<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Volvo C30 S review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/</link>
	<description>Australian Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:09:19 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/comment-page-1/#comment-78311</link>
		<dc:creator>Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/#comment-78311</guid>
		<description>also it&#039;s a...................bland Volvo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also it&#8217;s a&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.bland Volvo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/comment-page-1/#comment-78221</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/#comment-78221</guid>
		<description>I own a red S40 with this 2.4 five pot, and the engine is great. It has more power and torque than any rival (base engines in the Audi A3/A4 or BMW 120i or 320i), and the extra cylinder makes the difference. 125KW is huge for a &#039;base&#039; powerplant. It&#039;s far from the &#039;poverty&#039; engine it&#039;s portrayed as here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a red S40 with this 2.4 five pot, and the engine is great. It has more power and torque than any rival (base engines in the Audi A3/A4 or BMW 120i or 320i), and the extra cylinder makes the difference. 125KW is huge for a &#8216;base&#8217; powerplant. It&#8217;s far from the &#8216;poverty&#8217; engine it&#8217;s portrayed as here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/comment-page-1/#comment-78173</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/#comment-78173</guid>
		<description>How can you say the interior is bland. Take a look at Volvos from 3+ years back then you will appreciate the ultimate in bland - or better yet a SAAB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you say the interior is bland. Take a look at Volvos from 3+ years back then you will appreciate the ultimate in bland &#8211; or better yet a SAAB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milbob</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/comment-page-1/#comment-78150</link>
		<dc:creator>milbob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/#comment-78150</guid>
		<description>hmm.. quite a heavy car for its size, no wonder it sips 9.0L/100km.. not bad but still.. can&#039;t quite figure out why Volvos are always so heavy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm.. quite a heavy car for its size, no wonder it sips 9.0L/100km.. not bad but still.. can&#8217;t quite figure out why Volvos are always so heavy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/comment-page-1/#comment-78128</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/#comment-78128</guid>
		<description>I saw the T5 reviewed on Fifth Gear today. They said it was quite good. The guy that reviewed it said that this car proves centre consoles can be practical and not boring, and that its a premium drive not a sporty one. So its not really in the hot hatch segment having little less power than the Focus XR5, which shares the same engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the T5 reviewed on Fifth Gear today. They said it was quite good. The guy that reviewed it said that this car proves centre consoles can be practical and not boring, and that its a premium drive not a sporty one. So its not really in the hot hatch segment having little less power than the Focus XR5, which shares the same engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Jakovljevic</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/comment-page-1/#comment-78122</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Jakovljevic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/#comment-78122</guid>
		<description>Not really a fan of the rear, myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really a fan of the rear, myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/comment-page-1/#comment-78121</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/#comment-78121</guid>
		<description>Of course it’s the worst engine of them, it’s the cheapest and the only naturally aspirated one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it’s the worst engine of them, it’s the cheapest and the only naturally aspirated one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technofreak</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/comment-page-1/#comment-78119</link>
		<dc:creator>Technofreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/#comment-78119</guid>
		<description>Wrong engine in this one...def need CRD or the T5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong engine in this one&#8230;def need CRD or the T5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supercujo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/comment-page-1/#comment-78118</link>
		<dc:creator>Supercujo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/#comment-78118</guid>
		<description>Love the styling of this thing. The base model was always a puzzling item. The diesel has pull and the T5 has grunt, the base model is the definite orphan.

One thing I have never liked is the textured black plastic trim. Always seems to fade to gray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the styling of this thing. The base model was always a puzzling item. The diesel has pull and the T5 has grunt, the base model is the definite orphan.</p>
<p>One thing I have never liked is the textured black plastic trim. Always seems to fade to gray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/comment-page-1/#comment-78117</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/13349/2008-volvo-c30-s-review/#comment-78117</guid>
		<description>Love the c30, my favourite hot hatch. would def go the T5 tho</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the c30, my favourite hot hatch. would def go the T5 tho</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
