Volvo S60 T4 Review | CarAdvice

Car Advice

Volvo S60 T4 Review

VOLVO S60

Pros: Styling, safety, build quality, willing and torquey engine, value-for-money

Cons: Gearbox shift quality, ride a little firm

By Karl Peskett |
FIND DEALS

Price: $36,520 to $43,450

If it’s a premium mid-sized car you want and you’re watching your pennies, then there’s really only one option: the Volvo S60 T4.

Consider this: The Lexus IS 250 costs $55,800, the BMW 3 Series starts at $56,100, Mercedes-Benz‘s C-Class kicks off at $58,990, and Audi’s cheapest A4 lists for $52,200.

The price of the Volvo S60 T4? $48,990. It’s the only car in its class to come in under $50K. But if you’re thinking you’re getting some kind of bare-bones stripped out car with cloth seats and single-zone aircon, think again. It’s a remarkably complete package which downsizes under the bonnet to keep the cost down, rather than deleting interior luxury.

Powering the T4 is a 1.6-litre, four-cylinder turbocharged petrol engine coupled with a six-speed dual-clutch transmission. Known as EcoBoost in the Ford stables, this diminutive engine actually delivers the goods when it comes to outputs. Power is listed as 132kW and it makes 240Nm of torque, meaning it will go from 0-100km/h in 9.0 seconds. While that doesn’t sound like much, it feels a lot quicker on the roll than off the line.

The engine makes peak torque at 1600rpm and the torque curve stays flat as a pancake up until 5000rpm. While the on-paper figures suggest it will leap off the line at low revs, in practice it only gets into its stride after 2000rpm. Once past there, however, it’s a very willing performer. Peak power is made at 5700rpm, and it really does keep pulling until it upchanges near its redline.

There is an issue with the power delivery, however, and it’s with the gearbox. It tends to shunt through the changes, rather than smoothly shifting. You get used to it, but it’s a different style of change to the usual dual clutch quick shift. At full throttle, each change takes a lot longer than you’d expect from a DCT, and seems to be the result of a lightweight gearbox dealing with a car that weighs a lot more than a Ford Focus, for example.

It’s really the only flaw in the drivetrain, as it’s relatively lag-free and is also extremely quick to respond to throttle inputs in both revs and downshifts. It’s a lot more spritely than you’d think from a 1.6-litre and (apart from the auto’s shift quality) really suits the car well.

Fuel economy is listed as 7.4 litres/100km, but we averaged 9.3L/100km during a city-only week.

The Volvo’s steering is a little numb, but there’s enough weight to be satisfying; there’s a level of connection which makes an Audi A4 seems a little pale in comparison. It turns in reasonably well, and has a firm but forgiving ride which gives the S60 a good level of handling for its size.

The rest of the car is typical of the S60 range; high quality, soft-touch plastics, beautifully comfortable leather seats (the driver’s is electric as standard), a good amount of room for front-seat passengers and respectable legroom for the rear passengers. Headroom in the back could be a little better for taller people, however for the average sized male, there will not too many complaints.

The boot is also a good size, and making it all the more practical, the rear seatbacks can be dropped down. We had cause to test this feature when a friend riding his bike received a puncture. Undo the front wheel and a mountain bike fits into the S60 with no hassle at all.

The Bluetooth works a treat in both phone and audio streaming modes and the eight-speaker stereo is clear and bassy – Volvo really does terrific stereos. The new menu screen is still more difficult than the BMW equivalent to navigate through, but the screen itself is very high resolution, making it a pleasure to view. Navigation is still horrifically expensive though – it’s a $4175 option.

Included spec is pretty good: rain-sensing wipers, rear parking sensors (you can add fronts for $325), auto-dimming mirror, USB and iPod connectivity, floor mats, leather steering wheel with decor inlays, heated door mirrors and dual-zone climate control.

Being a Volvo, it’s safe. You get Volvo’s City Safety (which applies the brakes if it senses an impending front-to-rear collision), Anti-lock Braking with Emergency Brake Assist and Electronic Brakeforce Distribution, Dynamic Stability and Traction Control, a heap of airbags and various patented Volvo technologies which reduce whiplash, as well as side-impact protection.

Yes, the Volvo S60 T4 has a few flaws, but it’s the price which really is appealing. It’s a good size car that’s well built, and what you get for the money is extremely competitive. Considering how safe it is and how good-looking it is, Volvo should certainly make a sizeable dent in the sales of the base model 3 Series, A4 and C-Class.

Photos: www.janglovac.com


 

Owner reviews of the VOLVO S60 Add a New Review

  • notatoy

    There is a problem with this car. It is very very heavy.

    • John

      Not sure that 1500kg is all that heavy. The Mondeo is 200kg heavier.

    • Iggy

      IS250 is the same weight and produces 20kw more and probably less Nm of torque.

    • notatoy

      Sorry I have got the wrong info from someone.

    • notatoy

      I requested a brochure for this car and it says the T5 is 1800kg+. Now the website says T5 is only 1500kg. It must be an overseas brochure.

      • Tom R

        Possibly AWD diesel?

  • Vic

    Overall I think its a good package.But am still not convinced about the engine.I dont have a problem with small capacity engines and I undertsand why its in the volvo but considering its capacity its not economical at all.I mean 9.3/100 for a 1.6 ltr is horrendous.

    • Tom R

      I can imagine it’s there for the same reason the 318i existed or the Skoda Octavia 1.6. If you drive this and can scrape a little more for a real engine, you will. If not, you really want one anyway and will deal with it,

  • Ben

    not sure if I’m just reading it incorrectly but all of the prices for the quoted for the competitors cars are way off. All the quoted cars start in the low 30′s not 50′s. So either the prices are wrong or they should be quoting cars like the ES, 5 series, E-class, etc.

    • o

      Aus scam

    • Iggy

      Not sure where you’re from Ben? In AUS we pay premium prices from ‘not so’ premium brands.

    • piquetcon

      Ben, the price for a 3 series, A4 or C Class are correct as per the article, all in the $50k+ price range.

  • TonyB

    I know its been said before, but this naming system adopted by Volvo is crap. Both the T4 and T5 are turbocharged four cylinder engines. There’s not even any relationship between the name and the size of the engine along the line that BMW used to have. And yes, 9.3 l/100km out of a 1.6l engine is a little ordinary even if it was all city driving. And of course still no spare wheel.

  • davey

    Clever cost saving idea not to paint the base model.

  • SWE

    damn good automobile! Proud to have driven the D3 from Gothenburg, Sweden to Dresden, Germany and back. All 2000 kms in total. Awesome power on the autobahn!!

    Go Volvo!