<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Melbourne Motor Show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghost</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-59400</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-59400</guid>
		<description>so dissapointed 2008 motoshow
Benz was not there...maybe they chose the right way not to join this year!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so dissapointed 2008 motoshow<br />
Benz was not there&#8230;maybe they chose the right way not to join this year!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58613</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58613</guid>
		<description>its just like how when alfa romeo needed to replace their simply brilliant 3.2ltr V6 due to tigher emmissions laws which they simply could not meet so rather then going through the expensive excercise of designing an all new engine they simply took the 3.2ltr version of the alloytec and reworked it&#039;s heads so that it still made that awesome alfa romeo V6 engine note. It&#039;s way more cost effective to do that then do all the work yourselfs, why develop your own bottom end when GM has done a perfectly good job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its just like how when alfa romeo needed to replace their simply brilliant 3.2ltr V6 due to tigher emmissions laws which they simply could not meet so rather then going through the expensive excercise of designing an all new engine they simply took the 3.2ltr version of the alloytec and reworked it&#8217;s heads so that it still made that awesome alfa romeo V6 engine note. It&#8217;s way more cost effective to do that then do all the work yourselfs, why develop your own bottom end when GM has done a perfectly good job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bavarian Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58587</link>
		<dc:creator>Bavarian Missile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58587</guid>
		<description>Arrrrrr,realy.OK

But yep I agree with keeping the engine,bit of a waste other wise.

I don&#039;t think they will ever discount not using another supplier.......times are changing that way with manufacturing costs it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arrrrrr,realy.OK</p>
<p>But yep I agree with keeping the engine,bit of a waste other wise.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think they will ever discount not using another supplier&#8230;&#8230;.times are changing that way with manufacturing costs it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58583</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58583</guid>
		<description>yeah thats for their DIESEL engine, they still have the 1.6ltr PETROL engine as fitted to the mini.

And anyway even though now the joint venture is over, they are still obviously going to keep using the engine they have already designed, no point discontinuing a perfectly good engine. All this means is that they will not make any more joint venture engines in the future</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah thats for their DIESEL engine, they still have the 1.6ltr PETROL engine as fitted to the mini.</p>
<p>And anyway even though now the joint venture is over, they are still obviously going to keep using the engine they have already designed, no point discontinuing a perfectly good engine. All this means is that they will not make any more joint venture engines in the future</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bavarian Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58521</link>
		<dc:creator>Bavarian Missile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58521</guid>
		<description>MMM,thats weird then.Auto Blog reported they had.Take a squizz ............who knows?

&quot;BMW has said &quot;non, merci&quot; to continuing its diesel engine partnership with PSA Peugeot Citroen. The two automakers began working together two years ago to create 1.4- and 1.6-liter gasoline engines for BMW&#039;s MINI and PSA cars. Despite both companies at the end of last year looking at expanding their joint research into a high-tech engine, the synergies weren&#039;t providing the cost benefits desired with the small engine, so the affair has come to an end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MMM,thats weird then.Auto Blog reported they had.Take a squizz &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;who knows?</p>
<p>&#8220;BMW has said &#8220;non, merci&#8221; to continuing its diesel engine partnership with PSA Peugeot Citroen. The two automakers began working together two years ago to create 1.4- and 1.6-liter gasoline engines for BMW&#8217;s MINI and PSA cars. Despite both companies at the end of last year looking at expanding their joint research into a high-tech engine, the synergies weren&#8217;t providing the cost benefits desired with the small engine, so the affair has come to an end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58511</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58511</guid>
		<description>Just double checked for ya, the mini&#039;s engine is still the very same 1.6ltr direct injected turbo as found in the peugeot 207 gti. 

Apparently BMW designed the engine and peugeot builds it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just double checked for ya, the mini&#8217;s engine is still the very same 1.6ltr direct injected turbo as found in the peugeot 207 gti. </p>
<p>Apparently BMW designed the engine and peugeot builds it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bavarian Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58491</link>
		<dc:creator>Bavarian Missile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58491</guid>
		<description>naa Richo I think BMW pulled the pin with them late last year.Yep Daimler Chrysler did do them first ,in Brazil...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>naa Richo I think BMW pulled the pin with them late last year.Yep Daimler Chrysler did do them first ,in Brazil&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58490</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58490</guid>
		<description>same engine is in the new peugeot 207 gti and apparently its even better in that then it is in the mini. Very very nice little engine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same engine is in the new peugeot 207 gti and apparently its even better in that then it is in the mini. Very very nice little engine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58489</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58489</guid>
		<description>Peugeot is still building engines for mini&#039;s, which is so so sooooooo much better then the rubbish engine they had in the first new mini which i think was made by chrysler wan&#039;t it? whoever it was rubbish! brought down the rest of the car</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peugeot is still building engines for mini&#8217;s, which is so so sooooooo much better then the rubbish engine they had in the first new mini which i think was made by chrysler wan&#8217;t it? whoever it was rubbish! brought down the rest of the car</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bavarian Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58485</link>
		<dc:creator>Bavarian Missile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58485</guid>
		<description>Explains why my 5 series had problems with the Auto Richo......hahaha.Just jokes!

Gee Dingo you were almost pleasant there for a minute..then you top it off with Toyotas mighty force...

I can remember seeing that article on Auto blog not sure if they decided to go ahead though....it does make sense to share costs though. No matter what the reason,it good business sense.I mean Peugeot were building engines for BMW 
Minis for a while......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Explains why my 5 series had problems with the Auto Richo&#8230;&#8230;hahaha.Just jokes!</p>
<p>Gee Dingo you were almost pleasant there for a minute..then you top it off with Toyotas mighty force&#8230;</p>
<p>I can remember seeing that article on Auto blog not sure if they decided to go ahead though&#8230;.it does make sense to share costs though. No matter what the reason,it good business sense.I mean Peugeot were building engines for BMW<br />
Minis for a while&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 299/300 objects using memcached

Served from: www.caradvice.com.au @ 2012-02-11 22:21:40 -->
