<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Subaru&#8217;s marketing dilemma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/</link>
	<description>Australian Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:57:06 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-73476</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-73476</guid>
		<description>James  - you hit the nail on the head ... and have spoken the Toyota marketing mans darkest fear - yep, Toyota is indeed &#039;a cardigan brand.&#039;   

So sensible and nice and well... yeeeshh &#039;nice&#039;.... and Mazda ..welll......Mazda is just about bringing up the rear, being the younger lad/ladettes &#039;car of choice&#039; [bloody &#039;zoom zoom&#039; here and &#039;zoom zoom&#039; there] - in usually that shocking, god awful electric metallic blue  ...Oh I cant go on it&#039;s to aesthetically challenging ... Please somebody pass me that Fiat Ritmo brochure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James  &#8211; you hit the nail on the head &#8230; and have spoken the Toyota marketing mans darkest fear &#8211; yep, Toyota is indeed &#8216;a cardigan brand.&#8217;   </p>
<p>So sensible and nice and well&#8230; yeeeshh &#8216;nice&#8217;&#8230;. and Mazda ..welll&#8230;&#8230;Mazda is just about bringing up the rear, being the younger lad/ladettes &#8216;car of choice&#8217; [bloody 'zoom zoom' here and 'zoom zoom' there] &#8211; in usually that shocking, god awful electric metallic blue  &#8230;Oh I cant go on it&#8217;s to aesthetically challenging &#8230; Please somebody pass me that Fiat Ritmo brochure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-70818</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 06:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-70818</guid>
		<description>I think its a great idea for a car. Zippy, good looking and frugal. The best solution is for Subaru (Fuji heavy industries rather) to produce the car and sell it only through Toyota channels. 
What ever happened to the SAAB 9-2 &quot;saabaru&quot;?? It was a lovely collaboration. I&#039;d love for them to produce another model together - just fix up the &quot;swedish&quot; interior (v-ugly!!!).
Now Subaru - more efficient boxers please? I would have switched to Subaru a long time ago if only they could manage a decent cut on consumption. It seems to be their achillies&#039; heel in an otherwise outstanding line-up of vehicles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its a great idea for a car. Zippy, good looking and frugal. The best solution is for Subaru (Fuji heavy industries rather) to produce the car and sell it only through Toyota channels.<br />
What ever happened to the SAAB 9-2 &#8220;saabaru&#8221;?? It was a lovely collaboration. I&#8217;d love for them to produce another model together &#8211; just fix up the &#8220;swedish&#8221; interior (v-ugly!!!).<br />
Now Subaru &#8211; more efficient boxers please? I would have switched to Subaru a long time ago if only they could manage a decent cut on consumption. It seems to be their achillies&#8217; heel in an otherwise outstanding line-up of vehicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamison</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-69036</link>
		<dc:creator>jamison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-69036</guid>
		<description>Have you seen the price of engine rebuild for RX-7 FDs?
or Supra RZs?


Body wise, the cars assuming no crashes or accidents (big hits).. will last you 1 million kms or more... welding and materials have safety factors of more than double for &quot;cheap&quot; everyday cars... sports cars have even bigger safety factors on mechanical performance...

And define classics?.... I think some will have different perspectives on what car they are &quot;passionate&quot; with.
I&#039;d still love a &quot;clean&quot; Nissan GTR R32 one day... its trash to a lot these days especially the amount of modified ones on the market getting trashed by 18 year olds.... but a clean un-modified one... well.. to me would be worth garaging and just taking for a spin weekends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the price of engine rebuild for RX-7 FDs?<br />
or Supra RZs?</p>
<p>Body wise, the cars assuming no crashes or accidents (big hits).. will last you 1 million kms or more&#8230; welding and materials have safety factors of more than double for &#8220;cheap&#8221; everyday cars&#8230; sports cars have even bigger safety factors on mechanical performance&#8230;</p>
<p>And define classics?&#8230;. I think some will have different perspectives on what car they are &#8220;passionate&#8221; with.<br />
I&#8217;d still love a &#8220;clean&#8221; Nissan GTR R32 one day&#8230; its trash to a lot these days especially the amount of modified ones on the market getting trashed by 18 year olds&#8230;. but a clean un-modified one&#8230; well.. to me would be worth garaging and just taking for a spin weekends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Name</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68817</link>
		<dc:creator>No Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68817</guid>
		<description>Aaah but Jamison old chum - what&#039;s the point in having a nice &quot;beast&quot; and caging it up in the garage all week. You might as well drive it. Now if it was something really special - old clasic maybe or a Gallardo Syder then I would agree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaah but Jamison old chum &#8211; what&#8217;s the point in having a nice &#8220;beast&#8221; and caging it up in the garage all week. You might as well drive it. Now if it was something really special &#8211; old clasic maybe or a Gallardo Syder then I would agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamison</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68809</link>
		<dc:creator>jamison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68809</guid>
		<description>Yeah Toyota is definitely in need of &quot;sportier&quot; cars.
No doubt about that, heck even Toyota agrees.

Its just that everyday drive cars, cars that you dont care if you clock 100,000 Kms a year... cars that you dont mind not getting special high octane fuel, cars that you dont want to pay extra insurance for, cars that you dont want delays in getting parts when you need them ASAP.... basically A to B cars that are reliable... so I agree with James too.

My point, just so that even the young drivers understand is.

When you are on a market for a new car that you want to drive everyday.... Toyota has a good range, some are over priced than other manufacturers, but reliability over 4-5 years you definitely get your moneys worth on a Toyota.

I dont see how someone can justify driving turbo charged cars everyday to work, pay the extra dollars for premium fuel, pay the extra dollars for the 5000km service, pay the HUGE $$$ to maintain engine/body/mechanical parts after about 2 years.. assuming you drive it everyday... because darn it you will NEED to do that if you drive it everyday. If you&#039;re a executive getting six figures a year, fair enough... but for the 97% of daily drivers... I dont see whats wrong with Toyota&#039;s target audience.

I&#039;d drive a corolla or a camry everyday no problems, then take out the beast come weekend. 

Thats actually ONE huge reason Subaru opted to &quot;soften&quot; up the WRX. They turned a high maintenance weekend car, to a darn good daily driver in the 08 WRX... lots of whingers dont look at it from value perspective. 
Thats why, the hot hatches these days are great alternatives if you just want 1 car that goes hard and is a great everyday driver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Toyota is definitely in need of &#8220;sportier&#8221; cars.<br />
No doubt about that, heck even Toyota agrees.</p>
<p>Its just that everyday drive cars, cars that you dont care if you clock 100,000 Kms a year&#8230; cars that you dont mind not getting special high octane fuel, cars that you dont want to pay extra insurance for, cars that you dont want delays in getting parts when you need them ASAP&#8230;. basically A to B cars that are reliable&#8230; so I agree with James too.</p>
<p>My point, just so that even the young drivers understand is.</p>
<p>When you are on a market for a new car that you want to drive everyday&#8230;. Toyota has a good range, some are over priced than other manufacturers, but reliability over 4-5 years you definitely get your moneys worth on a Toyota.</p>
<p>I dont see how someone can justify driving turbo charged cars everyday to work, pay the extra dollars for premium fuel, pay the extra dollars for the 5000km service, pay the HUGE $$$ to maintain engine/body/mechanical parts after about 2 years.. assuming you drive it everyday&#8230; because darn it you will NEED to do that if you drive it everyday. If you&#8217;re a executive getting six figures a year, fair enough&#8230; but for the 97% of daily drivers&#8230; I dont see whats wrong with Toyota&#8217;s target audience.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d drive a corolla or a camry everyday no problems, then take out the beast come weekend. </p>
<p>Thats actually ONE huge reason Subaru opted to &#8220;soften&#8221; up the WRX. They turned a high maintenance weekend car, to a darn good daily driver in the 08 WRX&#8230; lots of whingers dont look at it from value perspective.<br />
Thats why, the hot hatches these days are great alternatives if you just want 1 car that goes hard and is a great everyday driver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naughtyius Maximus</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68750</link>
		<dc:creator>Naughtyius Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68750</guid>
		<description>Gee hope Toyota dont wreck Subaru as they build sportier cars then boring Toyota&#039;s. Yawn........zzz zzz zzz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee hope Toyota dont wreck Subaru as they build sportier cars then boring Toyota&#8217;s. Yawn&#8230;&#8230;..zzz zzz zzz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSU811</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68684</link>
		<dc:creator>OSU811</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 03:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68684</guid>
		<description>If i was to replace my liberty with a new car now, it would be the new xt manual forster for sure! I have had the pleasure of driving one and they are very refined/quiet, quick and responsive, very practical too,
and I think the new model looks really good just needs nice set of 18&quot; wheels and decent exhaust..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i was to replace my liberty with a new car now, it would be the new xt manual forster for sure! I have had the pleasure of driving one and they are very refined/quiet, quick and responsive, very practical too,<br />
and I think the new model looks really good just needs nice set of 18&#8243; wheels and decent exhaust..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSU811</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68681</link>
		<dc:creator>OSU811</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68681</guid>
		<description>mark i own a 2007 liberty wagon, and mate the only way to go with these cars is in the manual anyway much more fun and more resposive, and with the advantage of being cheaper and better on fuel, also rarer come time to sell..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mark i own a 2007 liberty wagon, and mate the only way to go with these cars is in the manual anyway much more fun and more resposive, and with the advantage of being cheaper and better on fuel, also rarer come time to sell..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Golfschwein</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68660</link>
		<dc:creator>Golfschwein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68660</guid>
		<description>I hear James.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear James.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68652</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68652</guid>
		<description>Tom, you said:
&quot;Out of the current subaru line-up, I won’t be replacing my MY04 liberty with any subaru, despite how much I love them. The new liberty’s have not evolved at all, and the rest of the range is currently bland. At least STi is trying their best with what they are given.&quot;

I own an MY04 Liberty (non-turbo) as well and I hate to say it but I do agree to an extent. I drive an automatic and compared to other autos of this class it is well behind. I am hoping that the MY10 next year (genV) will make up for it and adopt a DSG style gearbox for us auto drivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, you said:<br />
&#8220;Out of the current subaru line-up, I won’t be replacing my MY04 liberty with any subaru, despite how much I love them. The new liberty’s have not evolved at all, and the rest of the range is currently bland. At least STi is trying their best with what they are given.&#8221;</p>
<p>I own an MY04 Liberty (non-turbo) as well and I hate to say it but I do agree to an extent. I drive an automatic and compared to other autos of this class it is well behind. I am hoping that the MY10 next year (genV) will make up for it and adopt a DSG style gearbox for us auto drivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68651</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68651</guid>
		<description>Toyota have become a cardigan brand in Australia.  Camry drivers are now the new Volvo drivers - the worst.

Toyota are great at mass appeal vehicles and corresponding sales but the brand these days is a total snooze-fest.

Aurion = camry
corolla = female&#039;s runabout or company car
camry = A to B boredom in the extreme

Great cars - just bloody boring!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toyota have become a cardigan brand in Australia.  Camry drivers are now the new Volvo drivers &#8211; the worst.</p>
<p>Toyota are great at mass appeal vehicles and corresponding sales but the brand these days is a total snooze-fest.</p>
<p>Aurion = camry<br />
corolla = female&#8217;s runabout or company car<br />
camry = A to B boredom in the extreme</p>
<p>Great cars &#8211; just bloody boring!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68641</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68641</guid>
		<description>I really like what Toyota and Subaru are doing here.  I don&#039;t particularly mind this whole diluting of image- if Subaru sells their coupe for cheaper, and judging what happened with each generation of Impreza, it will definitely be fugly, I&#039;d buy Subaru&#039;s version over Toyota.

Well, price would be number one reason.  Next would be over eager driver nannies, a lack of.

I just want this car asap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like what Toyota and Subaru are doing here.  I don&#8217;t particularly mind this whole diluting of image- if Subaru sells their coupe for cheaper, and judging what happened with each generation of Impreza, it will definitely be fugly, I&#8217;d buy Subaru&#8217;s version over Toyota.</p>
<p>Well, price would be number one reason.  Next would be over eager driver nannies, a lack of.</p>
<p>I just want this car asap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: booter</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68628</link>
		<dc:creator>booter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68628</guid>
		<description>subaru and toyota together.... now i understand what went so wrong with the new WRX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>subaru and toyota together&#8230;. now i understand what went so wrong with the new WRX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XR2_Capri</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68622</link>
		<dc:creator>XR2_Capri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68622</guid>
		<description>toyota = McCar
Bland, not offensive but lots of people buy them because they just do a job or in the Mc theme stomach fillers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>toyota = McCar<br />
Bland, not offensive but lots of people buy them because they just do a job or in the Mc theme stomach fillers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JW</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68587</link>
		<dc:creator>JW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 09:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68587</guid>
		<description>But chances are it&#039;s going to look substantially different. Look at Lexus these days, while still retaining a lot of Toyota mechanicals underneath, the vehicles look substantially different, bar the LX570, which still is a better differentiated model than the last LX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But chances are it&#8217;s going to look substantially different. Look at Lexus these days, while still retaining a lot of Toyota mechanicals underneath, the vehicles look substantially different, bar the LX570, which still is a better differentiated model than the last LX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68576</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68576</guid>
		<description>J, it&#039;s more like AWD-FWR = RWD

So that would mean all the goodness of Subaru&#039;s best performance value for money minus all of Toyota&#039;s blandness and dullness equals a fun car.

Call me optimistic, but I don&#039;t really care what badge it&#039;s gonna be, as long as it&#039;s cheap, light, realiable and RWD.

More HP doesn&#039;t mean faster on a Downhill Race =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J, it&#8217;s more like AWD-FWR = RWD</p>
<p>So that would mean all the goodness of Subaru&#8217;s best performance value for money minus all of Toyota&#8217;s blandness and dullness equals a fun car.</p>
<p>Call me optimistic, but I don&#8217;t really care what badge it&#8217;s gonna be, as long as it&#8217;s cheap, light, realiable and RWD.</p>
<p>More HP doesn&#8217;t mean faster on a Downhill Race =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wheelnut</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68575</link>
		<dc:creator>Wheelnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68575</guid>
		<description>Maybe Subaru should create a completely seperate car company; like Toyota did with Lexus; which will focus on RWD cars and Subaru continues with AWD.

In the same way that Toyota make boring uninspiring run-arounds [Yaris] and Lexus make cars with slightly more passion style etc [IS250]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Subaru should create a completely seperate car company; like Toyota did with Lexus; which will focus on RWD cars and Subaru continues with AWD.</p>
<p>In the same way that Toyota make boring uninspiring run-arounds [Yaris] and Lexus make cars with slightly more passion style etc [IS250]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OSU811</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68573</link>
		<dc:creator>OSU811</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68573</guid>
		<description>I definately think the answer would be for subaru to do a better equipped AWD version and toyota to stick with a more basic rwd only platform.. therefore subaru could stick with it awd only marketing and price it at a higher more premium price than the toyota.. I would pay more for the suby for sure..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definately think the answer would be for subaru to do a better equipped AWD version and toyota to stick with a more basic rwd only platform.. therefore subaru could stick with it awd only marketing and price it at a higher more premium price than the toyota.. I would pay more for the suby for sure..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harry</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68563</link>
		<dc:creator>harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68563</guid>
		<description>I agree with Phil.... Buzz off Toyota.  Unless you encourage Subaru to get back to their basic best.. and build us the semi aggressive, all wheel drive, rough and tumble, notey, rugged, minimilist cars they offered us before the current bland Subie line up, then get away from the drawing board and stick to your refrigerators.
I look forward to the day when I want to buy another Subie again.  Its like I&#039;ve lost an old mate with most of the crap they dish up as Subies at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Phil&#8230;. Buzz off Toyota.  Unless you encourage Subaru to get back to their basic best.. and build us the semi aggressive, all wheel drive, rough and tumble, notey, rugged, minimilist cars they offered us before the current bland Subie line up, then get away from the drawing board and stick to your refrigerators.<br />
I look forward to the day when I want to buy another Subie again.  Its like I&#8217;ve lost an old mate with most of the crap they dish up as Subies at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: o</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-68562</link>
		<dc:creator>o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 06:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/12114/subarus-marketing-dilemma/#comment-68562</guid>
		<description>subys not exactly niche market in australia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>subys not exactly niche market in australia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
