2012 Honda CR-V revealed in patent images | Car Advice

Car Advice

2012 Honda CR-V revealed in patent images

By Tim Beissmann |

Official patent images of the 2012 Honda CR-V have surfaced ahead of the all-new SUV’s debut at the 2011 Los Angeles Auto Show in November.

 

The images reveal a design that largely remains true to the Honda CR-V Concept, which the Japanese manufacturer released in July, and support spy images of a CR-V under wraps in China that we posted last month.

Honda Australia has previously confirmed the new 2012 Honda CR-V will hit local showrooms in the second half of next year, following an overseas launch that will take place before the end of this year.

 

The 2.4-litre petrol engine is expected to carry over from the current model, although it will likely come with increased power and torque figures and reduced fuel consumption. The current model has maximum outputs of 125kW/218Nm, and uses 10.0 litres/100km of fuel on the combined cycle.

A six-speed automatic transmission is expected to replace the current five-speed in the fourth-generation compact SUV.

A number of questions still remain over the new model.

The first is if Honda Australia will introduce the front-wheel drive variant of the 2012 CR-V. With prices for the current model starting at $28,090 for the base model all-wheel drive, the addition of a front-wheel drive could potentially drop the entry price even lower, making the CR-V one of the hottest-priced SUVs on the market.

Another question is whether the new CR-V will have an optional third row of seats, making it a seven seater and an alternative to traditional people movers. The peculiar, inflated shape of the rear has led a number of people to speculate that the new model will offer a third row.

More details will be revealed in just under two months’ time at LA. Until then, let us know, would you buy a front-wheel drive CR-V, or a seven seater?


 
  • Showtime

    If you want a 7-seater, go for the Odyssey.

    • t39

      Odyssey is no good as a seven seater either: middle row childseat attachment belts are expected to cut thru passenger and luggage space in 3rd row and attach to the ROOF.

      So, if you have a child in the middle row, its child seat belts go thru where a 3rd row passenger’s head would be.

      • Aleks

        It also sucks, because it has a 2.4L engine to move a car that big, with 7 adults it struggles.

        • Freddo

          wouldnt you get a van for 7 adults

          • andronicus

            7 adults? Catch a bus what is this some sort of personal transport to a swingers party?

  • Able

    The rear is any current Volvo wagon (particularly the V50, XC60 and XC90) and the front is a massive grille with headlights that look like they’re trying to hide behind it. Lots of imagination being shown here… NOT!

    • Martin

      Agree with the Volvo comment – have to admit though that it does make it look better. The window line however is awful.

  • Opelman

    Yuck! Honda have certainly lost their way with design. This heap is hideous! Hopefully the actual car looks nothing like these

    • K20A

      Hideous is the right word sir.

      The rear is the most decent angle. Front is Tribecaish (read: ugly). Side on its too slab sided and top heavy.

      Lacking in tautness / purposefulness?

      When other cars managed to hide size with design (BMW X3, Kia Sorento, Hyundai ix35), this has potential to look more portly than its actual dimensions.

      • http://www.facebook.com/sammo.8191 Sam Moss

        Another example of good SUV design ie. ‘hiding bulk size’ is the new Touareg, it is a well-proportioned design!

        This CR-V is not the best, let’s hope it’ll look better in the metal.

  • Clem

    Front-wheel drive CR-V, or a seven seater?
    No, All Wheel Drive preferable. Seven Seater would be consider.

    “The 2.4-litre petrol engine is expected to carry over from the current model – 125kW/218Nm” :( :( :(
    I hope the revised engine has more Torque. Extra 10-30Nm is rubbish. More Torque please …

    A six-speed automatic transmission – Two Thumbs Up!

    • Joey

      HAHAHA – same crappy vtec engine from almost a decade ago!!

      Honda will continue to lose market share. No competition for the Sportage, Sorento, IX35, Tiguan etc

      GAME OVER if this is the best they could do

      • Bnm

        Crappy VTEC??

        What does sportage, tiguan offer other then a diesel variant?

    • Phil

      CRV globally sells around 250,000 units a year even with it’s ugly body, terrible specs and useless off road ability.
      Judging by the types of people that buy it, I don’t think they need to bother going to the trouble of improving it.

  • Mr Gaspo

    No diesel = no sale as far as I am concerned. As for looks, better than the current car… but still no oil painting.

  • DeJaVu

    Honda seem to be moving really…. slow compared to Toyota and Mazda.

    I think Honda’s lost it. I never though I’d say this, but I’d rather buy a Hyundai.

  • theillestlife

    looks liek a volvo from the back and the front headlights look like a lexus lx570.

    personally i reckon the orginal 1996-2001 cr-v looks the best still. but this is a improvement over the current

  • K

    i mean, honda can make nice looking cars…but with the CRV, it is uglier every generation….

  • HJP

    As much as I admire Honda cars in the past but all other Honda cars are going downhill, including this new CR-V. Honda must urgently overhaul their styling department or they will lose more sales to other carmakers, especially surging Hyundai and Kia.

  • MY

    Agree with K & HJP.
    As a current CRV owner, sadly to say I won’t return for this one!
    Honda, pls get rid of the current chief designer!

  • Can Fan

    Wake up Honda. Look at how many cars you sell today. For this look and design, it would make my selection easier next time to exclude this brand.

  • Lars

    Looks like former SSangyong designer has joined Honda.

  • http://Zuboora.com Mohamad is right when he says

    Nice to see Honda is still using the ugly stick with it’s cars..
    Hyundai finally ditched it.
    Kia also. Subaru has plans to.. Your next Honda.. Plz

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1715760895 Charles Dean

    Looking closely, it actually isn’t bad

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1435885244 Yani Hendriawan

    it looks the same -.-

  • col

    This looks really nice, and it will look better in the metal.

  • Doctor

    This look so……. well it’ll sell like hot cakes in the U.S.

  • mrxandthexfactor

    Hondas are getting uglier and uglier. This looks like a tank that’s been rammed into a wall. Why can’t they just stick to Civic Type Rs, CR-Z and hot things like that??????

  • Sumpguard

    Honda have lost their way! With the exception of the Euro (which itself is getting long in the tooth) their range is ordinary at best. Once upon a time they were THE Japanese pioneers. They still do great engines but that alone won’t sell their cars.

  • Bangel

    Even the YETI has more style than this , whats up with japs , only mazda seem to it right with fair , the others all seem to try too hard and then they over do it , restraint please .

  • Shak

    Honestly i dont see what all these comment are on about. It looks fine, and yes it does look a bit Volvo-ish at the rear but then again whats wrong with that, the current crop of Volvo SUV’s look very nice.

  • Dave

    Yuck!!! That looks so bad

  • Ryan

    they seriously need to put in their avtec engines asap…
    and this is pretty bulky

  • Steve

    Would like to know if their will be a diesel engine available here like they offer in Europe?