<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Melbourne Motor Show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/</link>
	<description>Resource for Car Reviews, News, Advice, Road Tests, Green Cars, Hybrids</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 11:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ghost</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-59400</link>
		<dc:creator>Ghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-59400</guid>
		<description>so dissapointed 2008 motoshow
Benz was not there...maybe they chose the right way not to join this year!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so dissapointed 2008 motoshow<br />
Benz was not there&#8230;maybe they chose the right way not to join this year!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58613</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58613</guid>
		<description>its just like how when alfa romeo needed to replace their simply brilliant 3.2ltr V6 due to tigher emmissions laws which they simply could not meet so rather then going through the expensive excercise of designing an all new engine they simply took the 3.2ltr version of the alloytec and reworked it&#039;s heads so that it still made that awesome alfa romeo V6 engine note. It&#039;s way more cost effective to do that then do all the work yourselfs, why develop your own bottom end when GM has done a perfectly good job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its just like how when alfa romeo needed to replace their simply brilliant 3.2ltr V6 due to tigher emmissions laws which they simply could not meet so rather then going through the expensive excercise of designing an all new engine they simply took the 3.2ltr version of the alloytec and reworked it&#8217;s heads so that it still made that awesome alfa romeo V6 engine note. It&#8217;s way more cost effective to do that then do all the work yourselfs, why develop your own bottom end when GM has done a perfectly good job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bavarian Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58587</link>
		<dc:creator>Bavarian Missile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58587</guid>
		<description>Arrrrrr,realy.OK

But yep I agree with keeping the engine,bit of a waste other wise.

I don&#039;t think they will ever discount not using another supplier.......times are changing that way with manufacturing costs it seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arrrrrr,realy.OK</p>
<p>But yep I agree with keeping the engine,bit of a waste other wise.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think they will ever discount not using another supplier&#8230;&#8230;.times are changing that way with manufacturing costs it seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58583</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 06:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58583</guid>
		<description>yeah thats for their DIESEL engine, they still have the 1.6ltr PETROL engine as fitted to the mini.

And anyway even though now the joint venture is over, they are still obviously going to keep using the engine they have already designed, no point discontinuing a perfectly good engine. All this means is that they will not make any more joint venture engines in the future</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah thats for their DIESEL engine, they still have the 1.6ltr PETROL engine as fitted to the mini.</p>
<p>And anyway even though now the joint venture is over, they are still obviously going to keep using the engine they have already designed, no point discontinuing a perfectly good engine. All this means is that they will not make any more joint venture engines in the future</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bavarian Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58521</link>
		<dc:creator>Bavarian Missile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 22:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58521</guid>
		<description>MMM,thats weird then.Auto Blog reported they had.Take a squizz ............who knows?

&quot;BMW has said &quot;non, merci&quot; to continuing its diesel engine partnership with PSA Peugeot Citroen. The two automakers began working together two years ago to create 1.4- and 1.6-liter gasoline engines for BMW&#039;s MINI and PSA cars. Despite both companies at the end of last year looking at expanding their joint research into a high-tech engine, the synergies weren&#039;t providing the cost benefits desired with the small engine, so the affair has come to an end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MMM,thats weird then.Auto Blog reported they had.Take a squizz &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;who knows?</p>
<p>&#8220;BMW has said &#8220;non, merci&#8221; to continuing its diesel engine partnership with PSA Peugeot Citroen. The two automakers began working together two years ago to create 1.4- and 1.6-liter gasoline engines for BMW&#8217;s MINI and PSA cars. Despite both companies at the end of last year looking at expanding their joint research into a high-tech engine, the synergies weren&#8217;t providing the cost benefits desired with the small engine, so the affair has come to an end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58511</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58511</guid>
		<description>Just double checked for ya, the mini&#039;s engine is still the very same 1.6ltr direct injected turbo as found in the peugeot 207 gti. 

Apparently BMW designed the engine and peugeot builds it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just double checked for ya, the mini&#8217;s engine is still the very same 1.6ltr direct injected turbo as found in the peugeot 207 gti. </p>
<p>Apparently BMW designed the engine and peugeot builds it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bavarian Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58491</link>
		<dc:creator>Bavarian Missile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 12:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58491</guid>
		<description>naa Richo I think BMW pulled the pin with them late last year.Yep Daimler Chrysler did do them first ,in Brazil...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>naa Richo I think BMW pulled the pin with them late last year.Yep Daimler Chrysler did do them first ,in Brazil&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58490</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58490</guid>
		<description>same engine is in the new peugeot 207 gti and apparently its even better in that then it is in the mini. Very very nice little engine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same engine is in the new peugeot 207 gti and apparently its even better in that then it is in the mini. Very very nice little engine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58489</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58489</guid>
		<description>Peugeot is still building engines for mini&#039;s, which is so so sooooooo much better then the rubbish engine they had in the first new mini which i think was made by chrysler wan&#039;t it? whoever it was rubbish! brought down the rest of the car</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peugeot is still building engines for mini&#8217;s, which is so so sooooooo much better then the rubbish engine they had in the first new mini which i think was made by chrysler wan&#8217;t it? whoever it was rubbish! brought down the rest of the car</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bavarian Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58485</link>
		<dc:creator>Bavarian Missile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58485</guid>
		<description>Explains why my 5 series had problems with the Auto Richo......hahaha.Just jokes!

Gee Dingo you were almost pleasant there for a minute..then you top it off with Toyotas mighty force...

I can remember seeing that article on Auto blog not sure if they decided to go ahead though....it does make sense to share costs though. No matter what the reason,it good business sense.I mean Peugeot were building engines for BMW 
Minis for a while......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Explains why my 5 series had problems with the Auto Richo&#8230;&#8230;hahaha.Just jokes!</p>
<p>Gee Dingo you were almost pleasant there for a minute..then you top it off with Toyotas mighty force&#8230;</p>
<p>I can remember seeing that article on Auto blog not sure if they decided to go ahead though&#8230;.it does make sense to share costs though. No matter what the reason,it good business sense.I mean Peugeot were building engines for BMW<br />
Minis for a while&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oz.</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58484</link>
		<dc:creator>Oz.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58484</guid>
		<description>Dingo, I never said his comment was wrong</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dingo, I never said his comment was wrong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guess Who aka Guess Who</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58482</link>
		<dc:creator>Guess Who aka Guess Who</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58482</guid>
		<description>Oz - Alan Watson&#039;s comment is all true. 

Not an extremist just someone with his head screwed &#039;on&#039; not &#039;off&#039; like most wacky Holden/Ford clowns.

Bavarian - refer Wheels March 2008 page 28 .... it also appears that BMW and Mercedes are joining forces to combat the Japanese invasion.

quote ... &quot; As unlikely as it may seem, Mercedes-Benz and BMW are about to move much closer together. The Teutonic arch-rivals are both nervously eyeing the rapid expansion of Lexus into Europe (backed by the all-conquering Toyota), while the success od Audi(backed by the might of the VE group) is not slipping past unnoticed either. The pressure is mounting&quot; ... unquote

gee - seems the mighty force of Toyota is on every manufactuers radar.  

ct</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oz &#8211; Alan Watson&#8217;s comment is all true. </p>
<p>Not an extremist just someone with his head screwed &#8216;on&#8217; not &#8216;off&#8217; like most wacky Holden/Ford clowns.</p>
<p>Bavarian &#8211; refer Wheels March 2008 page 28 &#8230;. it also appears that BMW and Mercedes are joining forces to combat the Japanese invasion.</p>
<p>quote &#8230; &#8221; As unlikely as it may seem, Mercedes-Benz and BMW are about to move much closer together. The Teutonic arch-rivals are both nervously eyeing the rapid expansion of Lexus into Europe (backed by the all-conquering Toyota), while the success od Audi(backed by the might of the VE group) is not slipping past unnoticed either. The pressure is mounting&#8221; &#8230; unquote</p>
<p>gee &#8211; seems the mighty force of Toyota is on every manufactuers radar.  </p>
<p>ct</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58476</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58476</guid>
		<description>also i had a feeling GM where going to do something with cadillac&#039;s V8&#039;s, because they had to cancel their plans to produce the northstar II V8 engine which was being designed to compete with the best of german V8&#039;s with DOHC and direct injection, so they needed a replacement of some kind and i guess with BMW they found a logical solution.

They had to cancel the northstar II engine because of stupid new US laws requiring fleet fuel economy averages to be something unrealistic like 7.0l per 100km&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also i had a feeling GM where going to do something with cadillac&#8217;s V8&#8217;s, because they had to cancel their plans to produce the northstar II V8 engine which was being designed to compete with the best of german V8&#8217;s with DOHC and direct injection, so they needed a replacement of some kind and i guess with BMW they found a logical solution.</p>
<p>They had to cancel the northstar II engine because of stupid new US laws requiring fleet fuel economy averages to be something unrealistic like 7.0l per 100km&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58475</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58475</guid>
		<description>BM - i knew about the auto&#039;s going into the 5 series, its actually the same unit as found in V8 commodores, and will go into the high output V6 commodores at the next update, with the current 5 speed going into the low output V6&#039;s. The update will include direct injection on both high and low output versions of the alloytec which is a very welcome advancement because if there is one area holden is most definetly behind ford it is in the 6 cylinder drivetrain area</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BM &#8211; i knew about the auto&#8217;s going into the 5 series, its actually the same unit as found in V8 commodores, and will go into the high output V6 commodores at the next update, with the current 5 speed going into the low output V6&#8217;s. The update will include direct injection on both high and low output versions of the alloytec which is a very welcome advancement because if there is one area holden is most definetly behind ford it is in the 6 cylinder drivetrain area</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58474</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 11:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58474</guid>
		<description>what you lot seem to miss is how bloody lucky we aussies are! We are truly spoiled for choice, in HSV and FPV we have the finest range of muscle cars in the world and at dead set bargain prices when compared to the euro fighters which cost hundreds of thousands of dollars more but are no where near hundreds of thousands of dollars better, better no doubt, but not all that much better.

The aussie car industry is a great industry and something we should be proud of but unfortunately you lot and your extreem attitudes take the aussie car industry back to the bad old days when aussie cars rated right up there with american cars as complete rubbish, albeit tough and reliable rubbish. Ofcourse we had great moments in our past such as the GT falcons and the hot torana&#039;s, but the fact of the matter is we produced alot of crap and its only now since probably the BA falcon and VY commodore that we have started producing some seriously world class cars in australia and we should be bloody proud of that and not get soo bloody side tracked trying to slag off the other side which frankly you only do that because your daddy taught you too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what you lot seem to miss is how bloody lucky we aussies are! We are truly spoiled for choice, in HSV and FPV we have the finest range of muscle cars in the world and at dead set bargain prices when compared to the euro fighters which cost hundreds of thousands of dollars more but are no where near hundreds of thousands of dollars better, better no doubt, but not all that much better.</p>
<p>The aussie car industry is a great industry and something we should be proud of but unfortunately you lot and your extreem attitudes take the aussie car industry back to the bad old days when aussie cars rated right up there with american cars as complete rubbish, albeit tough and reliable rubbish. Ofcourse we had great moments in our past such as the GT falcons and the hot torana&#8217;s, but the fact of the matter is we produced alot of crap and its only now since probably the BA falcon and VY commodore that we have started producing some seriously world class cars in australia and we should be bloody proud of that and not get soo bloody side tracked trying to slag off the other side which frankly you only do that because your daddy taught you too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bavarian Missile</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58473</link>
		<dc:creator>Bavarian Missile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58473</guid>
		<description>Well Ive just read that BMW are looking at supplying GM engines to compete against Ford. 

From Auto Blog&quot;&quot; Word out of Frankfurt from the Financial Times Deutschland is that BMW is in talks to sell engines and transmissions to both General Motors and Fiat. All three companies have declined to officially comment.

The news is interesting, but not surprising. You may recall that GM has been selling transmissions to BMW for well over a decade for use in various 3 Series and 5 Series models (the current BMW 328i automatic uses a 6-speed GM 6L45 unit). So far, however, all have been automatic transmissions.

Speculating about the details, our tipster suggests that BMW may be helping GM with their SMG-style transmission program. As for the engines? It is possible that BMW could be selling its 4.4L V8 for the Cadillac line or lending GM a twin-turbo to compete with Ford&#039;s twin-turbo direct-injected V6&quot;&quot;end quote

Sounds like that could be interesting......never knew GM supplied BMW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Ive just read that BMW are looking at supplying GM engines to compete against Ford. </p>
<p>From Auto Blog&#8221;" Word out of Frankfurt from the Financial Times Deutschland is that BMW is in talks to sell engines and transmissions to both General Motors and Fiat. All three companies have declined to officially comment.</p>
<p>The news is interesting, but not surprising. You may recall that GM has been selling transmissions to BMW for well over a decade for use in various 3 Series and 5 Series models (the current BMW 328i automatic uses a 6-speed GM 6L45 unit). So far, however, all have been automatic transmissions.</p>
<p>Speculating about the details, our tipster suggests that BMW may be helping GM with their SMG-style transmission program. As for the engines? It is possible that BMW could be selling its 4.4L V8 for the Cadillac line or lending GM a twin-turbo to compete with Ford&#8217;s twin-turbo direct-injected V6&#8243;&#8221;end quote</p>
<p>Sounds like that could be interesting&#8230;&#8230;never knew GM supplied BMW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richo</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58472</link>
		<dc:creator>Richo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58472</guid>
		<description>look at you lot! Your all bloody idiots! It seems if your a ford fan you can&#039;t accept when holden does something good, and if your a holden fan you can&#039;t accept when ford does something good!

I&#039;m sorry to tell you this, but anyone who have such extreem attitudes against holden or ford, i&#039;m sorry but your not real car enthousiasts, your just stupid fanboys running around with completely irrational and cliche&#039;d and often hypocritical arguments that only really serve to make you look like complete wankers

Fact of the matter is, the coupe 60 looked great, the HSV mechanically sounds awesome, front end styling a bit iffy however, and the new falcon range is clearly a great range of motor cars, although by no means diffinitively better then holdens offering. For mine, they look like pretty line ball now the commodore and the falcon and which one you buy will ultimately come down to personal preference as i severely doubt one will be any more remarkable then the other.

oh and the whole &quot;holden are gonna shit when fpv release their power figures&quot; crap, mate if they where going to be so fantastic fpv would have released them already. According to both wheels and motor the power figures will be around the 315kw which is hardly that dominant over the HSV&#039;s 307kw (wow 8kw...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look at you lot! Your all bloody idiots! It seems if your a ford fan you can&#8217;t accept when holden does something good, and if your a holden fan you can&#8217;t accept when ford does something good!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry to tell you this, but anyone who have such extreem attitudes against holden or ford, i&#8217;m sorry but your not real car enthousiasts, your just stupid fanboys running around with completely irrational and cliche&#8217;d and often hypocritical arguments that only really serve to make you look like complete wankers</p>
<p>Fact of the matter is, the coupe 60 looked great, the HSV mechanically sounds awesome, front end styling a bit iffy however, and the new falcon range is clearly a great range of motor cars, although by no means diffinitively better then holdens offering. For mine, they look like pretty line ball now the commodore and the falcon and which one you buy will ultimately come down to personal preference as i severely doubt one will be any more remarkable then the other.</p>
<p>oh and the whole &#8220;holden are gonna shit when fpv release their power figures&#8221; crap, mate if they where going to be so fantastic fpv would have released them already. According to both wheels and motor the power figures will be around the 315kw which is hardly that dominant over the HSV&#8217;s 307kw (wow 8kw&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oz.</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58462</link>
		<dc:creator>Oz.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 10:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58462</guid>
		<description>WOW, BRAVO!!

...Another Toyota extremist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW, BRAVO!!</p>
<p>&#8230;Another Toyota extremist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58456</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 09:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58456</guid>
		<description>I agree with the Holden fan that gives the prize to the one who sells the most cars. Go Toyota.

Holden was so busy fighting for that Toyota sneeked past them and now does almost more sales than Ford and Holden combined, yet Holden still place all of their effort on trying to out manouver Ford.

Maybe they&#039;ve given up on first place and are desperate to at least hold on to second place. Loosers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the Holden fan that gives the prize to the one who sells the most cars. Go Toyota.</p>
<p>Holden was so busy fighting for that Toyota sneeked past them and now does almost more sales than Ford and Holden combined, yet Holden still place all of their effort on trying to out manouver Ford.</p>
<p>Maybe they&#8217;ve given up on first place and are desperate to at least hold on to second place. Loosers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58433</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 05:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caradvice.com.au/10752/2008-melbourne-motor-show-2/#comment-58433</guid>
		<description>OZ...yes i agree there is more to just Ford in my life too....BMW, JAGUAR, Volvo, Astin Martin, Mazda are also favorites of mine, and even some Holdens....XUI  VE SS is ok except for the interior now I have seen the FG interior and those god damn oversized wheel arches. Holden have gone the American &quot;looks like a stuck on bodykit&quot; way of styling while Ford have taken the more coherent flowing style of the European Fords.......Guys like Frosty and Frugal one would have stayed in the Holden area all day because they have a closed mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OZ&#8230;yes i agree there is more to just Ford in my life too&#8230;.BMW, JAGUAR, Volvo, Astin Martin, Mazda are also favorites of mine, and even some Holdens&#8230;.XUI  VE SS is ok except for the interior now I have seen the FG interior and those god damn oversized wheel arches. Holden have gone the American &#8220;looks like a stuck on bodykit&#8221; way of styling while Ford have taken the more coherent flowing style of the European Fords&#8230;&#8230;.Guys like Frosty and Frugal one would have stayed in the Holden area all day because they have a closed mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
