2008 Subaru Impreza WRX review
24 Mar, 2008
82 Comments 
2008 Subaru Impreza WRX Review & Road Test
“Very quick, very comfortable and no doubt, very reliable. The new Impreza WRX is a superbly well sorted urban rocket with styling that won’t attract those unmarked devils”
Model tested: 2008 Subaru Impreza WRX five-door hatch (a four-door sedan version is available in the US and we should get it last quarter 2008)
Fast, but well mannered, a car for 24/7
Styling is still an issue
CarAdvice rating: 
Options: None
By: Anthony Crawford
I’ll be honest, I’ve never really been into the styling of the previous generations of the WRX despite having enormous respect for what Subaru has achieved over the years with this iconic car.
I first drove a WRX back in 1994, the year I put my first television series on cars together. The show was called Behind the Wheel and was hosted by James Morrison (yes the muso and self obsessed rally driver), Dick Johnson and Kevin Bartlett on the Ten Network. It was the first WRX released in Australia and this was the car I wanted to star in the opening sequence.
I only drove the car for ten minutes or so, but that was enough to wonder, how on earth Subaru could build a car with such phenomenal performance and sell it for less than $40,000!
I’m absolutely certain I was smiling like a Cheshire cat when I blasted up Warringah Road in Sydney’s northern Beaches, at a velocity which had me speechless at the time.
If that wasn’t enough, minutes later, the WRX annihilated two chicanes down the road, without a hint of body roll, something quite foreign to all but Ferrari and Porsche steerers at the time.
At that stage, I’m pretty sure I pulled over on the side of the road and began dialing as many mates as possible, to preach to them the new book of revelations. That’s the Subaru WRX edition. I was stunned!
Mind you, I don’t recall a single luxury item in the car but that didn’t matter one iota. I was already working out what the monthly payments would be, and whether the bank would lend me the money.
Location: Home / Subaru, Behind the Wheel / ...
Rate Post: 
(10 votes, average: 4.2 out of 5)
Loading ...
-
Print it:
![Picture1 019 [1024x768].jpg](http://www.caradvice.com.au/wp-content/gallery/lrdefender/Picture1 019 [1024x768].jpg "Picture1 019 [1024x768].jpg")
March 24th, 2008 at 12:32 pm
Ive grown to like the styling of the new WRX.
The front does look its best angle with the scoop, but i dont think the rear will grow on me it just doesnt look right still.
I wonder how this will compare to the Ralli-art Lancer though.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
Great review as usual. Must fully agree with the negative point noted on this car…..not ballsy and aggressive enough! Why have a souped up version with minimal variation over and above your average everyday base model!
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
Good point there,
It is hard to tell the difference between models unless you see the WRX badge or the bonnot scoop.
I guess Subaru wanted it that way with this impreza, a sleeper you could say to a degree.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Great Car. It has grown on me. Originally I hated it, but I really like it now, nice car
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 1:10 pm
I hated the styling when it first appeared, and my opinion has not changed unfortunately. As far as the car itself goes, it does sound like a great piece of engineering. Now if only they had actually spent some time on design. Those tail-lights look like the $40 Altezza wannabe racer lights from your local budget auto store.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
This is quite an acceptable looking car, and there needed to be a change from the hooligan image of the previous one. But please Subaru, leave the four door sedan version in America, it looks like a Daewoo.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
AT last a review which takes into account all the advances
of the new model ie(safety,refinement,driveability)
I actually like the classy new look not so boy racer..
yes the old models were/are fun to drive!! but a bit tiresome every day,, the new one has same overall performance in a much more refined/driveable package,I say
well done subaru to keep the price down too..as for the tail lights DOC, they are actually expensive individual LED’s which are clearer safer brighter and longer lasting!!
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 2:00 pm
Chris what would the cost be then if one of the LED’s blow.
I know that is unlikely but you never know and would they be easy to repalce?
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 2:06 pm
they tell me not much more than a standard bulb,,but are meant to last the life of the car anyway!! thats why traffic lights use them now,,also if you blow one you still have 11more each side unlike std buld where you have one each side..
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 4:00 pm
Have to agree with the review, a fantastic car and goes like a cut snake. I hated the shape first time I saw it but the more I see it in the flesh the better it looks. The integrated “bird catcher” on the bonnet looks so much better than the tacked on “letterbox” of previous models. In fact I went and bought one last month, in REX blue of course and have just clocked up 4000 kays. It is so good I am out driving it all the time.
As for Naughtyius Maximus and Atomic SSV complaining about the lack of difference between the other models the WRX has more difference than many other cars. What about the Golf GTI? Generally a sporty version will have a full body kit, bigger wheels and badge. With the WRX you also get the bonnet scoop (not with GTI) and can also have unique colour of WRC Blue (no unique colour with GTI). And lets face it the badge is usually enough as most will only be seeing the back end of the car as it blasts off into the difference anyway.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 4:04 pm
Further to my previous comment the Golf GTI does not really even have a body kit either, just a different grill treatment on the front. The Focus XR5 has body kit, wheels, badge and unique colour, no scoop. The Mazda 3 MPS has body kit, wheels, badge, no unique colour, no scoop.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 4:05 pm
hmm my spam was suburu
anyway maybe suby should offer a different rear light option like the differece between ss and ss-v lights even clour the plastic red would make the difference
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 4:10 pm
lol spam WRXSTI\anyway if i did buy one if definatley opt for the sat nav just so i didnt have to look at that raidio the golf interior only looks good in top spec and is aging
also ccan anyone tell me y oz corrlolas have that ugly radio faceplate thing while the new zealand and europe have beutiful integrated readio sections?
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 5:48 pm
If you want to have a look & get more information about the new 2008 WRX go to www.subaru.com & follow the links. It is a left hand drive model but will at least give you some idea what they look like inside & out !
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:13 pm
Rather have a VW Golf GTi over the Subby WRX.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:20 pm
Oh yeah! Then Duck, you won’t get AWD or those lovely Xenon beams or an iPod socket or even LED taillights. I like the Golf GTI a lot, but its getting dated now.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:22 pm
Anthony, Im just saying id prefer the german golf over the Subby because VW’s are a very reliable car. (not saying subbys arent reliable).
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:23 pm
Are those bucket seats standard? I dont think they are because they wont be in the STi.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:26 pm
I dont know, but the styling isnt ugly but its not as tough looking as the last version.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:27 pm
Is that fist pic on the 5th page from the Subby Tribeca or Liberty Interior?
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:28 pm
Duck, seats are stock standard mate. Extremely comfortable and supportive if you’re not carrying much excess.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:29 pm
Liberty
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:31 pm
VW’s still aren’t as reliable as Subaru’s. They actually aren’t that reliable at all. And they drink oil like you would not beleive. Dash fitment isn’t so good on some models either. The Subaru is much better. I’m on my fourth, and nothing has ever gone wrong with them, except flat battery and new tyres. That is it. I have had friends that owned both a golf and a Subaru. Their subaru was 8 years old, and the Golf was 2 and a half. It had spent more time in the workshop then the subaru over that 8 years that they had owned. When the golf was three they traded for a subaru, and they love it.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:38 pm
Anthony, Not disagreeing with you but the Subaru STi doesnt come standard with Recaro seats. Comes standard with Wing seats with leather and alcantara. The Up-Spec gets bespoke Recaros with huge wings like in the VW Golf R32.
Source: MOTOR Magazine (Febuary 08)
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:41 pm
Pretty big boot for a hatch. Good sized one!
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:42 pm
So could it be that the car is slightly getting slower every new gen?
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:44 pm
Aw, are you AW? Or are u two completely different people?
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:45 pm
Yes Duck we are. Sorry, forgot Caps Lock
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 6:54 pm
Duck, Recaros are standard on the Spec R STi. The standard seats on the stock STi look damn nice though.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 7:39 pm
She wouldnt win a beauty contest but its whats on the inside that counts. At least thats what my mother always taught me!
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 8:00 pm
For the money, you would take this over the Golf GTI though.
You get plenty of gear and as Anthony said AWD which makes this car even better again to drive.
Plenty of grip to in the dry and wet.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 8:05 pm
It’s a fantastic drive, but the grandpa Mazda-3 styling lets it down in a big way. That’s not to say the previous models would win any fashion shows, but they’ve really dropped the ball on that rear end. I hope we eventually get a sedan once again.
(Report)
March 24th, 2008 at 11:16 pm
Took one for a spin. Streets ahead of the previous models in day to day livability. Would trade my Honda Euro, BUT no auto option and black old world interior finish will stop the broad market appeal Subaru is looking for it
(Report)
March 25th, 2008 at 5:49 am
Nice driveline let down by a camry-esque exterior and a kia-esque interior. This comes from a 2x previous owner of a rexy. (01 and 04)
(Report)
March 25th, 2008 at 11:52 am
I found the interior disappointing on close inspection, too.
(Report)
March 25th, 2008 at 12:33 pm
Max speed: 209km/h
^ That cannot be right
(Report)
March 25th, 2008 at 2:34 pm
That is interesting Adam.
Most cars are limited to about 240-250.
Would that be speed limmited though?
(Report)
March 25th, 2008 at 2:44 pm
Golfschwein: What was so wrong with the interior?
(Report)
March 25th, 2008 at 3:34 pm
Just a personal thing. I don’t like the droopy, swoopy look of the dash and the plastics quality isn’t as good as Golf’s. Don’t get upset, now! It’s only my opinion.
(Report)
March 25th, 2008 at 5:00 pm
Golfschwein, I’m not getting upset. It was just a question. It is your opinion and I respect it. Unlike some others on this whole website
(Report)
March 25th, 2008 at 5:27 pm
I like the Impreza’s interior… Id take one of a Golf any day; better looking interior as far as Im concerned, AWD and something VWs dont have in any shape or form, reliability.
(Report)
March 25th, 2008 at 6:28 pm
It must annoy you terribly to learn, TP, that my Golf is my favourite car ever, and I’ve had sixteen! Completely reliable and just back from its 45,000 km service that required no remedial work, it’s at exactly the same kilometreage where my old Camry’s head gasket and 3rd gear synchro went to Unrelaible Car Heaven.
Sad. Happy Motiring!
(Report)
March 25th, 2008 at 6:30 pm
That’s ok, AW. I wasn’t having a go.
My above response to TP is having a go!
(Report)
March 25th, 2008 at 7:47 pm
The other thing with the Golf GTI is the price. Yeah the base price may be competitive with the WRX but their options list is longer than both arms. And once you start choosing from it the price heads off into the distance faster than the car. When you see reviews and videos and pictures of the GTI you never ever see a base model, always one loaded up with options to make it look better. Even the WRX is always shown with the SatNav option which is 4 or 5k.
So when you look at a review of the GTI you need to look at the base car and see just what you are getting for your money - not very much at all. No unique colour, no body kit to speak of, no AWD, and no bi-xenon headlights.
Of course SteveR32 and Golfschwein have provided us with totally predictable comments - kia-esque and camry-esque and droopy swoopy of all things. One even admits to going from the granny camry to the granny golf
(Report)
March 25th, 2008 at 8:10 pm
Tuff Guy, why can’t you be nice? In an earlier post, I genuinely wished you happy WRXing, and I know you didn’t see it.
Anyway, the Camry was company car issue. I’ll happily admit to being biased and enthusiastic about the Golf, but not blind. I know WRXs are good and I even bat for their exterior shape, something that not a lot of people do.
The Golf GTI was available in 2 unique colours until recently, when the dark metallic blue was made available across the range. Of body kits, who needs them? I’m not saying their right or wrong, but the GTI has always done without.
The hallowed Mk1 GTI (never sold here) even shared steel wheels with the rest of the range and relied upon the red-framed grille for external differentiation. So, it’s understated and probably still is to some.
I agree with options prices.
(Report)
March 26th, 2008 at 8:09 am
In relation to my previous comment about VW’s reliability. I have done some research, since I posted that comment, and things at VW have really changed. They are improving and in fact, I would buy one. My previous comment was based on 1 example, but I have done some reading, and found out more about them.
Golfschwein: What Golf are you driving?
(Report)
March 26th, 2008 at 8:12 am
Golfschwein: I can understand why you are having a go at TP. What the hell does TP know about Cars. That a corolla has 100kw. Wow. Tp, as I said on the VF comments, go away. Go to the Toyota Forums and let us get on with life
(Report)
March 26th, 2008 at 9:39 am
Hi AW. It’s a 1.9Tdi with a mind-numbing 77kw and manual box. It’s torquey, so is actually a lot of fun to drive.
(Report)
March 26th, 2008 at 10:50 am
Hi Golfschwein. Sounds good. Another friend has a 2.0TDI DSG, nice car. But she drives like a granny so it is slow with her, but her husband gets it up and rolling quickly. That is the advantage with Manual. Even with a small engine, it is better to drive than a Slushbox
(Report)
March 26th, 2008 at 12:37 pm
Tuffguy, you mention that my camry-esque comment was predictable…..how so? My previous 2 cars before this R32 was an 01 WRX and an 04 WRX.
When I bag the current WRX for its woeful exterior and interior design I am giving my 2 cents. The fact I have an R32 should’nt mean one iota. They are in completely different segments.
As far as what I don’t like about the new interior? Besides the overall toyota-ish design, it’s the use of hideous and cheap shiny plastics mainly, closely followed by the use of framed doors. I used to love my subies for having the frameless doors. They were unique. Subie has lost it IMO.
(Report)
March 26th, 2008 at 6:28 pm
I agree with Steve R32. The new WRX is a sub standard performing horror. I had a press car for some testing at Oran park a few months back, and was not impressed. High speed directional stability is scary, it is under braked, under-tyred, under-damped, and the interior and exterior are woeful. Someone also forgot to tell subaru that it is 2008, and a 5 speed box does not cut it anymore. The best figures we got for this car on a cool morning, torturing the clutch, with just driver on board and a quarter tank of Ultimate was 6.3 seconds to 100km/h and the standing quarter in 14.79. This is using digital measuring equipment that the ACP mags use. I own an MPS3, and my current daily driver is an Audi S3 (company car), and the WRX is not in the ball park of either car as a package. My brother owns a Golf GTI, and this is also far superior to the WRX in my opinion. People can harp on about AWD for as long as they like. Truth of the matter is, unless AWD has active diffs, and torque distribution left to right, it is just extra ballst.
(Report)
March 26th, 2008 at 6:41 pm
daewoo lanos crossed with a kia rio….
this is NOT a wrx.
its so korean looking its scary!!
(Report)
March 26th, 2008 at 6:44 pm
oh
body kits = for ricers ( and vr / vs commodore driver… oh same thing lol )
if a car was designed right in the first place, it wouldnt need a body kit.
(Report)
March 26th, 2008 at 11:23 pm
Previous new WRX models were all mercilessly bagged by so-called hardcore purists (I refer to bugeye and pig nose) and the latest model is no different. However I don’t believe the latest model deserves anywhere near the bagging it has been getting. This new model is an evolution of technology and style and a much better car for it. In fact the hatchback style was encouraged by the WRC drivers as it is a better shape for rallying. Now the sedan version - that IS one ugly car and does look like a Kia/Daewoo. Some should try reading the above very comprehensive review. Nick says it is under-braked and under-tyred - try reading what the reviewer says. It stops way faster and better than previous models and Audi also do not just go for the widest tyres. More brake pistons and bigger tyres are not everything. Nick also compares it to his S3 - well all I can say there is with 19Kw and an extra 20k in cost it would surely want to be better everywhere. Not really a good comparison - it should be compared with the STI which flogs both the S3/R32 on the road. The interior of the MPS3 is made of similar plastics and the noise, oh the damn road noise I just cannot live with it. As for interior plastics well I don’t sit there banging my head on the dashboard so who cares whether or not it is soft or hard, and styling is an individual issue anyway. Besides I bought my car for the car not the dashboard.
(Report)
March 26th, 2008 at 11:50 pm
Whilst previous models of the WRX have always been great cars they have acquired what some may regard as an unsavoury reputation. Besides being the car of choice for thieves and ram raiders a good many were to be seen in the hands of those reverse baseball capped, drug dealing, doof doof playing moronic wnkas. With this new model Subaru are expanding their market appeal to include much more sophisticated drivers and I believe they have succeeded.
Most cars are a package for a price. If one compares a WRX with a GTI, they are around the same price and each has its differences. GTI might have better interior plastics but does not have bi-xenon headlights. WRX has AWD and GTI wider tyres, etc etc. I happen to like the WRX package and Golfschwein and R32 like their GTI/R32 packages. I still do not know what camry-esque, toyota-ish, kia-esque and droopy-swoopy mean but they are not really descriptive of anything at all. Just a predictable style of bagging. Nor do I see any advantage or benefit to frameless doors. Golfschwein I still have not found the comment you speak of.
Again car packaging is like buying a computer - it is all about compromise. I would prefer to have a car with AWD and bi-xenon lights rather than a nice soft dashboard. I drive the car and go home to caress the wife because she is nice and soft, unlike my dashboard
(Report)
March 27th, 2008 at 8:12 am
Tuffguy,
Mate - its still a good car and congrats on your purchase. I would still consider it over a multitude of other cars out there. All I am trying to say is that it *should* have been better. Imagine Subaru had have given the Lexus guys the go ahead for the design…..now that would have been a good car. A car that makes you say “it looks better in the flesh” just doesn’t cut it for mine. I know that you can do this and that to the grille etc. But you shouldn’t have to. Thats my 2c.
(Report)
March 27th, 2008 at 9:01 am
Tuff guy, the reviewer tested the car on the road at 6/10ths. This is hardly going to tell you the full story of your ‘performance car’. Comparing the S3 to the WRX, Is like comparing Jen Hawkins to Casey Donovan. It’s hardly fair, i agree. The MPS 3 however stops better, goes better, especially rolling, has a far superior suspension tune, has a better wheel and tyre package Bridgestone RE050A 215/45/18 V Povo Spec Yokohama 205/50/17 (same size as SP23), has a 6 speed gearbox, has a much nicer, and better quality interior, and looks much better. Having owned 2 WRXs in the past (MY97 & MY99), i am a big fan. I just hate when manufacturers turn rally legends into cardigan wearing Korean clones.
(Report)
March 27th, 2008 at 9:24 am
Haha, antispam = subaru.
Anyway, for that kind of price and performance, something has got to give. In the Subaru case, it’s the interior. For the VW Golf, it’s the AWD system. There are many more give and take from both cars but the dashboard and AWD system are the main thing I can see.
One thing that annoys me about the 2008 Subaru is the engine. Don’t get me wrong, I love the 2.5ltr boxer that Australia gets, but as I see in the shots it only revs up to 6500rpm redline!!
Now, I know it has lots of middle range torque, but I also want high end torque. The japanese version of the 2.0ltr revs up to 8000rpm and has more power!!
I can’t belive it, 2.0ltr has more power than 2.5ltr on the same model!!!
That’s probably why the top speed is 209km/h.
(Report)
March 27th, 2008 at 9:32 am
Also, I wouldn’t mind seeing a 2008 STI model with 3 doors hatch.
Come on Subaru…don’t disapoint the purist any further!!
(Report)
March 27th, 2008 at 7:48 pm
R32 I can well understand the relevance when you say Subaru could have done better in some areas. And they can and have done better than the WRX - it is called the WRX STI and for an extra 25k you do get a better car. However you could say that about every car on the road. Hey with unlimited funds even Kia could build a Bugatti Veyron - but their mantra is cheap cars and that is what they do, build to a price. And that IS the bottom line - cars are built to a price and that price includes compromise. Sure the S3 is a better car but is it really worth the extra 20-25K??? And that is where personal choice comes into it. I love the WRX for what it gives me at its price (and its new look). I just do not like the Golf or what you get in the package. And that is my 2c worth.
(Report)
March 27th, 2008 at 8:16 pm
As for Nick I am a previous owner of a Mazda 3 and two things absolutely astound me about the entire range. Firstly that a 2008 model car is so disgustingly noisy. Secondly that so many still go out and buy them. Yes it is a great car but the noise, OMG the noise. Except for me. And I will have you know the plastics in the 3 are not superior to the WRX - they are just as hard all over , yet you do seem to have this ‘thing’ about the hard plastics in the WRX. I am not sure I really want to know what you do to your dashboard that you need it to be soft. But then you own a Mazda 3 so you have a hard plastic dash anyhoo
I considered the MPS3 but I just cannot get past the noise. The other things you still cannot get over is the bigger tyres and more brake pistons and the extra gear thing. For me 6 gears is just too many changes and I do prefer having only 5. Yes the MPS3 is faster and so it should be with significantly more ‘killer wasps’ under the bonnet. But the MPS just looks like a plain old ordinary 3 hatch unless you know what to look for, and what to hear for (OMG the noise). Probably why we see so many grannies driving them - they can turn off the hearing aids and the car is fantastic.
You say you owned 2 WRXs - lickety split and zippety doo da day. Both are so massively inferior in every possible way to the new model as to make them totally irrelevant. You are still massively hung up on the whole hatchback thing. Perhaps you can explain just which Korean hatch it resembles because I am unable to find ANY other hatch it resembles. Maybe you need to flick your baseball cap around the right way and turn up the hearing aid. Meanwhile I will go again and caress the wife cause she is nice and soft and that is what matters
(Report)
March 27th, 2008 at 9:15 pm
Golf (any spec) is for your cutesy wife. Driven the R32 and was uninspired. Would not expect any better from the GTi. Many comments regarding the STi here which are probably out of place as it is quite a different beast (least in performance and exterior) to the standard Rex.
Between a Rex and GTi would choose the Rex any day. You simply cannot and will not escape the fundamental handling problems (esp in the wet) of a FWD vehicle - particularly when you bolt on a turbo charger - and for this reason the Rex is my choice.
Twist it, spin it, yank it any way you want to, when it really counts in a tight and curly situation, you can trust an AWD system to pull you thru - with a FWD you can only hope the car magically finds its way.
(Report)
March 28th, 2008 at 2:08 pm
Mr TuffGuy, you are just trying to justify your bad investment. With a name like TuffGuy, i can see why you’d go for a new WRX. Ask anybody in the know, and they will tell you straight that WRX cars of the past are the real deal, and you Korean shopping trolley does not stack up. I’ll keep my hat on backwards and use every one of the 380Nm available to me. I’ll enjoy the car the same way as i used to enjoy my older WRXs. You can wear your bowls hat to cover your bald patch, whilst living in the shadow of WRX’s in the past…. And my MPS3
(Report)
March 28th, 2008 at 9:15 pm
Nick. No offence mate, but an MPS3 is unlikely to be seeing anything except the arse end of a WRX. Esp. up a slight incline with just a touch of damp on the ground. The day a WRX loses out to an MPS3, I will eat my Akubra.
(Report)
March 28th, 2008 at 9:27 pm
I’ve driven the MPS3 and while it goes like stink - it can be difficult to get the power down. The problem is, the car didn’t feel confident going into bends at high speed. The Suby on the other hand, inspires utmost confidence, even on poorly surfaced roads at speed.
(Report)
March 28th, 2008 at 11:12 pm
Firstly TuffGuy is my gaming name and shows a lot more imagination than ‘Nick’. Buying a MY08 WRX also shows a lot more imagination than buying a noisy front wheel drive granny Mazda 3 (with a turbo). Yes look around on the streets and all the girls drive Mazda 3s. You continue not to hear what anybody else says probably due to the bloody noise in your Mazda 3. I do not have to justify my purchase of a WRX and nor do record numbers of other people also buying them. Does the 3 have a 5 star Euro NCAP or ANCAP crash rating? No. Does the 3 have a 4 star Euro NCAP or ANCAP pedestrian rating? No. You to date are unable to back up your claim of ‘Korean shopping trolley’ by naming any Korean car that remotely resembles the new Impreza. Probably because it resembles nothing else on the road. You have just plagiarised that quote from someone else, again showing your lack of imagination. Bottom line is you got nothing which makes you a NUFFY.
So now the nuffy will be in a huffy when sitting in his stuffy 3 watching the arse end of any WRX disappearing off into the distance on that wet and winding road ROFLMAO. Note I said you will see it because you certainly won’t hear it.
(Report)
March 28th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
Once Mr imaginative Nick has answered my previous comment perhaps he can tell us more about how he drives cars round Oran Park with testing equipment just like the real magazines use. And remember he knows what he is talking about because his company car is an S3 and his own car is a MPS3 so that makes him an expert test driver too. The great thing about the internet is the ease of making up stuff - anyone can read a Wheels or Motor magazine or whatever and start throwing quotes around. You should give the forums a miss and join a chat room ROFLMAO. P.S. Don’t forget your hearing aid.
(Report)
March 29th, 2008 at 4:29 pm
I can’t believe that anyone who would be in a position to have an S3 as a company car instead of a Falcon or Commondore would not possibly buy a Mazda 3 hatch. I mean why would you bother?
(Report)
March 30th, 2008 at 3:04 pm
And the debate contiunes…I owned and loved a MY98 WRX. It was and probably is the car that I loved driving more than anything, and I have owned 13 cars. I was waiting in anticipation for the new WRX to buy, but once revealed I was gobsmacked, in the bad way. I test drove the WRX and was left underwhelmed, the old turbo rush is gone and the plastics are the cheapest I have seen…the back door is like a Melbourne taxi! I then drove the GTI and it was in a different league in the way it felt. Sure AWD is a huge bonus but the GTI package, performance and the Euro feel won me so I bought it. With leather on road for $42k Looking forward to checking out the Lancer Ralliart though…
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 9:48 pm
Keep your WRX’s in the garage until it rains you little girls. It’s fricken Australia, not London. The sun is out much more often than not. Does this make the WRX inferior evertime it does not rain??? Why doesn’t caradvice settle this argument once and for all. Eastern Creek or Oran Park. Im willing to allow Caradvice to use my MPS 3 for a 5 lap shootout. Is Tuffgirl, or any MY08 WRX owners up to the challenge, or does caradvice still have access to the car? If the MPS 3 wins, maybe tuffgirl can donate his rectum on Oxford street, and if not…. thats not possible
(Report)
March 31st, 2008 at 10:31 pm
My money would be on your MPS3 Nick.
(Report)
April 1st, 2008 at 9:25 pm
Gee it only took nuffy Nick 3 days to come up with that load of dribble. Still has not backed up any claims. So what are we this week? Still an expert test driver? Still using test equipment at Oran Park like the real magazines do? I am sure you are a 6 foot musclebound hunk too right? Ooh yeah fully sick mate. You forgot to mention the large chested blondes sitting beside you when you are track testing your cars. So were you wearing a hot pink mini skirt too when driving your Mazda 3?
A complete package is good both in the wet and the dry which the girls car is not.
Ho ho ho the one about donating my rectum on Oxford St is so funny ho ho ho NOT. To us normal people it makes no sense at all. However you seem to know a lot about rectums on Oxford St…….. I have heard the Mazda 3 is the car of choice down there. I bet you don’t even hear them coming without your hearing aid.
I know what you really do - you are a mechanic. Plain logic really given you are such a massive tool.
(Report)
April 5th, 2008 at 7:41 am
Sounds like Caradvice is getting paid to say nice things about Subaru.
MPS3 is faster than the WRX. Do a search on Youtube. The 08 understeers terribly and any advantage of AWD is gone due to the soft suspension. You are paying for a car with bodyroll, that has worse handling than most of the cars in its price range, that has worse fuel economy due to AWD.
But damn, I can’t argue about how well it’s selling. Because I see them everywhere.
(Report)
April 5th, 2008 at 7:53 am
The day we accept cash for comment is the day we close up shop. Never happen. I personally don’t mind the MPS3 as you get typically high rent interior and yes it does go hard. My only concern is that it maybe a handful for the average punter due to severe torque steer if you hammer it off the line. I also think that the handling dynamics are not as good as the new REX.
You would have to go with the Subaru badge thought, for resale and reliability alone.
(Report)
April 5th, 2008 at 8:36 am
Lol Id have a WRX over an MPS3… at least it doesnt literally torque steer you off the road.
(Report)
April 8th, 2008 at 10:05 am
I have a MY08WRX and live on the north coast of NSW where its rains alot, the roads are twisty, shity, potholed, narrow and off camber etc. This car is so smooth and quick on these roads its awesome, dodging potholes and animals is a joy. I doubt there are many cars out there that could thread these roads as well as the 08rex. On highway straights and clean sweeping bends it blends in with the other sub $50k sports cars, and does produce some body roll. It could also do with another gear on highway speeds. And not to forget the crap plastic interior?? But overall this car hauls, handles and stops like a bitch too, its a pleasure to drive. With a few suspension changes to sort the minor body roll and some exhaust/intake work {so i can hear the motor} this car will only be better.
(Report)
April 11th, 2008 at 12:11 pm
I’m looking at trading my Rx-8 in to a Rex in a couple of months. I just hope they have their engine problems sorted out by then.. If none of you have hurd have a look at the Website I have entered.. I really hope they have it sorted. Cause I was planing to get one at the end of june. Oh as as for the couple fighting about the WRX and MPS3 Both are good cars that have good and bad pointers. The MPS3 is noisy (Wouldn’t be as bad if the noise sounded good not Tinny like it is) The WRX is just a little too quiet. Be good if you could hear at least a little of that Boxer sound. As for the new styling I like it. I’m 27yo not some 16yo riding a mongoose saying its lost its street cred.. It was a smart choise by Subie to restyle it to suit a wider customer base. That probaby contributed to the drop in price cause of the estermated sales incress. which makes me very happy. I’ve got a mazda crazy mate who eats/sleeps mazda. I don’t know how people get hooked on one type of car and thats it (I’d get a Honda Vtec over a MPS) Ok the interior of the MPS is nicer than the WRX big deal the Rex is more enjoyable to drive. If I just wanted a car cause of just the styling I would keep my Rx-8. They look awesome. Just wish the had double the torque and used less fuel than a 1957 Charger.
(Report)
May 12th, 2008 at 11:53 am
Interesting read. I’m just writing up my thoughts for Trollhattan Saab on the 08rex I’ve had for the last two months. I drove a 2001 model for comparison and found it to be a lot more fun, though this one is more refined. It seems the Rex has grown up. Pity.
And how does James Morrison take to being called “self obsessed”
(Report)
June 11th, 2008 at 4:03 am
Do you think xenon-headlights are the next step to increase safety?
(Report)
July 2nd, 2008 at 1:31 am
I’m looking at spending 40K-45K in the next month, comparing the WRX to other cars like Golf GTI, Mini CooperS. Anyone got any news on when the Mitsu Ralliart Lancer is coming out? the MY08 WRX are on 39,900 driveaway deals at the moment… seems pretty good deal… but I’m really hanging out for the dual clutch ralliart, esp if it’s gonna be priced similar…
(Report)
July 4th, 2008 at 1:28 am
anyone know about the changes to MY09 rex?
(Report)
September 17th, 2008 at 12:37 pm
As more a generally shy substance over style man (but who also loves to drive) myself this car seems very good. Not only do I prefer the slightly more discreteness over a STi version but it also makes for a slightly more diverse car that will not scrape or get needless damage underneath for when I decide to bush bash a bit, and with all that flexibility and 4WD why would you not want to go where these beasts were born? Of course you get the practicality of the hatch too (or sedan now) and modern-day smoothness that would be present in many new cars, really a great drivers car I would imagine but at the same time a pretty darn decent long-distance cruiser.
(Report)