2008 Subaru Tribeca Review
24 Apr, 2008
25 Comments 
But it wasn’t even a big problem, it was simply the front headlights, they looked like they came from a 1960s Datsun. To put it bluntly, the front-end made a quality car feel mundane and repulsive.
The main issue with the original Tribeca design was its target audience. Americans. If you’re smart enough, you may even work that out from the name, Tribeca stands for “Triangle Below the Canal”, a neighbourhood in lower Manhattan, New York (and yes, the car is built in the States).
However the original Tribeca was not much of a sales success over there, even the Americans questioned the styling.
Thankfully someone at Subaru put on their glasses and sent the front back to the drawing board. The original Tribeca came to Australia in late 2006 and already, there is a new one. A much prettier one.
Others have criticized Subaru for turning the front end into a generic SUV face, but, what would they prefer? The original? I don’t think so.
The new Tribeca isn’t just a facelift though, the MY08 model has a few other goodies too, firstly it’s powered by the biggest engine Subaru has ever made, a 3.6-litre boxer which puts out 190kW of power and 350Nm of torque.
This is a big step up from the 3.0-litre unit (180kW/297Nm) used in the MY07 model. While the power has gone up, fuel economy has come down to 11.6 litre per 100 kilometres (12.4 previously).
The Tribeca marks a big change for Subaru, for so long the brand had been limited to the Impreza, Outback, Forester and Liberty. The Forester is the best seller of the bunch and the Impreza’s higher spec WRX and STi variants carry Subaru’s flag high and mighty. With the introduction of the Tribeca, Subaru is one step closer to offering a complete range.
So just how good is Subaru’s attempt at a large SUV? Originally the Tribeca was put up against everything from the X5 to Ford’s territory but these days, it’s pretty much directly pitted against the new Mazda CX-9, so it has a lot to live up to.
Location: Home / Subaru, Behind the Wheel / ...
Rate Post: 
(10 votes, average: 2.7 out of 5)
Loading ...
-
Print it:
![IMG_6652 [1024x768].JPG](http://www.caradvice.com.au/wp-content/gallery/landrover60thaniv/IMG_6652 [1024x768].JPG "IMG_6652 [1024x768].JPG")
not including dealer delievery taxes... by Markie is BORED
April 24th, 2008 at 6:22 pm
Subaru got some Greek stylist guy with a surname beginning with ‘Z’ fron Alfa Romeo, and he must have been a con-man because all he did was flip the Alfa front end upside-down and call it a Subaru. It didn’t work. It turned the bug-eye Impreza into something even worse, and the ‘why do we need this?’ Tribeca into a re-run of the ‘flying vagina’ Edsel. Subaru sacked him, but they should have done that before they hired him.
Now we have Subarus with Chrysler front ends, and the company is controlled by Toyota. Subaru’s future looks like a dark place, but we won’t miss the ‘DOOF DOOF’ of the stereo every time an older one goes past.
(Report)
April 24th, 2008 at 7:01 pm
I think the writer should do a bit of study.
“The Tribeca marks a big change for Subaru, for so long the brand had been limited to the Impreza (and its derivative, the Outlander), Forester and Liberty. ”
He may learn that:
Forester is a derivative of the Impreza.
The Outback & Tribeca are derivatives of a Liberty.
And that the Outlander is a Mitsubishi.
Sadly, Subaru have stopped making the Magna, and Mitsubishi are now producing a P76.
(Report)
April 24th, 2008 at 7:33 pm
The interior looks groovy!
(Report)
April 24th, 2008 at 7:49 pm
The centre console looks like a bit of melted cheese drooping down but otherwise it seems to be a marked improvement on the previous model.
(Report)
April 24th, 2008 at 7:56 pm
the original looks like a nissan micra SUV - in other words ugly!
(Report)
April 24th, 2008 at 8:22 pm
A vast styling improvement over the outgoing model. And a little exclusivity as well. Nice
(Report)
April 24th, 2008 at 9:31 pm
GOOD QUESTION BY WRITER - “…..did Subaru think the car was going to appeal to anyone except the visually impaired?”
NM response……arent Subbie and Toyomota trying to work out what size bed to get and produce silly designs. Ah the pain of looking at it!
(Report)
April 24th, 2008 at 9:45 pm
You’re right BHB, I did mean outback there not outlander, all fixed up, thanks for pointing it out.
(Report)
April 24th, 2008 at 10:19 pm
There are some SSanyongs that are far prettier than the first of this, and a far better vehicle for purpose as well
The new design is better, but a drover’s dog could not have designed something uglier.
What is surprising, is that cars are produced by more than just the designer, there are plenty of others that have to sign off before it is built.
Then again, the industry is littered with such glaring mistakes, take the home-grown AU for another example. One really bad model finished off the Falcon, which is now in its death throes - it will breathe its last when fuel gets to $2.00.
(Report)
April 25th, 2008 at 12:20 am
its medicore styling…
but its “prettier” than the previous one… but thats a given.. a car smash looks prettier than the first one.
Toyota Stylers, have been given more freedom actually… so hopefully back to “inspired” designs when the next models come out… Subaru looks to benefit from it…
The old WRXs, werent lookers either… admit it… great cars.. but their performance made there fans blinded from the appearance…
(Report)
April 25th, 2008 at 1:10 am
This yank tank actually looks and feels decent. I came across one while looking thru the new Impreza (don worry, ended up with a Mondeo) and the interior feels top notch. I’m pretty sure this car would sell better if Subie had actually promoted it. I haven seen a single ad for this car anywhere. The CX-7 u mentioned, on the other hand is fast becoming Eddie Everywhere.
And yeah lastly, Cx-9 doesn work on me coz i felt the proportions were perfect on Cx-7. Now if only Subie sold Diesels in these.
(Report)
April 25th, 2008 at 9:34 am
YUCK! [sorry ricky]
Cheers
F-0
(Report)
April 25th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
Original Tribecca = Flop
Solution?
Take one aborted Saab 9-6X (developed as another saabaru rebadge) and simply apply Subaru badges and change the grille slightly. (notice the Saab shaped headlights)
How else do you think Subaru could afford to change the look off the car so much and so quickly?
Anywho, better looking as a Subaru than a Saab.
(Report)
April 25th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
Given to look of the current Subie Impreza.. and the couple of models before that.. The 02 Bug-Eye Impreza looks more attractiuve and alot more uniform with the rest of the car. Infact I’d say it looks more modern particularly when compared to the one with wings
(Report)
April 25th, 2008 at 1:49 pm
I like the exterior of this model Tribeca way more than the old one. However the interior leaves a lot to be desired - I strongly dislike the slopping dash (looks like something from a French car in the 70’s), and the seats in the base model have very little support (made for fat Americans). They should refit better seats for Australia. Definitely needs a darker interior and dash redesign.
Subaru are also about 3 years behind now with their auto transmissions - all premium autos should be 6 speeds, with 5 speeds as a minimum in the base models. Sports models (wrx and STi) are desperately in need of a DSG gearbox (I personally am holding off upgrading my 99 wrx until Subaru provide one! and I cannot wait much longer). And how about the 4 speed autos in the new impreza and forester.. I mean.. seriously! Stakeholder Toyota should assist Subaru asap with their tranmissions.
(Report)
April 25th, 2008 at 3:32 pm
Disgraceful styling, looks likes a mad dog’s breakfast, and I totally with ^ gear box selections across the range are Shite. Wake up Subaru… there are probably thousands of potential buyers waitng desperately to replace their older Subies, but, if like me, they’ll give up and select other makers. We wait silently for some smart designs.
(Report)
April 25th, 2008 at 4:29 pm
I’d take a CX-9 any day, at least they look like they were styled this century. Sorry Suby, as good as you may be, this is average at best.
(Report)
April 26th, 2008 at 8:47 am
Casey if you actually took the time to drive both cars back to back, you would find the tribeca superior to drive
, it rides better , the gbox is smoother, it handles better because its constant awd not part time like the mazda, the engine sounds better (boxer layout), mazda has little bit more power but in this style of family car the tribeca has more than anough and has plent of bottem end torque, also tribecas new shape is lell likely to date as quickly as the oversyled mazda..
(Report)
April 26th, 2008 at 9:15 am
and a big advantage especially with fuel prices going higher and higher is the tribeca is much better on fuel than the cx9 and runs on std unleaded fuel..
(Report)
April 26th, 2008 at 10:58 am
OSU811, is right u know!
(Report)
April 26th, 2008 at 11:37 am
Another “Claytons” 4wd (the 4wd you have when not having a 4wd) that fell out of the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down. This car is about as much use as a chocolate teapot.
(Report)
April 29th, 2008 at 1:14 pm
OSU811 i’d have to disagree. Yes the tribeca rides a lot softer but at the expense of more body roll. The mazda rides a lot stiffer but it was designed that way from the ground up to embrace the so called “zoom zoom” philosophy. The subie is not quite sure about what it wants to be. Its too firm to be a true luxury vehicle, and too soft to be a sporty vehicle. I believe the mazda to be the better handling of the two, and its transmission is just as smooth if not better. The mazdas shift points are a lot better as well and it doesn’t hunt for gears as much. The mazda engine is a lot more responsive and i find is a bit more powerful. But yes it does use more fuel. honestly i think the looks are all subjective. To each his own.
(Report)
May 16th, 2008 at 11:44 pm
i am test driving one now - and it is growing on me. FENNO - a very funny post but a tad off the mark. Value for money this is one very good sensible family soft-roader. I have been a BA falcon wagon sorta guy with three toddlers and this is a car we would look at. A stylish really safe kid carrier with lots of great features for your $. Handles so well, nimble for its size and brakes on a pin. My only grip is its too quiet and all I hear is the transmission, so it sounds like Im driving a stylish sewing machine. Looks as great as a conservative family car can - even tho I want to buy the alfa 159 estate ….mmmmmm now thats a car. pity its only got room for the shopping.
yes - drive it for the weekend before bagging it people.
Oh yes my wife rightly points out ‘looks like lexus ‘cept only a third of the price and it doesnt talk at you all the time - god I hate overly chatty GPS units dont you?’
(Report)
July 17th, 2008 at 8:50 pm
We just purchased a 2008 Subaru Tribeca and was disapointed to find that Subaru Sat Navigation system has been substantially degraded.
The “blurb” given to new purchasers includes a booklet with the front cover labelled “Subaru” & suggesting that the vehicle contain “WheriS” navigation with “Version 13″ software.
But don’t be fooled, they have removed entirely such essential items as:- School zone warnings, Red light & Speed camera alerts etc. Worst of all the new cars have the old Version 13 software rather than Version 14 which was released in December 2007.
Subaru dealers are not interested to discus this deplorable situation.
What do you reckon can be done to overcome this problem??
James
(Report)
August 21st, 2008 at 3:23 pm
I just purchased the Tribeca early 2007 model. The one the writer calls ‘ugly’. Well I beleive it looks great. Not only great looking, but unique as well. The shape is not like the generic SUV faces you see on the road everyday.
So many times I’ve been stopped geting out of the car and people asking for a look. They often make the comment that it looks very similar to Porsche’s Cayenne. And I’d have to agree. It also has all the luxury you could imagine on the Premium model and for a 3.0L engine, it has enough power for a family car. My Tribeca is my dream car come true.
(Report)