Car Advice

Mazda BT-50 Review

MAZDA BT50

Pros: Superb 3.2-litre diesel engine, car-like drive with heaps of standard features, good ride and handling on and off road, rear-seat legroom in Dual Cab

Cons: Polarising front-end styling, no soft-touch dash

By Anthony Crawford |
Add to shortlist

Price: $32,590 to $52,710

Our Rating:  

Mazda BT-50 Dual Cab 4×4: 3.2-litre inline five-cylinder diesel with six-speed automatic transmission, 147kW/470Nm: $50,810 (Manufacturer’s List Price). Minimum and maximum pricing is based on Freestyle and Dual Cab chassis only. Single Cab pricing has not yet been released by Mazda.

You’re right. The front end of the new Mazda BT-50 utility doesn’t look anything like the Ford Ranger. Let’s get that well and truly straight.

The fact is though, that after sitting behind the wheel of the all-new BT-50 for over 250km on the tarmac and off road, Mazda has produced a high quality utility that will deliver more sales for the brand than any previous model.

On sale in Mazda showrooms in November, the BT-50 will be available in no less than nineteen different variants and that’s just with the Dual Cab chassis. Factor in the trim level, chassis and transmission type and there are literally dozens of BT-50 combinations to choose from.

The BT-50 might share the same platform as the Ford Ranger, but that’s where the similarities mostly end.

It’s clear BT-50 program manager Takasuke Kobayashi and his team set out from the very beginning of this project to do something different in the utility space when he said,

“I wanted to move into uncharted territory. I wanted to create a completely different kind of pick-up – one with the personality of a passenger car. So my team developed innovative, dynamic styling and equipment levels that match high-specification CD-segment cars. We re-engineered the technologies in the powertrain, steering system and frame to deliver the Zoom-Zoom driving pleasure that is Mazda’s greatest brand value.”

Mazda calls the new BT-50 “a genuine active lifestyle vehicle with SUV-like power and handling”.

There is no question that Kobayashi and his design team chose to move away from the blokey styling that most of the Mazda BT-50′s competitors share, and as far as SUV-like power and handling are concerned, you’d have to say Mazda has covered that off too.

Unfortunately we only got to drive the BT-50 with the larger 3.2 litre powertrain at the launch, but can attest its potency and general versatility across a wide range of driving conditions, including some off-road work.

With 147kW at 3000rpm and a stomping 470Nm from a low 1750rpm there was little need to ever change out of third gear when we hit some beautiful undulating landscape out of Canberra. There are huge reserves of pulling power from this inline five-cylinder powerplant and that includes fifth and sixth gear ratios.

There’s little if any turbo lag from this engine and the power is put to the ground via a smooth-shifting six-speed auto transmission, which feels more like what you would expect in a luxury car than a utility of such grand proportions.

Sitting on 90-100km/h in sixth with the auto box and there’s still enough torque to allow the driver to slow down for bends and then accelerate back up to the legal speed limit without having to shift to a lower gear ratio.

In auto guise the Mazda BT-50’s gear ratios are well spaced (if not long) for smooth driving with minimal shifts required up and down the ratio range, even across terrain with varied speed conditions. This kind of gearing also works well in reducing fuel consumption too, but more on that later.

Equally impressive is what Mazda has been able to achieve in the NVH (Noise, Vibration and Harshness) department with the BT-50 and this engine in particular. It’s quiet. I mean, it’s SUV-style quiet, even when you’re giving the drive-by-wire throttle a decent old prod.

You won’t pick this engine for a five-cylinder unit. It behaves more like a large six given how rapidly it responds to throttle input and the sheer ‘grunt’ on tap for mid-range acceleration. Overtaking on long straight country roads has never been easier.

While we didn’t focus on the BT-50’s fuel consumption due to there being both an off-road and on-road driving component as well as various driver change stops on the route, Mazda lists the combined consumption for the Dual Cab 4×4 with the 3.2-litre diesel as 9.2L/100km combined with an 80-litre tank.

CarAdvice will run a more detailed review of the BT-50 with real-life fuel consumption testing over an entire week at a later stage, but in the meantime we are comfortable with the published numbers after putting around 300km on the clock and registering a combined figure of 10.6L/100km.

The six-speed manual transmission in the same Dual Cab 4×4 chassis also proved to be a good drive. The shifts are rather spongy, but we do like the stubby little shifter and how it feels in your hand.

First gear is very short, however, and the shift to second requires some man-handling, but the rest of the gear ratios are much easier to engage. So short in fact is first gear that my colleague and I resorted to second gear take offs at the lights in and around the Canberra CBD.

As much as we enjoyed the manual Mazda BT-50 experience, for an extra $2000 I’d be going with the smooth-shifting six-speed auto, especially for those who will be travelling mostly urban kilometres with plenty of peak hour thrown into the mix.

It’s a fairly advanced gearbox using what Mazda calls Active Adaptive Shift (AAS), which as the name suggests, adapts the shift patterns to driving style. Drivers also have the option of using the Sequential Shift Control (SSC), especially in the kind of hilly terrain that we experienced on the launch route. It’s a relatively quick shifting auto, especially on the downshifts and an excellent marriage with the 3.2-litre diesel.

For a large utility weighing in at just over 2050kg, the Mazda BT-50 has plenty of poise when travelling at speed on bendy roads. The test vehicles were all fitted with the larger 17-inch wheels and the tyres were 265/65 series ‘All Terrain’. Grip levels were excellent and the suspension was relatively pliant on all surfaces, including the off-road sections.

Naturally, there’s a live rear axle with leaf springs at the rear to handle the 3350kg towing capacity, while the front end gets independent double wishbone with coil over dampers and anti-roll bar. The combination produces a reasonably pliant ride, even over the rough stuff. It’s not quite car-like but overall it’s a more comfortable ride than many will expect from such a robust utility.

Mazda has got the steering just right in the BT-50 too and that’s a direct result of moving from a ‘ball-and-nut’ set-up to a rack and pinion system (some would say about time) as well as a quicker steering-gear ratio that in the case of the BT-50 offers quick response and plenty of weight in the steering for more feel through the wheel.


Despite the extra length of the new Mazda BT-50 (that’s 220mm for the 4WD variants and 235mm for the 2WD variants) our Dual Cab 4×4 was decidedly agile through what was a rather tight off-road course.

Brake disc size has also increased from 14 to 16 inches, although the industry still makes do with drums on the rear. That said, brake pedal response on the BT-50 is responsive and linear.

Off road, the BT-50 4×4 is an adept performer. With so much low-down torque, the steep and slippery hill climbs were all too easy. So too is switching from 2H to 4H. You can do that on the fly by simply twisting a dial to the right of the shifter, which is what we did when we went from tarmac to dusty dirt road.

To engage 4L the driver simply needs to stop and engage neutral, then turn the dial, it’s that simple. If you need the BT-50 to climb to rock steps or another steep bank, you can also lock up the rear diff electronically, and that works a treat. Not once did the vehicle stumble through what might have been a challenging course for other vehicles in this segment. It was all too easy in the Mazda.

Mazda’s Kobayashi was going for a car-like experience with the BT-50, and together with the cabin’s exceptional NVH is a stylish and well laid out centre stack and console. You certainly don’t feel like you’re in a tradesman’s work vehicle, and that’s exactly what Mazda was aiming for.

The driver’s instrument panel is more like what you would expect in an SUV than a utility, and the sports steering wheel carries remote switches for Bluetooth phone, audio and cruise control – standard features across the BT-50 range, along with an exhaustive list of creature comforts. The fabric seats are easy on the back and exceptionally comfortable, and there’s a tonne of storage spaces throughout the cockpit.

As ‘car-like’ as the interior is, Mazda has chosen not to go with a soft-touch dash. In fact, I’m yet to drive a Mazda that has such. It’s high time that a manufacturer of such quality vehicles started to focus some attention on the touch and feel of plastics and materials used inside the cabin of its cars. Styling aside, it’s one of the few criticisms that can be levelled at Mazda’s BT-50.

Given that Mazda is aiming the new BT-50 at a wider buying group including those with outdoor lifestyle activities and some of those folks with families in tow, standard fitment across all three trim grades is a full suite of active and passive safety kit including Dynamic Stability Control (DSC) with ABS, EBD and traction control. Add to that features such as Brake Override System (BOS), Load Adaptive Control (LAC), Trailer Sway Control, Roll Stability Control, Hill Launch Assist and Hill Decent Control and it’s pretty much all accounted for.

Mazda has also strengthened the body shell of the latest BT-50. Ultra-high-tensile steel has been used for the rocker panels. In addition, the body shell of the new model Mazda BT-50 has around 20 per cent more torsional rigidity than the current model.

Several of the launch vehicles were fitted with one of two new accessory kits; called the Boss Sports kit (a unique airbag-compatible alloy bull bar, Lightforce Genesis Driving Lights, 17-inch alloys and stainless side steps and a lockable hard tonneau cover).

The other kit is called Boss Adventure and the only real difference between the two is a steel bull bar and a soft tonneau cover. Prices for these two kits have not yet been signed off by Mazda Australia.

It’s not perfect, there’s that styling issue that will be a problem for some, but in the BT-50, Mazda has produced what should be a ‘tough as nails’ utility that is more car-like than most of its competitors in both driveability and comfort.

Mazda BT-50 Features

XT 2.2L4x2 Single Cab Chassis 

  • 2.2 litre in-line 4 cylinder 16 valve DOHC intercooled turbo diesel
  • Max. power: 110 kW @ 3,700 rpm
  • Max. torque: 375 Nm @ 1,500 – 2,500 rpm
  • 80 litre fuel tank capacity
  • 6-speed manual
  • Fuel consumption (combined): 7.6 litres per 100km
  • 16 inch steel wheels with 215/70 tyres
  • Door handles (black)
  • Front bumper (body coloured)
  • Headlamps (halogen)
  • Power windows and mirrors (black)
  • Air-conditioning
  • Bluetooth® (hands-free compatible)
  • Cruise control
  • Floor covering: vinyl
  • Seat trim: cloth
  • Seat (driver’s front bucket) with: adjustable head restraint and rake and slide adjustment
  • Seat (passenger’s front bench) with: adjustable head restraint
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Trip computer
  • Wipers (front) 2-speed with variable intermittent function
  • Audio system with: AM/FM tuner. single-disc CD player and 4 speakers
  • Bluetooth® audio (MP3 player compatible)
  • Steering-wheel-mounted audio controls
  • USB input (iPod® compatible)
  • Airbags SRS: front (driver and passenger) and curtain (driver and passenger)
  • Anti-lock Braking System (ABS)
  • Dynamic Stability Control (DSC)
  • Electronic Brake-force Distribution (EBD)
  • Emergency Brake Assist (EBA)
  • Engine immobiliser
  • Hill Launch Assist (HLA)
  • Load Adaptive Control (LAC)
  • Remote central locking (2 transmitters with retractable key)
  • Roll Stability Control (RSC)
  • Side impact door beams
  • Traction Control System (TCS)
  • Trailer Sway Control (TSC)
  • Ground clearance (laden): 135 mm
  • Overall length: 5,124 mm
  • Overall width: 1,850 mm
  • Overall height: 1,703 mm
  • Wading depth: 600 mm
  • Payload: 1,306 kg
  • Towing capacity(braked): 2,500 kg

 

XT 3.2L4x2 Single Cab Chassis4x4 Single Cab Chassis

 

XT features additional to the XT include:

 

  • 3.2 litre in-line 4 cylinder 17 valve DOHC intercooled turbo diesel
  • Max. power: 147 kW @ 3,000 rpm
  • Max. torque: 470 Nm @ 1,750 – 2,500 rpm
  • Fuel consumption (combined): 8.4 (4×2) 8.9 (4×4) litres per 100km
  • 16 inch steel wheels with 255/70 tyres
  • Hill Descent Control (HDC) – 4×4 only
  • Locking Rear Differential (LRD) – 4×4 only
  • Ground clearance (laden): 200 mm
  • Overall height: 1,800 mm
  • Payload: 1,508 kg (4×2) 1,343 kg (4×4)
  • Towing capacity(braked): 3,350 kg

 

XT4x2 Freestyle Cab Chassis4x4 Freestyle Cab Chassis

 

  • 3.2 litre in-line 5 cylinder 20 valve DOHC intercooled turbo diesel
  • Max. power: 147 kW @ 3,000 rpm
  • Max. torque: 470 Nm @ 1,750 – 2,500 rpm
  • 80 litre fuel tank capacity
  • 6-speed manual
  • Fuel consumption (combined): 8.4 (4×2) 8.9 (4×4) litres per 100km
  • 16 inch steel wheels with 255/70 tyres
  • Door handles (black)
  • Front bumper (body coloured)
  • Headlamps (halogen)
  • Power windows and mirrors (black)
  • Air-conditioning
  • Bluetooth® (hands-free compatible)
  • Cruise control
  • Floor covering: vinyl
  • Seat trim: cloth
  • Seats (passenger’s rear bench) with: foldable seat base and under-seat storage
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Trip computer
  • Wipers (front) 2-speed with variable intermittent function
  • Audio system with: AM/FM tuner. single-disc CD player and 6 speakers
  • Bluetooth® audio (MP3 player compatible)
  • Steering-wheel-mounted audio controls
  • USB input (iPod® compatible)
  • Airbags SRS: front (driver and passenger), side (front) and curtain (front and rear)
  • Anti-lock Braking System (ABS)
  • Child restraint anchor points (2)
  • Dynamic Stability Control (DSC)
  • Electronic Brake-force Distribution (EBD)
  • Emergency Brake Assist (EBA)
  • Engine immobiliser
  • Hill Descent Control (HDC) – 4×4 only
  • Hill Launch Assist (HLA)
  • Load Adaptive Control (LAC)
  • Locking Rear Differential (LRD) – 4×4 only
  • Remote central locking (2 transmitters with retractable key)
  • Roll Stability Control (RSC)
  • Side impact door beams
  • Traction Control System (TCS)
  • Trailer Sway Control (TSC)
  • Overall length: 5,124 mm
  • Overall width: 1,850 mm
  • Overall height: 1,804 mm
  • Wading depth: 800 mm
  • Payload: 1,430 kg (4×2) 1,343 kg (4×4)
  • Towing capacity(braked): 3,350 kg

 

XTR4x4 Freestyle Cab Utility 

XTR features additional to the XT include:

 

  • 17 inch alloy wheels with 265/65 tyres
  • Door handles (chrome)
  • Fog-lamps (front)
  • Power mirrors (chrome)
  • Rear step bumper (chrome)
  • Side steps (aluminium finish)
  • Air-conditioning (dual-zone climate control)
  • Ambient temperature gauge
  • Floor covering: carpet
  • Leather wrapped: gear shift knob and steering wheel
  • Satellite navigation
  • Seats (driver’s front bucket) with: height and lumbar adjustment (driver)
  • High mount stop lamp
  • Overall length: 5,365 mm
  • Overall height: 1,810 mm
  • Payload: 1,163 kg

 

XT4x2 Dual Cab Utility4x4 Dual Cab Chassis

4×4 Dual Cab Utility

 

  • 3.2 litre in-line 5 cylinder 20 valve DOHC intercooled turbo diesel
  • Max. power: 147 kW @ 3,000 rpm
  • Max. torque: 470 Nm @ 1,750 – 2,500 rpm
  • 80 litre fuel tank capacity
  • 6-speed manual or 6-speed automatic – utilities only
  • Fuel consumption (combined): 8.4 (4×2 manual) 8.9 (4×2 auto) 8.9 (4×4 manual) 9.2 (4×4 auto) litres per 100km
  • 16 inch steel wheels with 255/70 tyres
  • Door handles (black)
  • Front bumper (body coloured)
  • Headlamps (halogen)
  • Power windows and mirrors (black)
  • Rear step bumper (black) – utilities only
  • Air-conditioning
  • Bluetooth® (hands-free compatible)
  • Cruise control
  • Floor covering: vinyl
  • Seat trim: cloth
  • Seats (passenger’s rear bench) with: foldable seat base and under-seat storage
  • Tilt-adjustable steering wheel
  • Trip computer
  • Wipers (front) 2-speed with variable intermittent function
  • Audio system with: AM/FM tuner. single-disc CD player and 6 speakers
  • Bluetooth® audio (MP3 player compatible)
  • Steering-wheel-mounted audio controls
  • USB input (iPod® compatible)
  • Airbags SRS: front (driver and passenger), side (front) and curtain (front and rear)
  • Anti-lock Braking System (ABS)
  • Child restraint anchor points (2)
  • Dynamic Stability Control (DSC)
  • Electronic Brake-force Distribution (EBD)
  • Emergency Brake Assist (EBA)
  • Engine immobiliser
  • High mount stop lamp – utilities only
  • Hill Descent Control (HDC) – 4×4 only
  • Hill Launch Assist (HLA)
  • Load Adaptive Control (LAC)
  • Locking Rear Differential (LRD) – 4×4 only
  • Remote central locking (2 transmitters with retractable key)
  • Roll Stability Control (RSC)
  • Side impact door beams
  • Traction Control System (TCS)
  • Trailer Sway Control (TSC)
  • Overall length: 5,124 mm (cab chassis) 5,373 mm (utilities)
  • Overall width: 1,850 mm
  • Overall height: 1,815 mm
  • Wading depth: 800 mm
  • Payload from 1,139 kg – 4×4 auto
  • Towing capacity(braked): 3,350 kg

 

XTR4x2 Dual Cab Utility4x4 Dual Cab Utility

 

XTR features additional to the XT include:

 

  • 17 inch alloy wheels with 265/65 tyres
  • Door handles (chrome)
  • Fog-lamps (front)
  • Power mirrors (chrome)
  • Rear step bumper (chrome)
  • Side steps (aluminium finish)
  • Air-conditioning (dual-zone climate control)
  • Ambient temperature gauge
  • Floor covering: carpet
  • Leather wrapped: gear shift knob and steering wheel
  • Satellite navigation
  • Seats (driver’s front bucket) with: height and lumbar adjustment (driver)
  • Overall length: 5,365 mm
  • Overall height: 1,821 mm
  • Payload: from 1,097 kg – 4×4 auto
GT4x4 Dual Cab Utility 

GT features additional to the XTR include:

 

  • Headlamps auto on/off function
  • Rear-view mirror with auto dimming function
  • Seat trim: leather
  • Wipers (front) 2-speed with rain-sensing function
  • Payload: from 1,088 kg – 4×4 automatic

 

Reader reviews of the MAZDA BT50

<

Write a review for the MAZDA BT50

Do you own this car? Share your opinion and add your own review below.

Add a New Review
>

The competition

  • AB

    Problem is, as a private buyer I have to purchase my own vehicles and styling is a major factor, regardless how good the car is.
    If I am going to put down $50K on a car, I have to like/be satisfied with its looks… and this just doesnt work for me…

    Therefore Ranger is hands down winner for my money

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au Anthony Crawford

      Perhaps you should drive both before a final decision. That said the BT-50 and Ford Ranger seem to be the pick of the bunch in this segment.

      • scottjames_12

        So, Anthony, which would you choose? Ranger or BT-50?

        • http://www.caradvice.com.au Anthony Crawford

          I’d need to drive them both back-to-back and way up things like resale and reliability. That said it would be a tough choice if that was my work vehicle.

          • Alex

            How can they differ when they are the same truck?

          • Caroline

            They are not the same truck at all. The have the same engine and the same transmission and front window screen, but everything else is different from suspension, to bolts to parts. No longer can a Ford owner walk into a Mazda dealership and buy parts like you could with the BT50 3.0L. With the new models you  have to source genuine parts as they wont fit on the same car and visa versa. Ford also are a lot more expensive for a car that handles not as well off unsealed roads.

    • Sumpguard

      I agree with AB. Most people would take appearance above a couple of extra features or a slightly better ride.

      The mazda’s looks would be very hard for me to live with day in day out and the simple fix would be to redesign those massive indicators in the headlights.

      It’s a shame they couldn’t match the quality of the exterior with the interior because inside it looks very well done.

      As an ex-tradie I can tell you they pretty much all want a rugged look in their utes and this will affect the mazda’s sales imo. I really can’t see this ute doing that well here in Australia despite their forcasts.

      • scottjames_12

        Yep I’m inclined to agree. They say first impressions last and I think a lot of potential customers will not even give the BT-50 a go once they see it. Especially as it does not have any must have extras compared to the Ranger.

        • Dan

          Problem with the Ranger will be resale due to the Ford badge. Mazda will hold its value a lot better.

          • scottjames_12

            Really? Did a bit of a look on Redbook and it looks like the BT-50 and Ranger are about the same, resale wise?

        • http://www.caradvice.com.au Anthony Crawford

          Are you kidding about the extras? Did you even see the list of features at the bottom of the review? The BT-50 as another reader has said has a class leading interior – that includes the extensive level of standard kit. Your statement is just plain incorrect and ill-informed.

          • scottjames_12

            Ok, Anthony, if I’m so incorrect and ill-informed, please enlighten me as to what the BT-50 has that the Ranger doesn’t?

            Seems to me the only thing you can get on the BT-50 that you can’t get on the Ranger is leather trim. The BT-50 on the other hand makes no mention of power seats, let alone 8-way power heated seats available in the Ranger Wildtrak. Or rear parking sensors. Or a reversing camera.

            I’m not saying it’s a bad interior, I actually quite like it. But I like the Ranger’s even more. And there isn’t anything in the BT-50 that would make me choose it over the Ranger.

          • Jay

            scott, firstly they are still a ute and having power seats is just silly. Trades will get dust etc in the door and screw the switch/electrics to it. Did you say sensors or camera… (on a ute?) You don’t need that unless your a s#%t driver. You might as well go and buy a falcon/taxi and put fairy lights on it!!
            I would buy the BT-50 over the Ranger due to the quality and reliability which comes from the Mazda Brand, Ford has no quality when it comes to mind for me.
            Resales – it might say in redbook (mind you redbook doesn’t buy cars) that they are the same in value after 3 odd years but the market dictates what they are worth and the Ranger is known as the Cheaper quality of the 2.
            I personally think the new BT-50 is different but everyone is going to follow suit and radically change there SUV’s and UTES.

      • Caroline

        I totally have to disagree. Its human nature that you initally do not like the look of the BT50. No one liked the Commodore VE when it came out, but over time everyone opinion was changed. What I love about the BT50 now is it LOOKS like a Mazda. If you see it on the road you will know by its distinct shape and headlights that it is a Mazda. And thats what Mazda was going for. This car has been selling out under our feet faster than what we can keep up with. (Yes I work for Mazda). And the rear diff lock and the Hill Decent Control are two incredible features. Trust me, take this baby out to a quarry and you’ll be more impressed with its performance than what you think.

        • Simone Robinson

          I am currently looking for a towing vehicle for my horse float. Originally i started out looking at a nissan navara and came across a BT50. Its” looks” is what got my attention!!! From front on i found it reminded me of a dodge ram! (which i cant afford). The price of a BT50 is in my market. Does anyone have any comments about the BT50″s towing capabilites. I know it has 470 nm and 147kw, and its turbo diesel. I currently drive a Nissan Navara 266nm, 125kw, petrol and tows ok on the flat, but really struggles on a hill. Thanks for any advice!! :) ))

        • Ronald

          im trying to make up my mind between a BT 50 and an Amarok.  Sure the BT 50 has a better list of goodies,but Amarok is a much wider truck.  Looks are not everything.  But the manual gearbox feels like there’s a pile of gravel and dirt in there already, before its even been to a quarry.  Why not a nice slick and smooth gearbox like I had my my MX5?

  • master

    It does have some styling issues, but the more I see it the more I get over it. The XTR and GT have some extras that the Ranger doesn’t (e.g. Satnav and Leather) + chuck in the Boss Pack and you have a well appointed, capable and decent looking 4WD ute. At a lower price too! I will definetly give it a drive and look over.

    • Modern Man

      Yes i understand the bt-50 looks good value with the satnav and leather pack, the wildtrak gets that and more admitedtly at a much higher price as there are heaps of other extras on this vehicle.

      The Ranger comes standard with 3350kg towpack, bedliner and sportsbar on xlt and wildtrak.

      Spec adjusted prices would be the same between the two but ford throws more as standard.

      I work in a large multi franchise dealer and unfortunatly unlike their passenger range, the BT-50 does not resale better than a Ranger due to its softer styling and slight lack of standard kit.

      Real world specs much larger than redbook wich is notoriously wrong to the whole motor trade. it is to be used as a guide only as their own website states.

  • John

    It honestly looks like they converted a Mazda 3 into a ute, and it hasn’t worked.

    • Daniel

      IMO it looks better than the updated hilux. But the Ranger looks better. The interior of the Mazda is spot on for me. But it is only my opinion. I reckon the styling will be a winner in Thailand…

      • MRL

        Mazda have already stated that they believe Australia to be the BT-50′s biggest market. Seeing as Thai’s buy almost 50,000 diesel pickups/month, that pretty much tells me they already know they’ve got no hope in the TH market.

  • BP

    The tailights remind me that the car wants to fly off into the air.

  • JEKYL & HYDE

    i’m sorry but,…

    one (well fed) skippy the kangeroo vrs both those bullbars is going to result in a panelbeaters win.

    might look good,sure hides the ugly front well,but not very functional for the rural area’s…

    • http://www.caradvice.com.au Anthony Crawford

      The Alloy bull bar has been tested on fake Roo with a 100km/h impact with no damage to the bar or vehicle. Mazda showed us the video.

    • Salt and Vinegar Chips

      You know nothing!

  • Wal

    The real question is, how is this compared to the industry standard- hilux?

    • Jay

      Wal the Hilux sells on the name but is slowly dying as Toyota have no idea on what people want. If they listened to the people they would have the Hilux towing 3,000 kg. there are caravans etc now which are over 2.5T unloaded and the “industry STANDARD’ Hilux can’t do the job”
      Hilux was yesterday’s news no today’s or the future. SORRY

  • AOK

    A Mazda Ute with “Style”…inside and out…FULL MARKS MAZDA…Again!…
    BTW: Made in the same Thailand plant.

  • alan

    Whoever designed those new style headlights, many car manufacturers are using lately, SHOULD BE SENT TO SIBERIA TO STRAIGHTEN UP!!! How ugly they are. Like the eyes of an alien, or a giant insect in a horror movie! They must be about half a metre long!!! How expensive is one of them to replace? 400 Dollars, or what?! Thanks god, at least a few companies like Audi or Volkswagen don’t follow this STUPID, UGLY fashion.

    • http://www.uhvourbvruo.com geezer

      Yikes…….. its the “Predator” ute.

  • Wal

    I’m confused, what segment is this for? And isn’t the hilux the one to compare to?

    • Billy N

      Reputation alone means Hilux will never be challenged. Cant see BHP / Rio Tinto switching over to Mazda BT-50′s regardless of how good they might be.

      • Billy T

        Rio tinto use whatever is at the right price and meets their criteria. I think I may be driving a BT50 at work in the near future

  • Guy Rigoni

    Tradies will far outweigh private buyers in this segment, so looks will count for little. Mazda should be on a winner here. I expect them to sell more than the Ranger as that vehicle is a Ford, for which is a turn off for a lot of buyers (think Courier….ugh)

  • Bazza

    Looks a lot worse in the pics, saw one at a Mazda dealer this morning and they’re quite similar to a Hilux. Interior is best in class my a counrty mile.

  • http://caradvice maersk

    Just saw one today driving near townsville,way better looking in the flesh than any photos suggest,i admit i was a big hater of the styling until 2day….cheers all…

    • MRL

      Yep, you have to see the BT-50 in the metal.

      It’s still ugly, but not bite-your-arm-off and vomit all over her face fugly, as it appears in the pics.

      • Deane

        Note to self: Don’t “visit” with MRL.

  • Ford Man

    What is this fascination with ‘soft touch plastics’. Who the f$&@ touches a dash to see how it feels.

    • Modern Man

      I agree.

      The only thing i want soft in my dash is an airbag. durability and easy of cleaning, no reflection in windscreen is what i want.

    • o

      Agree, as long as it looks good who cares, I’m sick of this being an issue.

  • Shak

    I probably have to see one in the flesh before i make final judgement…but honestly how much better could it look. i dont think many Tradies or the types of people who buy these cars will take very well to a car that looks like……..that.

  • hermz

    Great review Anthony. Personally the style has never seemed polarising to me just different to the usual American pickup truck, I like the fact i can go in to my dealer and buy accessories like bull bars and canopy’s with a Mazda factory warranty. Ford told me there would be a range of aftermarket canopy’s and bull bars in the near future. I hope to see a white one with the black boss pack to help make my decision easier :)

  • iNoob

    What I dislike most about that dash cluster is how difficult it is to clean it up >< .. even in the 3, the 6 – need to get some extra long brushes or compressed air in those (very) fiddly spaces around the cluster …

  • Snoop

    I can’t get passed the MASSIVE wheel arches at the front that lead to nothing at the back.
    IMO the styling for utes like these should not share similar styling to the cars.
    I think Mazda are doing some great things but, this needs a quick revision.

  • http://Caradvice HumpDiggy

    I was sold on the Ranger, but is still slightly out of my price range. I think the BT 50 is slightly more reasonably priced. The Mazda will look a lot better in real life than the pictures I believe.

    • David

      I agree whole-heartedly!! As for the looks, I was standing next to one in the showroom today and it was not the looks that I noticed, it’s the size.. This thing is HUGE, and am glad to see that it is, as it will easily fit the lads in on a weekend away.

  • http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v132/blink_me192/KODOBT50.jpg Baji

    ^^

    Kodo-fied BT50

  • Grumpy01

    Can’t believe I’m saying this but each time I look at it it gets better looking.

  • http://caradvice tradie

    i drove the new bt50 today and wow it looks better than the pics and to drive wow i have a nissan stx and the bt50 sh#ts on it

  • http://www.ozmazda.com/ ozmazda

    Well done Mazda for another bold and fresh look within your range. It takes balls to step outside the circle and you did that with the 3 and many in the media doubted that the front end would sell…..well you showed them. It’s great to see a new look in the ute range as the typical ute is bland and boring and the Ranger looks like a regurgitated american lunch…..
    Here in Orange my local Mazda dealer has heaps of orders and some are coming from the mines so for those that say blokes wont buy it because of the looks……you maybe wrong. I will say it wont sell like the Ranger as Mazda doesnt sell itself short on govo or fleet sales so Ford will try and flood the market but Mazda will reap in the more profit…
    I’ll look at a leased one next year in GT form instead of a CX5…

  • http://justcommodores.com.au Gravity

    Looks seriously ugly to me. Ford Ranger looks good.

  • col

    This looks really nice in the metal.

  • John

    The question remains – how reliable will it be ? It has a dual mass clutch apparently & this type of clutch is notoriously fragile. [Google clutch problems for some of its competitors & see what i mean!]Also this is a new engine in a configuration that is unusual & now discarded by VW in their Transporters. Why? First model runs often have problems so time will tell!

  • Derek Holden

    I run a transport business and a SDX auto Dual Cab has been my drive vehicle for the past three years. It is reliable, comfortable,has heaps of power and is great value. Offroad, it goes whereever I want it to without modifications apart from a snorkel and I have owned Turbo landcruisers and Pajeros.

    My only criticisms were there was no cruise control or bluetooth and rear legroom was minimal as was access for an adult(kids o.k.)but Mazda has addressed this in the new model.

    I just saw the new model in the flesh and yes it does look like a ’3′ or even a futuristic Mitsubishi Triton but I have found that the ’3′ styling grows on you.

    Who cares about Ford vs Mazda. The reality is if your a Ford buff you’ll buy a Ranger, if you like Mazda what choice is there but what it will do is turn heads and bring in new buyers & at 50k it’ll will make Toyota buyers think twice.

    Finally though, no matter what tweaks Ford make to differentiate the Ranger; it’s still Mazda technology that they chose. So, I guess I’ll go and arrange a test drive…. of a Mazda. After all, I own one now and love it.

  • Denis Dwyer

    I have been following this vehicle in the press for a while and am starting to notice that it is growing on me already.

    I’m keen to see just how good this motor and gearbox combo will be and then want to see how well the tail gate seals… or does it adapt to have a rubber seal fitted for those dust roads we have.

    When will the manufactures start to design the rear door so that an after market seal can be fitted to the tail gate. Fit a good canopy and I hope it will not be like a vacuum cleaner dust trap out there!!

  • http://www.caradvice.com.au/142496/mazda-bt-50-review/ matt

    i just bought a bt50 and i have to say i think that the ford ranger looks better but the bt50 is the best ute ive driven and i also drove the ranger. Hilux never even came close. If anybody remembers when the triton was released in its new shape people were disgusted, but it grew and now its one of Australias most popular utes. The mazda is hands down the best to drive with alot of extras included. Dont be too hasty to judge a book by its cover.

  • h

    Does it come in mens?

  • Roh

    Sure buy one. Just dont go too far, too often when it gets a bit of wear on it. Check the pricing of a basket of parts like CV’s, wheel bearings, etc. Mazada parts are BS pricing(not the general servicing),then decide. Thats why you see *ahem* other brands constantly in the country. Yeah they aren’t perfect either but a large and accessible range of HD aftermarket choices for parts helps.

    These Mazada/Amarok/Ranger etc thingies are for “tooling” (or being tooled?) round the ‘burbs with the odd foray into real 4wd territories. Not often do they survive there for any length of time.

    But as the(bank?)advert used to say “its your money, Ralph” and also I give a nod to Billy N’s comment above…

  • Ed

    My wife & I are in the market for a new 4×4 dual cab, we’d like to know whats the turning circle like for doing 3 point turns, u turns, reverse parking etc & would you buy the manual or auto if you were going to tow a caravan ? I’ve heard you can burn the clutch out by doing to much reversing into spots with the caravan. So maybe the 6 speed auto is the go, don’t mind the looks of the new BT50

  • Gino

    Test drove both and would have to say the ranger looks better but the Mazda wins hands down with it’s reliability factor/badge and price. But they both take the 4×4 sector to a new level, simply pure grunt, power and classy. Farmers will love it, especially the auto. The price variance with the same accessories is about $5000.00! Also I might add that having a Mazda sp25 also made my mind up. I once had an issue with the 3 that Mazda Australia promptly fixed, and installed upgrades which they didn’t have to. I’ve had issues with the clutch in both a Nissan SDX and Pathfinder that Nissan needs to address, so I can see the Maxda/Ranger will take sales off mainly Nissan. I have a Hilux SR5, done 200,000 k’s and never been touched. Will never go to Toyota simply because of the dealership here in Bundaberg.(the same applies to Ford).

  • BP

    I think even Mazda Australia is embarrassed by the front end of this Ute. This is shown through the recent ad where ther moving ute shown throughout the ad has a added bullbar on the front to cover up the polarising look.

    Even at the end of the ad, 2 of three utes are shown with bullbars & the one ute without it is half cut off by the camera & is situated at the back of the screen so you have to squint to see it.

  • Billy T

    Disappointed freestyle cab chassis doesn’t have auto option.I drive a Navara D22 and are about to upgrade. So far have tested ntssan D33 Hilux and Triton. Hilux was over priced and disappointing Navara was okay Triton seemed the pick of the pack. Will test a BT50 this week and going by the brouchers and pricing is looking like a winner. Zoom Zoom

    • Billy T

      sorry about typo should be nissan D40 not D33

  • Boycie

    I have always liked the Ranger look, but the BT-50 is growing on me. After a few weeks comparing the two, the Ranger is starting to look a bit like just a sort of nice facelift model. Sort of same old same old. The BT-50 instead appears new, and has grown on me. After I got over the first impression – I now think it looks wicked and wow! So the BT-50 is ordered!

  • Muzza

    I have been test driving for a new ute, SR5, amarok, and BT50, is it me, or is there excessive noise coming from clutch/transmisssion ? on gear changes. I have asked the dealer what the noise is, he has replied saying its how the cylinders line up diffferently (being the 5 cylinder) within the rev ranges – can anyone else provide me with info, or whether these noises subside with some k’s on it. Like the BT.

  • mark morrison

    This BT will grow on you the more you look the more you drive, i love it

  • pedro

    Red book has no idea on resale value . Its just there opinion nothing more and there opinion is usually wrong

  • Boycie

    Just had the first 1,000kms in my new BT50 auto 4WD.  They all said it was good – said it 50 different ways they did.  They lied.  It’s better than that.  We have just had record rain here (750mm in 48 hours); and had to get out across a swamped paddock.  I should have been stuck (like the neigbours Hilux) – but the ute hardly even left a tyre mark.  The old farmer sitting in the back was speechless.  And it handles and passes on the road with attitude.  It actually drives like a good car should.  The neighbours teenage sons thought it looked sort of wicked and devious – haha

  • Mattc

    i just had my 10000 service on the bt50 and i can honestly say that no other utes compare. As a plumber i haul some heavy loads and it doesnt have any issues. Ive got my fuel consumption down as low as 8.5L/100 which is fantastic for such a big vehicle and it drives perfect. I towed 3 tonne last week and i had no problems at all. I originally had ordered and left a deposit on a hilux but after driving this baby, the hilux is only a name, dont get me wrong hilux is a great vehicle but i think that other brands have caught them  and the ranger and bt50 have passed them.Toyota have become complacent in their  features, and i dont understand if they can now add a sat nav in their vehicle and lower the price by $3000, doesnt that mean that they have ripped us off for all these years selling Hilux for high 50′s? Hilux was the best for many years but now they have been dethroned by a bigger stronger vehicle with more features and better safety, Anyone who bought a hilux over a ranger or bt50 is either nuts or a toyota fan.