 110kW and 196Nm of torque, exactly the same as the previous model (although torque and power delivery are different through the rev range).

Subaru offers a choice between a six-speed manual (compared to a five-speed in the previous model) and a continuously variable transmission (CVT), which replaces the ancient four-speed automatic.

From the outside the new Impreza is certainly not as controversial in its styling compared to the previous model’s rather bland look. Its modern, sharp lines and edgier design are a welcome change but we wouldn’t go as far as to say it’s the best looker in class. The recently launched, Impreza-based Subaru XV has a more cohesive look in our opinion.

Subaru has equipped all three Imprezas variants with auto start-stop, a feature we’re more used to seeing in European cars. In fact, the new Impreza becomes the first car in the small car segment to feature the fuel-saving technology across the range. The system works by switching the engine off automatically when the Impreza has idled for more than half a second, an ideal outcome in heavy traffic situations. The instant the brake pedal is released the engine auto-restarts and away you go.

 

The idea is to save fuel when you’re stationary (the old belief that engines use more fuel to restart than they do to idle doesn’t apply to modern cars) but in such a manner that it’s seamless and smooth. The onboard computer can also work out if engine operation is required for occupant comfort (e.g. when it’s blistering hot and the air-conditioning needs the extra power).

It sounds rather complicated but after a day or two behind the wheel you won’t even notice it’s taking place. Subaru’s multi-function display is also clever enough to show you just how much fuel (in milliliters) you’ve saved during your auto start-stop, justifying its existence.

The Subaru Impreza range starts from $23,990 for the Impreza 2.0i, the same starting price as the outgoing model. An additional $2500 will get you a CVT automatic while the mid-spec Impreza 2.0i-L starts from $26,990 (+$2,500 for auto). The top-of-the-range, CVT-only Impreza 2.0i-S will set you back $31,490.

We started our review of the new Subaru Impreza range in a top spec i-S with the optional $4000 kit that includes sunroof, satellite navigation, leather trim and powered driver’s seat.

Subaru is adamant that its all-wheel-drive (AWD) technology is superior to the array of front-wheel-drive (FWD) contenders. There is some validity to this but given the advancements in FWD technology, the AWD advantage isn’t as great it once used to be.

Furthermore the Impreza’s AWD systems differ vastly between the manual and CVT. In the Impreza manual the AWD system is mechanical, meaning power split is 50:50 front and rear, which can change if either end loses traction. In that scenario the viscous coupling automatically directs torque to the appropriate end for better acceleration. In the CVT, however, it’s entirely electronic. When on the highway it’s more than likely that 95 percent of the driving force is directed to the front wheels, this can still go down to the manual’s 50:50 front/rear split when needed but around the twisty roads of Adelaide, we felt the two to be noticeably different cars.

The Imprezaʼs CVT transmission, like all transmissions of its type, is rather noisy. Placid driving will present little to no noise issues but give the accelerator a bit of a nudge and the whining sound begins. It’s an unfortunate side effect for a system designed to extract the most out of the engine with maximum fuel efficiency. Around town its docile and very easy to live with but expect to be pushing hard on the accelerator pedal if you intend to overtake.

With 80 percent of Impreza buyers expected to take up the CVT option, Subaru’s efforts have been blatantly focused on fuel economy – which is evident in light of the car’s five-star green vehicle guide rating. This is great news if the 6.8L/100km fuel economy figure is appealing to you, but on the whole we felt the transmission to be a tad underwhelming and the AWD system not as confident as we’ve come to expect from a Subaru. Its behaviour does improve when you use the steering wheel-mounted paddles (that engage preset gear ratios), but it’s by no means as engaging as the dual-clutch systems found in the Volkswagen Golf and, to a not quite as successful degree, Ford Focus.

The six-speed manual on the other hand is reminiscent of the first- and second-generation Impreza we’ve come to love. It’s the sort of mechanical connection between the driver, gearbox, engine and wheels that exerts enormous confidence. Around Adelaide’s hilly countryside we felt the manual Impreza to be more surefooted in and out of corners and certainly a better fit for Subaru’s “All 4 The Driver” mantra. It does have its problems, though, with torque holes through the rev range requiring regular gearshifts to tackle hills. The dash from 0 to 100km/h takes 10.5 seconds in the manual and 11.1 seconds for CVT models.

It’s a case of fuel economy taking absolute precedence. Subaru engineers could well have extracted better performance and acceleration from the gear ratios but only at the expense of fuel economy. For the everyday driver using the new Impreza for urban commutes, power delivery in both manual and CVT is more than adequate. As for handling and ride comfort, the Impreza performs well. With a centre of gravity even lower than the current supercar-killing Subaru STI (and not much further behind the Porsche Cayman S), the Impreza sits flat around bends without compromising comfort around town.

On the inside it’s very obvious that Subaru’s interior design team has finally learned its lesson. Soft-touch, high-quality plastics cover the dashboard and doors while the overall cabin ambience, even in the base model, is a significant improvement over the outgoing Impreza (and even superior to the current Liberty). The multifunction display (which gets a nice full-colour upgrade from the base to mid spec and high-end models) can be rather useful as it displays a variety of information about the vehicle. Bluetooth phone connectivity and audio streaming is standard across the range, as is native iPod/iPhone connectivity.

The Impreza offers a good seating position for the driver and forward visibility is top notch thanks to a low bonnet and an open, well-designed cabin. Speaking of which, cabin space has been marginally increased and there’s now just enough room to comfortably accommodate four large adults, even for long drives.

You may be thinking the new Subaru Impreza’s $23,990 starting price isn’t exactly cheap, given it comes with steel wheels and little other luxuries. Subaru insists it doesn’t want to compete in the cheaper part of the small car segment, and it has aimed to compensate with extra equipment.

For example, Subaru doesn’t charge for metallic paint or the DataDot technology that discourages thieves from stealing your car. Then there’s the AWD system, which provides more confidence on slippery roads. The company believes the AWD system adds at least $2000 in value to each Impreza.

Subaru has built the Impreza from top quality high-tensile steel and packs the cabin with seven airbags standard (including knee airbag), and it has received a five-star ANCAP safety rating. It’s also inherently a Subaru, so it will more than likely drive on till the end of time without a hint of complaint.

The new 2012 Subaru Impreza joins the most competitive segment in the Australian market at a time when more and more buyers are downsizing from large to small cars. It’s outdone in the performance category by the likes of Volkswagen Golf, Mazda3 and Ford Focus, but it presents an excellent alternative to the front-wheel-drive candidates. Be it in sedan or hatch (same price), the new Impreza is a vast improvement over the old in every category we can think of.

Subaru Impreza pricelist:

  • Impreza 2.0i six-speed manual $23,990
  • Impreza 2.0i Lineartronic CVT $26,490
  • Impreza 2.0i-L six-speed manual $26,990
  • Impreza 2.0i-L Lineartronic CVT $29,490
  • Impreza 2.0i-S Lineartronic CVT $31,490

Subaru Impreza servicing costs (manual/CVT):

  • 6 mths or 12,500 –  $259.00 / $260.41
  • 12 mths or 25,000 - $259.00 / $260.41
  • 18 mths or 37,500 - $336.42 / $337.84
  • 24 mth or 50,000 - $465.96 / $433.72
  • 30 mths or 62,500 - $259.00 / $260.41
  • 36 mths or 75,000 - $336.42 / $337.84
  • 42 mths or 87,500 - $259.00 / $260.41
  • 48 mths or 100,000 - $333.23 / $334.65
  • 54 mths or 112,500 - $733.70 / $700.04
  • 60 mths or 125,000  - $801.59 / $801.59

More information on Subaru Impreza specifications


 

Reader reviews of the SUBARU IMPREZA

<

By: Daz

Rating:  

Being 60+ we sold our '10 Forester XT Premium privately for something smaller and in a SUV/Hatch style. Read more

Write a review for the SUBARU IMPREZA

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

Add a New Review
>

The competition

  Variant Body Style Price From
SUBARU IMPREZA 20i AWD
  • 2.0L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 6 SP MANUAL
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $23,990*
SUBARU IMPREZA 20i AWD
  • 2.0L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 6 SP MANUAL
  • UNLEADED PETROL
5D HATCHBACK $23,990*
SUBARU IMPREZA 20i AWD
  • 2.0L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • CONTINUOUS VARIABLE
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $26,490*
SUBARU IMPREZA 20i AWD
  • 2.0L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • CONTINUOUS VARIABLE
  • UNLEADED PETROL
5D HATCHBACK $26,490*
SUBARU IMPREZA 20i-L AWD
  • 2.0L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 6 SP MANUAL
  • UNLEADED PETROL
5D HATCHBACK $26,990*
SUBARU IMPREZA 20i-L AWD
  • 2.0L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 6 SP MANUAL
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $26,990*
SUBARU IMPREZA 20i-L AWD
  • 2.0L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • CONTINUOUS VARIABLE
  • UNLEADED PETROL
5D HATCHBACK $29,490*
SUBARU IMPREZA 20i-L AWD
  • 2.0L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • CONTINUOUS VARIABLE
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $29,490*
SUBARU IMPREZA 20i-S AWD
  • 2.0L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • CONTINUOUS VARIABLE
  • UNLEADED PETROL
4D SEDAN $31,490*
SUBARU IMPREZA 20i-S AWD
  • 2.0L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • CONTINUOUS VARIABLE
  • UNLEADED PETROL
5D HATCHBACK $31,490*
SUBARU IMPREZA XV AWD
  • 2.0L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 5 SP MANUAL
  • PREMIUM UNLEADED PETROL
5D HATCHBACK $27,490*
SUBARU IMPREZA XV AWD
  • 2.0L MULTI POINT F/INJ
  • 4 SP AUTOMATIC
  • PREMIUM UNLEADED PETROL
5D HATCHBACK $29,490*
powered by
  VEHICLE PRICE
1995 SUBARU IMPREZA GXAWD N
  • 97,402 Kms
  • White
  • Hatchback
  • Auto
  • Petrol
  • NSW
$7,888*
Enquire Now
2012 SUBARU IMPREZA AWD G4 MY12
  • 852 Kms
  • Camellia Red Metallic
  • Hatchback
  • Manual
  • Petrol
  • NSW
$24,490*
Enquire Now
2012 SUBARU IMPREZA WRXAWD G3 MY12
  • 4,503 Kms
  • Lightning Red
  • Sedan
  • Manual
  • Petrol
  • NSW
$39,990*
Enquire Now
2008 SUBARU IMPREZA RSAWD G3 MY08
  • 78,337 Kms
  • Black
  • Hatchback
  • Auto
  • Petrol
  • VIC
$20,990*
Enquire Now
2001 SUBARU IMPREZA RX (AWD) MY01
  • 164,037 Kms
  • Blue
  • Sedan
  • Auto
  • Petrol
  • VIC
$10,995*
Enquire Now
2006 SUBARU IMPREZA LUXURYAWD S MY07
  • 98,195 Kms
  • Silver
  • Hatchback
  • Auto
  • Petrol
  • NSW
$14,888*
Enquire Now
2009 SUBARU IMPREZA RAWD G3 MY09
  • 16,291 Kms
  • Obsidian Black Pearl
  • Hatchback
  • Auto
  • Other
  • NSW
$21,888*
Enquire Now
Showrooms > Subaru > Impreza

2012 Subaru Impreza Review
Subaru
Impreza
An all-new Subaru Impreza has been released less than five years after the last model. But has it improved?
-1
http://www.caradvice.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/12Imp20iS04-e1330083343294.jpg

2012 Subaru Impreza Review
An all-new Subaru Impreza has been released less than five years after the last model. But has it improved?
3.5 stars
  • Noddy

    The new styling can be summed up in one word: ‘Edgeneric’.

    • Devil666

      Burn it with fire.

    • FanBoi

      Two words: American styling.

    • Aazz

      Underbite

  • UMWHAT

    my eyes are bleeding

    • Vantagious!

      I agree! Burn it with aforementioned fire!

  • Henry Toussaint

    It’s not good looking!

  • JJ04

    More like a downgrade, last model looks schmick compared to this

    • Bozzscaggers

      at least the new one doesnt look like a daewoo lanos

  • O123

    at 31k I would expect sat nav and leather, all its competitors have it

    • DaveofKTown

      Not true. Focus you can only get leather trim on titanium model. Cloth seats with leather sides. No AWD option either.

  • mvyrmnd

    The look of the car is far less offensive than the poor editing of this article. I thought you guys were trying harder these days to even manage to finish sentences. (See sentence discussing how DataDot technology helps discourage thieves from stealing your.)

  • crappie111

    All are so nice looking My eyes is not believe ……..how 
    Australian market at a time when more and more buyers are downsizing from large to small cars.

    • Dave121

      Use fire to burn it?

  • Perth Boy

    A face only a mother could love

  • Mighty Boy

    Better looking in real life, I saw one at the MMS.

  • Ima_Hogg

    The back is a Honda City.

  • Phil

    $600 a year servicing with the added inconvenience of having to take the car in twice a year?
     
    A VW Golf is about $350 a year yet people whinge about how expensive their servicing is – and in Europe they have 24 month service intervals which would basically half service costs.
    BMW 535i runnning on their 24 month service intervals works out at $307 a year ($450 for first service years/$780 for the 2nd). 
    Bloody hell, a Porsche 911 service works out to about $500 a year (approx $1000 service on two year intervals)!

    • Xavier, Style Messiah

      Ahem, its not the servicing that costs, its the expensive repairs to items that should not be going wrong or having to pay $$$ to get the brakes done.  I know, I’ve had 2 Golfs and they are unreliable and expensive to maintain.  Toyota kills VW in reliability and running costs.

      • Phil

        We’re talking about a new car here – expensive repairs to items that should not be going wrong will be covered for free by a thing called a warranty which lasts several years.

        Brakes have to be done on every car. If Subaru charges $259 for a basic oil and filter change, they are going to charge a lot more to do the brakes.

        Spending $$$ on maintaining a Subaru is guaranteed even if nothing goes wrong or the brakes don’t need doing.

        We’re talking about Subaru’s comparative costs to other brands – what does VW vs Toyota have to do with this?

        • k?

          I guess we conclude that both VW and Subaru are expensive to maintain.

        • k?

          I guess we conclude that both VW and Subaru are expensive to maintain.

          • Phil

            Ummm no…….your replying to my comment without having actually read my comment?

            Subaru servicing is almost twice as expensive as VW!

          • Guest

            I think what people were trying to point out was that it’s not just about servicing, but also about repairs for issues with the car. Sure, when you’re within warranty the costs might be covered, but that’s only for what? 3 or so years. And from what it sounds like, problems do occur after this period and people do have to fork out large sums of money for the necessary repairs.
            Regardless of Subaru’s costs, VW’s costs ain’t cheap.

          • Chris Chappell of Randwick

             I was quoted $420 first service on my 1.4 VW Polo office car from VW Barloworld.

            Now thats robbery….

        • Devil’s Advocate

           Yes Phil, brakes have to be done on every car. But it is known throughout the automotive industry that brake rotors on most European cars (VW, BMW, M-B etc) on have to be replaced in many cases at least twice as often as Asian/Australian cars.
          It is not unusual to replace the rotors on Euro cars well under 100,000km (some between 50-80,000km) and well within the warranty period, which of course doesn’t cover brake rotors/pads as they are considered “consumables”. With many Euro brands it is recommended to change the rotors on every second pad change. That adds up in the long run…

          • Phil

            That’s the complete opposite of my experience -  in particular a 1996 Falcoone which needs pads done every 30K with front rotors needing machining everytime and complete replacement every 2nd time (the problem clearly being that 276mm discs are way too small for a 1510kg157KW car). By comparison a B3.5 VW Passat (1504KG140KW) did 96,000km and never needed it’s 320mm discs done and the pads lasted untill 82K.

            Besides, even if what your claiming were true, every year this Subaru costs $300 more in base servicing than a VW or BMW. That leaves plenty of money to make up for any extra cost you may have to spend on VW or BMW brake work.

            This is all very bizarre. $600 a year is a astronomical amount to spend for basic servicing on a cheap 4 cylinder car.
            Yet not a single person agrees and everyone is leaping to Subaru’s defence with strange excuses?

          • Devil’s Advocate

             I am not disagreeing with that aspect Phil, just the brakes on Euro cars and on average how they generally have to be replaced more often. BMWs are worse than VW though! It is not through any fault of the brand, they do it on purpose. The softer rotor material allows the brakes to have better feel and bite, at the expense of longevity. Plus using a Falcon as an example is not indicative of most other Asian/Australian cars as they are also known to have ordinary rotors that never seem to stay in shape!
            You should already know from previous posts over the months that I am in the camp that many Euros are actually cheaper to service over the long term than many Asian/Australian cars, especially brands like Mazda and Subaru who insist on 6 month intervals. Especially the prestige brands like BMW/M-B with condition based servicing. No, VW is not included in this because they are not a prestige brand and are not condition based. In fact, VWs are even more expensive to service than the equivalent BMW, but are cheaper than Mazda/Subaru!
            I have also said in the past that a BMW 1/3 series is cheaper to service than a Commodore over 3 years/60,000km. A BMW X5 is also cheaper to service over that period than a Hyundai Santa Fe. My old BMW that I had was much cheaper to service at the dealer in the long term than my wife’s Mazda when serviced at the dealer.

          • AndyGF

             Dont worry Phil, millions of people agree with you, servicing costs like that, is ridiculous…

            But all the people here to drive real cars just skipped over this article, one look and they were put off, as was I.

            I just read it because I find comments from motor journalists on CVT very interesting, as the gearboxes themselves dont make any noise (or at least no noise audible over the engine noise – which itself is the cause of the DRONING, not a CVT gearbox – anyone who ever driven a Audi multitronic or even Nissan Murano will attest to that).

          • Josh

             Sorry Phil, but your Subaru dealer must be ripping you off….my ’11 Impreza R costs $380 per year in servicing costs

          • Phil

            Josh, how many years have you been taking you ’11 Impreza in for servicing for you to be able to add the annual servicing costs?

            I’m going off the prices written in the review.

          • JB

            My XR5T Focus has done 37,000km and has had 5 sets of pads and is up to it’s THIRD set of rotors . . . they just keep on warping! The most recent time ford wouldn’t replace it under warranty because I got fed up with OEM parts and went aftermarket, cost me over $1k. The car isn’t even 10months old yet and they can’t seem to find a problem with it! 

            The most recent set have done around 1,500km and can already feel a tremor in the steering wheel. European Fords are expensive, too. 

    • Hung Low

      Phil, the comparative pot loss in depreciation between a VW, BMW and a Subaru far outweigh your claimed service cost expense.
      These cars do have to live in the used market as well you know and a used car buyer will be the one getting hammered with Ëuro car running costs!

  • Car Bore

    The soon to be released Honda Civic represents better value with a starting price of $20,990 and standard features like: Alloy Wheels, Climate control, 5 star ANCAP and Better styling

    • Guest2

      The soon to be released Honda Civic is smaller than the current Civic but. I saw the new one on the freeway, it looks like transport.

    • ed

      The new Honda Civic is only that cheap because critics in the US slaughtered it for over a year and sales have been slow. Apparently it is so unsatisfactory they are already face-lifting it this year

      Honda hasnt been this cheap in a long time, as they have thought of themselves as the ‘Japanese BMW’. So you know something is up with the new civic is cheaper than the one that came out 6 years ago…

      Also, it doesnt have AWD…

  • Sumpguard

       The best looking car in this range is the new SUV. The rear end styling doesn’t work on the impreze hatch at all.

        How will they make the WRX appealing with that car as a base I wonder? I hope to be surprised!!

        Japanese auto design has become very stale in recent years. They all seem to be trying to outdo eachother for the underwhelming awards! You will knock me over with a feather when one of them designs a stylish car again.

       
      

    • O123

      hey mazda is great and nissan seems to be getting there act together.

      • Sumpguard

            I don’t mind mazda’s styling but it isn’t what I’d call great. Nissan’s line up is dated . Toyota’s is yawn inducing as is Honda’s for the most part. Subaru’s is lost at sea.

                Suzuki Kazashi is probably the one stand out.

        • Ectomorphian

          Don’t even mention Mitsubishi. I have a soft spot for them but my goodness, who or WHAT is designing their cars?

    • Estiff

      Yes most Jap designs are crud these days. Gee this is fugly.

    • Sub

      Korean cars are overly designed. Their cars look good now but what about in 3 years? Probably outdated by then. Japanese designs particularly subies grow on you. I own the 2012 subie hatch and it looks great. You have to see in person not just base it on pictures.

  • Xavier, Style Messiah

    More uninspiring dross from Subaru… sure its a better effort than the last model, but that’s not saying a lot.

  • Andrew

    Not a fan of the styling of the hatch. The last RS hatch looked better. Pity they don’t have a 2.5L version of this. The engine lacks oomph in the CVT, which is what most people are after nowadays. Subaru need to get their act together and release a new WRX & STi with a decent automatic gearbox. VW are dominating this segment. 

  • TJ

    What an underwhelming package from Subaru. Kudos for improving the cabin materials but the dash design is a little derivative. Kudos for improving fuel consumption but performance is off the pace. Not to mention the exterior design seems to struggle with imbalanced proportions — massive front overhang and big wheels needing to fill out those big arches. Subaru need to take a page out of Hyundai/Kia’s book and hire a designer ASAP.

  • Freddie Mercury

    Look at the specific output: 55 Kw/l and 98 NM/l. Hell those are the figures of yesteryear. Won’t cut it in today’s competition. Shame on you subie! Even Kia makes more powerful engine that you nowadays. Go back to the drawing board and give public a “real engineering”

    • Phil

      Actually the Cerato/i30/Elantra/3/Lancer all have 2.0 engines with about 110KWs with the Corolla also having a near identical specific output with its 1.8/100kw motor.

  • Nick

    I know most CVTs are noisy (I personally really like a car with it) but have you driven the Renault Fluence? It’s CVT is essentially silent. 

    • Guest2

      It’s engine and CVT transmission sames the Nissan Maxima 2.5L V6 CVT’s.

  • Acfsambo

    The 3rd pic, the blue one from the rear 3 quarter, looks a loot like a civic

  • Monteboi

    The front is nice but the back auful…

  • Robj

    Why no manual in top spec model? Also, like a 2.5L please..

  • Sub

    The car looks good in person. 

    • Thrillhouse

      No, it looks worse. If that’s possible.

  • Hung Low

    I think this is the best looking Impreza to date if you would use ‘looks’ and Impreza in the same sentence!

  • http://twitter.com/klowik klowik

    The new styling only looks good in the XV and hatchback form. I think most of sales will go to the XV model.

  • CUL8R

    This will be a winner for Subaru, despite the looks.
    They have the reputation of reliability and quality and that’s what the public want.

    • Richard

      Of course that’s not what the public wants. They want value for money. Do you think the Impreza, compared to the competition, provides value for money?  

    • ed

      Reliability and quality was a problem 20 years ago.

      Looking at trends today, people are moving more towards either snob-value or value for money.