Looks better in real life (Melbourne Auto Show), a diesel would be nice.
I like the styling
I think it looks great, especially in the tangerine pearl colour.
Was there a 0-100km time done, Tim?
Still testing, it hasn’t got up to 100km/h yet. Another sluggish Subaru shitbox.
“You can detect a subtle difference in ride height when you jump from the Impreza to the XV, but the overwhelming sensation is that you’re driving a small hatch rather than an SUV!”
Thats because you are driving a small hatch! Nice to see some different colours from Subaru though!
Didn’t like it before. Now see the photos of the blue one, I like it. Fold-flat boot is good too. Still not sure about the rims…
me 2 !!!
If they targeting the younger market then they should make a performance model. Would be a cracker
That black one looks pretty slick. I think this car’s got personality.
It looks good. Somehow the styling works better on the XV then it does on the Imprezza. The inside looks like a nice place to be and seems to be of good quality.
As was said above the fold-flat boot is great and makes it practical for a small suv.
However, the lack of a diesel option will hurt sales I think.
Especially with the CX-5 coming out very soon.
I think Subaru are lacking foresight by saying that it is a wish but not a priority.
More and more people are looking at diesel engines when buying cars like this for the extra torque.
Subaru had the opportunity here to really put pressure on the competition but they have let it slip by.
I totally agree Peter, this is everything I want.. except not in a diesel, darn! What are they thinking??!?…a 2012 model without a diesel option..doh
Diesel auto please Mr Subaru. Subaru should dump the partnership with Inchape as the current warranty is very poor… That is, rattles are not warranted after 12 months and roadside assist is extra cost.
A lot of brands only cover rattles for the first 1,500kms or to the first service! so 12 months is quite good!!
I can see this working, as the current forester got a fair bit bigger than the previous model and people like my wife were not impressed. (She has them at her work).
I like everything apart from those hideous rims. They will date in about 30 seconds.
Those wheels look like someone stole the honeycomb mags from a 1970’s HX Monaro LE and painted them black
I hope Subaru provide a no-cost swap to wheels which wont look like a bad 1970’s artefact.
Ditch the AWD [be useless off road anyway] turn it into [as per others] into a 2WD and take a further $2k off the price
Need longer service intervals, capped service prices, longer warranty, road side assist, this should be standard by EVERY brand in AUS.[God bless Mitsubishi]
AND a commitment to the Australia market by FHI aka Subaru Japan as the importer, not a seperate importer as per now
Ah the 15 yo troll is back…
No problems with any of my AWDs off road, you don’t know what you are talking about. And I don’t think you have a license (or pubes).
Piss off and go ruin some other internet website.
Most subarus are actually really good offroad for what they are.
I don’t think you have any idea what you are talking about.
I own a bog standard AWD 1999 impreza LX hatch. It comes with a 5 speed manual which includes second lever activating 20% reduction dual range transfer case.
I simply cannot fault the AWD. Even with its bog standard normal road height and no ESP or ABS it is a very capable and safe vehicle – within its limits.
Its been on beaches and soft snow and up and down steep unsealed roads. No – its not a rock-hopper but it is incredibly safe and the car has never missed a beat.
Really its just [like all the other stupidrus] a jacked-up-wagon
Lets call them “The Jacked Up Wagon Company”
NOT a patch on the vastly superior Mazda CX5
Good luck taken a cx5 offroad…
Gears a little to tightly spaced?? Are you serious!, Thats exactly what you want and would be a big improvement over the clunky long cable shift of the new liberty/outback if that is true?
He might of meant the ratios not the shift?
No if you read the sentance properly he is actually talking about the shift and operation Not ratios!! ( I found the manual shifter a bit fiddly and the gears a little too tightly spaced, although more time behind the wheel would likely resolve any deficiencies that weren’t intuitively mastered)
OSU811 – learn to read. He is clearly talking about the ratios. The shifter is fiddly AND the gears etc. No need to use so many exclamation marks – just open your eyes.
Not a bad looking car but as others have said, add a diesel to the line up please.
And is it just me that doesn’t like CVT’s?!
I don’t, but I now own one (outback) and it’s fantastic. as good as a ZF 6-speed.
I wouldnt go that far Alex, yes it is smooth quite and efficient in normal day to day use, but gets a bit revvy and definately not sporty when being pushed! Also the 5 speed in the 3.6 outback drives a lot better and more responsive/sporty imho..
Does it come in a range of colours?
It had better – the colour pictured above is just so ugly – the car looks like it’s been vomited on by the Jolly Green Giant after drinking 12 gallons of Fanta and eating 5 tonnes of ham & cheese baked beans.
The rest of it is OK though.
Actually, I take that back. I’ve seen other photos of the car in the same colour and it looks pretty good – a sharp, crisp colour. Must be the photos above – the colour looks like Fanta with milk mixed in (to me at least).
Ha! Nice one, Dianna.
It is a good question though. From the pictures here it looks like o=range, blue and the standard range of greys. Let’s hope there are a few more options.
Not a bit fan of the new Impreza styling, but have to say the XV looks a lot better and well proportioned (agree about the yuk wheels though!) not sure if it’s the ride heights, different bumpers or what, but looks a lot better than the standard Impreza. A turbo GT version would rock and could have the potential to make the XV a car that is ‘fun to drive’.
Funny how this works well as a design, yet the standard model looks more than a little out of wack.
Perhaps its the raised height, blackened arches that slightly disguise the terribly long front overhang and colour that does it… I have not pinned it down but I really like it.
Cant wait to see one on the road.
No Diesel no care. Tiguan kills it.
What for? At on the highway this will use 4-5L/100km, what good is the diesel? Apart from cost a lot more to buy.
Because the 2.0L NA motor is terrible. No performance at all. No way will it get anywhere near 4-5L/100.
How would you even know? It hasn’t been on any cars before this and those who have say its great. So stop claiming u know what it’ll be like
I take it you’ve never driven a Subaru Impreza.
Diesels are a fad, even car companies (BMW) are saying that with developments in petrols, they’ll soon become obsolete. They’re dirty, expensive to buy/fuel/service, they cost a lot to meet emission standards (EU5/6 particle filters aren’t cheap) and they emmit carcinogenic emissions. I’ll stick to petrols.
Leatherette seats ? – vinyl more like it… – sweat city.
Why not just a nice cloth ???
Hate leather seats…
No Mazda6’s without leather, now this !
you can clearly but this with cloth seats as seen in the photos.
Yes, the base model has cloth seats; the next model up has “leatherette” whatever tf that is and the sports version has leather.
These things look better in the flesh, but the NA 2.0 is just too week by today’s standards. A WRX version would definitely be welcome.
Fat seats which are rubbish for taller drivers. Hate my Forester seats now.
Still undecided, think it looks better in some of the pictures than the current one.
Too much black plastic on the outside. The black plastic fades and will look like something from the early 90’s. I think when I spend that much on a new car, I dont want to see black unpainted bits.
I will just state upfront I own a current model Liberty which has been a great car. I even like the CVT that works very well, the paddles are great and let you access its modest power at any time.
I wanted to like the XV, and it was on my short list for a new car for the wife. It now isn’t for 2 reasons, first the engine. It just does not cut it in this type of vehicle, a diesel auto would be preferred, I want some accessible torque. Hell I would even be happy to take a hit on fuel for a turbo petrol, if it reasonable.
Second is boot space of 310L. Even allowing for full sized spare it is well below average. The Tiguan which is much maligned for its lack of space has 395l, the Yeti, Dualis, ASX are all over 400L’s, the CX-5 is reported to have 500L.
I can’t fold the seats down with two kids sitting in them, so that does not help. That alone is a deal breaker.
Lets be honest it really is just a jacked up Impreza, and in this very competitive market that is not going to be enough to succeed.
Subaru, your pricing better be sharp or this will go nowhere.
If you’re after a family car, you should be looking at a Forester or Outback. Subaru already cater for families with their other models… this one is aimed at a completely different market. The market that doesn’t have kids continuously in the back of the car!
The KIA Sportage looks heaps better than this; I’m sure the Sportage is more value for money too
try seeing out of a sportage…. great car but no thanks!
I actually think the loud colour, body cladding, (cool) wheels and raise ride height really improve the hatchback Impreza, it looks far younger than the hatch.
40.4 litres per 100k according to the trip computer photo.
This will steal some sales from the SX4 4×4
I think Suby is on to a winner with this. It looks cool, especially in black. This market segment is obviously booming judging by the number of Dualis, iX35, Sportage, ASX etc that you see on the roads. Now that Suby has improved the woeful interior of the previous Impreza they’ll sell heaps.
Yes needs a gutsier engine to make it truly fun. Impreza is a very smooth ride which sets it apart from the rest, but give it a 2.5L or turbo or diesel & it would be a difficult package to beat.
Agreed Lavs, turbo powered would be awesome and diesel would be cooler when need more torque for towing. But this XV apparently fun to drive. cheers!!!
I might treat myself to one in the new year. My Bug Eyes Impreza is due to go…
Tempting. Time to trade my GT Forester.
LOVVVVE IT. Styling looks much better on this than it does on the plain Impreza.
I’m glad I’ve found the CarAdvice website. The carsguide ‘first drive’ of the XV refers to the car on multiple occasions as the ‘RX.’ Terrible journalism, especially considering the money they have to play with being part of news corp.
Interesting the positivity in this comments section compared to the regular impreza review. Maybe it’s the stronger colours, or the more aggressive stance, but the XV does look better and more modern then the impreza.
Alexander, you do have a point regarding diesels. If Subaru offered this engine as a turbo 1.5 that ran on 91 RON with the CVT and offered close to diesel economy then the diesel would be irrelevant.
Did anyone see the picture of the centre display screen with the fuel economy figure? 40.4 l/100km…
Hi, greetings from Central Europe (Czech Republic). Numbers 40.4 l/100 km are O.K., it means, that the car is quite new and it only went in and off the transport car.
I am looking forward to diesel engine (2.0 Boxer), which is very popular in Europe (quiet, strong, consumption about 5 l/100 km, acceleration 9,5 s to 100 km/h).
Do Subaru understand the idea of progression because they seem to be fixated on the exact opposite. You can add ugly as sin to the list of negatives.
I liked the concept & the car has gone close to delivering. While the better spare tyre is great, boot space is a massive issue, don’t care how much i can fit with the seats down, with kids i need to fit alot back there with the seats occupied. Being close to worst in class on this (and having less boot space than the hatch or sedan) it’s a big negative. Why upgrade to something like this for less space, when other models can deliver similar dynamics.
The colours are very bland also & look in the pictures almost matt like. The previous design pictures looked more metallic & very sexy. This ends up looking a bit cheap.
Hope they fix this up before release. Still looking forward to a test drive for that great Subaru drive experience.
The design is seriously terrible.. It looks very bland.. And interior looks harsh..
Sad to say, but I’ll easily choose a Hyundai or Kia over this
subaru buyer is different ciass than any other cars .Executive class ,so dont do comparison with any oyher cars .
When i’m driving in my 2011 Elentra everyone look at my car.. It seriously looks very good
this is the different between class of buyers now dont tell me chery looks better than subaru. my friend work at chery he had horrible exp with chery customer .subarus customers are different.
Did they not look at Hyundai’s when they designed this?
MORE POWER PLEASE !!! I hope it has more of the less conservative colours … So over the subdued office type colours. Not in the Subaru tradition.
Details of 2012 forester and outback please.
dont know yet ed but im looking ? dave and helen
Can,t wait to see what the awd can really do for usual surf tracks..a few limestone rocks..a bit of loose sand..can a malibu board fit inside..?
In Europe will be this model available also with 2.0 Boxer Diesel (108 kW) motor.
Needs more power, and smarter wheels.
Think I’ll just jack up my WRX.
Looks pretty damn good to me. Not a fan of the current Impreza, which is extremely bland and lacks individualism in its styling. The XV is the first sign that Subaru is starting to listen to its loyal band of followers.
The XV has all of a sudden risen to the top of my shopping list. Bring it on!!
I’m waiting til it comes to Oz as Diesel but it looks like the car for me, new Forester’s too big. Be good to have a wheel option too.
I’ll buy one like a shot – when there’s a diesel.
Pricing is out on Subaru website now. MUCH higher than expected[sadface]…
I think OSU811 is correct that he is not talking about the ratios although the english may suggest that……others have commented that it is too easy to move from second gear to fifth instead of to third which gels with the idea that the gate is too narrow.
Test drove this morning. On the plus side, some good features as standard incl. reversing camera.
But after 8 years of Forester XT driving(OK unfair comparison), seems sluggish and heavy. Really hate those wheel trims. Inclined to stick with the XT.
Mal may not fit inside, i got a 60 inch tv inside mine. but a set of cross bars for it wont set you back much. CVT is effortless and the suspension feels very sport like. 10/10 car.
Took an XV for a test drive today. Overall I think it is a very good option.
Points I noted:
– Performance is not strong. It is responsive enough around the twisty stuff if you keep it in the range. From a standing start it is slow. Up a long hill it has little acceleration above 90k per hour. I did not get a chance to try overtaking, but expect you will need a long runway. However, given the speed limits and the danger of insane speeds WRX can get to, it may save your licence or your life. The fun in driving is getting the best out of what you have anyway.
– Seats on lower end models are terrible. Soft and I could feel the metal frame under my right leg. The adjustments are such that you can not find exactly the right spot. The leather ones on the S are fine though, firmer with electric adjustment giving plenty of options..
– Not as balanced as the outback in handling. The front feels like it is tucking under at times and there is a bit of lateral movement on the suspension. Pretty minor though, generally does a great job.
– The luggage space is very small. I only need two seats so that is OK, but a show stopper for a larger family.
– Rims look a bit tacky, but actually match some colours well. The package looks great to me.
– The black looks the goods, pity black is so hot. There is a pale blue that is a good colour but does not go so well with the black rims and trim. The white was the surprise for me, it actually makes the package look a little classy and the black sets it off. The orange is much better in the pictures, more mustard in reality, yuck.
– Gear box (manual) is very nice to shift. As good as any for finding the right spot. Only complaint (contrary to the review) is that the upper gears are too far apart. I would prefer 3+ to be a little lower to give options up those hills.
– Reversing camera is excellent quality.
– I forgot to try the stereo!
A test drive is always a bit frantic, as you are trying to find the faults. I think once you owned this and settled in to it you would fall more in love each day. The top of range is the only option I would consider because of the seats (must), sunroof (must) and climate (nice) for not too much extra. The navigation is then a bonus.
I am in the US and car comes out in fall, cant wait. i love the rims
The rims are terrible and why the hell does the XV cost more than the other standard Subarus like the Forester and its even more than the Legacy in South Africa- Rowan
“its wheelbase is 10mm shorter, technically robbing it of some interior space”
This would imply that the floorpan has altered – unlikely, I would say.
The 10mm shorter wheelbase is probably just due to the longer springs putting the rear trailing arms at a steeper angle, therby pulling the rear wheels slightly forwards.
I live in the country, down a bush track & surrounded by forest and I can’t help but feel that one of these little beauties would do me very nicely. I spotted them when they first appeared and I’m interested as a second vehicle to my Pajero, which I use for towing and camping. Sure diesel would be nice but those fuel figures are pretty decent and the extra cost of the diesel donk would take ages to recover. Besides for short hops, petrol sounds the go.