<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMW&#8217;s new twin-turbo V8 (N63)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 07:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GhisGT</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68858</link>
		<dc:creator>GhisGT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68858</guid>
		<description>Turbocharging is adding more volumetric cubic charge into a cylinder. More cubes, turbocharging, surpercharging, nitrous, it\&#039;s all very similar. All adds more air and more fuel into the chambers.

Not every single post on here has to turn into mindless brand bashing dribble, does it?

That comment is like saying why have Ford used a N/A 4-litre when a 2-litre turbo would have done the same thing, or BMW\&#039;s fantastic M3 6-cylinder. They also could have used a much smaller capacity engine and used turbocharging. Why did they go more cubic capacity?

What’s the issue with a larger capacity engine? With power comes increased fuel consumption. 300kWs require a certain amount of fuel to be burnt, whether it\&#039;s from a blown application or naturally aspirated. 

I do also believe a W427 and BMW 5-series are marketed at different target buyers, people who buy the W427 aren’t looking for class or prestige in a badge.

All this is coming from somebody who is a massive fan of higher end BMW engines too, so I&#039;m not a one-eyed brand supporter or basher like most bloggers on this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turbocharging is adding more volumetric cubic charge into a cylinder. More cubes, turbocharging, surpercharging, nitrous, it\&#8217;s all very similar. All adds more air and more fuel into the chambers.</p>
<p>Not every single post on here has to turn into mindless brand bashing dribble, does it?</p>
<p>That comment is like saying why have Ford used a N/A 4-litre when a 2-litre turbo would have done the same thing, or BMW\&#8217;s fantastic M3 6-cylinder. They also could have used a much smaller capacity engine and used turbocharging. Why did they go more cubic capacity?</p>
<p>What’s the issue with a larger capacity engine? With power comes increased fuel consumption. 300kWs require a certain amount of fuel to be burnt, whether it\&#8217;s from a blown application or naturally aspirated. </p>
<p>I do also believe a W427 and BMW 5-series are marketed at different target buyers, people who buy the W427 aren’t looking for class or prestige in a badge.</p>
<p>All this is coming from somebody who is a massive fan of higher end BMW engines too, so I&#8217;m not a one-eyed brand supporter or basher like most bloggers on this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony M</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68835</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68835</guid>
		<description>Who needs cubes (HSV427) when you have class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who needs cubes (HSV427) when you have class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GhisGT</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68730</link>
		<dc:creator>GhisGT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68730</guid>
		<description>Peak KW means very little. Being a turbocharged car AND a V8, the instant low down torque from two smaller turbos will be phenomenal and naturally taper down towards the higher end of the scale, resulting in a lower peak kW figure but make a quick package overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peak KW means very little. Being a turbocharged car AND a V8, the instant low down torque from two smaller turbos will be phenomenal and naturally taper down towards the higher end of the scale, resulting in a lower peak kW figure but make a quick package overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phill</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68729</link>
		<dc:creator>Phill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68729</guid>
		<description>If ts anything like the TT6 it will be a ripper</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If ts anything like the TT6 it will be a ripper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68722</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 06:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68722</guid>
		<description>kw isnt that high, but i bet it would have a really wide torque range 1500-6000 just like the 335i</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kw isnt that high, but i bet it would have a really wide torque range 1500-6000 just like the 335i</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68710</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 06:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68710</guid>
		<description>Wicked, can&#039;t wait for a drive of that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wicked, can&#8217;t wait for a drive of that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frugal-One</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68709</link>
		<dc:creator>Frugal-One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 06:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12149/bmws-new-twin-turbo-v8/#comment-68709</guid>
		<description>*****PRIMO!*****

Doing nice work BMW, pity it attracts co*kspank type owners! :-)

Cheers

F-0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*****PRIMO!*****</p>
<p>Doing nice work BMW, pity it attracts co*kspank type owners! <img src='http://www.caradvice.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>F-0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 270/271 objects using memcached

Served from: www.caradvice.com.au @ 2012-02-11 19:16:44 -->
