Comments on: Couple sets fuel economy standard in Jeep SUVs

By: Can-Ad

Can-Ad — Sat, 19 Mar 2011 20:07:38 +0000

CAN – AD is:
• A non-chemical fuel conditioner.
• EPA tested, registered.
• 100% vegetable-based.
• 100% organic.
• 100% bio-degradable and completely non-toxic.
• Derived from 100% renewable and sustainable sources.
• Manufactured in a pharmaceutical quality facility in Canada ensuring true consistency.
• A cleansing agent whose chemical structure is similar to an ordinary detergent. However; CAN -AD does not contain any chemical additives or petroleum additives.
• Completely safe for ALL engines or other parts of the equipment both in the short and long term. • Completely safe for people. In fact, CAN- AD is so safe it can be shipped by air.
• Completely dissolves in the fuel tank leaving no residuals. • Contains bound oxygen. Thanks to continuously cleaned injectors/nozzles and the supplied oxygen, a more complete combustion is achieved. This means that more power is extracted during combustion and that fewer carbon particles pass through. • This, in turn, means lower fuel consumption and fewer exhaust emissions.
• CAN – AD cleans so efficiently that soot is released in the combustion chamber, as are bacterial-type contaminants in both the tank and fuel lines.
• CAN – AD is easy to use. There are no special handling or storage worries. Simply add to your fuel tank when adding fuel. • CAN – AD has a shelf life of 2 years

By: Andrew M

Andrew M — Thu, 06 Mar 2008 07:12:01 +0000

australia wont have green electricity anytime soon. you cant tell me the government or the multi billion dolar mining companies would continually open up new coal mines as they are to this day if it was about to put the brakes on the operations.
why not try and offset some of your emissions? wouldnt that be a more achievable target than aiming for zero emissions?

its all a big joke any way if you ask me.
im still yet to see some proof that shows the earth is actually warming.
also increased co2 in the atmosphere can be good for the environment from what ive read

so why does the government want to tell us the sky is falling in?
so they can scare the hell out of us into paying silly “enviro taxes” and the rest of the associated control measures they want to implement.

it is exactlly what they did with the drought in implementing more control over us by using scare tatics to get us to follow the tune

By: Alec

Alec — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:22:06 +0000

I want a cleaner, greener future, but to get hydrogen you need water…. and aren’t we in a drought???
Doesn’t seem like the way forward to me at the moment.
I have met people who have cars running on water, however the amount of energy required to convert water to hydrogen, plus the chemicals(acids) required to be added to the water to conduct a sufficient electrical current to complete the conversion are quite unrealistic at the moment..

By: Carl

Carl — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:12:30 +0000

Nn, From what i’ve seen you write on this wed site in the past i knew you would agree…. OK good night it’s 3am in Sydney and i got to go.. Cheers mate!!!

By: No Name

No Name — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:06:33 +0000

Oh my god Carl, we got a bit heavy there but I entirely agree with you.

By: Carl

Carl — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:48:11 +0000

One final comment and i got to go to bed, In 50 years most of us who are alive now will be dead and in 100 years all of us will be dead and that’s around the time that SH*T will start hitting the fan as far as climate change is concerned so why bother?????

Well we should bother because we are decent people and we have to try and leave this fish bowl as clean as possible for our decendants even the ones that will be born after we die deserve our respect!!!

By: Carl

Carl — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:31:09 +0000

Kevin Rudd has already signed Kyoto!! it was one of the first things on his “things to do list”…. Don’t get me wrong i’m not knocking coal miners they do a hard days work and they get payed well too but we now know that burning coal is a poison for our atmosphere so we should have the guts to fase out those jobs or our grand kids will pay the price for our greed!!

By: No Name

No Name — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:20:15 +0000

Not signing the Kyoto treaty was apoor move, my limited knowledge is that its purely on the ground of economics, its easier and cheaper and better for the economy to bury ones head and dig out the lovely brown coal. Mind you we do still have a few small coal mines and we import millions of tonnes of coal from Europe. mayby blighty isn’t so good after-all.

By: Carl

Carl — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:27:19 +0000

^^^^^^sorry No Name meant Nn ^^^^^^^^^

By: Carl

Carl — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 14:25:56 +0000

Yes NM i’m ashamed to say that our coal and uranium miners are a too powerfull lobby group and our spineless politicians won’t take them on or rock the boat… too many potential votes to lose!! But i must say that we are embarrassingly slow to produce zero emissions electricity in this great but (not perfect) country.

Also geothermal or (hot rocks) is an option that we are dragging our feet on!!!