Volkswagen Scirocco R Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Volkswagen Scirocco R Review

VOLKSWAGEN SCIROCCO

Pros: Fun handling; strong grip; punchy, flexible engine; good brakes; loaded with features; interior quality

Cons: Limited rear headroom; small boot; ride quality issues despite adjustable suspension; forward and rear vision not great; 98 RON fuel requirement

By Jez Spinks |
FIND DEALS

Price: $47,490 to $49,990

Our Rating:  

Another Volkswagen named after a wind has blown into Australia, though for the Scirocco it has travelled half the world more at the pace of a breeze rather than a gale.

The Volkswagen Scirocco, in only its third generation since 1974 as a sportier alternative to the Golf on which it’s based, has been on sale in Europe for nearly four years already.

VW’s Australian outpost, however, finally stopped dithering late last year and announced it would import the model after all. It’s only one variant, but at least it’s the sportiest: the Scirocco R.

Priced from $47,490, the VW Scirocco R ousts the three-door Golf R to be positioned not far from the five-door Volkswagen Golf R (from $49,990) but sufficiently distanced from the Golf GTI (from $38,990).

It’s also equipped like a true flagship, though. Unlike the Golf R, the Scirocco R – which still looks fresh because it was the first model to feature the brand’s current, horizontally grilled family ‘face’ – features the company’s Adaptive Chassis Control electronically adjustable dampers as standard rather than as a $1500 option.

Another $1300 of value is thrown into the equation with huge, 19-inch alloy wheels fitted inclusively.

Then there are LED daytime running lights, metallic paint, dual-zone climate control, cruise control, bi-xenon headlights, rear parking sensors, rain-sensing wipers, multifunction trip computer, Bluetooth with audio streaming and heated sports seats.

With just a higher-end audio, sat-nav and a glass sunroof as extras, the Scirocco has the shortest options list of any current VW passenger car or SUV.

The Scirocco R is about a year fresher than the rest of the range, though it uses a well-known engine under its bonnet – the direct injection 2.0-litre four-cylinder turbo from the Audi S3 and Golf R.

Again it’s detuned slightly for Australia – due to the country being classed as a hot climate by Germany to the annoyance of the local subsidiaries. So instead of the 199kW the engine produces in Europe, there’s 188kW (developed at 6000rpm).

Not a big deal in the greater scheme of things, and the 2.0-litre turbo has never disappointed in either the S3 or Golf R – notably the decent dollop of torque (330Nm) produced in the heart of the rev range between 2500-5000rpm.

As the launch drive gets underway in the Victorian Alps, we note that the mini-monsoon sweeping through ski territory would be ideal for an all-wheel-drive Golf R.

The Scirocco R, however, is front-drive only, instead relying on an extended action stability control system it dubs Extended Electronic Differential Lock (XDL) and first introduced on the current-generation Golf GTI.

On the wet, twisty climb from Mount Beauty towards Falls Creek, the system, if not a match for the speedy slingshot ability of the rival Renault Megane RS250 Trophee that’s equipped with a proper mechanical limited-slip diff, proves to be effective.

The XDL ‘diff’ can be felt nipping at the inside front wheel as the ESC applies dabs of braking to counteract the wheelspin to help maintain the desired cornering line rather than washing out wide (which would be quite literal in the torrential conditions).

While understeer will still be an inevitable consequence of misjudged speed, there’s surprising traction out of second- and third-gear corners.

It’s this type of twisty-road scenario that also shows off the Scirocco R’s advantage over the Golf R. With a 125kg-lighter kerb weight, the coupe-hatch feels noticeably more nimble on its feet.

Those ‘feet’ are also further apart, with the rear axle’s extra 44mm width visually noticeable looking at the Scirocco from behind, while the 51mm-lower roofline improves the centre of gravity over the Golf R.

Thick A-pillars can obscure vision around corners, though, and the sports seats could hold you in more securely.

Complementing the dynamics is tenacious grip from the 19-inch low-profile rubber, though the liquorice thin rubber does little for ride comfort, or noise levels, even with the adaptive dampers set to Comfort mode.

It’s an unsatisfactory mode that allows the Scirocco R to become floaty over larger undulations without providing driver and passengers from a deserved break from the ride that becomes increasingly fidgety over bumpy roads as you move from Normal to Sport modes.

It’s a contrast to our experience of the system when optioned with the Golf GTI.

For those with an eye for performance stats, the Golf R is still quicker than the Scirocco R from a standing start – all-wheel-drive helping to create a three-tenths-of-a-second gap: 5.7 v 6.0sec with ‘DSG’ dual-clutch auto or 5.9 v 6.2sec with the six-speed manual. It’d be more interesting and more relevant to see 80-120km/h times, though unfortunately they’re not provided by VW.

That’s still genuine hot-hatch pace and the engine’s characteristics are enjoyably familiar.

A nice induction rasp responds to strong throttle pedal applications as the Scirocco R accelerates, and the 2.0-litre turbo remains a wonderfully flexible unit that allows the driver to hold higher gears and rely on the meaty mid-range for momentum.

The six-speed manual is a light, slick and accurate gearbox that will please most enthusiasts, though the DSG – at least on the open road – remains a tempting option because of the paddleshift levers and exhaust parps that accompany upshifts only on the dual-clutch.

The manual provides marginally better fuel efficiency and emissions – 8.1L/100km and 189g/km v 8.2 and 192, with both bettering the figures of the heavier Golf R.

You’ll still need to pay for the most expensive unleaded fuel, though – 98 RON.

With the departure of the three-door Golf R, it’s certainly a clearer choice between the five-door and the Scirocco R.

The Golf R is naturally the more practical offering. The Scirocco R only seats four and even then headroom – but not legroom – is restricted for anyone over 5ft 9in, and the boot is deep but far from huge and with the small hatch door revealing only a relatively small aperture.

Rear vision isn’t brilliant, either, and unlike the Golf R there is no optional rear-view camera.

But the Scirocco R, crucially for some buyers, is the Golf that doesn’t look like a Golf.

There’s even some unique interior touches, such as the triangular door and console grips, that blend with switchgear, materials and parts such as the steering wheel shared with the Golf R.

The Volkswagen Scirocco R is certainly a classic case of better late than never.


 

Owner reviews of the VOLKSWAGEN SCIROCCO Add a New Review

  • Vdubs

    I’ve had the pleasure of test driving an overseas model of the Scirocco and i must say I’m disappointed that this has achieved only 4/5 stars. This car is engineering at it’s finest point. 

    The ‘negatives’ listed are common criticisms throughout all hot hatches and sports coupes. These shouldn’t have been marked against the VW at all.

    • zej

      A sports hatch/coupe, apart from being a cracker of a drive, should either be practical, or stunningly beautiful. The Scirocco is neither. The Golf R has it beat for practicality and performance (if not handling), and the styling is bland from the front and dumpy from the rear - like a half melted VW Polo or Alfa 147. So all you’re getting is a marginal improvement in handling which, lets face it, 98% of people wouldn’t notice anyway.

    • zej

      A sports hatch/coupe, apart from being a cracker of a drive, should either be practical, or stunningly beautiful. The Scirocco is neither. The Golf R has it beat for practicality and performance (if not handling), and the styling is bland from the front and dumpy from the rear - like a half melted VW Polo or Alfa 147. So all you’re getting is a marginal improvement in handling which, lets face it, 98% of people wouldn’t notice anyway.

    • Flipa42

      Five stars? Is it perfect is it? Your paying almost 50k for a federal car!

    • Flipa42

      Fwd not federal

  • Fredsvp

    as per usual Australia with a population of 23 Million gets cars that Canada is not allowed to buy – such as the Tiguan TDI, Golf 1600 TDI, Scirocco, Golf TDG which are all sold in Australia and Europe – and they say VW wants to expand their North American market……

    Additionally we are a slave to what USA likes and if they do not want the car then we are not allowed to have it ….let’s not even discuss the options of manual vs automatic…..

    To add insult to injury we are dissuaded from buying the cars in the USA vs Canada when they are cheaper in the USA – VW will not honour the warranty when both countries receive the identical car from Germany - 

    Have you noticed that none of the reporters will write about this issue -

    Talk about FREE TRADE

    • Showtime

      Well this is an Australian motoring website…

    • Shak

      Mate i just got back from Canada, and let me tell you the Canadians get many many more cars that we would love to have downunder.For one, you guys have the Muscle Car Trifecta in the Challenger, Camaro and Mustang. Then you have marques like Infiniti, Acura, Cadillac, Buick.

      • zej

        Good points all. But do we REALLY want Buicks? ok.. we’ll trade them Chery’s, Great-Walls or Protons for Buicks.

    • Blue_molotov

      Whinging to Australians about a lack of car choices is going to fall on deaf ears. At least you have to option of driving South of the border to the land of cheap ‘n’ plenty. You could buy an M3 for what we pay here on-road for the Sirocco.

    • Ridecycling

      I am really not sure what you are talking about.  The cars we get imported here are based on what the distributors think they can sell, pure and simple.  The car market in Australia is very different than the US, Canada and Europe for that matter. 

      Take the Hyundai i30 hatch for example; that model is not even available in the US or Canada yet it sells like hot cakes in Australia.  That is certainly contrary to your theory about the US driving our market.

      It is in fact exactly the opposite of what you are so sarcastically saying- it is in fact about Free Trade.  Our distributors choose what they think they can sell, it is nearly as simple as that.

      At the same time the cost of our vehicles is directly related to our Government taxation of cars and our small population size.

      I am not even sure why I am responding to your post; you make absolutely no sense at all.

      • G

        Who’s going to buy the i30 when they have access to the Genesis coupe? Most i30 drivers drive as if they’re in a sports car, no doubt they’d pick the Genesis if it was available.

      • Sam

        an application of Blue_molotoe’s comment is this:

        Price for Mercedes C63 coupe in Canada- $66,900 CAD ($63,108 AUD)

        Price for Mercedes C63 coupe in Australia- $177,033 CAD ($167,000 AUD)

        $66,900 CAD will buy you a Golf R in Australia.. If I where you I would stop complaining about the lack of variety of cars in Canada and start thanking your lucky stars about the insanely low prices you pay for the same product compared to numerous overseas markets…

    • zej

      Wowwee!! We get diesel Volkswagens!! And here I thought us Aussie’s were missing out on Corvettes, Cadillac CTS’s/XLR’s, Dodge Chargers, Challengers, Mustangs, Camaros (which were designed around an Aussie platform FFS…), V8 Lexus’s, Infiniti’s, not to mention a whole suite of manual and AWD BMW’s and Mercedes Benz’s. BMW 540i six-speed? BMW 330CiX AWD manual coupe? Mercedes Benz E500T 4-matic? Nah, we have putt-putt Volkswagen oilburners to make up for it.

    • Anonymous

      Gone a bit quiet there mate ?

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=522933607 Mark Barnier

      Fred, the reason VW Australia gets this car is that they can make more money out of us  than they can out of you. We pay $USD 40K for a Golf GTi. US price $25K. Even allowing for a generous mark up to cover shipping, a premium for manufacturing in RHD ect we are probably returning an extra $10K profit per vehicle!!!!  VW probably makes more profit selling GTi’s in Australia than in does in both the USA and Canada combined!

  • ridecycling

    As for VW waiting years to bring in this car, they already know this model, at this price will be a small seller in comparison to say the Golf and Polo.  This car is very very niche market. 

    The real question is, how long will it take VW Australia to bring in a car that will out sell the Sirocco 20 to one; the new Up!?  Priced correctly that car could sell like gang busters, yet I fear we will likely not see many of those for years to come as well.

  • Anonymous

    If you look at the Scirocco R as a better styled hotted up GTi it becomes an awesome proposition. If you look at it like a FWD less practical Golf R you’d never buy one. 

    But a GTi with more balls that looks like that is always a winner to me. 

  • Neeko

    Looks hot as! Shame about FWD though, AWD FTW!

    • 3D4

      Audi S3 perhaps?

      • Anonymous

        Just buy a Golf R and save $20K

    • Gokart champ

      You guy’s don’t know what your talking about!  That goes to everyone that thinks awd is da sh#$ !!!  Scirocco R and Gti 35 is faster then Golf R or S3 with there understeer awd system,  And on top of them all Renault Megane RS250 is faster then all above plus wrx sti and evo 10/ nissan 370z.    Do your math go to race track and forget who is faster at the lights!!!!

  • Thomas

    Give me a RS250 over this any day of the week.

    • Guest

      You obviously like cars that are ugly inside and out!

      • CRS200

        And this Sirocco is a good looker?

        Sorry Megane RS 250 in every aspect, but let’s talk about handling yes?

  • Fabbo

    I’d suggest you go test drive it before you make a negative comment. Also, hard to compare this car to the Golf R. Add all the options you get standard on the Scirocco R to the Golf R and you’ll pay $5,000+ more.

    • carbie

      Such as? $2k difference in base price makes the two extra doors, space for 3 adult sized passengers in the back, larger boot with decent opening and two extra driven wheels seem like a real bargain.

  • Walbjj

    I bought a 3dr gti a yr ago, if I knew the scirocco was coming out, I probably would of held on longer. But right now, I’m more than happy with the gti and see no reason to “upgrade”

  • Anonymous

    Id rather a 5 door gold R TBH, Maybe a 43k GTI version would sell better

    • Smoothcall

      GTI ED35?

  • Lbrinsmead

    I agree, it shouldn’t be marked down for that. Having a nicely styled shape usually compromises visibility – its a tradeoff.

  • JimmehJames

    I ordered my Scirocco in November with delivery expected in June,

    Out off all the cars i test drove this was something a little different, the dash is far more interesting too look at and feels better than what is in the golf,

    the pillar-less Windows are Great, driving possition is fantastic..

    The Addaptive Suspension is a little pointless, it goes from jelly to have no spine left in a push of the button,

    As per usual VW service was SHOCKING, e.g “get what your given” really cocky aproach to sales….

    OH and i now become something really bad, a VW Driver, its almost as bad a Camry Driver, ive been practicing my smug “i drive a VW” face too….

    Why buy the Scirocco? because every man and his dog has a Golf…

  • Heath Russell

    mps is still faster and 12k cheaper

    • CRS200

      Well while you comment is true when the corners come you can say bye bye Scirocco R and “Revoir” to the Megane RS 250.

  • Gmh-bogan

    From my point of view the Scirocco R IS DISSAPOINTING.Like the whole Rolf range,to wide for the length of the wheelbase.Seats look good but the interior styling is quiet poor.To much harden plastic for a prestige European brand.
    Even the Jez Spinks review has a lot more negatives than posotives.98 ron Kaboom coming.Rolf IS OVERRATED.

    • Pops

      VW salesmen like to think they are …. But VW is not a prestige brand.

      • Andrew

        But has Prestige maintenance costs….

        • Anonymous

          Quote and compare. Go on.

          • Andrew

            I’m talking from experience. If $800 for minor and $1250 for major service of our Mk5 Golf is any guide then my statement above is deadly accurate. Had enough poor quality to last a life time. Window regulator, door lock mech, airbag fault, AC compressor causing whole system to need replacing. Touch wood, I hope the DSG holds together till we can sell the bad experience away.

          • Anonymous

            Not good. My MkV tdi manual usually cost around $400 for an average service, although the 60,000′s $695 dealer quote had me scampering to a national repair franchise. With their inability to turn off the service reminder, along with one or two other ‘suspicions’, all remaining servicing was done by the dealer. I got the 90,000 done for under $600, even with giving them the nod for a couple of optional items such as tyre rotate and windscreen wiper blades.

          • Andrew

            What state is that in?  I’m guessing it’s not in a city with only one VW franchisee. Sucks to be me I guess.

          • Anonymous

            Perth, Andrew. Sorry I mistook you for a populist naysayer. Yes, having more than one dealer may help, but the rest of them only popped up after I bought my first VW from John Hughes, at a time when he was the one and only. Car ownership over the last twelve years has taught me to put aside four to five hundred for servicing, whatever the popular make – Holden, VW and Ford, in my instance.

          • Brendan C

            Really , Funny cost me $300 to service my R36 perhaps you need to shop around. Or they see you comming.

    • zej

      The Scirocco R has several shortcomings. You haven’e mentioned a single one of them. Too wide for it’s wheelbase? Seriously?

      • Gmh-bogan

        Looks like a bullfrog on four wheels from behind.$50,000 can buy you a decent car.Did mention the badly finished interior.Quiet a few mentioned in review.What happens when on a country road and bad quality fuel is added at the oldtime servo.Kaboom.

  • Tuffguy

    Firstly it is amazing how some get so off track.   This article is about the Scirocco R yet many see fit to dribble extensively about freakin cars in Canada and USA???   Get a grip people this is Australia and nobody cares about what is going on over there.   We also all know about the pricing disparity so build a bridge, you cannot do anything about it and whingeing achieves nothing.
    If Ridecycling prefers to be in the new Up over the Scirocco R then you get what you deserve and your comparison of the two is just plain nonsense.
    To Heath Russell, the MPS is just another Mazda (albeit now with a large hole in the bonnet) with torque steer by the bucketload thus rendering any extra power useless, noisy and quality not even in the same ballpark.   As for its looks we better not go there.
    However BirtyB you really hit the nail on the head.   Too many seem to be focused on the fact that it is FWD instead of AWD.   Yet with all the ranting and raving that goes on about how good Golfs and particularly the GTI is, not one word about the FWD.   Rather lots said to justify the FWD over cars like the AWD WRX.
    I was this close to trading in my MY08 WRX for a BMW 118i with 8 spd auto and options until I drove the Scirocco last Friday.   Needless to say I have now cancelled the BMW and will instead take delivery in the next couple of weeks of my Scirocco R DSG in Viper Green.   Yeah baby rocc on.

    • Devil’s Advocate

       Yes it is noisy, compromised in many ways with most interior surfaces not having the same quality, however the MPS doesn’t torque steer to the extent you are implying. Having once lived with one for a few years it is only really an issue on a wet and/or rutted road at lower speeds/ambitious throttle settings and is definitely not as bad as something like an Astra VXR and can be easily driven around. It is no different to having a powerful RWD car, except instead of the rear end stepping out etc, the steering wheel tugs a little. You could say it is part of it’s “character” and is a good method of feedback on how much power you can apply. If the extra power is “useless” because of the bucketloads of torque steer, how come it has continually won the showroom class in the Targa Tasmania over the last few years snapping at the heels and at times beating highly modified AWD rally specials, including having won some wet stages outright?

      It also still has an 80-120 time (good indicator of overtaking ability) that can embarrass some “more expensive” performance cars. Hardly a result of not being able you use the extra power because of bucketloads of torque steer.

      The majority of people who say it has bucketloads of torque steer either
      have never driven one or don’t know how to drive it properly. It is
      like ALL cars, no matter which end/ends drive the car etc you have to
      change your driving style to get the most out of them.

      • Andrew

        “how come it has continually won the showroom class in the Targa Tasmania?”
        Easy. Brendan Reeves and Simon Evans. Two of the best rally drivers in the world!

        • Devil’s Advocate

           Simon Evans has NOT driven the 3MPS in Targa Tasmania, however he is now driving a Mazda2 in the 2012 ARC. Depending on the year it has been Brendan Reeves, Rick Bates and/or Alister McRae.

        • Devil’s Advocate

           Simon Evans has NOT driven the 3MPS in Targa Tasmania, however he is now driving a Mazda2 in the 2012 ARC. Depending on the year it has been Brendan Reeves, Rick Bates and/or Alister McRae.

      • autoboy

        Devil’s Advocate

        You are spot on.  The MPS does not pretend to be a silky smooth uber cart.  Its ‘cheap’, has lots of noise, rattles your teeth and gives  you the odd lung punch – not lacking in ”character”!  If you dont what that, then I guess buy the VWs.

        Yes – difficult to get a clean launch, in no small fact due to wheel spin, but once wheel spin is taken out of the equation, as it is in most normal day to day driving, and once on the roll, that 380nm is something else.  As you indicate: In gear acceleration is pretty good. 

        Reckon though that I would have taken the REX or and EVO over the sirrocco though.

      • Bcmobbs

        Have just traded an MPS on Scirocco withDSG…The Mazda is not a pinch on the R as far as build quality goes. Neither should it based on price. The R is quicker for sure overall. The MPS has a better 80-120 (by a fraction)

        Overall the R is a greatly superior vehicle and far better looking as well.

        Very glad I traded… :-)

  • http://www.priceindiaka.com/ Price India

    Volswagen Scirocco R Is Very Nice Looking Car..

  • Guest

    Firstly glad those that like it have chosen to put their money where their mouth is.

    For me, I reckon it’s aged already. The green fad has already past its used-by date. Most likely it’d drive well as it should and make some impact to making looking at the everyday hatches on the road different. Mind you I’ve seen one everyday on a daily basis and it hasn’t turned my head.

    I wouldn’t say no to a drive but as for owning one, probably not my cup of tea.

  • shane

    so may experts but with so little knowledge on this website

  • Ch

    I’ve noticed that Volkswagen drivers are the worst drivers, they constantly cut into you etc.. I drive a Lexus IS350, which most of the time I’m relaxed and doing the speed limit, but when a golf driver swifts by I floor it and the golf drivers have a confused face gen I fly passed them lol

    • HOMER

      IDIOT.

    • HOMER

      IDIOT.

    • TuffGuy

      Yeah so you drive a tarted up and grossly overpriced toyota camry and that makes you a real hero eh???   I bet that gives you a real fizzy feeling in your trousers.

  • F1

    The only thing that I’ve noticed about German cars is that their build quality & exterior fit & finish seems sub-par, the body panels seem to have relatively wide seams and the cars themselves seem as if they’ve been “glued” together..

  • PeterG

    The girl next door in a prettier dress.
    Still kisses the same but ah its all in the mind…so why not pay more.
    Don’t know… after a few kisses its still the girl next door and the dress don’t seem quite so new.

  • CRS200

    Great car but I would nerver buy this over the “king” Renault Megane RS 250.

  • Andy

    Man there are some serious ego’s here! the keys to me are practicality, power/weight, fuel economy and low purchase price. I have a Colt Ralliart bought new in 2008 for $23k driveaway, has ESC/Recaro’s/Climate. Simple ECU work now has 150kw/1130kg, 8l/100km and 0-100 in 6.2. Go ahead spend $50k on a car you must have the money to burn so each to thier own

  • Kaas

    Rather stick with a GTI if you guys already drive it… or go for the Golf R… the 4WD and bigger cabin brings in much better value and practicality.

    As a Coupe…
    When The Toyota 86 comes out… which was reviewed and quoted “One of the best driving sports cars in the last decade” and second only to the Ferrari 458 according to Top Gear (who are anything but Toyota lovers), meaning the 86 even outdrives and outhandles exotics and other 100K+ cars…. and is slated to be 40K AUD (25-30K cheaper than the Scirocco)…. I dont think its even a contest…. only real VW badge lovers will even consider this over the alternative.

    • Kaas

      meant to say 10K cheaper not 25-30K (was thinking of 370Z)

      • Homer

        Agree but there is a but about the 86, same as the MX5, no real power. By power and more so, torque, I’m referring to enough for day to day use in traffic. Not having to drop gears all the time to be in the right rev band. Had a MX5, great car but gutless, had a Golf GTi, outstanding engine. Now, put that engine in the 86 or MX5 and you’ve got a world best value sports car.

        • CRS200

          “Not having to drop gears all the time to be in the right rev band ”

          Well that’s the beauty of a NA engine, keeping it in the high rev range, I do think the GT 86 will be a very interesting car.
          It has the same weight as the Clio RS 200 the same Kw’s. The only difference: GT 86 is RWD and the Clio RS 200 FWD. Interesting to say the least Clio RS 200 is a twisty mountain demon and the GT 86 will defiantly be a drifting machine.

          Personally I prefer FWD (not excluding AWD) to a RWD only because of my driving style. 

        • CRS200

          “Not having to drop gears all the time to be in the right rev band ”

          Well that’s the beauty of a NA engine, keeping it in the high rev range, I do think the GT 86 will be a very interesting car.
          It has the same weight as the Clio RS 200 the same Kw’s. The only difference: GT 86 is RWD and the Clio RS 200 FWD. Interesting to say the least Clio RS 200 is a twisty mountain demon and the GT 86 will defiantly be a drifting machine.

          Personally I prefer FWD (not excluding AWD) to a RWD only because of my driving style. 

  • TuffGuy

    Some here seem fixated on the Scirocco R being a 2 door coupe but in the end all that matters is the purchasing criteria of the person buying it.   For myself the kids have left home and there is only myself and the wife so this suits us.   The rear seat will only be used occasionally and locally for going out to dinner or whatnot.   As for having less value by being a 2 door coupe well that is just nonsense.   People buy whatever car for their own reasons and for whatever suits their lifestyle and needs.   Cars are targeted to a market and people buy to that market.   You could use the same comments to say don’t buy the Lambo Aventador because it only has 2 doors and is not practical and will have less value, buy a Colt Ralliart instead because it has 4 doors!    People also buy more expensive cars because they are in fact worth it because they are better hands down.   Mmmmm I can afford both so which should I buy – Colt Ralliart or Scirocco R?   If the Colt works for you then enjoy your choice but the Scirocco works for me.   We each actually have our own critieria to purchase to which makes any criticism irrelevant.

  • TuffGuy

    Some here seem fixated on the Scirocco R being a 2 door coupe but in the end all that matters is the purchasing criteria of the person buying it.   For myself the kids have left home and there is only myself and the wife so this suits us.   The rear seat will only be used occasionally and locally for going out to dinner or whatnot.   As for having less value by being a 2 door coupe well that is just nonsense.   People buy whatever car for their own reasons and for whatever suits their lifestyle and needs.   Cars are targeted to a market and people buy to that market.   You could use the same comments to say don’t buy the Lambo Aventador because it only has 2 doors and is not practical and will have less value, buy a Colt Ralliart instead because it has 4 doors!    People also buy more expensive cars because they are in fact worth it because they are better hands down.   Mmmmm I can afford both so which should I buy – Colt Ralliart or Scirocco R?   If the Colt works for you then enjoy your choice but the Scirocco works for me.   We each actually have our own critieria to purchase to which makes any criticism irrelevant.

  • Leahk78

    I just traded my Honda Civic Type R on the Scirocco R and I love it.  I was needing a kidney belt to go down the road in the Honda…. the Scirocco is a beautiful drive and extremely comfortable.  It also has the go that i need and want.  Like Tuffguy says (in not so many words) each to their own!

  • Sams

    Just spent one weekend behind the wheel of a NEW Scirocco R and I think it’s an amazing piece of kit.  Roll the throttle on smoothly and the FWD just grips and pulls hard!  The brakes can handle a lot of punishment without fade.  The DSG sounds awesome between shifts and is sooo smooth and fast.  Feels nimble and super fun to drive!  Really puts a smile on my face.  Before you diss it, you should drive one!  Awesome fun.

  • Feel

    I’ve driven MkV GTI, R32 and MkVI TDI.  All great in their own way.  Two biggest issues for me were: (1) steering feel (lack thereof) and (2) brake feel (over-assisted and too touchy).  I’d be keen to hear from those who have actually driven the Scirocco to see if they think its steering and brake feel are different from the models I’ve listed above.

  • Newlife067

    Thinking about it
    Well interesting read on all above, thinking about venturing into a Scirocco, and as said, first look at the green version, the body looked stretched, the blue takes adifferent shape.Do I or dont I go for the golf R, or the other. Having driven an astra turbo ,top of the line hatch which the ex  wife loves, was interesting to read about the suspension, asI  agree the sports mode certainly tightens the car, but what about the normal ride..Stepping out of a family unit Calais, still struggle with the options to be added to the car for the price that come standard in the Calais.Time will tell, as take one for test drive Saturday and will report back. Yes it is all in the eye of the beholder and there is a lot of choice out there .Also found it useful in report re servicing, as this is something if u have not owned a VW one would never know, and in Adelaide it is a limitedmarket.