2008 TRD HiLux 4000SL Review
June 27, 2008 by Alborz Fallah
2008 TRD HiLux 4000SL Review & Road Test
The all new TRD HiLux… a performance utility it ain’t…
Model Tested:
- 2008 TRD HiLux 4000SL – $64,990 (RRP)
Appeal, desirability, practicality.
Performance, handling, noise, interior refinement, stereo.
CarAdvice Rating: 
- words Alborz Fallah/ Photography Anthony Crawford
The TRD HiLux has been one of those reviews that I have procrastinated on for some time, not because I am lazy or because I am trying to avoid another scathing review… wait… no, the later is correct.
You see, I have tried, I really have, I waited a few weeks, I thought perhaps if time goes by, the TRD will make sense, perhaps it just confused me? Perhaps Toyota had given me a less than perfect example? Not so, excluding Anthony, the rest of us at CarAdvice are yet to fall in love with anything with a TRD badge.
Here is the essential problem. Despite what Toyota says, TRD is in fact in competition with HSV and FPV. You can’t launch a performance brand and expect not to be compared to the traditional players.
Sure the TRD Aurion is far more comparable to its Ford and Holden counterparts than the HiLux is to the HSV Maloo and FPV Tornado (F6), but you still have to compare.
I will try and get the good bits out of the way and perhaps try and convince myself through this review that the TRD does make sense, to someone.
Under the bonnet and with subtle TRD badging sits a large 4.0-litre, quad-cam, V6 petrol engine that delivers 225kW of power and 453Nm of torque.
Yes, only 225kW from a 4.0-litre V6 with a supercharger. Somewhat strange? More so when you consider the 3.5-litre in the TRD Aurion tends to make more power (241kW) but obviously has less torque (400Nm).
TRD has managed to increase power over the Dual-cab HiLux by 28.5 percent while torque goes up by 20.4 per cent. Which in a way explains the 25 per cent price increase. But is it warranted?
Phil – naaa … just a warm and fuzzy feeling !!
OH WHAT A FEELING
ooooow, there it was again
Quote -Luke GT [Dingo}: I have passion to challenge what i consider is wrong, mis-informed, unjustified and so forth.
Thats just it! you challenge it because you consider or believe it to be wrong ill-informed misguided etc even though it may actually be right.
However; you get on the offensive [what am I saying; you're always on the offensive] when people challenge your views for exactly the same reason.. As proof there’s 100s of your replies which contain personal insults
I mean just because the majority of people don’t read the “Toyota Weekly” [or use it as their reference] doesn’t mean their views are any less founded or researched than yours.
At least the majority of people on here are willing and able to talk about cars other than Toyota instead of hijacking a blog to talk about their beloved make of car as it’s the only thing they know about cars
I can barely remember when we used to have civil friendly discussions about cars on this website and most of the time we stayed on topic…. Not any more
People have an opinion that is different to yours – that’s life…. get over it
Quote [Dingo}: Better still – it’s a raw bitter pill to swallow in accepting Toyota is screwing your beloved GM (Holden) and Ford to the wall with a size 20 steel capped boot.
How the f–k do you screw something to the wall with a steel capped boot? most professionals use a cordless driver drill or at least a trusty old screwdriver. Then of course theres a Nail Gun…. but that’s another matter
Quote [Dingo{: As it stands, no owner has been reported a failed TRD Aurion unlike literally hundreds of owners of cars from Holden and Ford over the years.
Could that be because as it stands Toyota aren't or haven't sold that many TRDs...?
given that they have reduced the price of the TRD Aurion
3-4 times and they are no longer selling them through selected dealers indicates that they're not selling that well unlike HSV or FPV [which unlike TRD have waiting lists for their cars]
Which means its hard to make such a comparison.
I mean you could take a TRD Aurion HSV Clubbie and FPV GT and those 3 cars mightn’t have any problems at all – alternatively you could take another TRD HSV and FPV all of which could have a mechanical problem of some sort
In the same way the ANCAP tests dont actually test the build quality or safety of a particular model car…. more like the safety of a particular car of that model. Your car might be unreliable etc but someone elses might be perfect.
I find it strange that Dingo criticises V8 Supercars and its Bogan fans yet he follows NASCAR which is essentially the same form of [silouhette] motorsport and which also has its fair share of Bogan fans
So when you look at it even though he would like to think that he is in some way better than the Aussie Ford and Holden fans… because he follows a similar sport he is no better than the rest of us
At least our drivers actually have to change gear and contend with hairpin corners etc,, they don’t just drive round a huge bowl the way a pooh does when you flush your toilet
PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!PING!!!!
That’s the sound of Dingo’s dummy :D
Wheels July 2008 pg 54 – HSV and FPV both breakdown on track day … AGAIN !!
Why is that when a Commodore or HSV is reviewed or taken to the track they are reported to have brokendown, identified with faults or bare minimum a complaint is lodged about quality issues … it is an all to often and regular occurance.
The latest edition of WHEELS has highlighted my point … AGAIN !!
Todate, 1 TRD Aurion failure has been reported yet over the years, hundreds of failures have been reported with HSV’s and FPV’s and nothing remains any different today and that is the RAW TRUTH … no-doubt painful for some clowns to accept but it doesn’t change the facts – not even remotely.
First quote of the sentance “It seems that HSV’s and track day just don’t go together”
Buy the magazine and read the rest – what a joke !!
What else has there been lately – MOTOR reported brake fade on a HSV after a single lap, The HSV wagon (or SS – what ever it was) that suffered brake failure and resulted in a crash, WHEELS testing of a FPV about 6 mths ago but was cut short when the car decided it was ‘GAME OVER’ and not restart … the list can endlessly continue. This is just on the very top of my head without taking a minute to think of a many, many more.
Oh yeah – what about the fact that MOTOR reported 12 faults with 12 different variants of the VE Commodore they tested not to mention the rather lenghthy list of recalls and quality issues that have been indentified and reported associated with the VE Commodore.
Would you like me make a list … i rest my case !!
Like GT – you idiot, How many HSV’s or FPV’s have ended up on there roofs during a Wheels test?????!?!?!?!
Oh I’ve just become a fatality!!
hiiiiiiiiiiiiii
hii
hiiiiiiiiii
Does anyone know of road legal good looking rims that fit 2005-2008 4X4 hilux dual cab. looked at procomp but offset too large giving 4o mm track variation limit of 25 mm permitted NSW. also can speedo be recalibrated for larger wheel diameter
I’d like it – if it want so silly overpriced….
Your all f&%cked in the head.
Its a car over priced yes but you want more power in the bush buy it, you want to blow someone of the lights buy a Maloo.
Put it in perspective yes Toyota should not have branded this truck under the TRD banner and i think 5k cheaper would be a fair price but who gives a sh*t people i have met who own one of these say its a ball tearer of a hilux not a maloo a hilux.
Goes great off the road cant compare it to the daily driver for performance on the road but it was never meant to just a better performing dual cab ute.
I came to this site to find some informative criticism on this vehicle but obviously none of you have driven this car or are even remotely interested in an off road vehicle
the review was good but not as indepth as it could be. F&%king bunch of know nothing posers.
That goes for the TOYO fan too.