Comments on: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V sets pace at Nurburgring

By: Andrew A

Andrew A — Fri, 26 Dec 2008 21:21:36 +0000

No Doubt, the AMG S65 clearly has more power. …Speaking of worlds fastest Brick…

I’m not sure American cars will ever be ‘that much’ better then imports considering all the talented engineers here end up with “real” jobs involving military contracts manufacturing the worlds most impressive “everything.”

Anyway back to Cadillac. Was there anything they didn’t invent? It seems like they were the world first to invent just about everything found on a modern vehicle. What would the rest of the world have done without them.

By: Minnow

Minnow — Fri, 16 May 2008 05:40:49 +0000

Hmm this looks like a good car, 7.59… easy…. on a playstation!! Even on a playstation with road tyres, to achieve that time is pretty good

Most powerful production sedan you say? hmm me thinks NOT the 2007 W221 Mercedes-Benz AMG S65 with a twin turbo V12 puts out 450kw and has a combined fuel consumption of 14.8L/100k’s. All while capable of 1200Nm at 2000rpm, but they limit it too just 1000nm

By: Liam

Liam — Wed, 14 May 2008 22:56:20 +0000

Audi RS6 427kW (573bhp) and 650Nm. The Caddy is down on power, but has more torque. At this stage RS6 is Avant only, but that will change.

By: Richo

Richo — Wed, 14 May 2008 13:00:24 +0000

Andrew M whats with the whole “the falcon motor is better” crap? No one cares, everyone knows the six in the falcon is a very good motor, but by all reports the direct injected V6 in the caddy is a very very nice motor, and i just did some checking and i was wrong, its not low 7′s the V6 CTS does, its 5.9 seconds according to GM. Is that figure a bit “optimistic”? Who knows maybe it is, but at the end of the day i have a suspision that cadillac probably wheren’t targeting the aussie ford falcon when they where developing this car!!!!

By: Chucky

Chucky — Wed, 14 May 2008 12:23:49 +0000

Andrew M Says:
May 14th, 2008 at 9:07 pm
Richo,
the caddy is also direct injection, the falcon motor is not.

am i reading it wrong or does the V6 version do 0-100 in 7.56 secs?
that not impressive…..

———————————————————————————————————–

Actually, the direct injection V6 verson that we are getting does 0-60mph in well under 6 seconds. So I would expect about 6 seconds flat or a little bit over for 0-100kmh.

By: Andrew M

Andrew M — Wed, 14 May 2008 11:07:24 +0000

Richo,
the caddy is also direct injection, the falcon motor is not.

am i reading it wrong or does the V6 version do 0-100 in 7.56 secs?
that not impressive…..

By: SteveC

SteveC — Wed, 14 May 2008 10:37:43 +0000

Hmm….

Was the designer given only a ruler?

I can see lots of these with 29″ Chrome Rims driving around in the suburb up the road.

It’s still an American car.

By: PoisonEagle

PoisonEagle — Wed, 14 May 2008 10:26:51 +0000

How long until Caddy lands here?

By: anthony C

anthony C — Wed, 14 May 2008 09:51:10 +0000

are they HSV wheels???

By: No Name

No Name — Wed, 14 May 2008 09:42:21 +0000

Bloody Hell – Manufacturers seem to be going mad with power outputs and breaking records. It’s no wonder why GM & Ford are losing so much developing frankly pointless opportunities like this. Yeh great stuff but really WHATS THE POINT. Enjoy it while you can cos it won’t carry on for long, there’s too much pressure on manufacturers to make vehicles go further on a litre of fuel
The cars as ugly as to go with it.