2008 BMW M3 Convertible review | Car Advice

Car Advice

2008 BMW M3 Convertible review

By Karl Peskett |

2008 BMW M3 Convertible road test & review

bmw-m3-conv-16.JPG

Model tested: 2008 BMW M3 Convertible

Recommended Retail Price: $176,142

Options fitted: Seven-speed M double-clutch transmission with Drivelogic $7308

plus.jpg Performance, quality, folding hard-top, space, the sound, oh the sound

minus.jpg M-DCT confused, dull steering, heavy, needs 98RON

CarAdvice rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif

Review by: Karl Peskett

Photography by: www.OzCarSightings.com

Ladies and Gentlemen, this announcement is being made public. It’s over. Yes, I’m sorry, but it is. The love affair is finished, gone, done with, and buried.

It’s no secret – I love V8s. And I used to love Australian V8s – the key term here being “used to”. Ever since pressing the start button on some German equipment, that original flame slowly dwindled, until it’s now a smouldering pile of ashes – sorry Australia.

bmw-m3-conv-20.JPG

First it was Audi’s RS4. A clinical, pure sound which took the normal V8 rumble and polished off the rough edges. The 4.2-litre FSI engine was my favourite engine of all time, until now.

When heading to BMW to pick up its latest M3 Convertible, all sorts of questions flowed through my head. Will the engine be too highly strung? Will the car be rigid enough? Will the extra weight incur a performance penalty? Will my hair get messed up? What hair?

But after being presented with the stubby key fob, and led over to the black beast of beauty in the undercover car park, the question morphed. Even with the roof up, what will it be like? However, having realised that there were walls around, an acoustic challenge presented itself.

Next page…

bmw-m3-conv-25.JPG

Insert the key, press the starter, the engine quickly cranks and then grumbles into life. At idle, there’s deep bassy thump, a metallic whirring, and almost a tappety sound, making it seem a little crude and unsophisticated. I couldn’t help myself, though. A quick prod of the throttle, and a sharp echoey bark filled the carpark. Ah yes, you will smile. You can’t hold it back.

bmw-m3-conv-11.JPG

As the man from BMW ran through the various controls and iDrive, my eyes glazed over, just listening to the engine rumbling away, waiting, nay, begging to be used. Then, it was time to take off the lid. Holding the centre console button down, the roof neatly unclipped, folded and packed away in a staggering 22-seconds.

bmw-m3-conv-13.JPG

Now the time itself might not seem that quick, but when you take into account the fact that this is a heavy metal roof, and that there’s virtually no noise from the springs, wires and motors, you realise why you’ll pay an additional $13,000 over its Coupe sibling. The folding hardtop is simply one of the best around.

bmw-m3-conv-12.JPG

There’s an additional benefit. It’s called “aural delight”. With the roof off and the windows down, you get pure access to that heavenly engine. And boy, is it worth it. The 4.0-litre engine’s black and white figures don’t do it justice. A spec sheet will tell you that, yes, you get 309kW of power and 400Nm of torque. But the spec sheet doesn’t tell you how incredibly versatile, and well balanced is that engine.

Next page…

bmw-m3-conv-5.JPG

It will rev to 8300rpm, which is where peak power is made. In fact, we believe that it will rev higher than that. The way it delivers its power is semi-parabolic, with the redline seeming to be there only to maintain its longevity. But the engine wants to keep going. I wouldn’t be surprised if the test rigs regularly saw 10,000rpm when BMW was developing this masterpiece.

bmw-m3-conv-1.JPG

Sauntering out of the carpark and onto public road, you’ll get that lovely familiar V8 burble, and pottering around the ‘burbs, that’s no displeasure to listen to. From idle to around 4000rpm it sounds like any other eight-cylinder, but with a mild whine akin to a small supercharger.

bmw-m3-conv-24.JPG

But open the taps and from around 5000rpm onwards, there’s a gradual transition to a trumpety bellow that just gets better and better with each passing notch of the tacho. From 6500rpm it’s sounding nothing like a V8 anymore and more pure-bred race car, until finally at 8300rpm it’s shouting a cacophonic, yet symphonic, melodic, and harmonic tune that nothing comes close to. Flick the paddle on the right-hand side and the whole experience starts again.

Like I said, I’m in love with this engine.

bmw-m3-conv-23.JPG

And being a convertible, you WILL go searching for tunnels, just to fill your cochleas with that gorgeous sound. Whap it back to second, give it a bootful and just take it all in. Ah, that’s better. Plus, you’d think that the car came with a pack of Rice Bubbles as standard. On the overrun, all you hear is Snap, Crackle and Pop.

But unlike other V8s which make a nice noise but don’t go anywhere, this car is actually quick, with 0-100km/h taking just 5.1 seconds. When you consider the convertible is around 250kgs heavier than its Coupe counterpart, that’s some serious grunt. Not only that, but the final drive ratio is 3.15:1, so it’s got some legs too.

Next page…

bmw-m3-conv-21.JPG

Okay, so the motor is nothing short of brilliant, but that in itself does not a good car make. It’s the package that makes it truly special. So how does this package compare?

Well, as a convertible, to be sure, there are going to be compromises. Things like the boot space. It’s tiny with the roof down. That’s to be expected, but what is unexpected is the amount of rear legroom you’ll find. Adults can, and will, fit. It’s still best for short stints, however a quick trip into the hills, or along your local cafe strip, will still leave passengers refreshed.

bmw-m3-conv-17.JPG

Despite the weight penalty too, there’s still some chassis flex. Certainly, it’s much better than other chop-tops, but still not perfect. And another thing which isn’t perfect is the dual-clutch gearbox (M-DCT).

bmw-m3-conv-18.JPG

It is good, yes. On setting number 2, it’s as smooth as a regular automatic but it can still be caught out. A few times, while in automatic mode, the cog-changer just did nothing after a prod of the throttle. Of most concern was an instance after rolling through a give-way sign slowly.

bmw-m3-conv-6.JPG

Once onto the main road, I depressed the pedal expecting to pull away at a reasonable speed. Nothing, it just idled along at around 5km/h, then after a few seconds of nervousness, it finally realised what it had been asked to do, and tried to compensate by roaring off.

Now I don’t mind the sound when it does that, but I do mind if traffic is catching up with me. It’s much better then, to leave it in manual mode, and use the paddle shift. Press the M-button on the steering wheel, and the settings you choose will lock in. In this case, it was the full manual mode (which allows limiter hitting), and the most aggressive gear-change. And boy what a change.

bmw-m3-conv-15.JPG

The shove in the back you feel is the gearbox whacking the next ratio in, quicker than you’d ever get it done in a conventional manual. Little wonder why the M-DCT is 0.2 seconds quicker to 100km/h than its manual sibling. It’s a brilliant change that although quite sudden, never feels agricultural. But under very hard braking, the ‘box sometimes doesn’t downshift when you want it to, even if the revs would allow.

If it was me, I’d be sticking with the manual, even with the acceleration deficit. Would that suit the lifestyle of people who would buy this car? More on that later.

Next page…

bmw-m3-conv-19.JPG

What will impress is the interior quality. The leather is soft, pliable and extremely comfortable. Not to mention the fact that the seat-heaters work virtually instantly – perfect for those bitingly cold winter mornings. The woodgrain is authentic, the plastics are well chosen, and even with the three-piece folding roof up, there’s nary a squeak or rattle in earshot. Truly a well built car.

Plus the handling and balance of the chassis is impressive, too. On turn in there’s virtually no understeer, even at lower speeds. Thank the well judged suspension and Michelin Pilot Sport tyres for that. Want to be a hero and get the back end out? Yes, you can do that too, but it is a little twitchy with that weight hanging around the back end like a huge pendulum. Best to leave the traction control on M-Dynamic mode and just enjoy the drive.

bmw-m3-conv-2.JPG

Even the ride is firm but comfortable, with little crash, and excellent damping on both compression and rebound. The steering could be a bit more lively even though it responds well, although at speed the weight and resistance is perfect. So as an overall drive experience it’s quite engaging and a whole lot of fun.

The crux of the matter is this: If you want the lifestyle of a droptop, then the regular 3-series will do just that. Take the 335i convertible for example. It has an award winning motor, it’s very fast, it’s as smooth as King Island double-cream, and is just as well built as the M3. Yet it’s a whopping $50,000 cheaper.

If you want a performance BMW, then the M3 Coupe will offer better thrills, a more precise and involving drive experience, and again, you’ll have $13,000 in your back pocket.

The M3 Convertible will never be a track car, due to the extra weight, which, when really pushing it, causes the normally excellent brakes to fade a little. So it’s confined to the touring/cruising role, which it does very, very well. Even on crisp, dry, winter nights, sink the roof, crank the heaters, whack on the seat warmers and you’ve got an experience like no other.

It’s the sound, though, that really tugs on your heartstrings. Tunnel love has never been better.

Thanks to Jan at OzCarSightings.com for the photo shoot!

CarAdvice Overall Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif

How does it Drive: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Look: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Go: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif

Specifications:

  • Engine: 4.0-litre, V8
  • Power: 309kW @ 8300rpm
  • Torque: 400Nm @ 3900rpm
  • Transmission: M-double clutch transmission with paddle shifts
  • Top Speed: 250km/h (limited)
  • 0-100km/h: 5.1 seconds
  • Fuel Consumption: 12.1 litres/100km (Combined)
  • Fuel Tank Capacity: 63 litres
  • Fuel Type:98RON
  • Airbags: Front, side, & seat
  • Safety: ABS, DSC, EBA, EBD,
  • Weight: 1830kg

 
  • volk613

    Mainly a good review but I am confused by a couple of points.
    A plus is its performance, a minus is its heavy, wouldn’t being “heavy” reduce performance?
    Also what does saying it has no “understeer at low speed” mean? how many cars have under steer at low speed let alone a rwd?

  • laurie

    $176,000 + on road costs NO thanks give me a Ford or Holden any day and with the change I can put a deposit on a investment home the price for a badge is amazing then again each to their own

    laurie

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au Karl Peskett

    Volk, thanks for your comment.

    Point one – performance is all round, not just speed. If it was lightened, it could do a bit better. Par for the course with most convertibles.

    Point two – take for example the 350Z. At low speed its initial tendency is to understeer. Not off the road of course, but it will scrub. At higher speed it fairs much better. The M3 Conv is well balanced, so on turn in it doesn’t push like other RWD cars do.

  • http://www.myspace.com/tjantilag Tom Jakovljevic

    My god this thing sounded glorious, didnt it Karl.

    Such a nice car… like I’ve said previously, you would buy it to take clients out at day, go looking for tunnels to echo the sound at night, and by weekend you would cruise the coast with the top down.

  • Marc

    Great review and awesome photos! M3 is one of my favs

  • http://deleted Alex

    Laurie, your not buying a Holden or Ford with a better badge here. This car is better than a Holden or a Ford and thats a rather silly comment. Saying that, would I buy one? No would have to be the answer. I don’t like the idea that your paying extra for more weight over the coupe or the sedan and considering the M3 is supposed to be about performance, you really shouldn’t get the convertible. They should have given it a soft top because apart from anything, the new BMW 3 series convertible looks slightly awkward when the roof is up. It doesn’t flow as nicely in looks as the coupe does. It would have worked if it looked exactly like the coupe with the roof up but it doesn’t. I think if I was buying the M3 Id get the sedan because most of the people that were just buying it for the badge will get the coupe and the convertible.

  • Stevo

    Would love one, but how does a car that starts at $66,150 USD end up at over $170K AUD.

  • Fenno

    Exactly where does the M3 sit these days. It used to be the Hero car for BMW. But now theres the (335 similar performance for a lot less) and the M5 (or the M6 if you want two doors). It just seems to be lacking something that the M3′s of old just oozed.
    Maybe Bavarian Missile can enlighten me?

  • Fenno

    …and Stevo, to answer your question…LCT

  • MB

    I’m with Fenno but also add the 135i into the mix. Similar performace for less coin.

  • Stevo

    Fenno, I can accept LCT at 33%, extra shipping charges, smaller market in AU, weak Aussie dollar, and probably other reasons that the good people on CarAdvice will post up, but over 100K?

    Would like to see an article with the breakdown of taxes, shipping etc on a car like this one, or any car over the 57K LCT threshold.

  • riceboy

    Karl,

    With words like “cacophonic, yet symphonic, melodic, and harmonic”… “aural delights” and all that “tunnel love”… sounds like you’re getting your inspiration from adult movies with people of the same gender…

    Only kidding… good review… I agree with MB, 135i is a bargain with almost the same performance, and would leave enough change for a nice convertible too…

  • Realcars

    Must be one very precise v8 to rev like that.Would take a lot of money and effort to get a Holden or FORD V8 to work like that. Anyway this isn’t a car for the masses and they could probably get away with asking another 20 or 30k for the exclusivity taking into account the small number to come to our shores.

    What’s the point of being rich if u can’t have something better than everyone else.LOL.

    Anyway would make a pleasant diversion to sniffing seats in WA OR straddling breasts at parties like the rich and influential in NSW.LOL.

  • Austin

    Bring on the next RS4 and show us what it can do! Not a convertible person.

  • CB

    laurie Says:
    September 11th, 2008 at 3:34 pm
    “$176,000 + on road costs NO thanks give me a Ford or Holden any day and with the change I can put a deposit on a investment home the price for a badge is amazing then again each to their own”

    Smart people don’t pay $176K for this car, they lease it and write it off as a work expense – and these hold their value muuuch better than any Falcodore.

    The people buying these cars aren’t Falcodore owners with incomes of $60K, these are people on $200K+, with yearly repayments of say $30K, only about 15% of their income. And they’ll be buying more properties than you too.

  • No Name

    Totally agree on the noise bit – Audis 4.2 souond sooo neat. I’m not the biggest BMW fan (too many around these parts) but the M3/5 always get admiring glances from me….and they are so cheap to pick up 2nd hand.
    Ha Ha the spam was BMWM5.

  • Zip

    I don’t understand why the use of 98RON is a drawback for such a car of fine performance pedigree.

  • Tom

    Oh yes, lets compared a $180k BMW, to a 50k Holden. Also forget to mention that the Holden doesn’t really give up much in performance terms for that money.

  • Tom

    “But unlike other V8s which make a nice noise but don’t go anywhere, this car is actually quick”

    What v8′s would that be referring to? Like a Clubsport, that can match that 5.1?

  • volk613

    Tom what do the English Holdens and Fords cost? HSV and FPV are above the LCT threshold.
    Not only do we make successful NZ as our own but the English too.

  • Allan

    To me, holdens dont even deserve to be compared with the german heavyweights. Take the engine technology alone, it takes 6.2 litres of american push rod muscle to better what the RS4 and M3 can achieve with only around 4 litres…not to mention with 6.2 litres Merc can push out almost 380kw of power. And the only way they could match that was to go get a bigger 7 litre monster. Shame.

  • mamba

    All that talk about how it good it sounds and you don’t include a video clip or sound clip??? Booooo!!!

  • Realcars

    Worried about resale then don’t buy one of these especially when the next model comes out.LOL

    Guessing will be worth about 60k as a used example in five years.

    As for work expense tax right off then u better hope u never get audited by the ATO.LOL.

    Should see a sleazy real estate agent getting around in one of these soon.LOL.

  • Realcars

    mates supercharged xr8 can match this.LOL.

  • Twilight

    yeh, a supercharged xr8 probably could match it, but you’re missing the point.

    that XR8 engine is 5.4L (i think?) AND its got a supercharger donked onto it. (and are u reffering to BA-BFmkII falcon or FG?)

    this M3 has a much smaller displacement, and doesnt need any ‘forcefeeding’ to produce that same amount of power. let alone the fact that owning of of these is so much more exclusive than your ‘run of the mill’ falcon, which you see everywhere.

    i do get what you’re saying though.

    good review CA.

  • Bollinger

    I think this is less a review of the car and more of the engine…but what an engine! Would love for BM to provide their engines for a specialty maker to fit into a proper sportscar along the lines of AMG and Pagani, Audi and KTM etc. Do they already do so?

  • Tom

    Allan, what does displacement really have to do with anything?

    Here’s a curb ball, why do BMW need to make its engines rev to 8000rpm, when small block chev v8′s can make the same power alot lower in the rev range?

    I can’t stand displacement elitism. If it has some real world variables, like weight of the engine or fuel consumption that’s one thing, but we all know those are two area’s the LS engines excel in.

  • Bavarian Missile

    Tom,nothing to do with elitism,Im not taking away what a small block chev is capable of {old technology} ,but it can hardly be compared to the brilliance of BMWs engines,worlds apart! fuel consumption of this M3 is the same of the last inline 6,now thats impressive. They are the masters of engine manufacturing in the world,simple as that. Tom remember this is the equal to a German HSV in Europe,not BMWs fault we get taxed so high in this country,I would hate to imagine what a Clubbie would cost in the UK? Similar to an M3 I would imagine,now what would you prefer?

  • Al Juraj

    The price tag of more than 175K still justifies it over the base 911, which starts at over 210K. The M3 is faster and has a way better engine sound. It’s funny though that its folding metal top is a notch ahead of its M6 convertible mother, which only makes do with cloth. Yes, it’s not the fastest car you can buy for that much money, but it’s probably one of the most fun, well built wheels out there, and I’d certainly get one if I can afford it.

  • riceboy

    Maybe if I sell one of my kidneys and one of my gf’s kidneys, I might afford one now…

  • Tom

    Bravarian Missle, they sell the clubsport in europe, its called the VXR8. It’s about 20,000 pounds cheaper than a M3.

    Just like they sold the Monaro VXR, and VXR500 (supercharged), which again, were extraordinary cars for the money,

  • Watto_Cobra

    They featured the VXR8 on Topgear. Clarkson talked about how it has a Chev engine but no mention that the rest of the car is Australian >:-(

  • Bavarian Missile

    Yeah I know Tom I have had this argument before.True they do sell it in the UK Tom,35,000 pounds against the latest M3 for 50,000 pounds {Im sure the yards would be selling it for less now that the backlog has decreased for the model},seems the M3 has had a price increase from the previous 6 cylinder,back then when it was competing against the V8 VXR Coupe {Monaro}at 36,000 pounds the M3 was 37,000 pounds.I have to also say that even when the M3 was a six {3.2 litre} it was drafting the big 6 litre Monaro…..0-100 in the Monaro 5.0 sec the M3 5.2……….that pretty impressive for something that small.

    Torque curve is totally different on both cars,I recently had a run with a VE Maloo ,I was actually pulling away from him in first in second and keeping with him in third,not till 4th did he start to pull away. They truly are awesome machines.

  • Watto_Cobra

    And yours is more than a few years old now BM with half the capacity. It must still be a stormer.

  • Bavarian Missile

    Yeah Watto Im a storm in a E cup,hahaha

    Why arent you watching the race babe………….

  • Watto_Cobra

    Computer is near the TV and Carrera was on, lol.

  • Joober

    “Clarkson talked about how it has a Chev engine but no mention that the rest of the car is Australian” – I think it was more he made a mockery of it being Australian claiming it had a Yank engine. he knew it was downunder and made mocking comments (with dodgey aussie accent) throughout the segment.

    BM – Thats torque for you 500+ versus the 400 an M3 has.

  • Watto_Cobra

    Good call Joober. Been quite a while since I saw that ep.

    I’m pretty sure he mentioned the MonaroVXR from a few series earlier was Oz.

  • Bavarian Missile

    Yeah I realise that Joober,the BMWs torque curve is almost flat from 3 grand all the way through to 6.5 ,its making 400 nm at 3 grand and stays there for another 3500 rpm.Thats what makes it an exciting engine!

    No idea where the Chev makes 500 ,but I bet it climbs to get there!

  • Watto_Cobra

    Same reason the F6′s torque is so impressive. Flat as a tabletop at 565Nm from 1950 all the way to over 5gs.

  • Bavarian Missile

    Maybe my other half Wheelnut can find out for me,hes the Holden lover in the family!

  • Watto_Cobra

    He’s glued to the tele. Has he got his new ute yet? Must be champing at the bit.

    What year is your M3? I have forgotten :-( Looks awesome at dusk with the angel eyes.

  • Bavarian Missile

    Yep he is………Na hasnt got it yet,hes moving over first and settling in before he makes the leap.

    Mine is 98………..shes ten years old ! Angel eyes are cool ha!

  • Watto_Cobra

    Well, when you think about it, in ’98 Tickford didn’t yet have the TS/TE50 with 250KW and I’m not sure if HSV had the HSV300 so your M3 was easily whipping both at the time.

  • Watto_Cobra

    And still stacks up well against their latest.

  • Bavarian Missile

    Yep was whipping their buts then for sure,still was all the way up to the BF GTs,Im sure it would the current GT too knowing what the Cobra went like {yawn} when I used to drive it!Thing is though my car was 170 k new now valued at 50k same or similar value to the TS/50s now, they really held their value well. I wouldn’t take on the current F6 you would nail me,but Id have a good go at ya!hahaha

  • Bavarian Missile

    Back to the race Batman!

  • Wheelnut

    The new HSV LS-3 V8 in the VE Clubbie has to reach approx 4600rpm to produce 307kw – as Bavarian Missile suspected it does have to “climb” a bit more than its FPV tivals

    Which explains why in 1-2-3rd she was able to stay with the VE Maloo as the M3s power is instantaneous.. However; whne the Maloo got going into 4-5-6th gear it started to pull away

  • Andrew M

    Wheelnut,
    5th and 6th are pretty much over ride gears.
    not much pull to be had there.

    i would have said 3rd/4th would have been the “Pull gears” against the M3.

    the 6.0L chev doesnt have too much in 5th and absolutely nothing in 6th.

    and what speeds are we talking people??
    considering 2nd can be good for 90kmh-ish (depending on vehicle),
    if you are talking reving 4th all the way and talking 5th, thats massive speeds!!!!!!
    Im sure that was at the drag strip though???

  • Bavarian Missile

    yep,your right Andrew 2nd gear in my car is the speed limit…….gear ratio in the Getrag Box is real close in the M3, 5 gear being like 4th,I know the 6 speed Tremac in the GT was the same Andrew,6th gear no point!

    In 4th gear when he started to pull away I looked down at 160 clicks {sneaks up on you fast} I had enough by then!

  • Andrew M

    BM,
    the 4 sp auto falcons are good for 90kmh in first!!!

  • Andrew M

    spam word = XR8……..

    i put the XR8 to 150kmh and the salesman was sitting beside telling me to give it some.
    i wonder if he would have paid the flash for cash if i got done at 200kmh???
    it was harder to pay attention to the gear and revs because it was an auto :(

  • Bavarian Missile

    All comes down to gearing Andrew………the XA does 110 in 1st as well…………..are the falcons good for 250 clicks? M3 is limited to that

  • Andrew M

    i thought they still limited the falcons to 180kmh.

  • http://caradvicelcom chrystine Corral

    hey everyone i need someone to tell me what’s the price of a 2008 BMW M3 convertible ….thank you

  • mt evo

    I own an e46 M3 and a 335i coupe, i want one of these now too, after test driving the other day they are better than people have given credit, don’t beleive the hype over the 135i or the 335i – M3 is worth the extra bucks. Mind you i still love my e46 m3 and they are cheap now. As for holdens and fords?..they make great taxis.

  • Chris

    What a car!