Car Advice

Skoda Yeti 77TSI Review

SKODA YETI

Pros: Smooth, free-revving engine; decent ride and handling; spacious cabin; interior quality; clever, flexible rear-seat layout

Cons: No 4WD option available for 77TSI; premium unleaded fuel required; real-world city fuel economy; compact boot

By Jez Spinks |
Add to shortlist

Price: $26,290 to $28,590

Our Rating:  

Few people laugh at Skodas these days. The car brand that was as often the butt of cruel jokes in the 1980s – as with Lada and other Eastern Bloc makers renowned for disintegrating vehicles – has already been successful in Europe for many years since being taken under Volkswagen’s welcoming wing.

You might have a chuckle at the name of its compact SUV, though, even if the Yeti has a serious role of helping to further restore Skoda’s reputation in Australia since the brand returned in 2007.

Despite the name, the Yeti doesn’t leave a big footprint on the road. At just 4233mm long, it’s about the same size as the car from which it borrows its platform – the VW Golf.

That measurement makes it more of a compact compact SUV but then the Yeti also starts lower than a number of the most popular models in the segment, such as the Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-7.

We tested the most affordable Skoda Yeti – the 77TSI manual that asks $26,290 before on-road costs are added. That makes it a direct competitor for 2WD versions of compact SUVs such as the Kia Sportage, Hyundai ix35, Nissan Dualis and Mitsubishi ASX – all of which start at a similar price.

Inclusive features include 16-inch alloys (with full-size steel spare), cruise control, four-way adjustable leather steering wheel with controls, Bluetooth connectivity, trip computer, roof rails, seven airbags and stability control.

Metallic paint adds an extra $490, however, while other options that are likely to appeal to many buyers are a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic gearbox ($2300) and rear parking sensors ($640).

There are a few other features for those looking to indulge, though if you want all-wheel drive rather than front-wheel drive, you’ll need to make a notable financial jump to $35,690 for the diesel 103TDI model.

The 77TSI badge denotes a 77kW 1.2-litre turbocharged petrol four-cylinder under this Yeti’s bonnet.

The engine isn’t as great as it is in the lighter Volkswagen Polo city car because acceleration is never remarkable. Volkswagen doesn’t claim otherwise, either, listing the Yeti 77TSI’s 0-100km/h time as 11.8 seconds (12.0sec with the DSG auto).

Its smooth, easy-revving nature appeals hugely, however, with a light-to-hand six-speed manual – and those small dimensions – combining to make driving around town an easy task.

Freeway cruising isn’t exactly effortless, but the Yeti 77TSI just about has sufficient torque to hold the legal speed limit in top gear up inclines. A couple of downshifts will be needed for more urgent overtaking manoeuvres.

It’s only here where we found the Yeti 77TSI’s trip computer provided a read-out in keeping with the official combined fuel consumption of 6.6 litres (of premium unleaded) per 100km. As we added more city kilometres, the trip average spiralled into the teens.

Good seats and a supple ride help to reel off the kays over long distances, and the suspension continues to provide sufficient comfort over poorer surfaces, though its composure gets temporarily ruffled by bigger bumps.

For buyers looking for a compact SUV that’s more than just A-to-B transport, the Yeti is as fun to drive, perhaps not surprisingly, as its cousin, the Volkswagen Tiguan.

The steering shares similar traits – lack of feel but consistently weighted – and turning it through tighter corners finds a vehicle that is nicely balanced and not prone to excessive body roll.

That taller roofline contributes to a feeling of spaciousness in the Yeti’s cabin.
So headroom is taken for granted, but there’s also good knee room behind the front seats.

The Yeti also shares one of the Tiguan’s key weaknesses – a relatively small boot that’s a maximum of 415 litres – but unlike the VW the Skoda compensates with a cleverly flexible rear seating set-up.

Called VarioFlex, the system comprises three rear seats that can be individually folded down, adjusted for inclination or removed from the car completely.

The narrower middle seat acts as an armrest – with cupholders – when folded down.The outer rear seats also slide forwards/backwards.

The seatbacks don’t fold entirely flat, but a mountain bike is still comfortably accommodated even without the need to remove the front wheel. Remove all the rear seats and the Yeti becomes van-like in terms of practicality.

There’s also ample storage for smaller items and, although Skoda is essentially the budget brand of the VW Group, interior quality is of the standard consistent with what has come to be expected from the German automotive manufacturing giant.

A couple of gripes includes a lack of soft-touch plastics on the doors and, most unexpected for a VW Group product, grab-handles that aren’t damped.

These can be easily ignored in the context of the 77TSI manual’s $26,290 price tag, and the dash presentation is both logical and smart in presentation – with some obvious VW parts offset by unique Skoda fonts and touches.

Skoda continues to have a bolder approach than VW to the styling of its vehicles, though Australian buyers will determine whether that’s a good or bad thing.

The blocky Yeti isn’t quite as aesthetically quirky as the Roomster MPV – though sharing a similar upwards-curving window line on the front doors – but it’s still left of centre compared to the usual fare in the compact–SUV category.

With styling such a major influence on car purchases, it remains to be seen how the Yeti progresses in bolstering Skoda’s local sales. But for buyers looking for a practical, compact vehicle for use in the ‘burbs rather than the bush, the Skoda Yeti 77TSI is worth taking seriously.


 

Reader reviews of the SKODA YETI

<

Write a review for the SKODA YETI

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

Add a New Review
>

The competition

  • http://twitter.com/holotropik Holotropik

    Engine too small for Australia.

    • nickdl

      Yes, as much as the 1.2 is a great engine in the Polo, the Yeti is far too heavy for it. We can see the result of this in the review with poor fuel consumption.

  • Anonymous

    The engine is too small Skoda Australia, don’t you think the 90TSI 1.4T would’ve been a better option for the base model Yeti? I certainly do! It’s the only spoiler in what is otherwise one of the best vehicles on sale today.

    I’ve just taken delivery of my Yeti 103TDI (couldn’t be bothered waiting for the 118TSI and with such remarkably low fuel consumption, I can excuse not having the extra power of the 1.8T) and I actually really like it. It’s a better all-rounder compared to my previous Octavia RS 125TDI and it’s no surprise the Yeti is already Skoda Australia’s second biggest selling ca (no wonder they sold 655 cars last month). 

    They need the 118TSI here ASAP, maybe a base diesel, an equipment rise or price drop (the 103TDI 4×4 really should have more standard equipment here) and the Yeti would be all good. A bigger boot would be nice too…

  • LGT70

    I test drove both the 77TSI DSG and 103TDI 4×4. The 77TSI drives fine, but i do agree and still have resevations about the 1.2 litre engine.

    @Airtrek: agree the 1.4 would be a better choice, but it’s not available with the DSG overseas. The 118TSI is being released in March…..which is the one i’m waiting for.

    • Anonymous

      I know the 1.4 isn’t available in a DSG but it shouldn’t be hard for them to make it, especially as how many other FWD Golf-platformed cars are available in 1.4TSI DSG form. Even so, Skoda Aus should’ve made the 1.4TSI the manual and done the 1.2TSI as the DSG (I’d have no problem with that, though that’s because I’d never drive an auto). I agree, the 118TSI is the all-rounder and it’s available as a DSG too (even though it takes a power hit to 112kW). I wish they’d bring the 125TDI out here too… 

      LGT70 you buy that 118TSI, you won’t regret it!

  • Phil

    What is the point of this car?

    For around the same price, you can either get a Skoda Octavia Wagon with a more powerful 90TSI engine OR a Golf Wagon also with the more powerful 90TSI engine.
    Or you could just get the normal 77TSI Golf and save $5000.
    Neither of those offering are so dam ugly either. Yeti = Yuk!

    • Anonymous

      What is the point of any 2WD SUV? I think they’re the most stupid cars on the road.

      • Ibc

        A 2WD SUV is actually a PUV (Pseudo Utility Vehicle) for the great pretenders who don’t want a 4WD but want everyone to think they have one! That was how the soft-roaders became popular and now there are many even softer versions. Meanwhile, outside of 1-ton trucks, proper 4WDs are becoming few and far between.

    • Lucii Pooky

      The point of the car is to offer small car size with MPV like versatility. Its for people who don’t like wagons and think the Golf is too small. Also with 4WD it can actually go off road, and thats gotta be worth something. I think its a great idea and is much better than the ASX/Sportage/Countryman(which is a ripper)

      • Phil

        The Golf wagon has a bootspace of 505 Litres extending to 1495 with rear seats folded. The Octavia Wagon is bigger again.
        If you actually read this article, you’ll find the Yeti loses points for a “compact” boot which is only 415 litres with seats up.
        It also says in the review that there is no 4WD option in the 77TSI and it is FWD only. To get a 4WD Yeti you have to spend a whopping extra $10,000 extra for the 103TDI.

        • Lucii Pooky

          But what if you don’t want a wagon? What if you want a higher ride? What if you want something small(Remember its only a few CM bigger than a Golf)? These cars have a purpose and thats to offer a mix of a hatch with a crossover. This car is a winner, even ask its owners. And the 118TSi is coming out in March to cater for the $10000 hike up.

          • Phil

            If you didn’t want a wagon you wouldn’t buy a Yeti…..It has a wagon body after all……just not a very good one.

            If you want something small, why would you buy this over a Golf if it is “only a few cm bigger than a Golf” as you say?

            What do you want a higher ride height for? It’s FWD so no good for off roading. Maybe it’s for people with short person syndrome?

            This car is not a winner. It offers less power and less bootspace than normal wagons in the same price bracket. It is very ugly. It’s slow but it offers appalling fuel consumption on PREMIUM fuel  - L100km that go into the “teens” in the city!?!?!

            The article says few people laugh at Skodas but I think a lot of people will laugh at this onel. Or at least they will be laughing at the people who paid for one.

          • Lucii Pooky

            Its a shame then that this car is outselling the Golf wagon isn’t it? Also look at sales of the Dualis and ASX then looks at sales of the Octavia and Golf Wagons and you’ll see why this car appeals to many. I personally think the 1.2L is stupid like everyone else but the 103TDi and 118TSi are competively priced with their rivals and both have excellent 4WD systems. The Yeti 2WD is for city dwellers with a bit of ruggedness to it. If you don’t understand ask all the people are buying them. For a VAG fanboy I’m surprised you don’t see the point of this car!

          • Phil

            I’m not a VAG fanboy and you still haven’t provided a point to this car.
            You started off claiming it offered MPV versatility –  when it actually has a tiny boot.
            Then you say it’s for people who want to go off road – when this particular version is FWD only
            Then you say its for people who want something small – but you then point out that it’s bigger than a Golf (WTF? if you wanted small you’d just go for the golf!).
            Then you say it’s for people who don’t want a wagon – when it has a wagon bodyshape(!).

            The 103TDI is not competitively priced. For example, you can get a larger Holden Craptiva AWD with 7 seats, much more powerful diesel engine and a 6 speed auto for $200 less than the price of the 103TDI manual.

          • Lucii Pooky

            It offers MPV versatility because the seats can be folded multiple ways and even be removed. The car is only slightly larger than a Golf but its boot is 75 litres bigger. The 118TSi which is coming out in March will be competitively priced with the ASX and Dualis AWD and offer a better transmission/engine than both. And the 103TDi is 40K driveway which makes it $1500 cheaper than a diesel ASX, which although has a better equipment list is inferior to drive and is cheaply made. Also if you’ve ever seen one you would know that it looks like a regular hatch on stilts. Also who the heck would want a Craptiva?  

      • tekkyy

        size matters
        its great to add to the range in the segment
        the CX-7 mentioned in the article gives us the two extremes

        (though its sad to see crap included in a CA article
        CX-7 is alright but is NOT one of the most popular model as written
        Forester, mentioned together, sells almost twice as many, no.1 vs. no.6 or so?)

      • Anonymous

        Here’s some interesting context around dimensions and luggage capacity, Lucii.

        Yeti sits on a wheelbase just 4mm longer than Golf and its overall length is just 24mm greater than the Golf hatch. The Golf wagon is 408mm longer than Yeti. Yeti is a substantial 204mm shorter than a Tiguan. Focus hatch is 159mm longer than Golf hatch, courtesy of its more fastback styling, yet has less boot volume.

        With all that in mind, I think the Yeti does a terriffic job with what it’s got. Like I say (and I know you don’t disagree with me), if you want more boot, get a l-o-n-g-e-r car! :)  

  • http://www.pcsgroups.com/ car rental kolkata

     Awesome design and style.

    • Des

      I think the word you want is “AWEFULL”.

      (It’s OK we understand that English is a second language to you).

  • Snowman

    The sales confirm that there are a lot of people that like this car. Although I have only seen 1 on the road so far, there will be many more coming as deliveries arrive. Overseas sales show that it is a top seller. Dont know why we Aussies have such a different view on the design compared to the rest of the world……

    • Des

      The sales are pretty much ALL demos. The TDU cycling event is the biggest “buyer” of these ugly little sods. Did not hear one positive comment from the crowds about the look of these things!

  • Anonymous

    I love the design of these cars and agree that a 118TSI will round the range out nicely. It’s both interesting and very slightly amusing that the same boot space discussion is happening around the Yeti that surrounds Tiguan.

    I haven’t compared overall lengths, but the secret behind the boot space is that it’s not a big car. It’s a very squat one, in fact. Quite simply, if you need more boot space, you’ll need a longer Yeti. And then it wouldn’t be a Yeti. It’d be something else, like a Lancer hatchback or a Golf wagon or an X Trail.

  • Aaa

    VW management pushed their messy VGT turbo charger + supercharger + intercooler + crappy unreliable little engine to other manufacturers. The more things you have the more there are to go wrong. A great VW engine is the air cooled unit in the old Beetle. Coz when their gasket leaks, the engine cool still run. Lucky that Suzi wants nothing to do with VW. Else VW will dictate that every Suzi model must use VW’s unreliable twin charger.

    • Gmh-bogan

      Aaa excellent comments made.A Suzuki person told me VW where trying to pass the handgrenades on to Suzuki.

  • http://twitter.com/klowik klowik

    I’d like VW to bring in the Cross golf model. I don’t want a Tiguan or bigger Subaru Liberty wagon but I want a 4×4 with the size of Golf.

    • 3D4

      Get the Subaru XV…

      • Anonymous

        Or get a pair of eyes… 

        klowik you know the CrossGolf isn’t actually a 4×4 right?

  • horse

    what crack are you guys smoking saying this is good looking!!!
    The rear looks like a lego land delievery vehical. the front with those built in spotlights looks , well wrong!!

  • Birdlife

    I love the Yeti. It’s my kinda car. But I’m frustrated. 

    Here is as good a place as any. 

    DSG – technological marvel or Dumb Stoopid Greabox?WHY…WHY!? Do VW persist with it as their automatic? The 6 speed DSG particularly – in traffic is a pig. And yet adjectives like “amazing and brilliant” keep getting thrown it’s way. What’s amazing is that a gearbox in a semi prestige vehicle in 2011 can be so awful. If a Korean or Chinese gearbox behaved like that there would be the usual “not up to standard” descriptions – but VW can continue to inflict it on the public as a technological marvel. And I’m sure it is…but as an everyday device built for a specific purpose…it’s NOT VERY GOOD. Come on journos…you all keep hinting at it without ever saying it…try it….. NOT VERY GOOD. There…see? Easy.

    • The man in the know

      Your biggest problem is not the gearbox but ignorance in relation to what the technology is and has to offer. DSG i not an automatic, it is an electroncialy controlled dual clutch manual gearbox. When you remove your foot from the break pedal you are enabling the gearbox to engage the clutch and engage first gear. If you are accelerating before this has occurred (normally because of 2 feet driving) then it would be akin to accelerating hard in a manual vehicle whilst engaging the clutch normally, it would be jerky.

      The fix is very simple, i found that allowing a split second from the time i lift the brake pedal before accelerating i get no jerk from the gearbox at all! I just adjust the way i drive rather than demanding the vehicle drive how i expect it to.

      BIRDLIFE, i know you wont get it but the DSG is not about the smooth drive it is the marvel of being quicker 0-100km than its manual equivalent and for the most part more fuel efficient. What other gearbox offers that?? and when you drive it right then it is insanely smooth but if all that adds up t  being “not very good” in your eyes then i hope the korean rubber band boxes keep you happy.

      • Birdlife

        I never said it was an automatic. I said…why do they offer it as their automatic.

        Why do reviews of the DSG by reputable motoring journalists continue to mention that the gearbox can be jerky in traffic? Because…it can be jerky in traffic. I drove the 7 speed DSG – not too bad. Drove the 6 speed twice  - not so good. ”The DSG is not about the smooth drive” – no kidding!”0 -100 kms quicker than a manual” So what!? Honestly – who cares.C’mon – there a modern automatics that are quick – economical and super smooth. They’re just not to be found in VW product. Pity.

      • zej

        Yeah, but who pays $2+k for a DSG gearbox that’s slower and less fuel efficient (VW/Skoda’s specifications, not mine… do you disagree?) than a properly driven manual?
        Those who can’t, or can’t be stuffed changing gears and operating a clutch by themselves. Those ‘enthusiasts’ who insist that the DSG is not an automatic gearbox are merely deluding themselves that they’ve chosen the easy/lazy option while still shouting about the fact that it’s “really a manual, with not just one, but TWO clutches!”. No, it’s not a conventional torque converter automatic gearox with a planetary gearset, but it is an automated (and therefore, automatic) gearbox. The electro/hydraulic/mechanical bits are shifting the gears for you as well as manipulating your clutch, no matter what you say. If you really wanted a manual gearbox, you should have bloody well bought one. 

      • carbie

        Love that logic. ”ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED dual clutch MANUAL gearbox”. WTF?

        • The man in the know

          Yeah WTF, research it and maybe your tiny little mind might expand to a point where it can understand something more than just “but it’s got a d for drive so it must be an auto”

          Research DSG on google please educate yourself

          • zej

            Carbie’s got you there. Perhaps your mind could try to grasp the fact that a manual gearbox is so called because the drivers changes gears MANUALLY. An automatic gearbox is named such because it shifts gears for the driver AUTOMATICALLY. Nothing to do with whether or not it’s got clutches, cones, synchros, torque converters or bands. Next you’ll be trying to argue that a CVT is really a manual gearbox…

  • Birdlife

    I love the Yeti. It’s my kinda car. But I’m frustrated. 

    Here is as good a place as any. 

    DSG – technological marvel or Dumb Stoopid Greabox?WHY…WHY!? Do VW persist with it as their automatic? The 6 speed DSG particularly – in traffic is a pig. And yet adjectives like “amazing and brilliant” keep getting thrown it’s way. What’s amazing is that a gearbox in a semi prestige vehicle in 2011 can be so awful. If a Korean or Chinese gearbox behaved like that there would be the usual “not up to standard” descriptions – but VW can continue to inflict it on the public as a technological marvel. And I’m sure it is…but as an everyday device built for a specific purpose…it’s NOT VERY GOOD. Come on journos…you all keep hinting at it without ever saying it…try it….. NOT VERY GOOD. There…see? Easy.

  • Anonymous

    I think if people look at the statistics on the many cars with DSG gearboxes you will find that unlike torque coverter based automatics it uses no more than a manual, and often less. In a Europe where fuel economy (and therefore CO2 emissions) are what is important for all kinds of tax reasons all the makers are moving to these gearboxes, Ford and FIAT/Alfa being converts.

    • Birdlife

      Europe understandably look for every bit of fuel saving they can find and rightly so – but some solutions are more practical than others. Some are more Eurocentric than others. I’ll bet you my pet goldfish that if Skoda or VW Australia could have a modern no fuss fully automatic transmission option for their range they’d scream thank god and say thank you very much. 

  • Henry Tossaint

    Why Didn’t they just bring the V6?

  • Davidkelly673

    Hi all, I’m just waiting for my 77tsi to arrive and I’m actually moving from a golf gti to the smaller engined Yeti – I test drove the Yeti three times and really couldn’t see what the fuss was about regarding the size, it had plenty of power for moving my small family unit and outdoor belongings around or perhaps Aussies just don’t like smaller more efficient engines?