Loading indicator
News & Reviews
Last 7 Days
  • Increased efficiency, spacious and quiet cabin, improved quality and finish, driving dynamics, visibility
  • Not the cheapest small car around, nor the fastest, notchy manual gearstick feel

7 / 10

2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review

The all-new Subaru Impreza has taken significant steps forward in efficiency, quality and overall refinement.

The fourth-generation Subaru Impreza sedan and hatch go on sale in Australia in early-March 2012, at which time it will become the first mainstream small car to come with stop/start engine technology across the range. The new feature is among a number of enhancements to the 2012 Subaru Impreza that make it at least 20 per cent more fuel efficient that the model it replaces.

The new Impreza uses 6.8-7.1 litres/100km on the combined cycle – a significant improvement over the previous model’s 8.8-8.9 litres/100km efforts, and one that brings it much closer to the economy leaders in the small-car class.

The increased focus on improving the efficiency of the traditional Boxer petrol engine means a diesel-powered Impreza has been placed on the backburner. Subaru Australia managing director Nick Senior admitted the brand currently has no plans to offer an Impreza diesel.

“It is not a priority at the moment,” Mr Senior said. “It is on a wish list but there are many other things on the wish list before diesel.”

2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review

If you clicked through to this review to read how mental the new WRX is, we’ve got bad news there too. The Subaru WRX and WRX STI models will follow a different lifecycle to the mainstream Impreza. Although they will be based on the Impreza and use a high-performance version of its engine, the sporty Subarus won’t enter production for about three years. That means the current shape will have to soldier on until 2014. But enough about what’s not available…

On sale in Australia from March will be three grades: the entry-level Impreza 2.0i, the luxury-appointed Impreza 2.0i-L, and the sports-oriented Impreza 2.0i-S. The new names replace R, RX and RS and come into line with Subaru’s international naming structure.

Prices and specifications are still to be confirmed, but don’t expect the new Impreza to be cheaper than the old one. Subaru Australia general manager marketing, Andrew Caie, said the brand would ideally like to keep prices the same as before, but admitted if they were to change they would head north rather than south.

The outgoing range was priced between $23,490 and $30,490 before on-road costs, giving us an indication of what to expect when the new model arrives.

At that price, the base model 2012 Subaru Impreza will be considerably more expensive than some other entry-level competitors, including the Mazda3 Neo ($20,330), Hyundai Elantra Active ($20,590), Holden Cruze CD ($20,990) and the Ford Focus Ambiente ($21,990).

2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review

Every model in the 2012 Subaru Impreza range will be equipped with seven airbags and the rest of the expected safety kit, as well as cruise control, Bluetooth phone connectivity and audio streaming, USB and AUX media ports, and automatic air conditioning. Subaru Australia also expects all models equipped with the continuously variable transmission (CVT) to feature steering wheel-mounted paddle shifters (official confirmation still pending).

The 2.0i-L model adds 16-inch alloy wheels, a 4.3-inch colour multi-function display in the centre console, rear-view camera, dual-zone climate control, steering wheel audio controls, sunroof, rear privacy glass and front fog lights.

The 2.0i-S tops the range with HID xenon headlights, leather upholstery, eight-way power driver’s seat, and alloy pedals. Satellite navigation with SMS voice-to-text and voice command will be available as an option on the two higher-spec models.

Every variant will be available in four-door sedan and five-door hatch body styles, and with the option of a six-speed manual transmission or the ‘Lineartronic’ CVT. The CVT will come with a price premium (likely to be $2000), although Subaru Australia is yet to lock down pricing details.

One thing we can tell you all about is the new engine, as we were invited to put the Impreza through its paces (be it briefly and under restrictive conditions) at Fuji Heavy Industries’ private test facility in Japan.

2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review


Despite producing identical power and torque figures to the old engine (110kW/196Nm), the 2.0-litre four-cylinder engine is a completely new powerplant. The horizontally opposed FB Boxer engine integrates lightweight components, a longer stroke and Subaru’s Dual Active Valve Control System, which all translates to improved efficiency and more low- and mid-range torque.

The engine itself still has the rumbly start-up and metallic whirr that is characteristic of Boxer units, although it is considerably quieter and more refined than the engine it replaces.

Much of its performance is dependent on your transmission choice. The six-speed manual gives you the best performance, with a 0-100km/h acceleration time 0.8 seconds faster than the CVT (10.7 vs 11.5), although neither is exactly what you’d call zippy. The manual shifter can be a little tricky to handle. The H-patterns are positioned very close together and more than once I shifted straight from second gear to fifth. Fortunately, the truck-like gearstick vibration of the old model has been almost completely eliminated in the new car.

The CVT has a typically high-pitched, whiny note during acceleration, although that’s simply part of the deal when you buy an infinite-ratio gearbox. The CVT doesn’t offer the same level of driver engagement and enjoyment as the manual, but it hits the mark from an economy perspective (6.8 litres/100km combined) and will meet the needs of most small-car buyers.

2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review

The CVT’s paddle shifters allow you to flick between six pre-determined ‘gears’. While the system responds quickly and accurately, it doesn’t really add a lot to the overall driving experience.

At lower speeds, both combinations should be brisk enough to keep pace with traffic, although higher-speed on-ramp and overtaking manoeuvres will take a little more effort. Cruising at highway speeds is a breeze, with tall gearing leading to low revs and minimal engine noise.

Sound intrusion into the cabin is mostly muted at all speeds, with the loudest noise coming from the tyres. It’s a big step forward in refinement from the old model, and arguably puts the Impreza right up there with the quietest small cars.


It’s even quieter when Auto Start Stop takes over. In CVT models, the system is activated 0.5 seconds after the car comes to a halt. The engine kicks back on 0.35 seconds after you release the brake pedal, tap the accelerator or turn the steering wheel. The same times apply to the manual, although it’s a slightly more convoluted process. The system requires you to come to a stop, put the car in neutral and take your foot off the clutch. To restart the engine, you have to depress the clutch, put the car back in gear and then release the brake.

The new Subaru Impreza feels solid on the road. Although the electric steering offers less feedback than we hoped, there’s now more weight to the wheel around corners and at higher speeds. The all-wheel drive system gives you the feeling of being pushed rather than pulled, and both sedan and hatch feel composed and flat in basic manoeuvres. The pedals are well positioned and have a good feel. The brake is almost perfect: progressive, and without any early lightness or grabbing.

2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review

As is often the case, the new Impreza looks better in person than in pictures. It’s a lot less fussy than the old model, and appears larger and more assertive. One specific area Subaru’s engineers focused on was the door handles. On the old model they felt loose and tacky, but the new Impreza’s handles are perfectly solid. It’s a little thing, but often it’s the little things that make or break your purchase decision.

The cabin has taken a huge leap forward in terms of material quality, technology and overall layout. There are soft-touch plastics across the dash and on other surfaces you regularly come in contact with. The uncluttered dashboard layout, detailed MFD screen and the classy feel of the dials are among the highlights for front seat passengers. Unfortunately, Subaru has stuck with an old-school fixed key rather than a modern flip design.

The driver’s seat doesn’t offer a lot of side or lumbar support but it felt comfortable for the short stints we spent in it. Visibility is excellent out the front as Subaru has pushed the A-pillars 200mm forwards and reduced their width to great effect – and apparently without compromising structural integrity. The view out the back is also relatively unobstructed in either body style.

The Impreza’s rear-seat legroom is a triumph. The car’s wheelbase has grown by 25mm, and that extra inch has all been added between the front seatbacks and the rear passengers’ knees. It makes the Impreza one of the roomiest small cars on the market.

2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review
2012 Subaru Impreza Review

There’s 460 litres of space in the sedan’s boot and 340 litres in the back of the hatch (up 40 litres and 35 litres respectively). They’re not class-leading figures, but they’ll more than accommodate what most small-car owners generally need to haul. A space saver spare tyre sits under the floor.

If Subaru Australia can keep the price of the new Impreza close to that of the old model, it will have a seriously appealing small car in its showrooms. The new Impreza is better than the old one in almost every conceivable area. Most importantly, some of the old model’s weaknesses (efficiency, quality and refinement) have become some of the new car’s stronger suits. It won’t be the cheapest small car on the block, but if you’re after a dynamically strong small car that’s quiet and spacious, line-up a test drive of the new Impreza in the early months of 2012.

  Submit an Owner Car Review


2012 Subaru Impreza Review
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
  • 8
  Submit an Owner Car Review

  • Matt H

    Comprehensive review. Best one i’ve read on the impreza so far. However all the international sites say that subaru suggest that the Impreza does 0-100 in 9.8s with the CVT. I thought that was quite slow. 11.5s is ridiculously slow for a car in its class.

    What is the stop-start like in real driving conditions, such as finding a park etc?

    • DaveofKTown

      I just drove the XV this morning with start/stop. It only kicks in when you have the brake pedal further in than usual and it wont kick in if the wheel is turned from center or the indicator is on. You can also apparently turn it off. The dealer had no idea how it worked…

  • anthony

    The interior looks a little bit like the MK5 Golf/Jetta,expecially the dashboard,but the outside is still ugly.

    • Golfschwein

      I wasn’t going to say so, Anthony. But now that you have… :) Anyway, if that means the dash is far more agreeable than the old one, so be it. Outside is an improvement too, if not absolutely my cup of tea. Some will like it.

    • Where-is-yr-Emergency-Brake-Assist-Hyundai

      As an ex Gen 2 Impreza owner who has been consistently disappointed over the years with the following generations of Impreza (space saver tyres, appalling lack of rear seat room, bloated disproportionate styling), I must admit this is a step in the right direction, especially in regards to rear leg room and dashboard design (the current utilitarian dash looks fine on the Forester, but appallingly out of place in the Impreza and Liberty/Outback).

      However, it appears the little man hiding in Subaru’s design dept is still causing a bit of nighttime havoc with his ugly stick (at least on the exterior) … and for Australia’s sake if Subaru is serious about marketing themselves as AWD ie. THE snowfield vehicle, surely put in a full sized tyre? A space saver completely defeats the purpose of paying premium for an AWD car because you’re in less-than-ideal road conditions …

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au Kane

      ^^^ are you serious they look nothing alike?

  • Justin

    Big improvement under the skin, unfortunately the skin is still the same

    • andronicus

      It is MUCH better than the model it replaces though.

      Subaru havent got the outside right yet but they are improving….well the hatch exterior has improved anyway.

      They still have to do better then that because their are other companies who do this class better.

  • SCK

    I like how the boot has those hing hider..

    Not many cars in this segment have that..

    • davie

      a lot of cars have replaced those big hinges with the mini hinges. The big ones take up boot room

      also That hatch hole appears quite pretty small!

    • Where-is-yr-Emergency-Brake-Assist-Hyundai

      Hard to believe these goose hinges are still being used, regardless of whether they’re covered (Honda Euro) or not (Hyundai Elantra) … the mini cantilever hinges used by Mazda and BMW and the Mitsubish Lancer are unobstrusive and really clever – I’ve often stuffed luggage up to the brim of my Maz3 and the boot simply shuts flush because the hinges don’t crush anything inside … so my 400L boot was really 400L, not a 450L boot being reduced to way less if goose hinges hit luggage inside … could the use of goose hinges apparently be from Audi previously encountering user OH&S issues (finger jamming in the external cantilever hinges) in the States? I recall reading reading about this when a modern day Audi was being reviewed (ie. they went back to the goose hinges) …

      • Judah777

        The newly release for 2012 BMW 3 series sedans all use goose-neck hinges.

  • Westie

    Another three years for the WRX and STi???
    Surely this shape will be over halfway to replacement by then?

    • Andrew

      Topgear Mag were saying a different body would be used for the WRX/STi and it would be a 1.6T instead of the 2.0.

  • Andrew Cowley

    The Japanese just dont get diesels do they. Not on the priority queue it says. So they prioritized a CVT gearbox (which nobody wants; most people couldn’t care less whether it’s a standard auto or CVT) over a diesel model.

    • camaro

      hey mate go for a ride. I think even CVT in Lancer which is nearly end lifetime still wont make you feel disappointed. Especially, if you dont compare to a expensive car gearbox. It’s quite amazingly.

    • yogi

      I think the japanese do make diesels (Honda, Mazda etc) but us Aussies are not bringing it here. I have seen a diesel CRV and various others models through europe and some parts of Asia.

  • KD

    That front overhang is H U G E !

  • Hung Low

    Looks like a SX4 sedan from the side pic!

  • theillestlife

    i wonder if it will grow on people as the current gen impreza did…

    • Ian

      the current Gen hasnt grown on me, its still an ugly pig. Pretty sure the majority agrees

  • FrugalOne

    Goose neck boot hinges


    Like always, ugly and overpriced

  • Vibe

    Is the stop-start system standard?

  • Soupratt

    They really need to fire Homer from the design team . Couldn’t possibly be any uglier or boring if they tried. Is there some sort of competition between Subaru and Toyota for the most dull design in the galaxy ?

    • Hung Low

      I have no doubt this will sell well though with the extra space that the Impreza needed up back and start/stop tech.

      Something about it that has reliability and a hint of old school Subaru written all over it!

      • Yonny

        Oh, I don’t know – this car looks powerful like a gorilla, yet soft and yielding like a Nerf Ball – Homer must be on to something.

        Personally, I like it. Looks a bit angular and sharp from some angles but overall looks OK (as pictured, and will probably look better in the metal).

  • DL


  • tj

    gut feeling suggests the next toyota corolla is going to look a lot like that …

  • Seano

    Yawn, anyone buying a new small car that doesn’t get a focus is stoned!!!!!

    • http://beltedradial.blogspot.com @Beltedradial

      ….or over 6 foot tall. I’m 6 foot 6 (198 cm)and cannot fit in the Focus. Cruze is a much better fit (I’m 6 foot six or 198cm) and the 1.4 Turbo with Six Speed Manual is a great combination.

      Even the Kia Cerato has better interior space (try the back seat).

      Impreza power plant is, as usual, not impressive.

    • DaveofKTown

      Agreed Seano. I was waiting for this Impreza as I currently drive a 2001 Bug-Eye. I may however have to go and deal with the terrible Ford dealers. And I mean TERRIBLE.

  • victor

    Why do Japanese manufacturers insist on boring and staid designs all the time(with the exeption of the excellent mazda)? In this case it borders on being downright ugly. Shame.

  • doc

    this model makes the last one looks pretty.

    • gibbut@hotmail.com

      last one looked like a kia from the 90s at least this one looks modern.

  • omgwot

    the hatch looks like an i30, Hyundai is getting smart – pinching designs years before the car is released.

    • camaro

      Hyundai new I30 is a stretched nissan leaf and few shapes from ford fiesta. That’s isnt all my words, I’ve seen few car reviews on youtube said that too.

  • Davorit

    Dear Subaru designers, please visit OPSM.

  • Stooge

    Put it this way…. I’d sleep easy dropping 20-30k on an Italian push bike than give any hard earned dollars to Subaru for this ugly duckling. Given the choice, I’d take pedal power.

  • http://www.carguide2u.com/ Pichet J. – CarGuide2u

    Overall I think this car looks good. Except the rear end. It looks insanely outdated.

  • cc

    Ugly inside and out.

  • David

    How come here in Australia we only get a 2.0L engine in the Impreza, while in the US, the standard engine is a 2.5L?

    • Matt H

      Last model had the 2.5L from the forester/liberty (legacy). but this new model will be the 2.0L world wide. The Yanks aren’t happy apparently but the new engine + lighter car + new gearbox is supposed to be quicker then the old 2.5.

  • Simon

    NO thanks

  • Milsie

    That front overhang is so long I’m surprised the rear tyres aren’t hovering off the ground.
    Also really loving that parking-brake surround. YUCK. Looks like an old saggy bag.

    • my99WasBetter

      It has that unfashionable overhang because the whole Engine is in front of the front axles. Cars with the engine east-west on top of the gearbox can move the wheels further forward. But you’re right, it does look weird. Why-oh-why the ugly parking brake surround! My MY99 model has it coming our of the box between the seats, and looks miles better than that. Maybe we can get a bush carpenter to fix it…

  • Vlad

    Really disapointed in looks – it’s more of a KIA now

    • gibbut@hotmail.com

      nah look at the last model beside this. it WAS a kia ( with a lanos back )

      • chugs

        looked more like a BMW in my view.

    • Hmmm…

      Kia’s look better than Subarus these days

  • Steven

    FLAT SEATS. I bet there’s no tilt or under thigh support?

    • chugs

      you can get excellent sport seats for it.

  • j

    It has such an American feel. Reminds me of the Sebring and the new Civic.

  • davie

    I own a my99 impreza. It has a soft touch feel and there are signiciant similarities in the overall design of the interior with this brand new one.

    Makes me wonder what they have been doing for the last 10 years with their crappy scratchy ugly interiors design.

  • K-Pop

    Exterior styling still not the prettiest, but much better than the old one. New interior styling is a million times better looking than the old one.

    • chugs


      shorten front end makes it look stumpy and cheap. The grill is appealing to fat amercians all the way and the rear end is just plain ordinary. The break lights on the previous gen are really nice looking as is the ass.

  • PeterG

    Sad to say it but the days that Subaru were innovators and produced cars a cut above are way gone.
    What changed inside the company? Maybe they make more profit theses days but the consumer is way worse off.

  • eip

    Looks like a decent, competent package overall, but it wouldn’t necessarily be on the top of my list.

  • Martin

    They don’t make pretty cars anymore

    • http://mickdim@internode.on.net mick11

      buy HONDA accord euro!

      • Samr

        Name one?

        • Martin

          Tribeca? Current Impreza? XV? You can’t be serious

  • Vince

    Looks like a lot of people love ugly cars.. that or all of Subaru’s employees are voting down everyones posts haha.

    • Thrillhouse

      Standard. See what happens when you bad mouth a Lexus next time there’s a review!

  • Bozman

    What a nice Hyundai Getz! Good job!

  • Homer

    Car looks great except for the front, back, sides and top.


    I’d hate to see what the STI version will look like…

  • Judah777

    @Caradvice / Tim Beissmann

    Can you please confirm that the 2012 Impreza will be available with a 6-speed manual; I’m currently living in Canada where the new Impreza is being sold with a 5-speed manual and that transmission is not even available on the highest grade called “Limited” here, nor are HID headlights an option.

  • Andrew

    Can you put up rear pics for the sedan?


    I always suspected that a tie up with Toyota would be bad news for Subaru. I’m very disappointed. Subaru used to make reliable cars you wanted to own, not the ones you made excuses for buying. Its brand value has been diluted. They are boring appliances now.

  • Judah777

    @ Caradvice:

    Would please post interior pictures of the 6-speed manual ?

    • Matt H

      and any rear shots of the sedan?

  • http://caradvice OSU811

    Hatch looks ok, sedan a little dull, I like the sound of the new gearbox if its as close together as CA says, it means it is not the same as the clunky long cable shift 5sp as in the new liberty/outback! yeah for that:-)

    • http://caradvice OSU811

      I also love the new interior/dash!

  • http://caradvice OSU811

    6sp sorry

  • Thrillhouse

    What happened to you Subaru? You used to be cool.

  • JML

    Is anyone else sick and tired of having to hit the (click to show comment) button to view what are perfectly legitimate comments, censored by the petty fans of whatever vehicle the article happens to be about?

  • Sal

    Anyone who looks at the 5-door model and thinks it looks uglier than the 2011 is crazy. The 2011 model is a failure in every way (features, fuel economy, aesthetics) – The 2012 model is all about rectifying the fail that was the 2011 model. I only WISH that I did not have to wait until late December to even try one – I’ll be pre-ordering a sport-limited model tomorrow though.

  • Zoru

    Seriously what is stopping Suburu from making a good looking car??

  • Leon

    Subaru has definitely gotten the ugly stick these days.. With so many good looking (and performing) hatches around at present why would you buy something that looks like turd!?

  • Tom

    So, does the Auto Start Stop work when the Climate Control needs either Heating or Cooling?

    Details from here:


    The question comes up because I was reading about the “Auto Start-stop” on the new models officially detailed here:


    From that page:

    “During Auto Start Stop operation, the air conditioner, navigation and audio systems are all fed by the auxiliary power supply.”

    I could read that to mean the Air Conditioning keeps running when the engine is stopped, but technically that seems to be very difficult.

    So I asked Subaru and got two sets of responses:

    “We are glad to hear of your interest in our up and coming “Start- Stop” technology. There is a set criteria that governs whether or not the motor will stop when the vehicle comes to a stand still. In relation to the climate control system, depending on the temperature inside the vehicle compared to what is set on the climate control will govern whether or not the engine will stop or be required to restart. For instance on a 40 degree day with the air conditioning on full, the vehicles engine is most likely going to be on when the vehicle is stationary.

    So by saying that, the statement that you have brought to our attention is in fact incorrect, in the way that the Air Conditioning system will require the motor to be running to operate efficiently.

    I have brought this up with our IT department who are going to look into it and if required change the press release, thank you for bringing this to our attention.”

    “As per the A/C system the water pump is still mechanical so when the temperature between what is set on the climate control system differentiates from the actual cabin temperature the engine may be required to restart to maintain the correct cabin temperature.

    What was meant in the press release by the A/C system still operating via auxiliary power, we gather was referring to the actual climate control panel and the fan which may be blowing over the already cooled evaporator or heater core.”

  • Sdfgsfg

    I wonder if Subaru will put the WRX STI with CVT through World Rally Campaigns? that will really prove that their CVT is reliable.

  • DaveofKTown

    Sorry to say that the pricing in this review is WAY off!!! I was at a dealer last weekend and he had the pricing. He reckons they are starting at $30K drive away. Well above the mark of this review.

  • Patrick-Bateman!

    This car is a fail. It is a definite improvement on old Impreza, but doesn’t bring anything new to the table. The fact that it cannot match the current class leader VW Golf, where the base engineering of that car is 9 years old is hard to fathom. 
    It shows that economy of scale is needed to produce something really good, and anyway you look at Subaru does not have economies of scale. 

  • Happy Peter

    Since this is AWD, I don’t think you need chains to drive at snowy mountain during ski season. That’s a great car for skiers. I have a start-stop car, it sure save fuel at traffic lights. 10.7 is very slow for this expensive small car. Need to chip the engine to go faster.

Subaru Impreza Specs

Car Details
Body Type
New Price
Private Sale
$14,630 - $16,630
Dealer Retail
$16,190 - $19,250
Dealer Trade
$11,600 - $13,300
Engine Specifications
Engine Type
Engine Size
Max. Torque
196Nm @  3200rpm
Max. Power
110kW @  6400rpm
Pwr:Wgt Ratio
Bore & Stroke
Compression Ratio
Valve Gear
Drivetrain Specifications
Drive Type
Final Drive Ratio
Fuel Specifications
Fuel Type
Fuel Tank Capacity
Fuel Consumption (Combined)
8.8L / 100km
Weight & Measurement
Kerb Weight
Gross Vehicle Weight
Not Provided
Ground Clearance
Towing Capacity
Brake:1200  Unbrake:650
Steering & Suspension
Steering Type
Turning Circle
Front Rim Size
Rear Rim Size
Front Tyres
205/55 R16
Rear Tyres
205/55 R16
Wheel Base
Front Track
Rear Track
Front Brakes
Rear Brakes
Front Suspension
MacPherson strut, Coil Spring, Hydraulic double acting shock absorber
Rear Suspension
Double wishbone, Hydraulic double acting shock absorber, Coil Spring
Standard Features
Air Conditioning
Control & Handling
Electronic Brake Force Distribution, Vehicle Stability Control
Cruise Control, Power Steering, Trip Computer
Radio CD with 4 Speakers
Power Mirrors
Power Windows
Dual Airbag Package, Anti-lock Braking, Head Airbags, Side Airbags, Seatbelts - Pre-tensioners Front Seats
Central Locking Remote Control, Engine Immobiliser
Service Interval
6 months /  10,000 kms
36 months /  999,000 kms
VIN Plate Location
Driver Side Eng Scuttle
Country of Origin