SUV sales soar despite fuel costs | Car Advice

Car Advice

SUV sales soar despite fuel costs

By George Skentzos |

Soaring fuel prices have certainly forced buyers to reconsider their priorities when looking at a new car; however Toyota has labelled the small car dash a simplistic approach to the problem.

SUV sales soar despite fuel costs

The company’s senior executive director sales and marketing David Buttner has said that these generalisations ignore the strong growth in sales of sports-utility vehicles (SUV).

The sales of these SUV’s has increased by 13.2 percent for this year alone – making it the fastest growing segment at a rate of more than treble the overall market.

“Rising fuel prices have definitely accelerated demand for fuel-efficient four-cylinder cars,” Mr Buttner said. “However, families and other SUV buyers are focused on requirements such as space, comfort, performance and reliability – as well as fuel efficiency,”

Australian motorists purchased almost 110,000 SUV’s in the first half of this year – with 20 out of 23 manufacturers improving over the same period last year – second only to the small-car total of 123,000.

Toyota leads this sales list with its Prado, Kluger and RAV4 models which take the top three positions in a segment which offers over 50 models.

SUV SALES BY MODEL 2008 (TO 30 JUNE)

1. Toyota Prado 7,854 +4.8%

2. Toyota Kluger 7,513 +278.7%

3. Toyota RAV4 7,684 +6.7%

4. Ford Territory 7,266 -19.4%

5. Subaru Forester 6,910 +13.2%

6. Toyota LandCruiser 6,407 +48.0%

SUV SALES BY MARQUE 2008 (TO 30 JUNE)

MARQUE SALES +/- MARKET SHARE

1. Toyota 29,458 +40.2% 26.9%

2. Nissan 10,852 +0.2% 9.9%

3. Subaru 10,707 +6.2% 9.8%

4. Ford 8,417 -20.2% 7.7%

5. Mitsubishi 7,841 +0.7% 7.1%

SEGMENT 109,669 +13.2%


 
  • No Name

    Yep same here in Pommieland, SUV’s all over the place. don’t really see why people really need the 4wd here especially as they are pay several thousand pounds more than a standard saloon car which is cheaper to run & insure.
    Has the fuel cost rise really made any difference, don’t think so. I still do all the same trips as I did before just a bit slower.

  • http://. Naughtyius Maxiumus

    Congrats for Ford who are too backwards to establish any real range in SUV’s. Territory is only a meek effort and people can see its old……not updated……bland when lined up with a Toyota! Ford should run a business and have a range of cars instead of tired old designs devoid of major style! No wonder Toyota sell well…….updates and nail the look and features whilst opposition are idle in this area!

  • Andrew M

    what do you reckon NM?

    bring on the Kuga?? ha ha ha ha

    i know that will get you jumping once the kinetic range of SUV’s hit town.

    i do agree partially with you though.

    ford has no probs in coming up with some awesome cars, the main problem is that they sit on them for too long.
    the territory blitzed the opposition when it came out, and a few years on, others have caught up so what does ford do? not much but watch their sales share diminish.

    by that time their are established patrons of the other marques.

    thats also the reason falcon sales started dropping.
    sure the BA was one hell of a car for its day, and fair enough in the form of the BF11 it more than held its own against its opposition, but it got to the point where the biggest detraction was that it wasnt new.

    perhaps ford should implement smaller updates, and more of them, rather than massive updates and fewer of them.

    sure the massive update path makes for a better vehicle, but it doesnt make for better sales

  • Duck

    What about the Holden Captiva? I guess it’s not worth looking though.

  • http://integra Terry

    The Ford Territory is still the best SUV. Toyota have copied it and really it doesnt outsell it by much seeing the Territory is 5 years old now. Shows how good it still is. If you want ugly and boring then you buy a Kluger……if you want car like handling, driveability and much better and safer towing ability you buy a Territory. If it is still so close in sales now just wait for the new model………it will be much better than Kluger, just like FG Falcon is so so much better than a Camry……oh, Aurion….. the BADGE has changed !!!!!

  • http://deleted Alex

    Terry, im not gona get into a big thing about which ones better Toyota/Ford (I think they are both horribly ugly) but you talk like the new Territory is just around the corner but last time I heard, its still about three or four years until Australia gets a new Territory. Also, I know that the Kluger doesnt have a Diesel option anyway but I think it was stupid and irresposible of Ford to make a FPV model instead of fitting a nice economical diesel. Apart from anything, I dont care how good/bad the FPV one is but if your gonna show off with a flashy in-your-face performance SUV, why would you want to be seen in a Ford thats marketed for families? Its like driving around with the roof down in a Vauxhall Astra Convertible. Do you really want to advertise that this is the best convertible you can afford?

  • Andrew

    Terry Says: “The Ford Territory is still the best SUV”
    I assume you mean except for the rust issues? http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11206136

  • BIG JIM

    The territory is superior to the kluger because it is AWD and RWD instead of FWD. The best softroader SUVs are the Landrover Freelander, Subaru Forester, Suzuki grand Vitara and Ford Territory. They all have fulltime AWD/4WD.

    The others are crap due to their FWD and FWD based 4WD. FWD combined with the top heaviness of softroaders makes a very poor handling vehicle which is a bloody crap drive.

  • Lazybones

    “The Ford Territory is still the best SUV. Toyota have copied it”

    Both the Prado and Rav 4 are years older than the Territory, how did you work than one out, wasn’t the Territory supposed to be Fords answer to the X5?

    “The others are crap due to their FWD and FWD based 4WD. FWD combined with the top heaviness of softroaders makes a very poor handling vehicle which is a bloody crap drive.”

    Its an SUV! If you want good ride and handling buy a sports car. SUV is just a jacked up wagon. Pack the kids in it, lots of storage space and off we go on the family day out/School or shops! The FPV version is for dads going through the mid-life crisis!

  • http://integra Terry

    Lazybones……Yes thats right..Toyota Kluger copied the Territory in making it 2wd or AWD……..too bad they didnt make it rear wheel drive so it was nice to drive and good to tow with like a Territory.
    You also said “if you want good ride and handling by a sports car” well you definatley havent driven a Territory as they handle and ride much better than alot of cars do !! And no.Territory isnt Fords answer to the X5 but because it is so good to drive the comparison has been made.

  • Tomas79

    Terry, are you really that stupid to claim that Ford territory was the first AWD or 2wd system??? Jesus, you should get out more!!
    Chances are that the klugger design team in japan, have never even heard of the local territory!!

  • Dlr1

    So Terry, Toyota copied the Territory by making it available in 2wd or 4wd? Big deal… since the first generation Kluger/Highlander has been available in other markets since 2001 I would say that Ford copied the Toyota concept. Perhaps you could even say that Ford copied Nissan who made a version of the Patrol wagon for some markets during the 1990′s that was rear wheel drive only. At the end of the day the Territory is still a good vehicle, its just that today the competion has improved and the territory is off the pace. The design is 4 years old and hasnt changed cosmetically in that time.

  • http://caradvice.com.au OSU811

    The truth is that subaru actually invented the whole 4wd suv market back in the seventies, with there 4wd leonie wagons, and have continued to dominate and grow in the suv market since then, and everyone else has copied this formula from them!!!!

  • Mike Hunt

    Driven both a Territory and a Kluger. The Kluger was far, far a head of the Terriroty. The Territory engine was lifeless, the car rattled like a babies toy and tell me, why does EVERY model have non-colour coded plastic door handles? Talk about cost cutting!!

  • SamR

    You want to know what I think will happen? Tough! I will tell you anyway :)

    I think Petrol prices will stabilise maybe at $120 Barrel for a few years and Americans will forget about fuel prices again.

    The big car makers in the USA will go back to building big SUV type vehicles and retro muscle cars and the same thing will happen in near future. Fuel price shock!!

    The American car makers will never learn and the public will always be fickle. They will only drive small fuel efficient cars when they have absolutley no choice.

  • tom

    Subaru did not invent the formula. Go look at landrover and jeep histories. Daimler-benz had four wheel drive passenger wagons back in the 30′s also.

  • http://integra Terry

    Mike Hunt……..you are rally talkin out your Toyota bias arse if you thing a Klunker drives anywhere near a good as a Territory. If you can read properly I said that Toyota copied the idea of making the Klunker available in AWD or 2WD…….sure the Kluger is a nice SUV but it has only just caught up with the latest model…..except in overall vehicle dynamics……..and of course towing ability . Shows how good the Territory is ……..4 years old and still as good as a brand new Klunker !!!!!

  • http://integra Terry

    we all know about those Toyota quality surveys………lol

  • Andrew M

    how about another name change Dingo……..

    next time, try and be less biased and more creative

  • Tomas79

    Terry Says:
    “we all know about those Toyota quality surveys………lol”

    No, show us some? But we all know Toyota Tops all the quality survey conducted by reputable 3rd party agencies.

    Terry Says:
    “If you can read properly I said that Toyota copied the idea of making the Klunker available in AWD or 2WD”

    That’s just fcking stupid!!

    Go Prius I checked out the survey, on drive.com and all the results were as expected!! ;-)

    Also notice how the above article “SUV sales soar despite fuel costs” does not apply to the territory, since it’s sales have actually declined

  • Wheelnut

    http://www.drive.com doesn’t exist; [it's under construction] there’s NOTHING on it…. but at least now we know where you Toyo-philes get your “reliable” “factual” information from….nowhere

    However; you might want to try http://www.drive.com.au – its not a bad site

  • Tomas79

    Ofcoursem the simple minded wheelnut has to point out the obvious. Ford territory would not score a mention of this type outside of the *.au domain!!

  • Lazybones

    “you definatley havent driven a Territory as they handle and ride much better than alot of cars do !”

    Sorry only do Manuals, I don’t doubt it drives as good as a normal car, but i’m talking sports car.

    “I think Petrol prices will stabilise maybe at $120 Barrel for a few years”

    Oil and Stabilise, hmmmm. its only going to get more expensive mate. Lets just enjoy the recent price drop while it lasts.

  • BIG JIM

    Oh what a rollover!

    Toyota Kluger AWD rolls over during basic ESP test. In the process becoming the first car to rollover in 45 years of Wheels COTY testing.

    The Toyota was widely criticised (as have Toyota’s in general for several years) for the poor handling and ‘sub-standard’ ESP or DVC as Toyota calls it.

    If you are thinking about buying a Kluger, please consider otherwise, you and your families SAFETY are at potentially SERIOUS risk.

    Wheels has asked Toyota to ‘urgently’ update their VDC.

    Toyota were given right of reply and countered by saying
    effectively the test wasn’t conducted to ISO standards. Well, the real world isn’t a laboratory. Is it?!

    Vehicles with much better handling AND stability control systems are BMW X5, Ford Territory, Mazda CX7 and CX9, Landrover Freelander, Subaru Forester, Suzuki grand Vitara.

    And that stuff about Topgear talking up the kluger is a lie as they dont sell them in the UK.

  • Tomas79

    BIG JIM Says:
    “And that stuff about Topgear talking up the kluger is a lie as they dont sell them in the UK.”

    Jim, not everything revolves around the UK!!
    You might not believe it, but some of the colonies do have their own local versions of “TOP GEAR”, hell even germany does! Go prism was referring to the Aussie issue of “Top Gear”.

  • marc

    ive had a KXR 2wd kluger for 3 weeks since brand new. when it was 5 days old the display came up with a VSC fault and ABS fault and engine management system fault. not happy. had 300k on clock. took it in to dealer, which i wish i could name, and they reset it and without even a road test gave it back to me. sure enough 2k down the road the fault is back on. booked in again, told it needs a new computer. takes 10 days to get part in ” GREAT CUSTOMER SERVICE” . so today the comp was replaced but sure enough, although this time it lasted 10k, but the error is back. so now ive left this car at the adelaide dealer untill they get it right. so are klugers lemons??????? or is this a 1 off thing and this particular adelaide dealer is incompentent????????????????

  • http://integra Terry

    Klugers dont roll over……the old people in their lawn bowls uniforms who drive them dont go fast enough !!! lol Klugers make good old people taxis……they dont have to bend down to get into them……..lol dont know how you can say a Kluger is fuel efficient, its a gass guzzler if you put more than 2 people in it and that shitty engine wont tow anything but a small trailer……….Toyota couldnt design a good suspension if they tried…….what a joke……..a car that rolls over these days !!!

  • Lazybones

    “Lazybones – no SUV handles like a car, they are SUV’s not cars.”

    I Agree, hence my earlier point to Big Jim. I think the newer breed of SUV’s do handle like an average car. By that i mean really average. I think Terry is a tad delirious in his assement of the Territory vs Normal car handling.

    But if you want a decent ride and sharp handling then an SUV is not for you. What a joke “SUV”, nothing sporty about taking the kids to school :)

  • Tomas79

    Terry, i bet you are one of those muppets that drives around in $2k commodore in a white cap, and a massive Chevy sticker across the back window?!

  • Tomas79

    Lazybones,
    I’m not a big fan of soft-roaders myself. But I don’t think the “SPORT” in SPORT Utility Vehicles does not ment to place them on a race track!! But Offroading, and camping is a sport too, also you can utilize the space for sporting utilities, such as diving equipment, etc… Also you can easily tow a jet-ski, and a boat, etc…

  • Wheelnut

    Quote [Dingo]: If people want a sports car they’ll buy a sports car. If people want a SUV they’ll buy a SUV. If people want a 4×4 or a regular run-about then they’ll buy accordingly …

    I agree Dingo – People are free to buy whatever make model or type of vehicle they like or [they believe] is most suitable/prcatical for their needs….
    So why it that if people choose to buy a car other than a Toyota or they don’t drive a Toyota you and your crue automatically refer to them as Morons or Bogans etc?

  • Bavarian Missile

    I guess Tomas would know ALL about soft off-roaders owning a Prado!

    Talking of Chevs saw an 80 series yesterday with one in it!

    Also know a guy in Tassie that has a mud-runner,a land cruiser with a Chev in it,only way to get it moving fast enough when your racing !

  • Tomas79

    Bavarian Missile, are you telling me you don’t know what a soft-roader is??

  • http://integra Terry

    Tomas79……..unlike you I actually know about cars and I drive the best car in the country……….FG XR6 Turbo and one of the best utes in the country, AU series 3 XR6 so dont tell me I know nothing about cars. Reliable, comfortable, rugged, great to drive, great economy on petrol and gas (ute) and will last forever, unlike your re-cycled coke can Toyota crap !!!!!! As you know Australia has an ageing population and they buy Toyotas because it is JUST a car and Toyota give them away at ridiculous prices to boost their sales figures……thats a well known fact.

  • The Axe

    To all those disputing that Territory was the first SUV in with 2wd and awd. It was the first in Australia, and Toyota saw what a great idea Ford had and did the same.
    Ford introduced the idea of an SUV that handled to this country as well. Toyota, and Holden for that matter, still hasn’t caught up.

  • Glen

    Dingo says “WHEELS despite thier so called expertise failed miserably to indentify they had exceeded the envelope of the Kluger”

    Well Dingo I thought thats what the job of the ESP was. To keep a car controllable once past its dynamic limit. It is suppose to keep a vehicle controllable when usually the vehicle would go out of controll. According to the Wheels driver the ESP system actually attributed to the roll over by not allowing the driver to recover. If you have even driven a car with a decent ESP you’ll know that once the vehicle gets a little sideways it will use the brakes on each individual corner to straighten itself up. Obviously the ESP in the Klugar did not straighten up like it should.

  • Kenny

    Let see what is wrong with the Ford Territory it is a gas guzzler. It consumes more fuel than a Toyota Prado or a Mitsu Pajero and the Territory is not a real 4WD like the other two. Territory sold well was cos there wasn’t much competition earlier on in the Aussie market. SUV. This big Jim fellow doesn’t have a clue about the SUVs & AWD systems. Most of the smaller SUVs used to be AWD where normally a 50:50 torque split between front and rear wheels, a centre diff could vary the torque dependent on slipping etc. Due to fuel economy issues most of the car manufacturers allowed the driver to choose between AWD & front wheel drive. In terms of handling the SUVs r far better than the large rear wheel falcordores.

  • Glen

    Well Kenny I think you take the prize for the most ridiculous comment made on CA. Kenny said “In terms of handling the SUVs r far better than the large rear wheel falcordores”

    Ok another point a PETROL Pajero or Prado is far worse on fuel than a Territory. Average Fuel on AWD TX Territory mostly urban cycle is around 14-15l/100km. Petrol V6 Pajero 17-18l/100km, Prado 17-19/100km. These are figures from customers of the car yard I used to work at. I always asked because potential customers would ask me when looking at cars. The customers were in their late 40′s-mid 50′s and said they mostly drove it around newcastle. It makes sense considering the Territory is a tad lighter than the other 2 because it doesn’t need the heavy duty suspension of the off-roaders. If you were talking about the diesel’s then yes you are correct but definately not the petrol variants.

    The reason the Territory sold well is because the majority of people who bought an SUV never ever considered it to be taken off-road. So Ford made the Territory more like a highrise stationwagon than a 4X4. It gave the driver the higher seating position but the handling of a passenger car. Plus the interior design was great for people with children. At the time there was no other SUV like that until the Klugar, Captiva & the larger Forrester came along.

  • http://email Jetski

    Go Kluger,

    You really are a fool.. Your statements are below par and your poor ability in expressing views is some what questionable..
    You act as if you work in the industry and have tested numerous amount of SUV’s. Now I’ll be quite frank germ..

    The Ford Territory has been the bench mark as far as how drive dynamics associate with SUV’s..

    Every auto Jurno.. will tell you the same shit moron..

    Grow up and give credit where its due..

    And as Far as I know from a good source, the new territory will leave Toyota for dead..

  • http://email Jetski

    Kenny you truly have not driven a Pajero.. They make a Ford territory seem some what closer to a corolla in terms of fuel economy comparison..

  • Tomas79

    Terry, no you definitely don’t know much about cars, given your previous comments. The FG Falcon is a great car, and definitely the best aussie designed car so far, but just because you drive one, does not mean you know anything about cars!! And realistically, you can’t talk about the ruggedness and reliability given its recent launch, only time will tell!!

    And the rest of the thing you mentioned about Toyota is absolute rubbish; I won’t even bother with an answer for that!!

    The Axe Says:
    “To all those disputing that Territory was the first SUV in with 2wd and awd. It was the first in Australia, and Toyota saw what a great idea Ford had and did the same..”

    The klugger first generation was released on the U.S market in 2001 with both 2wd or AWD.
    The ford territory was released in 2004 with 2wd or AWD. So you tell me who copied who??

  • Tomas79

    As far as fuel consumption goes, my d4d diesel prado gets about 8.0l/100km on the free way, and 10 in the city. And according to the pradopoint forum, realistic fuel consumption on the petrol is about 14-16.

  • Tomas79

    By the way, I got to say looks of the 2nd generation klugger have really grown on me!! It reminds me of the Toyota Tundra, which really love to get!!

  • http://911GT4 ladybird aspid

    El Aspid is just so cool – i am counting down the days til i get mine

  • http://aca Go Kluger

    Jetski – i have obviously hit a raw nerve with my referances to facts and figures which co-incidentally are often a sound presentation of the market.

    Nobody has questioned the dynamics of the Territory however there are far more facets in engineering a vehicle then handling alone – am i wrong … NO !!

    And while i am at, give the Kluger credit were credit is due.

    And while i am at it … did you notice has dismally the Territory faired against the Kluger in the ‘Leaked Australian Quality Survey’ and the best part of it all – the survey was conducted by none other then the manufactuers themselves and intended to be used internally as a referance tool amoung themslves and not for public viewing hence it’s ‘leaked’ title.

  • BIG JIM

    Any car purchase can end in tears or worse. That is precisely why you should aim to purchase the safest car you can, with the primary aim, avoiding the accident in the first place. For this you need dynamic ability.

    The problem is, the ESP system is meant to aid drivers with inadequate ability and or in a sticky situation. Many drivers don’t have a clue, don’t pay attention, have little idea of the capabilities of the vehicle and consequently on occasion overdrive. Which is why 30% of deaths are single vehicle rollovers.

    The following is from Bulmer’s Wheels COTY article.

    “The rolloever is an unenviable first for Wheels COTY and for me. And, while more than happy to shoulder responsibility for overdriving, on this occasion I believe that deficiencies in the Kluger’s ESP contributed to this crash, which is why you are reading about it here.”

    “Importantly, I am not alone in my criticism of the Kluger’s dynamics. Six other jusdges, all of whom had driven both Klugers before my crash, noted that the cars’ ESP performance was sub-standard.”

    “It’s telling that there were similar criticisms of the ESP performance of the Lexus LS this year, while last year the Toyota Aurion took flak for it’s lack of ability in this area, as did the Lexus RX330 in 2003.”

    The simple facts are. All of the cars were overdriven. Of the 46 variants based on 20 all new models, 45 passed the same test. Just one, the Toyota Kluger rolled.

  • Glen

    Dingo

    1st with the police was it a patrol VE Omega or a Highway Patrol SS. Also how long ago was the incident as Omegas did not have ESP as standard until about 4-5 months ago and I know for a fact Police forces do not option up of the standard patrol cars to save money. So more than likely a VE Omega patrol car would not of had ESP.

    2nd, a drunk in an SS Commodore?? I will bet hard earned cash that ESP was disabled. In the unlikely event that ESP was involved then Holden need to reconfigure their ESP system if a commodore “just slides of the road” in the above scenario.

    Yes an ESP is not perfect, no system ever is. But Wheels would not have been driving above and beyond what would be considered normal driving and 100 kays on a smooth dirt road is acceptable depending on road condition and weather and tyre condition.

    I want to see that telematry data as Toyota has so far not produced the result so could be saying anything. Dingo you must be a twit if you think someone driving on a country road comes across a Roo in the middle of the night and thinks “wait I better avoid this obstacle in ISO accordance” Every other car that has ever done that test has not rolled even without ESP including the 2004 COTY Ford Territory (They tested all models including ones without standard ESP)

  • BOSSCR

    The scary thing is, more and more people (housewives, accountants etc…) get into these SUVs with 200 killer wasps and poor handling and think that they go so much better than their old Corolla, that they must handle so much better too. Give these clowns more power and higher driving poisition with better visability, and they drive it so aggressively. People should have to sit an additional test when getting their licence to allow them to drive SUVs. If i had to get another licence to ride my bike on the same road, surely we should make drivers of SUVs sit say, an additional 30 minute test in a SUV. Obviously it would be a nightmare to go and do this retrospectively, but maybe something for new drivers.

    Also, my company car probably sees more off road action than the majority of the soft-roaders listed above.

    PLEASE NOTE: My comments are not directed at any make/makes in particular.

  • BOSSCR

    Also, sitting an additional SUV test, may deter people away from SUVs and help the local car makers. Either that, or it may encourage the car makers to make better handling SUVs….

  • Lazybones

    “Lazybones,
    I’m not a big fan of soft-roaders myself. But I don’t think the “SPORT” in SPORT Utility Vehicles does not ment to place them on a race track!! But Offroading, and camping is a sport too, also you can utilize the space for sporting utilities, such as diving equipment, etc… Also you can easily tow a jet-ski, and a boat, etc… ”

    Yes your right, but at what point did I say an SUV is a track bred sports car?? Your confusing me with Terry. I’ve been saying just the opposite!! My point is that its just a replacement for the old Wagon!! End of story, look at the Kluger in the picture above, pictured in the snow, oooohhhhhh. It would be more real world to picture it in Safeways/Bunnings car park or outside a school. I took my RAV 4 to the snow last week for the first time in its 2 year life. But seriously do you think many SUV owners actually use it for more sports releated things than domestic duties!!! Nope, I own because i need it for my family duties. It should be DWFSR (Domestic Wagon For School Runs) not SUV :)

    “Lazybones – there is a whole lot more to motoring then just handling. People like yourself are so fixated on handling alone that the multitude of other facets that create motoring is completely ignored or forgotton about

    No….Mummy make him stop…its can’t be true…I will have my 2 seater mid engined sports car when the kids grow up!!!! arrrhhhhggggg…..

  • Dlr1

    BOSSCR, i do see your point about an additional test for SUV drivers, but then wouldn’t we need additioanl tests for real 4x4s (much poorer dymanics) too? What about sedans with over 300HP? aren’t they a handfull in the wet or gravel roads too? What about one tonne utes or commercial vans? neither of these come close to any SUVs in terms of vehicle dynamics.

    As for Jed Bulmer… well of course he’ll be happy to blame Toyota. Especially as he’s the first journo to roll a car during COTY testing. That probably says as much about him as the car. Given the choice of sitting behind the wheel in the Kluger or in a passenger seat next to him… i’d take the Kluger.

  • Bavarian Missile

    Totally agree with Lazybones,todays so called SUVs are nothing more than wagons with lift kits,and women still cant drive them any better than the Camry Wagon they stepped out of!

    oooooooo Lazybones………Poor baby the day will come when the kids leave and you can get that sports car,Dingo just doesn’t understand car enthusiasts requirements in cars “handling”,he likes us to remember the other facets of motoring such as reliability ,much better to have than driving a sponge!

  • Tomas79

    Bavarian Missile, as GO Klugger has pointed out;
    “In someways i understand why people like yourself are fixated on handling because in reality, that’s pretty much about the last post standing for GM and Ford.Here is a reality check for you as harsh as it maybe and that is, if companies want to survive then they must provide the goods that people want and if they don’t – they’ll go ar*e up … PERIOD !! ”

    Also another reason the likes of you keep bringing it up, is because handling is a matter horses for course, and can not be quantified and therefore truly proven!!
    If you could derive a numerical value for the handling of a car, (and you never will be, because it all is objective) you would have seen that Lexus blows all over BMW, and Toyota over GM and FORD also!!

    And a true enthusiast knows, there is much more to cars, then just taking to a racetrack.
    By the sound of things, Bavarian missile you would love a Morgan!! Because even the president of the UK Morgan club reckons, half the fun of Morgans, is having to fix them up on the side of the road, half way through your trips!!

  • Sam

    Tomas79
    If you really would like a Toyota Tundra there are thousands of them they can’t sell in the US and Toyota is cutting production. They are sitting in the car yards for an average of 100 days (Detroit News On Line -2/08/08).

  • Wheelnut

    If I got a Kluger… which would be straight after my labotomy – I would get the number plate Fleddie!

  • Bavarian Missile

    Grumble grumble grumble,just about to go wash the M3 and again I have sit Tomas down in the corner and shake my finger at him!

    The point is Tomas handling IS one of the attributes required when you buy a car to enjoy! One I guess you wouldn’t have gotten get as you drive a Prado with a lift kit!

    Not all of us have to put a good handling car around a track day to enjoy it,the pure pleasure of driving a long hard cornering drive is how well something drives without feeling like a Sydney Ferry . Pushing a car hard in to a corner fast without a twitch coming from its chassis is one of the most pleasurable things one can do on a Sunday arvo.

    ”Quote If you could derive a numerical value for the handling of a car, (and you never will be, because it all is objective) you would have seen that Lexus blows all over BMW, and Toyota over GM and FORD also!”"

    hahaha thats gold Tomas ,BMW have some of the best chassis in the world,Lexus can only wish to be as good one day,any jero will tell you that the Chassis under a M3 will outdo the new try hard M3 beater,Lexus IS-F .As far as Toyota out doing GM and Ford ,yeah right,I love to see the TRD try nailing an F6 in handling or performance for that matter.

    Love a Morgan ,naaaaaaaaa,but would an Aston they too are renown for being unreliable,care factor,zero!

  • Glen

    Toyota’s are good for basic transport for mindless drones but not much else. So what if Toyota sell more cars than Holden & Ford combined, so what if they score better in user surveys that only Toyota driver’s seem to care about. They are souless transport. They will get you from A to B just fine. But don’t offer anything special like the Falcons & the Commodores do hence why the passionate enthusiasts drive them. Also the cars that offered that special something like the celica and the MR2 were discontinued and the only thing on the horizon of any hope is the joint venture with Subaru, they couldn’t even think of it or develop it themselves. And the lexus’ were a direct copy of the BMW 3 series and are still no where near as good. Thats my opinion and the Toyotasexuals will come on to have their whinge saying I’m a bogan but I won’t give a toss.

  • Kenny

    Glen, I went by ADR figures according to ADR combined figures the Pajero GLX consumes 13.5 L per 100 km, Prado GXL 13.1L per 100 kms, while Territory TS 12.8 L per 100 kms, under a liter difference. The kerb weight of the three cars are Pajero 2085kg, Prado 2110kg & Territory 2080kg. There is no point in comparing the 2WD Territory to the 4WD Prado & Pajero. From these figures I’d rather buy a real, reliable SUV like the Prado.

    Jetski is an idiot a Territory consumes twice as much as a corolla ( a Corolla consumes 6L per 100kms).

    Then compare it to a AWD Kluger which consumes 11.0L per 100 km and the kerb weight is 1920kg

  • Wheelnut

    You can actually put a figure on the handling of a car infact their are a number of measurements used all of which give an indication as to how well a car perfoms and handles.. The main ones are G-Forces n Drag Co-Efficient oh and of course the Power to Weight Ratio all of which integral parts of Physics and Automotive Desig/Engineering

  • Wheelnut

    Handling mightn’t be important to you Tomas But I’d Love to see you try to drive from one side of Australia to the other without having to negotiate a corner let alone sweeping bend [Blue Mountains] at speed as the majority of are highways

    Sure you can hit the brakes to slow down and take the corner at a more pedestrian speed [at or below 60Km/h] but then you would be putting an enormous strain on the chassis the brakes the steering and suspension as the car tries to wipe off all the terminal velocity you created by driving at 100Km/h..

    Its much more efficient and easier on the car to keep the momentum going change gears and float through the corner that way there is less abrupt braking or heavy acceleration required thats why car enthusiasts look for the apex

    Remember there are no perfectly dead straight lines in nature as curves are more flowing and keep the energy moving

    Having said that a Soft Roader like the Kluger isn’t exaclty a Performance Car or to be driven at high speeds [100Km/h+]; whereas a BMW M3 is.. and are therefore; engineered differently.

    Other factors that can effect a cars performance are its height width track and wheelbase

  • Glen

    Kenny, Using the ADR figures for fuel consumption is like using the red book for resale prices, its rubbish. You can only use real world figures because each person drives differently. If you were buying a vehicle for an off-road adventure, yep steer clear of the territory it was never meant to be an off-roader. But the vast majority of those Pajero’s and Prado’s never see dirt.

  • Tomas79

    Go Klugger SPOT ON as Always!!

    Wheelnut Says: “You can actually put a figure on the handling of a car infact their are a number of measurements used all of which give an indication as to how well a car perfoms and handles.. The main ones are G-Forces n Drag Co-Efficient oh and of course the Power to Weight Ratio all of which integral parts of Physics and Automotive Desig/Engineering “

    True, but it is impossible to combine all these characteristics into a single value without being objective. As in to show that car A has 2.34 units better handling then car B.
    So it’s all horse for courses!!

    Jetski Says:” The Ford Territory has been the bench mark as far as how drive dynamics associate with SUV’s.Every auto Jurno.. will tell you the same shit moron.Grow up and give credit where its due.And as Far as I know from a good source, the new territory will leave Toyota for dead.. “
    Well why is Ford Territory the only SUV, in the above article to have dropped in sales by nearly 20%, while all the others have actually increased in sales??! And before you start blaming the age of the vehicle, note that the number one selling Toyota Prado (LC120) has been sold in Australia, virtually unchanged (apart from the D4D diesel ) since 2003, a year before the territory has been released. Of course the Australian public aren’t going to be suckered into spending their hard earned on a shoddy built car, with a substandard reliability ( with reference to the drive.com.au’s, leaked report).
    As for swerving to avoid roos, all the 4wd magazines I’m subscribed to state, that it is far safer to actually hit the animal, then to swerve to avoid it.Cruel it might be, but it still is the safer option!! Off course, it’s better for you if drive a full size 4wd with a bulbar, then a road car, or a small cross over. But better yet, it’s common sense to drive at a reasonable speed for that area, so you have enough time to react and stop, as threat becomes visible!!

  • Bavarian Missile

    Wrong Dingo,Im yet to find a jero that states that the chassis under the Lexus is superior to the M3,perhaps you can enlighten me,also have read and seen numerous reviews where the M3 beats the IS-F around the track why cause its not as well balanced as the M3 ,needs to go on a diet!

    Um and in regard to comparing a Prado to an M3 thats plain dumb Dingo.Not to mention they dont make tow bars for M3s!The point being made was that BMW will beat Lexus with handling and their tuned chassis.The Prado was only mentioned cause Tomas couldn’t say what a great handling car feels like when he drives a 4×4!

    Oh and when we finally get rid of you for good Dingo do us all a favor and take the skirt holder with you!I could handle 10 TPs to listening to you both ramble on to each other!

  • Wheelnut

    Tomas It is possible to combine all those characteristics into one value… Its called setting a Lap Time.

    Because if the car is engineered and set up properly with the right amount of drive grip and able to deliver the right amount of power when its needed as well as have the stopping power to match.. it will be able to perform and handle far better than its counterparts.

    I realise that there are those who arent interested in lap times or 0-100 times etc However by doing a couple of laps at reasonably high speed in a controlled environment around a track with a mixture of undulations off-camber corners hairpins and sweeping bends you are able to get a better indication as to what you and your car are capable of compared to another car.. not to mention where its and your short cumings are..

  • http://realcars realcars

    Territory although requiring an update is a SUPERIOR tow vehicle to Kluger.

    The critical factor in toeing is tow ball weight and the second gen Kluger is still useless in this regard as its tow ball weight spec is no better than most small FWD passenger cars which limits it to a box trailer or trailer camper.

    U can attempt to tow a medium pop top or bigger with the Kluger but u risk bending it due to the lower torsional rigidity of the monoque chassis used.

    Territory is also monoque in construction but far stronger with more than double the tow ball weight limit and therefore is capable of towing vans far beyond the legal weight limit. This is partly due to the sturdy falcon floor pan.

    Once again the physical strength of construction is superior in the Ford.

    The Territory tends to be over engineered where as usual the Toyota is made just strong enough or in the case of the Kluger not strong enough for a task traditionally assigned to this type of vehicle.

    Unfortunately many Grey nomads have bought the Kluger to have their expectations dashed by the low tow ball weight this vehicle can handle.

  • http://realcars realcars

    After all u wouldn’t tow a medium or larger van with a Camry so how could u expect a Kluger to accomplish the job given the shared platform and identical tow ball weights.

  • Glen

    Well dingo obviously the ISO aren’t good enough. That telemetry data has never been made public, plus what could they get from it? All they could get would be air/fuel mixture, throttle and brake position, revs, and where the computer decided to send the brake pressures to each corner. Unless Toyota are running a full data acquissition system such as shock pods, g sensor, lambda sensors, their analysis would be very basic.

  • Bavarian Missile

    Thats it Realcars seems the grey nomads are also responsible for buying the rest in the Toyota range too!

  • http://realcars realcars

    “In relation to towing Kluger is very much a pretend SUV”.

  • http://realcars realcars

    That may well be the case BM but u have to go Landcruiser or Prado for a decent tow vehicle in the Toyota range.

    Territory possibly still comes up triumphs compared to Prado despite the full chassis of the Prado i.e light truck construction but overall I believe Territory would be easier to live with i.e more car like to drive. Driving a truck soon gets pretty boring.LOL.

    They should call the Kluger the SUV u have when your not having an SUV.LOL.

  • http://realcars realcars

    “Don’t be fooled Safe-T-Cell is nothing more than an advertising sound bite”.

  • Bavarian Missile

    Agree with that, Landcruiser the pick in them. Prado is more suitable for the in a city dirt road drive on the weekend.Having owned a couple of Landcruisers bought for carrying excess children {better alternative than a Tarago back in the mid 90s} and towing, both were great vehicles in what they were purchased for! Luckly we also had a few GTs to turn to on the weekend when need a little excitement hehehe!

  • http://realcars realcars

    Yeah, owned the first of the twin cam 80 series for similar reasons but got sick of all the clunking and banging(manual)
    although it could tow anything.

    Was too tiring to drive once the aura had worn off.

    I felt at one with the other brothers in their big rigs though.LOL.

  • Tomas79

    Wheelnut Says:
    “Tomas it is possible to combine all those characteristics into one value… Its called setting a Lap Time.”

    Wheelnut, once again there is too many factors effecting a laptime, to attribute it’s value purely to the handling of the vehicle. E.g power of the car, power delivery, tyre pressure, tyre type, weather, the experience of the driver on the track,etc… not to mention some tracks will favour some cars better then others.

    Bavarian Missile Says: “Thats it Realcars seems the grey nomads are also responsible for buying the rest in the Toyota range too! “

    In other words “Toyota; the wise mans choice!!”
    Realcars, if the Territory is such a great car, how come it’s the only SUV above that has declined in sales by 20% since last year, againts it’s significantly older competition?Also how come it stinks so much on the leaked quality report?!!
    Bavarian Missile Says: “Agree with that, Landcruiser the pick in them. Prado is more suitable for the in a city dirt road drive on the weekend.”

    Come on, it’s not like you know enough about 4wds to tell the difference, let alone pick what one is suited for what!! By the way, the Prado is a Landcruiser 120!!

    Bavarian Missile Says: “Having owned a couple of Landcruisers bought for carrying excess children”
    What a hypocrite, and you been going on about turag tractor types for weeks!!

  • Watto_Cobra

    If I remember correctly, Bavarian Missile also used her Landcruiser for big towing jobs.

  • http://realcars realcars

    Just telling it the way it is in relation to towing Thomas69!

    Kluger hasn’t the tow ball weight spec to handle more than a smallish camper trailer.

    Another correction the Prado is actually based on the Hilux!
    not the Landcruiser which is an entirely different animal.

    Remember Prado should be really named Hilux Prado rather than Landcruiser Prado.

    Sadly another Toyota marketing exercise to make u believe u are driving with the big boys.LOL.

  • Kenny

    Glen the reason I quoted the ADR was because of many factors affecting real world consumption figures (style of driving etc). ADR figures may not be accurate, but variation of ADR to real world figures for Territory or Prado or Pajero would be pretty much the same. What my argument is why would you buy a territory for the similar price & running costs you could buy a real 4WD like the Prado or Pajero.

    The Kluger consumes less petrol than a Territory, if I am not going off road I’d rather buy a Kluger than a territory.

  • BOSSCR

    To those who suggested special licences for 300kw utes, 4x4s, vans etc…. I agree whole heartedly. How hard would it be to sit a commercial vehicle test/ 4×4 – soft roader test/ performance car test….? Sure the things you learn and perform in a test might be lost after 10 years, but if you have only ever driven auto corollas, then you shouldnt be allowed to jump into a patrol/prado/cruiser or a GT3/C63AMG/M3/W427/F6/ TRD Aurion (hahaha)……..

    At the end of the day, its not going to happen.

  • Tomas79

    Realcars, are you retarded or something?
    There is a number of different landcruisers series available at the moment, i never said the prado is based on any of them!!
    This just shows how little you know about 4wds, let alone Landcruisers!!

    The new Hilux uses an redesigned and scaled up version of it’s previous platform, while the Toyota tacoma (U.S Hilux look alike) uses the Prado’s (land cruiser 120) platform!!
    So does the Toyota FJ Cuiser, and Lexus GX.
    It only shares the D4d engine(which by the way has been significantly tuned up for the prado) and some minor suspension components with the Hilux.
    Actually the Prado is built on the same line as the Lexus GX, which explains it’s significantly higher build and material quality when compared to the 100 series.

    The Prado is landcruiser 120, an all new design, actually designed in a french design studio. By the way, the Landcruiser 76 is a first generation Prado, that was never sold in Australia, and recently it has been face lifted, strengthed and re-engined, and resold as a 5-door LC76 in austrlia!!

  • Tomas79

    I’m all for extra licensing (preferably a 4wd course) for 4wd, and higher power/usual vehicles!!

  • http://realcars realcars

    U would buy a Territory because it is actually good to drive and can tow just about anything!

    Pretty straight forward really.

    Toyota fuel consumption figures supplied by the manufacturer.LOL.

    Nearly the same as the figures quoted for Aurion.
    Gee, Toyota must have reinvented the laws of physics while we weren’t looking.LOL.

    Kluger drives similar but has limited towing ability and like the Territory isn’t a “real off roader”.

    In my book that puts the Territory in front in terms of practicality and especially if u need a tow vehicle.

  • Tomas79

    Hey Go Kluger,
    Just got myself a copy of the Top Gear Australia magazine.
    They say that the BMW 7 series has knocked of the lexus LS design!!

  • Tomas79

    realcars Says:
    “U would buy a Territory because it is actually good to drive and can tow just about anything!”

    well, that’s why there is a such a down turn in their sales!!

  • http://realcars realcars

    Sorry to shatter the web of deception weaved by Toyota THoma69 but the Prado is based on the Hilux chassis,floorpan and running gear.

    As I have already mentioned Hilux Prado is the accurate name plate rather than Landcruiser Prado as the Prado shares nothing in common with Landcruiser other than a name.

    If your local Toyota mechanic tells u otherwise u better look elsewhere for service.LOL.

  • http://realcars realcars

    Amazing how most Toyota buyers know nothing about cars.

    Then again is it?

  • http://realcars realcars

    Unfortunately many people don’t learn about Tow ball weight until they buy their Kluger and try and marry it up with a decent size van!

    If dimpled rear quarter panels on your new Kluger don’t worry u then go ahead.LOL. Oh what a feeling!

    Thomas69 do u feel ripped off that u now know u are driving a Hilux derivative?

  • Tomas79

    Realcars, once agian you’re absolutely pulling sh!te out of your arse!! Do some research you idiot!! Hilux and Prado aren’t the same platform you idiot!! And i still don’t know what land cruiser you are referring to that the Prado should be based on?!! It’s an all new design!! the previous Prado, the 2nd generation Prado, was the Land cruiser 90!!
    This one is all new!! In Europe, Prado is known simply as Landcruiser, while the 100/200 series, is landcruiser v8.

  • http://realcars realcars

    The French contributed to styling only of the Hilux Prado.

    Who else could have come up with that Gaudy chrome grill?LOL.

  • Tomas79

    Realcars, unlike you who bought an au falcon ute, just cos your old man said falcons were tops, i actually did research all the cars in the range carefully…

    You talk utter rubish, no wonder you bought an AU falcon ute!!
    I’d have a hilux over it any day thanks!!

    Seriously, for a guy that regularly comments on toyota’s on here, you sure don’t know the first thing!!

  • http://realcars realcars

    Might be all new body panels and all new in the sense that it is based on the current generation Hilux rather than the previous one but it is essentially a Hilux and not a Landcruiser in any sense as the tittle would suggest.

    Sorry to rain on your parade anyway Hilux isn’t all that bad is it?LOL.

  • Tomas79

    Please Realcars enlighten me what a landcruiser is?!!

  • http://realcars realcars

    U done your research that well that u bought a Hilux Prado.LoL.

    U listened to dopey salesman and the Toyota spin like most gullible fools.

    P.S I am not the one that paid 65k for a Hilux.LOL.

  • http://realcars realcars

    GEE u are a slow learner Thomas69!

    How many ways must one put it to get the message through?

    I don’t give a stuff if u believe me or not!

  • Tomas79

    Realcars, you are the idiot that paid 5K for a AU ute!!

  • Golfschwein

    Hey Tomas79…is there a problem? You seem to be perpetually angry. :(

  • http://realcars realcars

    I know a lot about Toyota Thomas69 that is why I wouldn’t currently buy one.

  • http://realcars realcars

    Actually I paid 10k for my Egas Au ute three years ago.
    What a ripoff.LoL

    In hindsight I should have paid 65k for a Hilux Prado.LOL.

  • Tomas79

    Seriously, Realcars read up on hilux and Prado’s when you get a chance!! So you don’t embarrass yourself so bad!!

  • Tomas79

    Realcars, in your druged f*cked mind, hows the Tacome related to the hilux??

  • http://realcars realcars

    I’ve only had two cab/savs tonight I swear!

    That’s right keep telling yourself it’s a Landcruiser and when u wake up tomorrow it will all seem just like a bad dream.LOL.

    U must be right why else would they call it a Landcruiser.LOL.

  • Tomas79

    Golfschwein, sorry mate.
    People are free to have what ever opinions about toyota’s or whatever. But when they pull fact’s out of their arse and pull them against well documented historically ones, that just ruins the whole point of this forum!

    By the way, Landcruiser is just a name.
    And hilux is a brilliant ute, and it does shares some engines (albeit differently tuned) and some suspension parts. But it is a totally different platform to the land cruiser 120. And only idiot would argue against that given the wealth of information available!!

  • Tomas79

    Realcars, entertain me What doesn’t it make it a 120 series landcruiser?

  • http://realcars realcars

    If it’s any consolation I think the Hilux Prado is better value than the Hilux Turd.LOL.

  • Tomas79

    Better yet,
    Grow some balls, and join the forum and post the pics up of your rust bucket. I’ll happily discuss it there.
    Better then flooding the unrelated blog here!

  • http://realcars realcars

    I am off!

    Is is anything u want it to be Thomas69!

    Goodnight and thanku.

  • Tomas79

    Anyway, I’m off for the day,
    Lucky your on here, if you said that to me in real life, you’d be lying on the floor right now, all massed up, coughing out your teeth!! :-)

  • http://realcars realcars

    The AU might be ugly but at least I know what it is.LOL.

  • http://realcars realcars

    I doubt that very much.LOL.

  • Watto_Cobra

    My brother is planning to trade his 4cyl petrol hilux in on an RTV ute. He’s realised he doesn’t really need 4WD, just something with decent ground clearance and the diff lock could possibly come in handy. The main reason is he sees me getting 500-750km to a tank in my AU where he gets 450 – 500kms in his Hilux.

    Toyota’s rediculous resale is actually a plus in this situation, he will likely come out with enough for a gas conversion if the RTV isn’t e-gas already.

  • http://realcars realcars

    Yeah,I was looking for an Egas RTV but the Egas version hardly come up for sale. So cheap to run people must hang on to them.

    About resale u pay a lot for a 4×4 hilux new in the first place.

  • Watto_Cobra

    Threatening someone with physical harm on the internet?

  • Tomas79

    Watto_cobra, don’t get your panties in a knot!!
    I don’t do threats, if this real life, it would be more case of a “I was watching the ant crawl across the table, while realcars massed himself up…” heheheh :-)

  • Sam

    Some of these Toyota owners are a sensitive lot, perhaps that is why most of their SUVs don’t leave the suburbs.

  • http://integra What The ?

    The Kluger is based on a very outdated platfrom. It is the same platform that the Aurion\Camry (same thing) is on. It is outdated and is why those cars come nowhere near other makes in regard to road-holding and handling. It is also why Toyotas are boring and bland to drive……

    Toyota bring out a “new” model but really its just a re-hash of old ones………. they put an Aurion badge on a Camry and call it a new car !!!!!! what a joke!!!!

    With the current rush for small cars Toyota are doing well but it wont last………..

  • BIG JIM

    I have personally driven the following jap softroaders/SUVs Kluger,CRV, RAV4 and xtrail for extended periods (hire cars). And due to them being FWD or FWD based AWD their handling was/is skittish, nervous and dangerous. They also have bad understeer and torque steer and it would be unsafe to swerve a roo as you would most likely roll over.

    The market for softroaders stipulates that they should be able to be a family run about during the week and cater for adventure pursuits on the wkend. ie. driving out to a national park for hiking, kayaking etc. Kluger,CRV, RAV4 and xtrail are inadequate for this as their uneasy dynamics makes them unsafe to handle the small windy roads.

    Thats why I reccomend softroaders with good handling dynamics such as Landrover Freelander, Subaru Forester, Suzuki grand Vitara and Ford Territory.

    And heres a selective quote from Drives BRUCE NEWTON “Toyota Kluger…. Lacks Territory’s handling finesse”

  • Dlr1

    Realcars, sorry but you are wrong the Prado is not a Hilux derivative. End of story.
    Big Jim, if you think the Grand Vitara has superior on road dynamics to an X trail or Rav4 you must have a strange idea of what good handling is. While i would agree the suzuki is superior off road that doesn’t make it better on road. And i have done more in these than just hire one. The Forester certainly is one of the better on road handlers, but its low clearance does limit its off road ability. As for the Freelander… i just hope the new model is more reliable than the old one. Theres a joke in the motor industry about the base model freeladers being worth more than the upscale models because theres less bits to fix on them.

  • Bavarian Missile

    Quote Tomas79 ” Bavarian Missile Says: “Thats it Realcars seems the grey nomads are also responsible for buying the rest in the Toyota range too! “

    In other words “Toyota; the wise mans choice!!”

    Reply no just shows there as boring as we say they are!

    Quote Tomas79 “Bavarian Missile Says: “Having owned a couple of Landcruisers bought for carrying excess children”
    What a hypocrite, and you been going on about turag tractor types for weeks!!

    Reply hahaha well I have no idea what a Turag tractor is {do a Toorak Tractor though}As our gorgeous Watto said it was also used for towing a show car around in a purpose built trailer for it,sold the cruiser when we moved into the suburbs.

    Quote “Come on, it’s not like you know enough about 4wds to tell the difference, let alone pick what one is suited for what!! By the way, the Prado is a Landcruiser 120!!

    Reply Mate I was driving the West coast of Tasmania {real 4×4 driving } when you were still at school! Prado is a poor mans Landcruiser more suitable for the city types like you !

    Realcars hope you reported Tomas for his threat against you.

  • RoFlmaTiC

    I’m surprised the Honda CRV didn’t make it to this list, I see them all the time when I’m out on the roads!

  • Tomas79

    Bavarian Missile, Seriously I don’t know why you keep on posting on here, since obviously you don’t know much about cars do you?!!
    Bavarian Missile Says:“Reply hahaha well I have no idea what a Turag tractor is {do a Toorak Tractor though}As our gorgeous Watto said it was also used for towing a show car around in a purpose built trailer for it,sold the cruiser when we moved into the suburbs.”
    Nah, you said it your self, it was primarily an van alternative for the kids!! So what if you occasionally pulled something, I’m sure you could have pulled it in something else just as well!!
    Bavarian Missile Says: “Reply Mate I was driving the West coast of Tasmania {real 4×4 driving } when you were still at school! Prado is a poor mans Landcruiser more suitable for the city types like you”
    So what if you are a grey nomad, obviously you don’t know much about off-roading. And don’t make any stupid assumptions about me either, I guarantee I have seen much more off-road action in Australia and overseas, over more type of terrain, then you could have thought possible!!
    And as for a poor man’s land cruiser…. I have no idea what land cruiser you are referring to??!! Like I said, the Prado is a land cruiser itself!! Anyway I’d waste my time even trying to debate that stupid comments with you, since you wouldn’t know any of the attributes that make an 4wd important, nor how the land cruisers compare to each other, let alone other 4wds!!

  • gibbo

    After owning a Territory AWD 6 speed auto for 12 months now,and travel 34 k`s a day on dirt roads, and having owned several Jap soft off roaders, i feel convinced that Aussie soft roaders designed for Aussie conditions, although a cliche, is the only way to go and the Japs still need to do a lot of work on theyre traction control systems,vehicle stability controls and brake distribtution systems.I admit that these systems take away the common sense factor of driving but i can clarify 1 point.In the Ford, They DO WORK!!!

    I must admit I am somewhat biased, having witnessed a neighbour roll her Nissan X-trail at about 50kph trying to avoid a dog which ran onto the road.

  • Bavarian Missile

    Tomas Ive been posting on this site for over 12 months as your the new comer and clearly dont understand the term Toorak Tractor it you that has a limited knowledge of car talk and understanding.

    In regard to owning a Landcruiser for Towing and carting 4 kids around at the time and you suggesting I could have used something else almost refers to the fact you wouldn’t recommend buying one. Even to tow occasionally doesn’t mean you shouldnt purchase the best tow vehicle you can afford that was a new Cruiser at the time and as the trailer was covered in fully and holding a $100,000 GT Falcon the option of using a VAN is hardly a safe one or smart one!

    Me a Grey Nomad hahaha,Im blonde and dont fall into the baby boomer category sorry!How does that give me no knowledge of Off Roading though,do I have to pass some sort of test ? Tasmania has some of the Worlds best wilderness experiences equal to any in Europe,so your bragging rights of living in Europe are just that,at the age of 29 years how long have you lived in Australia for, let alone the amount of driving you’ve done in a life time! Love to know how much time you’ve lived in the City ,Ive done 12 years in W.A half of that in the Goldfields and traveled around Australia numerous times!

    Prado is still a Prado and a Landcruiser is a Landcruiser,simple as that argue till the cows come home if you wish too over that point!

    In regard to the price of fuel to fill the Cruiser………how times of changed use to fill both tanks for $100 but paying for fuel has never been a big issue especially at that time when we owned a mechanical workshop
    so it was all claimable.

  • Tomas79

    Prado is only a Prado in australia, and maybe parts of the asian pacific!!! In europe it’s land cruiser, and land cruiser 100 / landcruiser 200 series are referred to as Landcruiser V8, or landcruiser amazon (and other variations depending on the country you are in)!!
    At the moment in australia, you can buy Landcruiser 70,76,79,120,200.
    And there is still a lot of landcruiser 40′s,60,90′s,100,105s around.
    If i want to look international for parts, to mod my prado, i dont look for prado’s, i look for LC120!!

    But like i said, it’s only a name!!

  • Tomas79

    Bavarian Missile Says: ”
    August 4th, 2008 at 1:26 pm In regard to the price of fuel to fill the Cruiser………how times of changed use to fill both tanks for $100 but paying for fuel has never been a big issue especially at that time when we owned a mechanical workshop
    so it was all claimable. ”

    Yes, i agree, especially since the prado has 180L fuel tank, and last time i have refueled it costed me roughly $2 a liter for BP ultimate Diesel. But luckily I have managed to go for last 3 weeks without refueling.
    Even though it’s a 50Km journey to work one way, and last weekend i had a short 3 hour offroad session with a mate.
    But today, i’ll definately need to refill, but it’s good to see the prices have gonee down a fair bit!

  • http://caradvice.com.au OSU811

    subaru did in fact produce the first SOFT ROADERS! as all the 4wd wagons previous to that were big heavy 4wd trucks, not actually based of a car or car chassis, hence the word soft roader because they dont have a separate chassis, so the original 4wd leonie wagons in the seventies were the first official soft roader suv,s and everyone else has copied this formula from subaru…

  • Spitfire

    Big Jim, for starters the AWD Kluger is NOT FWD based. It is in fact constant AWD with a front rear 50:50 torque split with a limited slip diferrential.

    As for your comment that its handling was/is skittish, nervous and dangerous, and as it’s uneasy dynamics makes it unsafe to handle the small windy roads of a national park, what a load of codswallop.

    If you can’t get it right stay off this site.

  • marc

    the service centre still has my car and no closer to fixxing problem. im getting worried about the long term reliability of the vehicle due to the fault finding, there pulling the car apart, wiring looms etc to find the electrical fault causing EMS VSC ABS faults.i wonder how long i gotta wait to get kluger back. its fast becoming a regrettable purchase.

  • http://www.lhuda.com/vb/ AhMaDh

    nice Rang from ToYota