Car Advice

2008 Volvo C30 S review

By Karl Peskett |

2008 Volvo C30 S 2.4i review & road test

08volvoc30sf3qu2.jpg

Model Tested:

  • 2008 Volvo C30 S 2.4i

Options:

  • None fitted

Recommended Retail Price:

  • $35,950

plus.jpg Styling, smoothness, engine performs well

minus.jpg Bland steering, bland brakes, bland interior

CarAdvice Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF (3.5/5)

- Photographs and review by Karl Peskett

 My wife was driving behind me the other day. I happened to be behind the wheel of this Volvo C30 S at the time. She rang me on my mobile to tell me something. As I picked up the phone and put it on speaker (naturally), I didn’t even get a hello.

The first thing she said to me was, “You know, your bum looks big in that.”

72-es-gold.jpg

And that pretty much sums up the styling of this car. You see, Volvo has paid homage to one of its classics, the 1800ES. Not that that’s a bad thing. In its heyday, the 1800ES, along with the P1800 coupe, was a masterpiece of design. It was certainly different.

08volvoc30srear3quarter.jpg

The slanted rear glass panel, the concave waistline; The 1800ES was a nice piece of metalwork. And to my eyes at least, the C30 is also a fine looking automobile.

So yes, it’s very bum oriented, but I reckon that’s a good thing. It certainly gets everyone talking anyway. And people talking and pointing is better than apathy – Volvo has to score points for polarising the people.

Next page…

08volvoc30sf3quhigh.jpg

In S form, you get the basic package. It’s nice to once in a while get the base model of a car, where PR departments normally load up their test cars with options. The black C30 S, you see here, only came with automatic transmission.

So as a car, how is it? Well, it’s actually quite a relaxed drive. And that’s not a negative thing, either.

08volvoc30sf3quhighpol.jpg

The 2.4-litre inline five cylinder petrol engine doesn’t create any output records with a kilowatt rating of 125, and 230Nm of torque. But it doesn’t mean that it’s got no pull.

Certainly it’s very linear in the way it gives you its power, but the top end delivery is quite surprising. In fact, overtaking on country roads is a sinch. A 0-100km/h time of 8.8 seconds is not to be sneezed at too, especially when there are cars making a lot more power which can’t match that.

08volvoc30sgrillebadge.jpg

And the automatic which mates up to the engine is a fine unit too. It’s smooth and willing, although the response of the manual gate could be a little snappier.

08volvoc30sheadlight.jpg

Behind the wheel, you’ll find that the steering is dull, but has nice weighting. What’s interesting is you can hear the servo assistance when wheeling around in carparks at slow speed. There’s an electric whirr, as the motor slews the rack back and forth. The turning circle’s not bad, either.

 

08volvoc30sfrontendhigh.jpg

The C30 S handles reasonably, with a slight understeer bias, typical of heavier front-wheel-drives. The brakes need a little push to give their best, but they don’t fade too much, and the grip to ABS calibration is rather good.

08volvoc30ssidebuilding.jpg

The ride is on the firmer side, but it’s acceptable. It does crash slightly on harsh ridges, and can be a little jittery in some situations. The damping is obviously different to the two cars built on the same platform – the Focus and Mazda 3. But where it feels better is in body rigidity.

The body has a fairly solid feel about it. Thank the hefty side intrusion beams for that. This does two things to the car. It reduces room inside which means that there’s no pretensions for it being a five seater. But it also adds to the weight of the doors. Still, for the reduced room, four adults can comfortably sit in it with no issues. The rear can feel a little claustrophobic though, with smaller rear windows.

08volvoc30sinterior.jpg

The seating however is excellent. Even the base cloth, if it can be called that – it’s more a synthetic material – is nice. There’s just enough bolstering and padding for the chairs to look like chairs, and not like something that’s been ripped off the shelves of Ikea.

08volvoc30srearseats.jpg

The base stereo is alright – option up the DynAudio stuff if you can – and the switchgear feel and interior finish is a cut above its Ford and Mazda siblings. But you’d hope so, with a starting price of $36K.

With no real surprise-and-delight features though, the justification for buying one will surely be the safety angle. That’s fine, except there are ANCAP five-star cars which come in well under thirty grand.

08volvoc30sf3qulow.jpg

It’d be nice to think that there’ll be a few C30′s running around because at least they’re non-conformist and far from bland. Even so, as unique a looker as it is, the base model, (S), feels a little out of place in the C30 lineup. The D5 has the torque and the T5 has the headkicking power and handling.

But in this car, the 2.4 engine just isn’t inspiring enough, and the interior lacks ambience. The C30 S, therefore feels a little underwhelming. It’s not a bad car, just not a great one.

There’s that whole style versus substance argument again…

CarAdvice Overall Rating: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF
How does it Drive: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gif
How does it Look: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF
How does it Go: rating11.gifrating11.gifrating11.gifrating_half.GIF

Specifications:

  • Engine: 2435cc 5-cylinder petrol
  • Power: 125kW
  • Torque: 230Nm
  • Transmission: Five-speed Geartronic Automatic
  • Top Speed: 215km/h
  • 0-100km/h: 8.8 seconds
  • 0-400m: N/A
  • Fuel Consumption: 9.0 litres / 100km (Combined)
  • Fuel Tank Capacity: 62 litres
  • Fuel Type: 91RON Unleaded
  • ANCAP Rating: Five Star
  • Safety: TCS; Front, Side & Curtain Airbags
  • Turning Circle: 10.6 metres
  • Weight: 1437kg (Tare)
  • Wheels: 16-inch

 
  • Mitch

    Love the c30, my favourite hot hatch. would def go the T5 tho

  • http://navelcontemplation.blogspot.com Supercujo

    Love the styling of this thing. The base model was always a puzzling item. The diesel has pull and the T5 has grunt, the base model is the definite orphan.

    One thing I have never liked is the textured black plastic trim. Always seems to fade to gray.

  • Technofreak

    Wrong engine in this one…def need CRD or the T5.

  • Mitch

    Of course it’s the worst engine of them, it’s the cheapest and the only naturally aspirated one

  • http://www.myspace.com/tjantilag Tom Jakovljevic

    Not really a fan of the rear, myself.

  • Martin

    I saw the T5 reviewed on Fifth Gear today. They said it was quite good. The guy that reviewed it said that this car proves centre consoles can be practical and not boring, and that its a premium drive not a sporty one. So its not really in the hot hatch segment having little less power than the Focus XR5, which shares the same engine.

  • milbob

    hmm.. quite a heavy car for its size, no wonder it sips 9.0L/100km.. not bad but still.. can’t quite figure out why Volvos are always so heavy.

  • G

    How can you say the interior is bland. Take a look at Volvos from 3+ years back then you will appreciate the ultimate in bland – or better yet a SAAB.

  • Luke

    I own a red S40 with this 2.4 five pot, and the engine is great. It has more power and torque than any rival (base engines in the Audi A3/A4 or BMW 120i or 320i), and the extra cylinder makes the difference. 125KW is huge for a ‘base’ powerplant. It’s far from the ‘poverty’ engine it’s portrayed as here.

  • Duck

    also it’s a……………….bland Volvo.