blog counter
2008 Volvo C30 S review : Car Advice | News Blog

2008 Volvo C30 S review

June 11, 2008 by Karl Peskett  




08volvoc30sinterior.jpg

The seating however is excellent. Even the base cloth, if it can be called that – it’s more a synthetic material – is nice. There’s just enough bolstering and padding for the chairs to look like chairs, and not like something that’s been ripped off the shelves of Ikea.

08volvoc30srearseats.jpg

The base stereo is alright – option up the DynAudio stuff if you can – and the switchgear feel and interior finish is a cut above its Ford and Mazda siblings. But you’d hope so, with a starting price of $36K.

With no real surprise-and-delight features though, the justification for buying one will surely be the safety angle. That’s fine, except there are ANCAP five-star cars which come in well under thirty grand.

Share this article:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg

Pages: Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5




Related Articles:

Volvo XC60 2008 Geneva Motor Show
Volvo XC60 2008 Geneva Motor Show In a previous life, Volvo held passenger safety above all facets of car design, and

Ford might keep Volvo after all?
With the sale of Jaguar and Land Rover expected to finalize by month's end, the attention now points Volvo's way.

Volvo C30 Video
Another addition to CarAdvice TV, the Volvo C30! Interested? Read the review.

Volvo C30 Green race debut
Volvo C30 Green race car World Touring Car Championship race debut “Qualifying tenth fastest out of twenty-six cars and racing towards

Ford to consider selling Volvo
This has been a long time coming but Ford Motor Company has today officially announced that it's considering the

Comments

10 Responses to “2008 Volvo C30 S review”
  1. Mitch says:

    Love the c30, my favourite hot hatch. would def go the T5 tho

  2. Supercujo says:

    Love the styling of this thing. The base model was always a puzzling item. The diesel has pull and the T5 has grunt, the base model is the definite orphan.

    One thing I have never liked is the textured black plastic trim. Always seems to fade to gray.

  3. Technofreak says:

    Wrong engine in this one…def need CRD or the T5.

  4. Mitch says:

    Of course it’s the worst engine of them, it’s the cheapest and the only naturally aspirated one

  5. Not really a fan of the rear, myself.

  6. Martin says:

    I saw the T5 reviewed on Fifth Gear today. They said it was quite good. The guy that reviewed it said that this car proves centre consoles can be practical and not boring, and that its a premium drive not a sporty one. So its not really in the hot hatch segment having little less power than the Focus XR5, which shares the same engine.

  7. milbob says:

    hmm.. quite a heavy car for its size, no wonder it sips 9.0L/100km.. not bad but still.. can’t quite figure out why Volvos are always so heavy.

  8. G says:

    How can you say the interior is bland. Take a look at Volvos from 3+ years back then you will appreciate the ultimate in bland – or better yet a SAAB.

  9. Luke says:

    I own a red S40 with this 2.4 five pot, and the engine is great. It has more power and torque than any rival (base engines in the Audi A3/A4 or BMW 120i or 320i), and the extra cylinder makes the difference. 125KW is huge for a ‘base’ powerplant. It’s far from the ‘poverty’ engine it’s portrayed as here.

  10. Duck says:

    also it’s a……………….bland Volvo.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word