<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FG Falcon FPV official power figures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oracle</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-289301</link>
		<dc:creator>oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-289301</guid>
		<description>Never ceases to amaze me ..holden....ford...blah blah blah blah..a 71 charger mopar worked six can do 12 dead..and super charge or turbo it no rice eater...blue opal.. hsv..garbage will come near it...bring back the glory days...str8 up carb fed suicide machines ..cast iron heads...Keith Black forged stroker pistons...demon carbs....outta my way mamalooks!......MOPAR OR NO CAR!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never ceases to amaze me ..holden&#8230;.ford&#8230;blah blah blah blah..a 71 charger mopar worked six can do 12 dead..and super charge or turbo it no rice eater&#8230;blue opal.. hsv..garbage will come near it&#8230;bring back the glory days&#8230;str8 up carb fed suicide machines ..cast iron heads&#8230;Keith Black forged stroker pistons&#8230;demon carbs&#8230;.outta my way mamalooks!&#8230;&#8230;MOPAR OR NO CAR!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ED302bucket</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-243341</link>
		<dc:creator>ED302bucket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 11:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-243341</guid>
		<description>if 290kw ps = 276Kw din, then 315Kw din = 330Kw ps (5% or so in conversion)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if 290kw ps = 276Kw din, then 315Kw din = 330Kw ps (5% or so in conversion)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A_C</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-215363</link>
		<dc:creator>A_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 02:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-215363</guid>
		<description>In stock trim they do 280 (Regulated) and 6.1 to 100 who\&#039;s dreaming chum?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In stock trim they do 280 (Regulated) and 6.1 to 100 who\&#8217;s dreaming chum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-215352</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-215352</guid>
		<description>Are you saying your Mazda 6 MPS does &quot;0-100 4.2 and have a top speed of 350+&quot; ?

Are you serious?

You are dreaming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying your Mazda 6 MPS does &#8220;0-100 4.2 and have a top speed of 350+&#8221; ?</p>
<p>Are you serious?</p>
<p>You are dreaming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A_C</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-215351</link>
		<dc:creator>A_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 01:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-215351</guid>
		<description>Its nice hearing you experts talk about hasbeen cars.
The reality is an EVO or Mazda MPS 6, now 4 years old are so much better engineered cars it&#039;s not funny. They are also quicker than you realise. The 6 ECU has been deliberately set by Mazda to cut throttle Back to 70%. In spite of this It produces some very respectable results. Ofcourse you can do what I did to mine and have the W.O.T. and the throttle back removed from the ECU and you too can do 0-100 in 4.2 and have a top speed of 350+ in a rice burner that is quieter and smoother and far better outfitted. I know both the EVO and The Subaru also have similar controls. Internal space in the 6 Is just as good as any of your large footprint cars and safety I know I&#039;d rather be in my 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its nice hearing you experts talk about hasbeen cars.<br />
The reality is an EVO or Mazda MPS 6, now 4 years old are so much better engineered cars it&#8217;s not funny. They are also quicker than you realise. The 6 ECU has been deliberately set by Mazda to cut throttle Back to 70%. In spite of this It produces some very respectable results. Ofcourse you can do what I did to mine and have the W.O.T. and the throttle back removed from the ECU and you too can do 0-100 in 4.2 and have a top speed of 350+ in a rice burner that is quieter and smoother and far better outfitted. I know both the EVO and The Subaru also have similar controls. Internal space in the 6 Is just as good as any of your large footprint cars and safety I know I&#8217;d rather be in my 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scrotum</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-81074</link>
		<dc:creator>Scrotum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 03:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-81074</guid>
		<description>And HSVs advanced development strategy to counter FPV is:

&#039;Chuck on some more Cubes&#039;

Looks like they are clutching straws</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And HSVs advanced development strategy to counter FPV is:</p>
<p>&#8216;Chuck on some more Cubes&#8217;</p>
<p>Looks like they are clutching straws</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ford GT</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-73351</link>
		<dc:creator>Ford GT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-73351</guid>
		<description>Drive did it&#039;s first test of the car yesterday. Bit disappointing they only recorded 0 - 100 in 5.3 seconds. Having said it beats the new 6.2 commie which recorded 0 -100 in 5.6 seconds. According to Rod Barret, the manual F6 has the goods to go under the five second barrier. Here&#039;s hoping!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drive did it&#8217;s first test of the car yesterday. Bit disappointing they only recorded 0 &#8211; 100 in 5.3 seconds. Having said it beats the new 6.2 commie which recorded 0 -100 in 5.6 seconds. According to Rod Barret, the manual F6 has the goods to go under the five second barrier. Here&#8217;s hoping!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joobs</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-69801</link>
		<dc:creator>Joobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-69801</guid>
		<description>Resale on ANY new car nowadays for the loss!!!

There is so much competition and cheap alternative (albeit commensurately cheap quality!) now that ANY new car has relatively poor resale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resale on ANY new car nowadays for the loss!!!</p>
<p>There is so much competition and cheap alternative (albeit commensurately cheap quality!) now that ANY new car has relatively poor resale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jAF</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-69794</link>
		<dc:creator>jAF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 02:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-69794</guid>
		<description>Resale Value.... Ford For The Loss</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Resale Value&#8230;. Ford For The Loss</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azza</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-68996</link>
		<dc:creator>Azza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/11926/fg-falcon-fpv-official-power-figures/#comment-68996</guid>
		<description>Why is it that everyone is bagging out the GT in this part of the forum??? As far as I&#039;m aware, a jump from 290 to 302 - 315 all in less then a year is a damn good effort. And on the base of it all... it&#039;s basically 290 - 315, which is still an increase of 25 kilowatts. Maybe it&#039;s just me but, the FG GT is a damn fine looking, extremely powerful car. As for the Typhoon/Tornado, anyone bagging that, leave the forum now! You don&#039;t deserve to call yourself human if you can find a way to bag it. The Typhoon in many ways is a massive history mark in the pages of all vehicles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that everyone is bagging out the GT in this part of the forum??? As far as I&#8217;m aware, a jump from 290 to 302 &#8211; 315 all in less then a year is a damn good effort. And on the base of it all&#8230; it&#8217;s basically 290 &#8211; 315, which is still an increase of 25 kilowatts. Maybe it&#8217;s just me but, the FG GT is a damn fine looking, extremely powerful car. As for the Typhoon/Tornado, anyone bagging that, leave the forum now! You don&#8217;t deserve to call yourself human if you can find a way to bag it. The Typhoon in many ways is a massive history mark in the pages of all vehicles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.027 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 299/300 objects using memcached

Served from: www.caradvice.com.au @ 2012-02-12 02:06:09 -->
