Mazda3 Maxx Sport Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Mazda3 Maxx Sport Review

MAZDA MAZDA3

Pros: Best-in-class steering; great to drive; good ride quality; smart, practical interior; packed with features including sat-nav

Cons: Relatively thirsty; road noise; rear seat could be roomier; engine and five-speed auto getting dated

By Jez Spinks |
FIND DEALS

Price: $20,790 to $26,290

Our Rating:  

The Toyota Corolla had looked set to become the car to make local history, but instead it was the Mazda3.

It has been a case of ‘when not if’ that a small car would finally end the Holden Commodore’s enduring reign as Australia’s best-selling vehicle, and in 2011 the Mazda3 recorded 41,429 sales to become the first different model at the top of the industry charts for 15 years.


		
		
		  
		  
		  
		  
		  
		  
		   
		  
		

It’s been a remarkable rise for the 3, which, along with the Corolla, has benefitted the most from Australians’ mass exodus from large cars to small cars.

Sales of Mazda3s have nearly doubled since the Mazda 323 became known simply by the brand name with a single digit in 2004.

Mazda introduced a new SP20 variant last year that was the first of the Japanese brand’s models to introduce its ‘SkyActiv’-branded technology that is designed to help improve fuel efficiency, though with the 3’s new mantle of ‘Country’s most popular car’ we’re refreshing our memories of the Maxx Sport that launched as part of the second-generation Mazda3 launched in 2009.

It’s the joint second-highest-selling Mazda3 along with the SP25, with both behind the Neo.

The Maxx Sport’s entry price was reduced by $1870 to start from $24,490 as part of a range update last year – which included some minor styling and suspension changes – to incorporate the new SP20 model. That positions the Maxx Sport between the base model Neo (from $20,330) and SP20 SkyActiv ($27,990).

Although it sits on the next-from-bottom rung of the Mazda3 ladder, the Maxx Sport is far from a poverty pack offering.

A highlight of the standard fare is satellite navigation, a rare feature for a car costing less than $25,000. Other features include 16-inch alloy wheels, dual-zone climate control, rain-sensing wipers, Bluetooth connectivity, trip computer, auto on/off headlights, leather-wrapped steering wheel and gearlever, six airbags, stability control and cruise control.

Three years on, the Mazda3’s cabin still looks relevant, even if it lacks the edginess of the newer Ford Focus or classiness of the Volkswagen Golf.

While there are plenty of hard plastics, they are inoffensive to sight or touch and there are quality materials in important places such as the dash and armrests. The mouse-fur-imitating rooflining is probably the most obvious sign of cost-cutting.

Ergonomics are excellent, too, and there are no buttons or dials that require a high iQ number to figure out. A dual display in a dash cowl – directed towards the driver – presents temperature/fan/circulation info on the left and trip/sat nav/compass on the right.

A blue light strip that pulsates when the volume dial is rotated is also a neat touch.

Storage options are taken care of with a deep console bin with tray, lidded double cupholders in the centre console, a decently sized glovebox and well sized door pockets with moulded bottle holders.

The Mazda3 ‘stores’ its driver and passengers well, too. The front seats provide excellent comfort, partly thanks to decent under-thigh support, there’s good vision including well shaped side mirrors, and a tilt- and reach-adjustable steering wheel contributes to a spot-on driving position.

In the rear quarters there’s decent (if far from generous) legroom, and good headroom and foot space, aided by a comfortable bench with a centre armrest. There are no rear vents, though.

Open the hatch (a sedan alternative is available) and there’s a boot with good depth (though benefitting from absence of a full-size spare and just a space-saver) and the parcel shelf is removable to help fit larger items such as mountain bikes or boxes.

The rear seats fold down in a 60/40 split, though the floor is stepped rather than flat.

The Mazda3 is not just popular in overall sales that include fleet purchases but is also the favourite choice among private buyers, so Australians clearly appreciate a car that is one of the better small cars to drive.

Steering is a typical engineering strength of Mazda’s, and the Mazda3, in this writer’s opinion, offers the best in the small-car class – ahead of the likes of the Focus and Golf.

It’s impeccably weighted and progressive while also providing the kind of connection between the road surface and driver’s fingertips that is not that common in the class.

Combine that with a chassis that’s engineered to entertain on winding roads with its excellent body control, and the Mazda3 is a small car that delivers driving enjoyment to the average owner while offering some appeal to the motoring enthusiast.

The Mazda3’s suspension – struts up front, multilinks at the rear – also provides a sufficiently supple and compliant ride around town, even if it’s not quite as absorbent as the Golf’s underpinnings over a broader range of bumps.

Road noise, though, remains a chronic issue for the Mazda3 – and many Mazda models in general – with intrusive tyre roar generated even at moderate city speeds.

The Mazda3 Maxx Sport’s 2.0-litre four-cylinder is quieter. Producing 108kW at 6500rpm and 182Nm at 4500rpm, the engine is a smooth operator that generates adequate performance and mates nicely with the intuitive five-speed automatic.

The auto asks a $2000 premium over the standard six-speed manual.

Although the SkyActiv version of the Mazda3 boasts a class-leading petrol economy figure of 6.1L/100km – helped by direct fuel injection and engine stop-start technology – the Maxx Sport’s less advanced 2.0-litre remains one of the thirstiest among its small-car peers with an official consumption of 8.2L/100km for the auto (the most popular transmission).

A requirement for only regular unleaded petrol helps to keep running costs down, and the noise refinement and relatively high fuel consumption only take a couple of layers of gloss of what otherwise continues to be a strong small-car package. Popular or not.


 

Owner reviews of the MAZDA MAZDA3 Add a New Review

  • mick

    My wife hit a kangaroo 2 months ago in our 2010 Mazda 6. It caused $8000 damage.  We are still waiting for parts.My panel beater has tried, as well as myself to get parts from MAZDA Australia but they dont care. MAZDA Australia ,FAIL.  My advice is dont buy a Mazda.

  • http://twitter.com/jackkl Jack

    As much as I love the Mazda3, what is Mazda’s fascination with that design of wheel? Does anyone actually like that design, I mean I thought it looked bad on the Mazda6, but this…

    If I ever bought one, I’d go straight home to look for 1st Gen SP25 wheels on eBay.

    • Spitfire

      I agree with you on that one Jack. Quite frankly I think the wheels are ugly.

    • ABC

      I like :)

  • Lavs

    I test-drove both a mazda 3 maxx sport and a ford focus trend last weekend. The ford gave a more compliant, smoother ride with less road & engine noise. The sat nav on the mazda 3 is a joke. It’s small, not a touchscreen, & controlled with a little lever on the steering wheel. There’s a cheapness to the 3′s exterior; the panels don’t appear to be of the same quality of an impreza or a golf. It looks more like a toy car & slightly effeminate. I think it’s overrated.

    • Roger

       The hard plastic on the dashboard remind me of those on the plastic toolbox. I think the gen 1 Mazda 3 interior look more classier than the current one

    • Guest2

      So you bought the Focus?

  • Anonymous

    Interior looks much better now the silver is gone

  • Vic

    Awesome!Mazda really outdoes itself nowadays..Why some people chose the corolla over the mazda I have no idea.
    Cant wait for the new mazda6!

    • Guest

      Hope you get that bonus from Mazda

    • Vid_ghost

      Because the corolla uses 7.5L/100k (auto) and comes with caped servicing, while the mazda3 usage 8.2L/100k (auto) and has no discounts or special offers for servicing.

      Some people do care about overall cost more then anything else.
      But still go for either Mazda3 or Toyota Corolla for the safety and reliability.

      Once the skyactive engines are in every mazda3 from the base model up to the top spec car then we will see mazda3 decimate all other rivals… Full skyactive tech should bring fuel usage under 6L  ..  just wow!

      • Guest2

        SkyActive with engine start/stop every 2 minutes should burn out the starter motor pretty quick and chew through the batteries too. 

        Scenario: What if you have a weak battery and managed to get the car started thru jump start or push, then the car automatically shuts the engine off. You’d be stuck.

        • Guest

          Guest2… do you reckon that a group of people capable of designing such a system are somehow incapable of recognising a low-battery scenario and dealing with it?  Granted it is possible, but it seems doubtful to me.

          • jekyl & hyde

            does anyone know if the “stop/start” feature actually happens when the air conditioner is going flat out,or the stereo’s pumping,or both?i thinking not.why sacrifice a $120 battery to save 10c of ulp…

          • Anonymous

            If i-stop senses it needs to run the air conditioning at a maximum setting, it will not shut down the engine. If air conditioning is running at a low or medium setting, it may or may not shut down the engine as its actions will be dictated by the cabin temperature. Stereo is not affected by i-stop as it runs off the battery.

          • SP20

            IStop.
            Battery must be either 60% or 80% charged I forget which.
            The Motor stops at an exact point and the injection and spark help to start.
            AC stays on but the fan slows down.

          • ABC

            It’s almost impossible to measure how much juice a 12V lead acid has if you don’t charge it from the start. A faulty 12V battery may have the correct voltage. But can’t supply the current soon after a heavy load is put on it. There are hundreds of brands of 12V lead acid batteries. The best way to check the battery is to take a sample of electrolyte (sulphuric acid) from the battery and measure it’s specific gravity. I would be extremely worried in an automatic stop/start car when the 12V lead acid battery is weak.

          • Springvale Boi

            “AC stays on but the fan slows down”.

            This can’t be true as there’s nothing to turn the compressor. Only the fan runs. The fact the the AC light is on doesn’t mean that the compressor is turning.

          • http://profile.yahoo.com/NKSGPC5SGNSGQ7GSEGIKUP3OUI __A_YAHOO_USER__

            AC isnt very good without the engine running.. not sure how this will work in the end

        • Anonymous

          Mazda’s i-stop system is designed to make very little use of the starter motor as the engine will always set itself into an ideal restart position.

          One cylinder remains in the combustion-stroke position and the restart process begins when fuel is injected directly into this cylinder, atomized then ignited, which causes the piston to move down. At the same moment, the starter motor applies a small amount of additional momentum to the crankshaft. Both these events together to initiate an extremely quick restart of the engine.

          Don’t forget the regenerative braking system will also capture the kinetic energy made during braking and use that to recharge the battery regularly. 

          Rest assured, there won’t be blown starter motors or a high rate of flat batteries.

          • ToyotaGuru

             The SP20 does not have regenerative braking.

          • Anonymous

            Right you are, I’m getting ahead of myself here. The full suite of SkyActiv technologies – including iEloop regenerative braking – will appear in the CX-5 due out shortly.

          • ABC

            Looks like you’ve cut and pasted the info. If you are not sure whether the SkyActive Mazda3 has regenerative braking or not, then you don’t know SkyActive well.

          • Anonymous

            No, I did not cut and paste as you suggest. I have been been keeping tabs on SkyActiv for quite a while now as I am very interested in the next gen Mazda6 due in 2013 to replace my current VW Passat. I do know as much as any other consumer who chooses to do online research on SkyActiv. I quickly typed the response without proofreading it, hence the erroneous comment pertaining to the Mazda3 SP20 and regenerative braking.

            Indeed, the current Mazda3 SP20 is the first iteration of the SkyActiv engine and 6sp auto, but the full SkyActiv suite will appear in the CX-5 shortly and the Mazda6 early 2013.

            Owing to my interest in both Mazda and VW I have been reading about the similarities and differences between the two brands incorporation of these new technologies. For example, my B7 125TDI Passat has a stop-start system; however, it relies more on the starter motor than Mazda’s i-stop system which uses different facets of the engine to regulate the system. Furthermore, the Passat relies solely on brake pressure, whereas Mazda’s i-stop also makes use of the steering wheel position in ways VW does not. Both regulate air-conditioning in a strikingly similar way though.

            Regenerative braking is standard on my Passat and I’ll be interested to learn about the technicalities of Mazda’s i-ELOOP in comparison. Hence, why my mind was thinking ahead to Mazda’s use of the technology.

            I hope this makes matters clearer and puts to rest the notion that I don’t know what I’m talking about on these matters.

        • Ted

          The stop start function does not work from the starter motor, but from fuel being sprayed in the pistion chamber when pistion no. 1 is up. (read the Sky Mazda road test)

          • Springvale Boi

            It still needs assistance from the starter motor.

          • ToyotaGuru

             Don’t believe everything motoring journos tell you Ted.

      • SP20

        Yet Toyota will ask charge $500 for paint??
        And decrease the amount of discounts on the car??
         
        So yes great marketing but the saving may not add up.
         
        Also there was comp, in which real world driving the Mazda used less that the Toyota.

      • Ansett

        “But still go for the Mazda3 or Toyota Corolla for safety and reliabilty”

        The game has changed, whilst granted theese are good cars….Hyundai/Kia reliablity is well up there and equals if better then Toyota in my experience recently.

        I co manage a rental fleet of over 3000+ cars and with the last model Corolla’s we had on fleet some (not all) threw pistons out the sidewall of the motor. As yet an i30 or Hyundai/Kia of any sort is yet to fail.

        Toyota can only ride on the tail coat of the Cruiser for so long as they have gotten far too big now and quality whilst still excellent is slipping unfortunately. Not sure what the new current model is like yet, we only have just got a couple at this stage.

        We have more and more customers requesting Hyundai over Toyota also, and if you have driven the latest Elantra you will know why.

        About the only car I would avoid like the plague is the Holden Cruze, a woeful, gutless, badly geared, uncomortable heap of a vehicle that is only bought by rental companies and brand snobs who buy anythong as long as it has a Holden badge no matter how bad it is….

  • mick

    Buyer Beware, Mazda Australia  are terrible in  stocking  of spare parts. I have waited 2 months. 

  • Fairlane

    Happy as with my new Mazda 3 here. 09 Plate purchased in December. Only got a Neo sedan here, no complaints about the fuel economy here but ive got a 6 speed manual. Slight bit of road noise and the crappyness of the bluetooth system will not do music streaming from an Iphone are my only complaints.

    • Fairlane

       That should read 09/11 plate purchased in December

      • Guest2

        If you’ve got a Mazda3 auto,  it should use around 8.8L per 100km in real life.The rest of the competitors (auto) use 7-ish. That’s comparing apples with apples.

  • http://www.facebook.com/antmindel Anthony Mindel

    I think the all new Honda Civic will give the 3 a good run for its money.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/NKSGPC5SGNSGQ7GSEGIKUP3OUI __A_YAHOO_USER__

      I dont think so… its starting price is way too high, honda is still overpriced and i have no idea why a Thai built car with less tax costs more then a japanese car with more tax! Do they really think people will pay more just for the “HONDA” brand name. I think a quick look at the market share in Australia and the down down down of the honda brand will point to a CLEAR ,, no Australians do not buy Honda’s anymore

      • somebody who knows nothing

        Well Mazda Charge more for their Thai Built cars. What I can’t understand is why Mazda build cars for Australia and don’t send them onto other countries?
        After all Australia is realistically the ONLY marketplace where Mazda is enjoying success. Japan, Europe & America it is regarded as a niche market low volume brand.
        But then again Australians regard VW, Renault, Peugeot etc as Prestige cars so I guess that goes a long way to explaining things

        • feaewf62637

           remove yourself from the gene pool, retard.

        • Ga

          loser

        • Ansett

          if that is true, a ‘niche’ market in the USA would probably equal our entire population considering the market targets a population of over 313 million I would lay odds on they sell a hell of a lot more then we do here.

          Same in Europe and Japan. Just because the 3 made #1 here its still not even a flash in the pan in comparison, so Mazda, while pleased with the result will probably still focus more efforts overseas then here.

      • Mark

        Actually, the Civic will be made in Japan, but that’s only due to the floods in Thailand

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/NKSGPC5SGNSGQ7GSEGIKUP3OUI __A_YAHOO_USER__

      I dont think so… its starting price is way too high, honda is still overpriced and i have no idea why a Thai built car with less tax costs more then a japanese car with more tax! Do they really think people will pay more just for the “HONDA” brand name. I think a quick look at the market share in Australia and the down down down of the honda brand will point to a CLEAR ,, no Australians do not buy Honda’s anymore

    • Guest2

      While everyone is making their cars bigger. The next Honda Civic is smaller than the current model.

  • T J

    “A requirement for only regular unleaded petrol helps to keep running costs down, …”

    The other day paid 153.9 cents for a liter regular unleaded, and diesel was only 5cents dearer. 

  • veksta

    i braught my wife a brand new 09 mazda3 maxx 6speed manual in jun 09 (only because she put something foward to me i could not refuse if i buy her a new car she will never ask to drive my r8 clubsport again) so yeah mazda3 was the choice made. we are very happy with the car over all but im going to right a few of the bad points and see if its common to all. alot of people are saying mazda is bad with road noise but im yet to hear it in our mazda.engine noise yes the injector noise could almost be mistaken for a noisy lifter sound.when cruising on the highway with aircon on it seems to have split second power surges every couple of km,s mazda dealer says its normal (mmmm ok). now the clutch the worst part of driving it. its way to light&shutters when taking off at low rpm.taking off from lights the car has to be taken to about  4500rpm just to keep up with the rest of the flow of traffic &1st gear ratio is way to short so lots of red lights means motor will be getting pushed harder and then whatch the little 2.0ltr guzzle the pulp down.i drove my 6.0ltr clubsport while following my wife in mazda the whole way on a 1&half hr drive (city driving) and mazda used approx 6liters more fuel
    Maybe they should of left out 6th gear (which only drops u down 200rpm on highway anyway) and had a longer ratio 1st gear.we had the auto maz3 for a day while ours was getting serviced and it took the stress of coming up to a red light away cause just taking off from lights only required little bit of acceleration and only 3000rpm and we taking off ahead of every1 else. so auto the better option in my opinion.Our daughter now needs her first car so i sneakely snuck down to mazda &test drove mpv maz3 turbo. (whooh whooh) very very impressed so result of that was the daughter gets the maz3 and wife gets mpv &the wife sneakely saying i cant drive the mpv unless she can drive the clubsport. yeah i can live with that

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/NKSGPC5SGNSGQ7GSEGIKUP3OUI __A_YAHOO_USER__

      Yep, the auto is the better option

    • Tom

      I have a 6 speed manual ’09 Maxx Sport, and find the performance from standing start more than adequete. I think you might be to used to your 6.0 Clubsport, yes you do need to get the revs up at the clutch enagement point, around 2000-2500. If you don’t have enough revs at clutch engagement it’ll take off with a shudder and be slow. Offcourse the auto is more user friendly, while the manual requires some skill to master the required revs/clutch engagement. I’ve driven both auto & manual and prefer the manual.

  • Dave S

    I think it is funny that the only car that outsells the Commodore after being number one after 15 years, is a hatch / sedan that is described as being almost as big as the early Commodores.

    Sounds like if you cant beat them join them.

    • Rub it

      No, it doesn’t sound like that at all.

  • Lbrinsmead

    Nice car, but I’d still prefer the Golf.

  • Rabs1979

    I just bought a 2012 mazda 3 maxx sport and i’m pretty happy with it once you get use to clutch it’s such a nice ride. I test drove all the cars in the same class and no other car came close and really it’s by far the best looking all the other cars are really quite hideous in the same class

  • Davidburrell

    Hi,

    We purchased a few Mazda 3 Maxx Sport cars mid 2009 as a company car.
    I have had one of the cars since new and have travelled all over NSW and ACT in it. It sits at 210,000 km as of today and has not missed a beat. The front pads were changed at 165 000 and the backs are yet to be changed since new.
    It still drives like new.
    Average fuel economy is 7.3 with average speed 52 km over 210.000. I am on my 3rd set of tyres. It has always been serviced by Mazda I Parramatta NSW.
    The only negative is when you have a baby capsule in the back the front passenger seat needs to go uncomfortably forward.

    These comments are coming from an unbiased Holden Man

    Hope this helps first time buyers

  • Ranald14

    I reckon I have never seen such a collection of “dont know what I am talking about” in the comments above about Stop/Start technologies , fuel usage, batteries etc tc

    Its must be wonderful to have the confidence to write so drivel about stuff you clearly know nothing about

    • Ted

      They all must be Public Servants, that just talk for the sake of their mouths opening..

  • Jack Brabham

    It’s a disposable car. A bit like buying a pack of razors. Drive it to work for a few years and give it to the kids.

  • Dannyperry1963

    gee you people are easily fooled into buying garbage. if you respect yourself and your family you would look at the worlds number 1 brand Volkswagen. I tell you what drive a Volkswagen and this then drive a tinny Mazda and see which you choose. I have been in the car industry for over 30 years and I have seen some manufacturers getting worse and worse, this is why Volkswagen has now holding all top spots worldwide for the first in the history of the motor vehicle, oh and guess what yes they are very very easy to afford. and the economy just smashes japcrap out the door. Grow up and buy quality. oh and 5 star safety rated by European standards which are far better than ours.
    no wonder our country is the way it is, with people thinking Mazda’s are good cars, what a joke.

  • Fionajohnston16

    Oooh above the ‘poverty pack’, just how to buy into the stupid greed focused, you need more and if you don’t spend up so I can make my bonus we’ll sneer and look down on you.
    Is it nice to know you’re doing their work of embarrassing people into buying more than they need or can afford for them?
    Way to go, next article, “how not to buy clothes from Target because my friends and I will sneer and call you a ‘Tarjay princess”