2008 Volvo V70 T6 first steer
31 Mar, 2008
44 Comments 
2008 Volvo V70 T6 First Steer & Review
Model tested: Volvo V70 T6
Recommended Retail Price: $67,950
Options fitted: Radar cruise control ($3,950); Speed sensitive power steering ($750); sunglass holder ($100); Volvo navigation system ($3,950); sunroof ($2,150).
Styling, impressive handling, interior room, safety
Satellite navigation a bit dated and slow
CarAdvice rating: 
- by Paul Maric
Before you reach for your e-mail icon to write me a letter of annoyance over double testing of cars – this is NOT the Volvo XC70. Although it resembles Volvo’s latest iteration of the cross-country soft-roader, the all-new V70 is a different beast altogether.
For starters, the new Volvo V70 only comes in one guise for the Aussie market. The ‘T6’ title refers to the unit under the bonnet. The turbocharged 3.0-litre inline 6-cylinder motor pulsates 210kW and a very brisk 400Nm of torque. Power is delivered via a 6-speed automatic gearbox. All these turbocharger shenanigans return a fuel consumption figure of 11.3-litres/100km – pretty modest when you consider the performance!
If the acceleration doesn’t blow you away, the handling certainly will. Coupled with a Haldex all-wheel-drive system, the V70 has tremendous grip through corners. Sitting on 18” wheels with 245-wide Pirelli Pzero tyres, grip levels are prodigious – making it the best way to drop the kids off to school and make it home before your favourite morning show begins.
The interior is typical Volvo – clean and sleek. The quality of materials used is extremely impressive, as is the fit and finish. The cabin is very quiet at highway speeds, indicating good cabin sealing. Front and rear leg room caters for families, with more than enough space for adults to stretch out.
The advanced key fob allows the drive to obtain information about the car’s status, meaning that you will never have to think back and try to remember if you have locked the car, as the key stores the last state.
Optional radar cruise control allows the driver to maintain a set distance between their vehicle and the car in front. This allows the driver to concentrate on one thing – driving. The system can also pre-emptively brake for the driver if it senses an impact is imminent, this further reduces the braking distance in the event of a collision.
Pages: 1 2
Location: Home / Volvo, First Steer, Behind the Wheel, Car News / ...
Rate Post: 
(11 votes, average: 4.09 out of 5)
Loading ...
-
Print it:
March 31st, 2008 at 3:39 pm
I agree having driven one , awesome wagon very solid and great build quality feels like a bank vault every bit as nice as a 5 series or E class with AWD and $$$ plenty of change. Xc70 will have this turbo 3.0 six next year should be fun in the dirt.
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Awesome set of wheels, Volvos are as realiable as anything and safe as houses…
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 4:24 pm
maybe they should put this engine in the c30
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 4:28 pm
Its too wide for the engine bay … but i know Volvo in Sweeden have a C70 with the Yamaha sourced V8 they use in the S80 AWD and the XC90 sqeezed in and that is the same engine bay as C30 ….mmmmmm C30R V8 AWD that would hammer
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 4:42 pm
Yes, I am biased (I have a new XC70 D5 on order) but isn’t one of these so much better than a 4WD to drop the kids off school mums ?
If I didn’t need the extra ground clearance the XC70 has, I would have bought one of these…
Well equipped for the money too…
Glad to see the tester was impressed, even when he hadn’t discovered the adjustable steering weight control…
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 6:11 pm
The stunning aspect about this V70 is the pricing - both in comparison with the XC70 and more so the S80. The V70 is effectively the wagon version of the S80 sedan - but it signifcantly undercuts the price of the sedan. Comparing with the 3.2 non-turbo S80 AWD, it has much the same features but is a wagon and has a much better engine - and its $7,000 cheaper!!
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 7:23 pm
man i love volvo they are great the. interior in my opinon is better than any bmw or merc and even yes an audi there built like a house and in my opinon look very modern and 90% of the time all i ever see driving volvo are young families not old people
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 7:51 pm
O, you are so right. These guys have surpassed Audi in the interior department!
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 8:04 pm
Try the BMW 5 series touring 535 diesel 0-100 in 6.9. and 6.6 litres/100. OK it more expensive or maybe BMW 520 diesel to 100 in 8.5 and 5.3litres per 100.
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 8:14 pm
i feel that the 5 sereies wagon is odd looing from angles and the interior in black is downright depressing
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 8:15 pm
BMW isn’t even in the same league here in australia. The starting point for the 5 series touring is the 530i at an almost unbelievable $119,500. No wonder they sell X5 at a ratio of 100:1 to the touring. Volvo should be commended for pricing the V70 and XC70 so competitively when compared to their european rivals.
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 8:17 pm
Volvo’s designs are definitely heading in the right direction. The V70 is as good as the E-class or 5 series if not better. If you wanted to purchase the E350 estate, which has similar performance (200kw, 360nm & 11L/100km), you would expect to pay at least $134,000. That’s double the V70, I know what I’d rather get.
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 8:18 pm
The V70 is the wagon variant of the S60 not the S80.
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 8:22 pm
Alex, the new V70 is the variant of the S80, volvo are scrapping the S60
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 8:26 pm
Yeh I know BMW are a bit pricey. commendations to Volvo for keen pricing. Still prefer the D5 though.
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 8:39 pm
Jase, you are correct mate
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 8:41 pm
No one has mentioned the Dynaudio sound system in the V70. I rate it in the world’s top five in-car sound systems, maybe higher!
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 10:24 pm
Is this car front wheel drive or AWD…did I miss this in the text??
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 10:33 pm
Whoops..cancel that, just read it again…
(Report)
April 1st, 2008 at 2:04 am
Anthony,
After trying a favorite CD with both the standard and Dynaudio stereos, I was happy to pay the extra $930. Both were good but the Dynaudio gave me goosebumps ! You can get a Dynaudio upgrade in a Passat too, but even VW charge you $1990…
I made the mistake of paying for a BMW stereo upgrade once (and it was well over $1k), and all I got was a slightly clearer version of a very inferior stereo…
(Report)
April 1st, 2008 at 6:30 am
That’s quite a nice looking car too, would look great in black ;)
(Report)
April 1st, 2008 at 7:12 am
$68k
LOL
Hope they are satisfied selling 10 a year
LOL
Cheers
F-0
NB WHO???? would buy this when a BMW/Benz wagaon is the same coin?
NBB Best Ford piss-off Volvo as they have L/R and Jag. would like to see them married to SAAB
(Report)
April 1st, 2008 at 9:40 am
For $7000 more I’d have the 3.0 V6 Diesel Touareg any day.
And get better fuel economy to boot.
(Report)
April 1st, 2008 at 9:43 am
It is a very smart looking wagon, honestly if you keeping a car for a long time, resale shouldn’t be a big issue. You are also saving $30-$35 compared to the less powerful and older 530i Touring.
(Report)
April 1st, 2008 at 10:13 am
Well frugal one im obviously guessing you drive a falcon or a commodore
1.the v70 has more powere and to get that power in a merc or beemer you ill pay around another 50k
2.the v70 only hope to sell 250 [er year mainly cuase theXC70 is cheaper but this has better equipment.
3.have a look ast the interior in this compared to anything else.
(Report)
April 1st, 2008 at 11:35 am
Reckless One - Talk about getting Off Topic !
I don’t think anyone considering a V70 will be looking at a Touareg too - different markets altogether.
Have a look at some of the equipment you get in a V70 STANDARD vs what are options in a Touareg anyway - on that basis, the VW is way overpriced…
BiXenons - $3000
Electric Tailgate - $1400
Foglights - $500
Dynaudio - $2500
(Report)
April 1st, 2008 at 2:13 pm
Hey Reckless one, You will get a big discount on the Toe-Rag as well they have a paddock full of them …. nobody is buying them
(Report)
April 2nd, 2008 at 8:54 pm
Volvo have been creating very very good cars for quite a while.
if only they learnt to design a front and rear that doesnt,…….. well,……… look like a volvo
i think those of you that are dissing volvo simply cant see past the typical Volvo styling stereotypes
(Report)
April 2nd, 2008 at 11:21 pm
Yep no surprises. I bought a new S40 in late 06 and Volvo are just going and going now. They’re right with Audi, Merc and BMW now. This is an extremely gorgeous car, with a great engine, enjoyable dynamics, and the best interior in the class (Audi included). If you still can’t get your little heads around a great looking, great handling Volvo, then who gives a toss, they’r probably inbred rats anyway…
(Report)
April 3rd, 2008 at 12:00 pm
Well said Luke
(Report)
April 4th, 2008 at 7:21 pm
I am a convert to the new breed of volvo and will likely become a volvo family. I had an old 360 as a student, then went into many euro marques. I have just run in a C30T5 to commute in and love the ergonomics and responsiveness. YOu can not challenge the value gear the T5 provides. I think this V70 will be similarly be the perfect compliment for weekend work and the daily family driving needs. Well done volvo - you are delivering on your marketing promises!
(Report)
April 5th, 2008 at 8:38 am
this volvo is bloody bad value, as it doesnt come with sat-nav etc for 70k! thats ridiculous!
(Report)
April 18th, 2008 at 9:44 am
Better than BMWs wagons No Name…….How is $68,000 exy Frugal? Bloody good value I think,nothing comes close to their interior finishes ,Im seriously considering another one! O you are absolutely correct. Only thing I would consider next time is AWD and manual,Im too hard on autos! I think Volvo are getting over the Ovlo driver stigma Andrew,thats reserved for Prius drivers now!
(Report)
June 7th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
anyone knows why V70 doesn’t offer the D5 diesel engine available for xc70? Thanks!
(Report)
June 9th, 2008 at 10:22 am
Weirlo,
The D5 is available for the V70 in most European markets. It was a decision made by Volvo Australia to only bring in the T6 AWD version of the V70. Because of the different import duties on the XC70 and V70 (the V70 is subject to a 10% import duty while the XC70 with its higher ride height has only 5% as its classified as a 4WD), for the same spec car, the XC70 should always be cheaper. The only way Volvo could bring in the V70 and still make it competitive against its own XC70 was to bring it in in a single highly spec-ed T6 AWD version. If nothing else the fact that the V70 is cheaper than a similarly spec-ed up XC70 shows the amount of markup there are on factory options (and yes Volvo is not alone in this).
(Report)
June 9th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Thanks a lot, TonyB. I compared in detail between V70 and XC70. I am having trouble to decide which one to go now. V70 is a better deal all the way, but XC70 has a diesel option and higher ground clearance. After having three Foresters, maybe I should go back to NOT-SUVs. The claimed soft off road ability is rarely going be used and useful.
(Report)
June 9th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
also considering Passat 4-motion wagon and Audi A6 allroad quattro. But passat comes short on reliability records and A6 quattoro is really poor value with its more than $120,000 on road cost. Hope Volvo Au will bring V70 R here when it’s out!
(Report)
June 10th, 2008 at 6:58 am
Weirluo,
Have you sat down and done the economics on diesel vs. petrol. 12 months ago diesel may have had an edge. Today even against premium unleaded diesel is no longer economic. The one other advantage turbo-diesel offered was the “driveability” factor - the wide flat torque curve gives impressive rolling acceleration. Against non-turbo petrol engines it wins hands down. But the turbo-charged T6 gives the same or better performance so that argument also bites the dust.
I too am in the position of deciding between the D5 XC70 and the great value-for-money V70 T6. My personal opinion of the D5 XC70 was that it simply doesn’t have what it takes to lug around something that weighs 1.9 tonnes. However as I also like the advantage of higher ground clearance even for city driving (speed bumps, low profile roundabouts etc), I’m currently hanging out for the hope Volvo Aust will bring in the XC70 T6 (the T6 XC70 is confirmed for the left-hand drive US and Canadian markets next year).
(Report)
June 10th, 2008 at 10:27 am
Through two and a bit years of Golf ownership, diesel fuel has always had a 15-20% price premium over 91RON petrol, much less over the 95 and 98 brews.
Nothing’s changed. Pick what you want and go for it.
(Report)
June 10th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
TonyB,
I am not very concerned about “petrol vs diesel” arguement. In the end, the cost differences (purchase+running) wouldn’t be a number big enough to change my preference on car selection. A T6 XC70 equiped similarly as V70 would be a no-brainer buy! I don’t understand why T6 XC70 comes out so much later. Do V70 have exactly the same engineering structure as XC70?
Golfschwein, Golf is great car, but it’s a too small car for a famil.
(Report)
June 11th, 2008 at 7:01 am
Weirlo,
I must admit I agree with you on the petrol vs diesel issue - in the end the difference in overall cost of ownership probably isn’t that big compared with the initial cost of the car. On the issue of the T6 engine, its largely a matter of timing. The 3.0 litre T6 engine - which is a development of the 3.2 litre non-turbo engine - is relatively new and I suspect its has been a case of limited supply. You also have to appreciate that in most overseas markets the V70 actually outsells the XC70. Thus the focus has been to get the T6 into the V70 (and the S80 in some O/S markets) with the focus only now switching to the XC70 - largely driven by the poor sales of the 3.2l XC70 in Volvo’s key US market where they don’t have the D5 diesel.
(Report)
June 12th, 2008 at 9:22 pm
well, I have to be honest. Volvo Au website is very poorly maintained, outdated info, always shown as oversea models, lack of information, and the website is down again, for example, try to click on “features and options” for V70. it sounds like Volov staff never open their own website to find out what’s wrong.
This is just a point that can be expanded to the Volvo Au marketing/management team. Judging from their performance, they have done a very poor job. Get rid of them and grab some real marketing talents, the Volvo sale will fly up!
It’s a pity that there are many people loving Volvo cars but being poortly treated.
TonyB, V70 is definitely the one for me to buy if I don’t buy other brands (also considering X5 but feel it’s over priced and there too many X5s on Melbourne Street). even a new T6 XC70 is out next year, it will be much more expensive than V70 if same equipemtns are fitted.
(Report)
June 13th, 2008 at 10:21 am
Weirlo, if I had to make a decision right now, I would also take the V70 T6 over any current XC70. If the XC70 T6 does make it to Aust, all things (ie spec level) being equal the XC70 T6 should be cheaper than the V70 T6 because of the import duty concession the XC70 has over the V70. However it remains to seen whether Volvo Aust will bring in the XC70 T6 and then at what spec level. I agree if you spec up the current XC70 LE to the same spec as the V70 T6 then yes it becomes more expensive - but that only because of the high cost of the factory options.
One word of advice if you go with the V70 (or even XC70) path - make sure you tick the option box for the speed-sensitive power steering. For a vehicle of this weight (and cost) it should be standard.
And yes I also agree on the state of the Volvo Aust website - its not the best maintained.
(Report)
September 2nd, 2008 at 3:48 pm
what’s the verdict- passat r36 vs volvo t6? same money
(Report)