<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class Roadster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-102207</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-102207</guid>
		<description>My favourite car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favourite car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devil666</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80759</link>
		<dc:creator>devil666</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80759</guid>
		<description>What, no mention of the brand new double clutch sequential gearbox? &quot;Automatic with double de-clutching&quot; just isn&#039;t the same thing. Bit lacking in substance this review... nice pics tho...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, no mention of the brand new double clutch sequential gearbox? &#8220;Automatic with double de-clutching&#8221; just isn&#8217;t the same thing. Bit lacking in substance this review&#8230; nice pics tho&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80554</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 08:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80554</guid>
		<description>The SL600 appears on the surface too make the SL63AMG redundant. In reality however they are completely different in nature and each offers it&#039;s own take on a performance SL. The SL600 is a torquemeister which obviously has it by the truckload and like alot of V12&#039;s does not need to rev to deliver the goods. The sound is too subdued though going by the reviews I have read around the world. The SL63 on the other hand is a real revver over 7200 max and has a glorious sound. Only a AM V8 Vantage sounds better than AMG&#039;s 6.2L V8 in my opinion! I still think the ole 5.4 supercharged is the best sounding V8 ever (even better than the AM) but the 6.2L V8 is very close behind!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SL600 appears on the surface too make the SL63AMG redundant. In reality however they are completely different in nature and each offers it&#8217;s own take on a performance SL. The SL600 is a torquemeister which obviously has it by the truckload and like alot of V12&#8242;s does not need to rev to deliver the goods. The sound is too subdued though going by the reviews I have read around the world. The SL63 on the other hand is a real revver over 7200 max and has a glorious sound. Only a AM V8 Vantage sounds better than AMG&#8217;s 6.2L V8 in my opinion! I still think the ole 5.4 supercharged is the best sounding V8 ever (even better than the AM) but the 6.2L V8 is very close behind!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chopstar87</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80534</link>
		<dc:creator>Chopstar87</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80534</guid>
		<description>The Black one looks so sweet and Tuff!!! that one of the best looking Mercs i have seen!!!! and Very powerful!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Black one looks so sweet and Tuff!!! that one of the best looking Mercs i have seen!!!! and Very powerful!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80532</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 06:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80532</guid>
		<description>Mitch,

Mate BiTurbo over twin turbo... nothing different, where any diference lies is whether the turbos are operating parallel, in that say a V6 has a turbo per bank, or sequential, where one turbo operates at certain revs and the other sometimes in conjunction runs at higher revs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch,</p>
<p>Mate BiTurbo over twin turbo&#8230; nothing different, where any diference lies is whether the turbos are operating parallel, in that say a V6 has a turbo per bank, or sequential, where one turbo operates at certain revs and the other sometimes in conjunction runs at higher revs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80527</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 05:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80527</guid>
		<description>Er, doesn&#039;t the SL600 make the SL63 kind of redundant?  Let&#039;s see - it has more power, heaps more torque, and costs only $3,000 more.  Sure, it&#039;s not an AMG, but I still think the SL63 is an unnecessary part of the range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, doesn&#8217;t the SL600 make the SL63 kind of redundant?  Let&#8217;s see &#8211; it has more power, heaps more torque, and costs only $3,000 more.  Sure, it&#8217;s not an AMG, but I still think the SL63 is an unnecessary part of the range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D 1 0 N</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80523</link>
		<dc:creator>D 1 0 N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80523</guid>
		<description>Very nice, but given a choice between the 65 AMG and an Aston Martin DBS for much the same money, I&#039;d go the Aston hands down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice, but given a choice between the 65 AMG and an Aston Martin DBS for much the same money, I&#8217;d go the Aston hands down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80507</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80507</guid>
		<description>whats the difference between twin turbo and biturbo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whats the difference between twin turbo and biturbo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80495</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80495</guid>
		<description>A superb looking vehicle built for speed and comfort, no doubt. But if you do happen to run the car at track day day or two, just pray that you don&#039;t come up against a Lotus Exige S 240 down the straight or worse still, through the corners. I should add, that the guy with the Lotus will have   written a cheque for just under $150K and that includes a USB  iPod connector!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A superb looking vehicle built for speed and comfort, no doubt. But if you do happen to run the car at track day day or two, just pray that you don&#8217;t come up against a Lotus Exige S 240 down the straight or worse still, through the corners. I should add, that the guy with the Lotus will have   written a cheque for just under $150K and that includes a USB  iPod connector!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperCujo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80494</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperCujo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13974/2008-mercedes-benz-sl-class-roadster/#comment-80494</guid>
		<description>I sure hope you get a ton of stuff than just a big engine if you opt for for SL 65 AMG over the base model.

SL Mercs come pretty highly specced, even in base form, and I don&#039;t think the AMG motor costs $245,000 alone... where does it all go. Other than into the F1 engine development program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sure hope you get a ton of stuff than just a big engine if you opt for for SL 65 AMG over the base model.</p>
<p>SL Mercs come pretty highly specced, even in base form, and I don&#8217;t think the AMG motor costs $245,000 alone&#8230; where does it all go. Other than into the F1 engine development program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 299/300 objects using memcached

Served from: www.caradvice.com.au @ 2012-02-12 01:54:28 -->
