Automotive industry crucial to Australian economy: FCAI | Car Advice

Car Advice

Automotive industry crucial to Australian economy: FCAI

By Tim Beissmann |

Australia stands at a fork in the road and needs to invest in the nation’s ability to design, engineer and – most importantly – build vehicles if we are to remain a strong and diverse knowledge economy and a viable automotive manufacturer, according to the president of the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI).

Mike Devereux, who is also the chairman and managing director of GM Holden, says investing in the automotive industry is crucial to ensure Australia is more than “a farm, a mine or a hotel” in the future.

“That’s the future we’re contemplating – if we give up manufacturing capability, we mortgage our future for the things we can’t even imagine today,” Devereux said. “If we’re serious about Australia being a ‘knowledge economy’, we need strategic capability. A first-class education system and the ability to build things – high-tech, value-add products like cars – are the building blocks.”

He said developing sustainable technologies and creating efficient vehicles would be fundamental to the local industry’s future success.

“There’s no silver bullet here or in any other market when it comes to the environment. We need to pursue a range of options including electrification, but we also need real world solutions for today that support the way Australians really live.”

Devereux says the rapid shift towards global vehicle development was an opportunity for Australia rather than a roadblock, and believes the battle between brands has been superseded by the larger issue of country versus country.

“It’s not about Holden vs Toyota vs Ford vs importers. It’s about how each of us convince our parent companies to invest right here in Australia. When we compete to design, engineer or build a new model in this country, we’re not competing with rival brands, we’re competing with rival countries.”

The Australian automotive industry directly employs 59,000 people, and the FCAI estimates that for each of those jobs another six people are employed in supporting industries – equating to more than 410,000 workers in total.

Devereux refuted the common criticism that the local industry resembled a dinosaur, and insisted that it deserves the government support that many other industries enjoy. He highlighted the mining industry, which has received more than $6.2 billion from the Federal Government over the past four years through the Diesel Fuel Rebate Scheme.

“Government investment, or intervention, should not be a dirty word,” Devereux said. “Government support and investment in automotive capability can happen in several ways.”

He also made an example of Australia’s vehicle import tariff rate, which, at 3.5 per cent, is significantly lower than a number of other countries (South Korea: eight per cent, European Union/UK: 10 per cent, China: 25 per cent, India: 60 per cent, Thailand: 80 per cent).

Regardless of the strategy, Devereux says “long-term policy certainty, clarity, consistency and competitiveness” is absolutely critical.

“We can’t establish long-term co-investment plans only to pull the rug out from under companies halfway through decade-long product development and investment cycles.”

Devereux admitted the industry also had to play its role in securing its future.

“It’s our job to be as flexible as possible, we have to run extremely lean and efficient operations. We are committed to being the best of the best and competing to overcome the challenges that high labour costs and high currency present this country,” Devereux said.


 
  • Dangel

    Time for another government hand out , the posturing begins , if this was soviet russia i would agree , non of them is OZ owned .

    • robj

      They pay taxes as do the employee’s and suppliers. This will be a big impact on the economy if we lose it as well as skills and all the workers on centrelink is an additional cost. How is that better??

      • Phil

        How do you know its a additional costs? Got some figures for us?
        The handouts to the local manufactuers goes into the $Billions and the handouts will only get bigger as the sales of local cars continue to slide. Meanwhile employee numbers continue to fall as would the amount of tax they all pay in total.

        • Dave S

          Oz owned or not, if car manufacturing closes the only economy it will hurt will be ours.

          We are talking a lot of jobs and lots of income.

  • Snoop

    Its not a matter of being OZ owned or not Dangel. The big picture is, like Mike Devereux says. It’s about the parent companies showing faith in Australian design and engineering.
    This has nothing to do with Falcon and Commodore.
    Looking at the future of the Australian motor industry is the focus.
    It’s about what our engineers and workers can do and produce for a global market, given the support.
    The hardest thing is, getting the parent companies to show faith in our abilities.

  • davey

    The Australian public deserve an unbiased review of the automotive sector, and whether it delivers in real terms a positive or negative to the taxpayer.

    All the vested interests will naturally push their empty barrows seeking a fresh fill of taxpayer funds to prop up their foreign owned businesses.

    So what does each automotive industry job cost the taxpayer each year???

    Do we really wish to end up as a faux economy, looking busy but really just spinning our wheels sliding backwards into economic oblivion, which just requires higher taxes from those propping up the country.

    • Robert Ryan

      More the case if those jobs disappear how much is it going to hurt the economy.

      • Tomas79

        You cant keep proping up unprofitable industry for ever either.
        The pain will just be temporary, till the workers relocate to a more profitable industry.

        • Robert Ryan

          That is the problem what profitable industry? If you have only Mining and agriculture and a decreasing and flutuating tourism industry you will have massive unemployment in Australia.

    • Daniel D

      Or we just want to be a country that digs holes and sells our natural wealth for the next two hundred years (40 years for some things) and then have nothing left?

      Because for all the critics of manufacturing all ever hear as an alternative is mining or sponging off the mining industry as a public servant or service industry.

      Hardly first world stuff.

  • G

    Of course the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries would say the automotive industry is crucial, it’s self serving. It’s not like they’re going to say the Australian automotive industry is an industry that can’t survive without the govt propping it up.

    • Phil

      Especially since the FCAI Boss also happens to be the Boss at GMH…

      How on earth could they have a balanced view with such a big conflict of interest right at the top?

  • Snoop

    I do agree with the government funding issue.
    I hate to see that our auto industry have to rely so much on government funds.
    We’re not the only one’s but yes, they are American companies.
    (or American owned, for the Holden fans)

    I just think that Australia can produce world class cars. Not just big sedans/wagons.
    It all comes down to the parent company’s pushing it.
    Sadly I dont think that will happen.

  • Exchange Student

    Based on the four comments present at time of writing, I’m dissapointed by the negativity. “Snoop” has hit the nail on the head, and been down-voted for his troubles. He’s absolutely right.

    It would be great if these companies were Australian-owned, but that isn’t the case. So, regardless of who owns them, how about we focus on the economic benefits these companies can provide for Australians? I mean, come on; we’re talking about the best part of half-a-million jobs here! We’re talking about 410,000 people just like any other Australian – trying to pay off a home loan, trying to give their kids the best education they can, etc., and (based on threads on other articles on this website and others) the majority of you want to take away their jobs?

    In other news, why is the Federal Government continuing to push towards a free-market economy when (I believe) NONE of our economic neighbours (nor much of the rest of the world) are even in the same library, let alone on the same page. “Australia’s vehicle import tariff rate, which, at 3.5 per cent, is significantly lower than a number of other countries (South Korea: eight per cent, European Union/UK: 10 per cent, China: 25 per cent, India: 60 per cent, Thailand: 80 per cent).” Now, I’m not by any means advocating a Chinese-/Indian-/Thai-level tariff, but those of South Korea and the EU/UK are (in my opinion) not unreasonable. Manufacturing, particularly in the automotive sector, plays an essential role in a strong economy. A country’s economy can’t run on a services sector alone.

    I would like to see less hostility between the manufacturers and the public. Australian-built cars are hammered time and again on this site for a supposed lack of build quality, while the journalists actually sitting in these cars and driving them around say that the quality is actually not too bad. On the other hand, there is clearly a need for the local manufacturers to address their attitude toward warranty claims. Hey, I never said they were perfect; there’s only so much quality you can buy for the prices they charge. And besides, if you want BMW-/Mercedes-quality, buy one of those instead; but the chances are, you’ll be in a much smaller car than you want with a lot less performance than you were hoping for.

    The next time I’m in a position to buy a new car, it’ll be Australian-built. The only reason I didn’t last time, is because there were (and still are) none in the segment (light car), and the cheapest was out of my price range.

    • Noel

      So let me get this right, you like so many other Australian’s didn’t buy an Australian built car, your reason, the type of car I want isn’t built in this country. Yet you are on here saying other Australian’s should buy Australian built cars, you can see the hypocrisy……..surely.

      We have been supporting an industry that has been building cars we don’t want. They build big cars because they can make more money out of them. The manufacturers say they don’t build small cars because it is too difficult to make them profitably.

      Australia can’t have it both ways, low/zero import tariffs and a motor manufacturing industry, it just won’t work.

      Sorry, I’ve owned a Falcon and a Commodore and they are poorly put together at best. Equipment levels and technology don’t match many cars at the same price. What you get is more metal and that isn’t enough to keep people buying them.

      Our motor manufacturing industry either needs to be more competitive or needs more Government protection.

      • Exchange Student

        Noel, in what way is that hypocritical? I didn’t have the money nor the need for even the cheapest of Australian-built cars, so I had no other choice. At the time (2008), that would have been an entry-level Commodore or Falcon (large cars) and I was in the market for a light car. Furthermore, a second-hand Australian car wouldn’t have given me the 5-star safety rating I was looking for, nor would that purchase have contributed to the manufacturer in any way. Had it been the case that there was an Australian-built light car (and there still isn’t), I would have bought that.

        That said, I do agree with you on the fact that their failure to embrace the changes occurring in the sector is a problem. I’m looking forward to the arrival of the EcoBoost Falcon, and would like to see Holden offer Commodore which targets fuel efficiency. Perhaps this could be achieved by putting the 2L diesel engine from the Cruze into it? Fuel efficiency seems to be the main concern of previous large-car buyers. I’m living in Europe at the moment, and I can tell you that the stereotype of everyone pootling about in small cars is not entirely true. There are a lot of 5-Series and E-Classes (and other large cars) on the roads here, and SUVs seem to be gaining popularity. The difference is in how much fuel they use. While an Australian large car has a gas-guzzling 6-cylinder under the bonnet, they’re mostly 4-cylinder diesels here. Ford Aus, Holden – take note!

        I agree with you – you can’t have it both ways. Sorry if that wasn’t clear in my earlier comment.

        I’ve also read/heard about the quality problems, although it seems to be less of a problem now that it was in the past, and they both seem to be starting to offer better specification levels, albeit slowly. I understand that the manufacturers’ complete aversion to warranty payouts is part of the problem, although if they got those issues right from the outset, it wouldn’t be so much of a problem.

    • Doctor

      Well I believe in the concept of free trade but it s/be a 2-way street. If Thai vehicles come into Australia duty free then so should our exports to there be duty free. There probably aren’t any because of the Thai 80% duty.
      The other thing that I would like to suggest is that Australia has for too long built cars that the rest of the world doesn’t want. As a high cost country, like Germany, we should be building high-end product and not trying to compete at the low-end of the market.

      • Dangel

        Doc we can export to thailand duty free , but as you said they would not want our large sixes .

        Volume is the problem , do we make cheap cars ,no , do we make upmarket , no .

        If a maker was australian owned we should support it , but these are foreigned owned co’s .

        So we keep throwing govt cash at jap/usa makers who cry poverty , and the govt will keep doing it to placate the unions .

        • Daniel D

          Australia is one of only a dozen countries in the world who has the engineering capability to make a car. That is not something you just throw away, unless you have a very limited view of the worth of that skill.

          Currently Australians are obsessed with sponging off the mining industry and not much else. That is not a balanced economy or a viable future for all Australians or for grandchildren, when those resources are mined, sold for pennies on the dollar and gone forever.

          There was a reason why the manufacturers were encouraged to setup in Australia after the war and those reasons haven’t changed. Some folks need to brush up on history.

        • Lox

          We were screwed in the Thai deal as they implemented measures with the registration (from memory) post FTA which resulted in higher taxes on our vehicles. That made them unattractive.

          • Lox

            Extract from The Age, Make or Break article
            “They refer to the Australian branch of the Ford Motor Company, which had hoped to gain a foothold in the Thai market when the Thai-Australian free trade agreement came into force in 2005. Ford Australia designs and builds the large four-wheel-drives such as the Territory, a vehicle it proposed to sell in Thailand.

            But no sooner had the ink dried on the agreement than the Thai government introduced two new excise taxes amounting to a 50 per cent price rise on cars like the Territory.”

  • me-all-day

    If they need more Government money to make them viable then they need to go.

    • incentive75

      Maybe its not all about how much governmnet can give, maybe government can take less to make the automotive industry profitable and relevant. Couldn’t they sort some taxation incentives to keep people employed in the industry – how about tax free incomes for automotive employees?

      • Trump

        Its a double negative for the government, society and the general standard of living in Australia if the manufacturers go.

        1 No PAYG income revenue coming in
        2 Social security payments going out.

        Its simple maths, the government will prop up this sector for a long time.

      • Lox

        When tariffs were higher and we protected our industry, like other countries do, we didn’t have to throw as much money at the industry.

        Put a 25-80% tarriff on imports like other countries do and see how many imports people buy.

    • Daniel D

      I trust you don’t ever need to take advantage of Medicare with that view of the world.

  • paulb

    Great article.Any government assistance is small compared to what the local industry gives back.

    • Robert Ryan

      It does not talk about the economic value of the Australian parts industry, that supplies parts to overseas car companies i.e Corvette and it’s brakes.

    • Phil

      Yea paulb, the local industry supplies plenty of valuable votes to whichever of the two major political partys offers the biggest handouts.
      It’s a great way of buying a victory in the marginal seats in which the bulk of the car industry employees reside in.

      • paulb

        Yea Phil go and live in Germany the home of VW.

      • Dangel

        Correct phil , just a stunt from an industry that must eventually have a shake out .

        The yanks had to redraw the wage and perks deals with the unions , same will happen here .

        Wouldn’t it be nice if every business could run to the govt for a handout , creaping socialism will cripple this country .

  • http://www.mahindrafirstchoice.com/ used cars india

    Thank you for this blog i really like this blog Automotive industry crucial to Australian economy: FCAI…

  • Jacob

    Australia makes Trucks and Buses too…but nobody talks about that.

    Its always cars, cars, cars, even if Australia might be more competitive in making Commercial Vehicles rather than cars.

    • Robert Ryan

      The Automotive parts industry brings in a lot of money to Australia.

  • Snoop

    Australia will never have it’s OWN car industry, or brand. The large Aussie car will be gone soon, Falcon and Commodore. There’s no doubting that.
    We do need an automotive industry in this country instead of imports only. That includes the future Ford and GM products.
    The amount of money these guys throw at concept cars that never come to life.
    At least take a chance and throw some of that money over here so our guys can have the chance to design and build something other than a large 4 door sedan that may attract world attention.
    We do pretty well considering the budgets given to work with.

    • Shak

      Well we build a 4WD, a small car, a hybrid, three large sedans and one mid sized. We have also designed and engineered a Pony Car, a utility which is being sold worldwide, a mini city car being sold in India, various EV concepts and some very fine driving Family Sedans. Australian manufacturers design and build a very diverse range of products, its just that many people are still stuck in the past and believe the only things we make are Falcadores.

  • what tha

    Deveraux’s just having a whinge, because sometime next year he is going to have to offer over 1000 employees very generous redundancy payments, that management at Holden were too inept to prevent. Not to mention that if he has to slow down production of the commodore or cruze (to make production = actual buyers who want the car), then under his watch, Holden will go from the second largest seller in Australia to maybe number 5. For all the time he spends on whinging, he may one day realise that coming up with solutions that he can control may also be a way to be run a profitable company.

    • JEKYL & HYDE

      gee,your crystal balls a little foggy today.redundancy,slowing down production,no demand…WTF are you on about??…

  • Shak

    I would much rather my money go into paying Aussie workers, who work for a foreign owned company than have that foreign owned company send ALL of their profits overseas to pay some foreign workers. As long as GM, Ford and Toyota employ Aussies to design engineer and build cars in this country, our local manufacturers should get some help. Every other developed manufacturing nation does it, so there is really no reason for us to try and give our local producers a little boost.

    Little things like no LCT on local made cars, or even a reduction in the Import tariff paid by manufacturers who make at least one car here on their imported models. Anything to encourage genuine investment by the parent companies of our local manufacturers should be welcomed.
    Long Live Australian Manufacturing!

    • Shak

      * not to try.

    • what tha

      So next time you go and buy a locally made car, offer to pay an extra $5000 over the retail price. That way your money can help support the whingers. The other 86% of australian car buyers who buy imported each month, will spend their money of cars that are made at factories who bosses are paid due to their innovation, quality and efficiency. Only Devereaux seems to have a “whinge” KPI in his employment contract.

      • JEKYL & HYDE

        better still,why don’t you pack your bags up and move on india,thailand,china,and work 12 hr days for $10 a day(take a face mask)…

  • Snoop

    That is true Shak.
    Which goes to show the potential for Australian design and engineering to expand beyond the Falcon and Commodore.

    As much as we do build and help engineer many different vehicles in this country,
    that is still a very small part to play compared to the the extensions of the same company’s around the world.
    We’re just not taken that seriously.

  • http://NSSAN James Cortez

    No doubt Australian Engineers are very good and can build well engineered cars or trucks for that matter. the achilees heel is, as always, high labor cost. This gives investors a second, third thought to manufacture automobiles downunder. The strong labor union only makes economic decision worse.

  • davie

    The full text of the speech is available on other websites. He mentions the history of manufacture of an electronic device and how the USA has lost (for ever) the technology.

    He praises innovations by all 3 local manufacturers and builds a convincing argument forward.

    I recommend people actually read the speech in full before commenting. Also, it may actually help some people with how to present a point of view in a mature manner.

    • Mad Max

      You sir, deserve a Caradvice medal! Presententing a balanced view in a mature way is not a strong point of many contributors to this blog site. The only thing you need to add is the dictionary definition of “balanced” and “mature” so that some of the contributors can understand the meaning of both words. But you will need to put it into very simple, basic, easy to understand words or it will be a lost cause.

  • Roadtard

    How quickly the haters would change their tune if VW bought Holden. Commodore TSi’s and TDi’s would be uber-good, with profits gladly sent to the Fatherland.

  • M

    Any industry that is willing to commit to sustainable business plans that nurture expertise, create investment and secure employment should (within reason) be encouraged.

    Regards within reason, if the Government and Tax payer funds are committed to the motor industry, it would be beneficial to consider what plans the Global players have for our engineering and manufacturing resources.

    The Mitsu 380 was a solid example of a short term injection to secure short term employment for a short sighted business plan (a car that was sold to a small population base and that was not re-tooled for export markets with any semblance of reasonable product demand).

    As Ford (for example) engages a global strategy – thus finally producing world cars for a global market – surely the investment and expertise in the brilliant people that man our motor industry should be realised – so that they (these people) play an important role in engineering and possibly producing components or indeed whole cars as part of this initiative??? Imagine the Terri – with a global focus – and much greater R&D resources thrown at it!!!

    Yes we all bang on about the quality of our local cars – and yes they do not compete necessarily with regards build quality, plastics matching etc – but if the Terri was developed for the Nth America, Russia, Sth America etc – and its chassis and engine used to produce an MPV for Europe – then our industry would be globally focussed – stronger – more sustainable – and less likely to be so easily undermined by Mngt business plans extolling the end is near (as so often happens).

    And yes – I am now going to read the report…

  • Richard

    All GM Holden, Ford and Toyota need to do is produce cars Australians want.
    Where is Holden’s SUV? Where are their diesel motors?
    If you were really commited you would manufacture what the market wants and not just ask the government for more money.

    • Roadtard

      Holden’s SUV? The local Sportwagon and the imported Captiva not enough, Richard?

      • IfItAintARotorItAintAMotor

        The Captiva is the answer to nothing. A truly god-awful car…

  • Lukaas

    (1)People here who are opposed to the hand outs… why?
    How does it affect you? Taxes?…. why dont you complain about your Tax money funding HUGE salaries of useless politicians?

    Having a an Automotive Industry allows Australians to have jobs and expertise fields.

    You guys think Australia has many other industries they can shift workers to?

    LMAO…. Australia is in danger of becomming a Nation of Consumers without jobs in a decade or 2.

    if anything Australian government need to shift some money and REINFORCE its manufacturing industry.

    Not everyone can work for a BANK….BANKS exists because their are people earning money from other industries outside of banking/finance etc.

    (3) In terms of Australian Cars.
    Sales are down because of the product itself not because its made in Oz.
    Ford is slowly bringing out smaller cars to its plants.
    Holden is also doing the same.
    Toyota is different that its products built here is sold 90% overseas. But with the new engine plant, I dont see why they cant introduce a local built SUV or Small car in the future.

    Lack of sales from local oems show that the market is moving away from large 6s… so whats the solution? Start making new products. Being built in Oz is different matter, people will buy what they need.

  • Pauly

    Question….

    With all that tax payer money handed to Holden to build the Cruze here… does that mean they could easily build the VOLT here?

    Australia could export the car in Right Hand Drive to the rest of the world and take the load off Detroit to build both left and right drive.